Encourage the most ignorant among us to assert a proxy for violence in favor of that into which they have been indoctrinated, by those without life experience in markets,when the entirety of their future is dependent upon markets for which they have INTENTIONALLY been unprepared.
Mordant satire by Alexandra Petri: Why I, a young person, probably won’t vote. (I’ve actually received letters with such reasons.) Young people: Don’t let this apply to you; Vote! https://t.co/yILcCyYKvn
Left wing = female reproductive strategy, associated cognitive biases, and associated brain structure:”The Herd”. It uses threat of ostracization from the Herd by disapproval, ridicule,shaming, gossip, moralizing, rallying – and not argument. I listed the steps in the technique.
You really aren’t trying to pretend you have an argument, or that you have any capacity whatsoever to discourse in these matters. (I am one of the primary researchers of the means by which the Abrahamists, Marxists, Postmodernists, Feminist, and Women, produce non-argument.)
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45431003_10156755022457264_3814271274876665856_o_10156755022452264.jpg WHO IS AFRAID OF WHOM? BE SERIOUS….
This constant accusation of ‘fear’ isn’t ‘fear’, it’s DISGUST.
The left (Herd) ‘fears’ the right(Pack) is ‘disgusted’.
(I mean, this level of fake news outrage is just ridiculous)Noah J RevoyThe more we trust the angrier we get when that trust is broken.Nov 4, 2018, 9:42 AMCurt Doolittleperfect.Nov 4, 2018, 9:43 AMDaniel Roland AndersonNailed it Noah J Revoy.
If you look at my political progression, it’s a reflection of a decrease in trust and an increase in anger:
Reaganite Cold Warrior (civnat) (I trust anyone who isn’t a communist or a sympathizer.)
Buchananite Paleocon
I stop trusting Establishment Republicans who want to keep our troops out there and won’t defend our culture here. I begin to suspect that most non-whites don’t share my beliefs, but trust that they can be converted.
Ethno-nationalist: I trust my people, find Kevin MacDonald, and name the “enemy who hath done this.” (Matt. 13:28-30. Great parable, btw!) Yes, I still trust Christianity here.
Alt Right: I don’t trust most of my own people, but believe they can be converted. Anger rising.
Full Fash Propertarian: Let those that convert, convert. Suppress those that don’t. Destroy those that resist. Time’s up.
If there’s a step from here, that step can’t be far from near total destruction. And I’d be so angry at that point, I wouldn’t care.
Interestingly, anger has actually focused, but mellowed. I’m less affected by anger than ever. It’s a math problem.
Things will play out deterministically, and I trust that whatever role I have to play (commensurate with my level of agency) will be sufficient.
Sufficient to what? Sufficient to be remembered by those that come after if we win, and sufficient to look at myself in the mirror one last time and say “you have fought the good fight; you have run your course; you have found and kept the true faith.”
I don’t need more than this.Nov 4, 2018, 11:58 AMGL SevierAbsolutely, spot on, increase in anger and decrease in trust, and just like the conservative to paleo to ethno, to alt right, there is no going back.Nov 4, 2018, 3:53 PMElgin McConnell LoneyThat goes both ways, NoahNov 4, 2018, 8:04 PMJoe FossLeftist fear is different than conservative fear.
The left is “scary-wow-bad” while the right is essentially “will we make it?”
Undirected general fear. Also known as concernNov 5, 2018, 6:07 AMCurt Doolittleshort term long termNov 5, 2018, 6:19 AMCurt DoolittleyesNov 5, 2018, 6:19 AMJames Lyons Sr.Ain’t scared!
Cept bears, bears gonna eatNov 5, 2018, 5:39 PMWHO IS AFRAID OF WHOM? BE SERIOUS….
This constant accusation of ‘fear’ isn’t ‘fear’, it’s DISGUST.
The left (Herd) ‘fears’ the right(Pack) is ‘disgusted’.
(I mean, this level of fake news outrage is just ridiculous)
Liberals tend to authoritarian economic equality, and conservatives to authoritarian NORMATIVE equality. Equality of outcome on the left (Dysgenic Equality), vs equality of RULES on the right (Eugenic Markets)
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
FORESTLANDS: Aristocratic Ethics: What will someone not retaliate against even if we agree to it?(rulers/teleological ethics:outcomes) The ethics of warriors who must hold territory. This is a very high cost strategy because while professional warrior aristocracy is militarily superior, smaller numbers mean threats must be constantly suppressed when small, as soon as identified. (Profiting from the domestication of man)
BORDERLANDS: Cosmopolitan(Jewish) Ethics: What will someone consent to Regardless of future resentment and retaliation? (borderland/subculture/deontological ethics:rules) The ethics of diasporic, migrating traders, or herding peoples who can prey upon the locals who hold territory. This is a very low cost (parasitic) ethics that avoids all contribution to the host commons, but requires preserving the ability to exit (migrate). It is the raider strategy by systemic and verbal rather than physical means.
STEPPELANDS: Russian(Orthodox) Ethics: What can I get away with now by negotiation and subterfuge, and hold by force later? (steppe raiders) The ethics of steppe people surrounded by competitors, always hostile and unpredictable. This is a difficult and expensive but only possible strategy, when one is surrounded by hostile opportunity seekers. While seemingly expansive, itâs actually a fearful one â aggression as the only possible means of controlling defensive positions across open territory.
FERTILE CRESCENT LAND: (Profit from the subjugation of man) (cyrus was lost).
RIVERLANDS: Chinese Ethics: What can I get away with now, but over time make impossible to change later? The ethics of long term ruling bureaucratic class. Sun Tzu strategy, and Confucian hyper familism. This is an exceptionally cost-effective strategy if one possesses a territorial resource (heartland), and can fortify that heartland. Riverlands strategy defends against Steppland and Desertland strategies. (Profiting from the domestication of man)
DESERTLANDS: Muslim Ethics: (I am still working on this one because I donât get that itâs causal, but opportunistic.) What can I justify now in order to make this minor advance now? And thereby accumulate wins by wearing down opponents over long periods. The ethics of opportunism. As far as I can tell islam is just an excuse for justifying opportunism. We can consider this the combination of religion and justifying opportunism â a long term very successful strategy becuase itâs very low cost.
HOSTILELANDS: African Ethics (pre-christian). Africa is akin to the Desertlands because of the sheer number of competitors, the hostility of the disease gradient, the plethora of wildlife, combined with the primitiveness of the available technologies. This is the only possible strategy until one or more core states can evolve, and create sufficient stability in some regions. (this is occurring now).
CIVILIZATIONS NOT STATES
It is a mistake (always), to consider conflicts within states over local power (capital allocation), as of the same consequence as conflicts between civilizations over borders. Because the former is a kinship conflict over priorities, while the latter is a genetic conflict over group evolutionary strategies.
FORESTLANDS: Aristocratic Ethics: What will someone not retaliate against even if we agree to it?(rulers/teleological ethics:outcomes) The ethics of warriors who must hold territory. This is a very high cost strategy because while professional warrior aristocracy is militarily superior, smaller numbers mean threats must be constantly suppressed when small, as soon as identified. (Profiting from the domestication of man)
BORDERLANDS: Cosmopolitan(Jewish) Ethics: What will someone consent to Regardless of future resentment and retaliation? (borderland/subculture/deontological ethics:rules) The ethics of diasporic, migrating traders, or herding peoples who can prey upon the locals who hold territory. This is a very low cost (parasitic) ethics that avoids all contribution to the host commons, but requires preserving the ability to exit (migrate). It is the raider strategy by systemic and verbal rather than physical means.
STEPPELANDS: Russian(Orthodox) Ethics: What can I get away with now by negotiation and subterfuge, and hold by force later? (steppe raiders) The ethics of steppe people surrounded by competitors, always hostile and unpredictable. This is a difficult and expensive but only possible strategy, when one is surrounded by hostile opportunity seekers. While seemingly expansive, itâs actually a fearful one â aggression as the only possible means of controlling defensive positions across open territory.
FERTILE CRESCENT LAND: (Profit from the subjugation of man) (cyrus was lost).
RIVERLANDS: Chinese Ethics: What can I get away with now, but over time make impossible to change later? The ethics of long term ruling bureaucratic class. Sun Tzu strategy, and Confucian hyper familism. This is an exceptionally cost-effective strategy if one possesses a territorial resource (heartland), and can fortify that heartland. Riverlands strategy defends against Steppland and Desertland strategies. (Profiting from the domestication of man)
DESERTLANDS: Muslim Ethics: (I am still working on this one because I donât get that itâs causal, but opportunistic.) What can I justify now in order to make this minor advance now? And thereby accumulate wins by wearing down opponents over long periods. The ethics of opportunism. As far as I can tell islam is just an excuse for justifying opportunism. We can consider this the combination of religion and justifying opportunism â a long term very successful strategy becuase itâs very low cost.
HOSTILELANDS: African Ethics (pre-christian). Africa is akin to the Desertlands because of the sheer number of competitors, the hostility of the disease gradient, the plethora of wildlife, combined with the primitiveness of the available technologies. This is the only possible strategy until one or more core states can evolve, and create sufficient stability in some regions. (this is occurring now).
CIVILIZATIONS NOT STATES
It is a mistake (always), to consider conflicts within states over local power (capital allocation), as of the same consequence as conflicts between civilizations over borders. Because the former is a kinship conflict over priorities, while the latter is a genetic conflict over group evolutionary strategies.
—“Hello Mr. Doolittle, what if might doesn’t make right? Any thoughts or previous writings?”— A Friend
“Wrongs Exist. Right Is That Which Is Not Wrong.”
propertarianism.com/2018/01/23/wrongs-exist-right-is-that-which-is-not-wrong/
Might makes rights.
https://propertarianinstitute.com/2018/08/07/might-makes-rights/
“Might Makes Right By Righting Wrongs: A Declaration”
propertarianism.com/2016/11/02/might-makes-right-by-righting-wrongs-a-declaration/
“Violence and Virtue vs Morality and Fraud”
propertarianism.com/2011/03/04/violence-and-virtue-vs-morality-and-fraud/
“The Virtue Of Violence”
propertarianism.com/2010/04/23/the-virtue-of-violence/
“The Necessity, Virtue And Morality Of Organized Violence”
propertarianism.com/2013/09/07/6480/
“Liberty And Violence”
propertarianism.com/2012/03/01/liberty-and-violence/
“Violence Is A Beautiful Word”
propertarianism.com/2010/04/23/violence-is-a-beautiful-word/
—“Hello Mr. Doolittle, what if might doesn’t make right? Any thoughts or previous writings?”— A Friend
“Wrongs Exist. Right Is That Which Is Not Wrong.”
propertarianism.com/2018/01/23/wrongs-exist-right-is-that-which-is-not-wrong/
Might makes rights.
https://propertarianinstitute.com/2018/08/07/might-makes-rights/
“Might Makes Right By Righting Wrongs: A Declaration”
propertarianism.com/2016/11/02/might-makes-right-by-righting-wrongs-a-declaration/
“Violence and Virtue vs Morality and Fraud”
propertarianism.com/2011/03/04/violence-and-virtue-vs-morality-and-fraud/
“The Virtue Of Violence”
propertarianism.com/2010/04/23/the-virtue-of-violence/
“The Necessity, Virtue And Morality Of Organized Violence”
propertarianism.com/2013/09/07/6480/
“Liberty And Violence”
propertarianism.com/2012/03/01/liberty-and-violence/
“Violence Is A Beautiful Word”
propertarianism.com/2010/04/23/violence-is-a-beautiful-word/
