ANTIFA FOR SOCIALISM
These are not very smart people. They just ‘know something is wrong’. What they don’t know is that what we have today isn’t capitalism or rule of law but financial predationism. And that socialism is absolutely not the answer because the same reason they don’t understand what’s wrong, why, and how to fix it, is the same reason why ‘the bottom can never rule’.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-05 16:57:00 UTC
by Eli Harman
REPRESENTATIVE democracy privileges elites by concentrating power in the special interests (through campaign contributions, lobbying, and a host of other mechanism… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=300459587217605&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-04 18:12:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1047912321635500032
https://www.wbtw.com/news/pee-dee/florence-county-deputy-shot-near-hoffmeyer-road-in-florence/1495532293TRAPS: IN CIVIL WARS, THIS BECOMES THE NORM. THEN THE FIRST RESPONDERS STAY HOME. THEN THE CHAOS BEGINS
https://www.wbtw.com/news/pee-dee/florence-county-deputy-shot-near-hoffmeyer-road-in-florence/1495532293Updated Oct 4, 2018, 3:11 PM
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-04 15:11:00 UTC
As Tribes Each Loving our Histories, advancing our Nation, Tribe, Clan, Kin, and Family, without imposing costs upon one another, we are in harmony. As ideological monopolies attempting to eradicate history, nation, tribe, sclan, kin, and family, we are eternal enemies. Only the monotheists attempt this evil monopoly. End the monopoly of monotheism, and end universalism, communism, islamism, semitism, abrahamism, corporatism, and the war between the races. There is only one universal law between men: non imposition. It is a negative law, not a positive one. With this one negative law, all positive choices are available that do not impose the costs of survival and domestication upon others. The problem is that the monotheisms, monopolies, all favor the interests of dysgenic reproduction, and the devolution of all capital and civilizations that fall under it.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-04 12:22:00 UTC
Steven, Measuring Violence Deltas doesn’t help us as much as measuring theft. With material goods replaced by title to fractional goods, we have simply devalued violence and increased the value of cunning, deceit, fraud, and conspiracy. Those men lived in a very different world.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-01 22:15:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046886393006493696
Reply addressees: @sapinker
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046619253779107841
IN REPLY TO:
@sapinker
It used to be worse: Between 1830 and 1860, there were 70 violent brawls between congressmen. https://t.co/rwTqICDTQt
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046619253779107841
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/42862313_299118997351664_4618817575399194624_n_299118994018331.jpg Yes on content, no on criticism. More later. Demand for monopoly of positiva is different from necessity of monopoly of negativa. Make up whatever fairy stories incels desire. There is only one truth, and it is falsehood, and everything else is simply preference that expresses one’s reproductive interests.Yes on content, no on criticism. More later. Demand for monopoly of positiva is different from necessity of monopoly of negativa. Make up whatever fairy stories incels desire. There is only one truth, and it is falsehood, and everything else is simply preference that expresses one’s reproductive interests.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-30 12:42:00 UTC
It is a simple matter of prosecution, restitution, and punishment, and punishment severe enough that none other dare attempt it.Our law used to recognize the fact that women will more likely lie in matters of status, and men less likely lie in the same matters.We must restore it.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-29 16:17:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046071538351566854
Reply addressees: @DonShillvio
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1045932068931198976
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1045932068931198976
Yes on content, no on criticism. Demand for monopoly of positiva is different from necessity of monopoly of negativa. Make up whatever fairy stories incels desire. There is only one truth, and it is falsehood, and everything else is simply preference that expresses one’s reproductive interests.
—“It’s the problem of squishy definitions like “liberalism” opposed to clear operational definitions. Propertarianism, essentially, combines nomocracy and property, where by law is decided by calculating exchanges of demonstrated property (en toto). All the nuances and details boils down to different configurations (and preferences) in which one applies this basic fundamental notion.” — Bill Joslin —“It’s not a matter of “don’t have spiritual values.” We ALL have them. Trying to eradicate spiritual values is most likely a vain and pointless ambition.The issues are:1) It’s not always possible to meaningfully communicate spiritual values that aren’t already shared. And even when it is, it’s usually not possible to reach any sort of agreement.2) It’s very hard to check, correct, adjust, or update spiritual values that are wrong, bad, unsuitable, or out of date.Which is why maybe you might WANT a few autists around profaning the sacred with unnaturally precise and complete language.Otherwise your faulty spiritual values have no way to die, when they inevitably must, but to die with you…”—Ely Harman
Yes on content, no on criticism. Demand for monopoly of positiva is different from necessity of monopoly of negativa. Make up whatever fairy stories incels desire. There is only one truth, and it is falsehood, and everything else is simply preference that expresses one’s reproductive interests.
—“It’s the problem of squishy definitions like “liberalism” opposed to clear operational definitions. Propertarianism, essentially, combines nomocracy and property, where by law is decided by calculating exchanges of demonstrated property (en toto). All the nuances and details boils down to different configurations (and preferences) in which one applies this basic fundamental notion.” — Bill Joslin —“It’s not a matter of “don’t have spiritual values.” We ALL have them. Trying to eradicate spiritual values is most likely a vain and pointless ambition.The issues are:1) It’s not always possible to meaningfully communicate spiritual values that aren’t already shared. And even when it is, it’s usually not possible to reach any sort of agreement.2) It’s very hard to check, correct, adjust, or update spiritual values that are wrong, bad, unsuitable, or out of date.Which is why maybe you might WANT a few autists around profaning the sacred with unnaturally precise and complete language.Otherwise your faulty spiritual values have no way to die, when they inevitably must, but to die with you…”—Ely Harman
( No thanks. I just want to run the Vlad Tepes Department of Flaying and Impalement – and use lots of lemon juice and salt. 😉 )
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-29 00:41:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1045836041721139200
Reply addressees: @RandallRobbbin_ @AnnCoulter
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1045818248854298624
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1045818248854298624