–“A warrior is someone’s child who hasn’t grown up and who can’t share the world with others and must force his will on others. Humans are ALL from an anarchist order where collective decisions are made by direct consensus of tbe entire community. Amarchy isn’t where no one is in charge, it’s where everyone is in charge.”— Did your mommy tell you that fairy story? Are you the child of a single mother? Are you a lower prole? Men rule. Because if they dont, even worse men will rule. And we obtain rule, and preserve rule, by violence, and violence alone. The natural order is that the strong kill, enslave, and enserf the weak. The unnatural order is civilization. Which is why we have so many institutions to try to preserve it. Warriors are usually happy to allow you your fantasies. but never assume for a moment that you are other than the property of some group of men who find greater utility in your freedom than the higher cost of your enserfment or enslavement. He who can destroy a thing, owns the thing. Everything else is permission.
Theme: Coercion
-
“A warrior is someone’s child who hasn’t grown up and who can’t share the world
–“A warrior is someone’s child who hasn’t grown up and who can’t share the world with others and must force his will on others. Humans are ALL from an anarchist order where collective decisions are made by direct consensus of tbe entire community. Amarchy isn’t where no one is in charge, it’s where everyone is in charge.”— Did your mommy tell you that fairy story? Are you the child of a single mother? Are you a lower prole? Men rule. Because if they dont, even worse men will rule. And we obtain rule, and preserve rule, by violence, and violence alone. The natural order is that the strong kill, enslave, and enserf the weak. The unnatural order is civilization. Which is why we have so many institutions to try to preserve it. Warriors are usually happy to allow you your fantasies. but never assume for a moment that you are other than the property of some group of men who find greater utility in your freedom than the higher cost of your enserfment or enslavement. He who can destroy a thing, owns the thing. Everything else is permission.
-
THE ODDS DON”T MATTER ANY LONGER —“What you’re going to see, increasingly, are
THE ODDS DON”T MATTER ANY LONGER
—“What you’re going to see, increasingly, are individuals for whom the odds don’t matter any more, because they have nothing left to lose, and who will act without any expectation of success, alone at first, but eventually in groups. Only when all hope is lost will the path to victory be clear, because that is the only circumstance under which anyone will go to the trouble and risk to clear it.”— Eli Harman
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-21 13:10:00 UTC
-
WHAT DOES AN ARMY LOOK LIKE? by Eric Best The left was once scattered and relati
WHAT DOES AN ARMY LOOK LIKE?
by Eric Best
The left was once scattered and relatively powerless, though not as much as the true right today, since there weren’t the same societal and institutional pressures keeping them from organizing and acting. They had sources of funding and support both foreign and domestic to lessen the risk they faced. An important fringe leftist in the 60’s would have, for instance, an unassailable position in a University and a circle of admirers among the upper class. Even if a majority of Americans would find them detestable (if they knew who they were), they would not lose their job and more importantly, would not be outcast from their part of society. It took them decades to get where they are now, having taken over so many institutions that their ideology and worldview is now the default.
We can’t imitate them because we don’t have 50 years to do it and the social dynamic is totally different. Everyone knows what they can do as an individual in their own life to be better and prepare (i.e. stop being a NEET sperging out uselessly on the internet) but 1 million individuals even of quality do not make an army. What is the first real step to organizing seriously? What does it look like?
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-21 10:20:00 UTC
-
Untitled
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-20 19:59:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1031631929605599232
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/39515216_282600782336819_59502347511
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/39515216_282600782336819_5950234751141937152_o_282600775670153.jpg https://www.news.com.au/finance/economy/world-economy/south-africa-begins-seizing-whiteowned-farms/news-story/8937f899bd3f131bfc4ffb648ea5c53bhttps://www.news.com.au/finance/economy/world-economy/south-africa-begins-seizing-whiteowned-farms/news-story/8937f899bd3f131bfc4ffb648ea5c53b
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-20 15:59:00 UTC
-
“Someday, when all your gold, silver and copper are all likewise swept away, you
—“Someday, when all your gold, silver and copper are all likewise swept away, your kind will pray for a man with cruel iron 😉”—Ahmed Reda
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-20 13:31:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1031534114468507649
-
All we ask in propertarianism is to impose reciprocity by violence as a means of
All we ask in propertarianism is to impose reciprocity by violence as a means of restitution.
In other words, we only act to restore natural law.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-20 10:53:00 UTC
-
THE PROBLEM WITH OPPOSITION TO PROPERTARIANISM Social Democracy -> Classical lib
THE PROBLEM WITH OPPOSITION TO PROPERTARIANISM
Social Democracy -> Classical liberalism -> Libertarianism -> Anarcho Capitalism -> Neo-Reaction -> Propertarianism -> Fascism
The progress of our understanding from optimism and ignorance to pessimism and certainty.
The problem with Propertarianism for other groups is that it’s law not literature, and as law it is unforgiving (intolerant) of falsehood, pretenses of knowledge or goodness whereas almost every other method of argument makes use of pretenses of truth, knowledge, and good in order to achieve an end that does NOT require truth, knowledge, and reciprocity.
Why? Because we rally around (politically and socially) discounts that are obtained by use of falsehoods, pretenses, and irreciprocity.
So the question is always and everywhere, why one would pursue one’s ends (power) by means of discounting using falsehood, pretense, and irreciprocity (fraud), rather than pursue them honestly and restitutionally (restitution) by violence, or honestly and predatorily (predation) by violence – other than (a) one has no chance of achieving other by coercion or violence.
In other words, why pursue a failure other than to avoid action in pursuit of a success?
All we ask in propertarianism is to impose reciprocity by violence as a means of restitution.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-20 10:52:00 UTC
-
The Problem with America’s “Policing”
by Aaron Kahland The biggest problem is what America is policing. If peoples aren’t paying for a service, it is likely because it is a sh*t service. America polices ‘wars for democracy’ across the globe. America polices mass immigration into Western societies. E.g. Turkish presence in Germany is a direct result of US policy. America polices Saudi Arabian and Israeli interests in the Middle East. America polices Sunni aggression/expansion against more moderate, Shia societies (e.g. Bahrain, Syria) in the Arab World. America polices destablization in North Africa which causes mass migration. America polices prohibition in Central and South America which also contributes towards destructive migratory patterns into the US and Canada. America polices the Veiceroy status of Great Britain and Germany America policed the democratization / destruction of Rhodesia and South Africa