THREE CLASSES OF COERCION
(regular repost)
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-28 10:53:00 UTC
THREE CLASSES OF COERCION
(regular repost)
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-28 10:53:00 UTC
THE CONFLATION AND EXAGGERATION OF CRIMINAL DATABASES
POLITICAL
They have screwed up the terrorist database by conflating terrorism with rebellion, insurrection, and crime. (Political)
SOCIAL
They have screwed up the mass shootings database by conflating family murders with social wrath. (Social)
PSYCHOLOGICAL
They have screwed up the serial killer database by conflating the repeatedly violent or commit multiple acts with those who develop plans for killing in and of itself. (Psychological)
SEXUAL
They have screwed up the sex crimes database by conflating uncontrollable risk with controllable risk crimes. (Sexual)
CRIMINAL
They have screwed up the criminal database by conflating crimes the crimes by severity of punishment rather than motive and risk. (Criminal)
WHITE COLLAR
They have all but licensed white collar and informational crime on scales that is terrifying. ( Fraud )
*INFLATION IS EVERYWHERE BY MEANS OF CONFLATION*
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-25 20:29:00 UTC
TRIPARTISM
Tripartism:
Those who Rule (Army) – Force: Freedom/Threat .
Those who Teach (Academy) – Words: Oppy./Ostracization.
Those who Labor (Family) – Trade: Consumption/Deprivation.
Labor divided into the hierarchy we call the economy: Investment, Finance, Banking, Organizing, Managing, Laboring, Trading, Distributing. (Libertarian)
The Academy evolved into the Academy, Media, State (clerical), Bureaucracy. (Feminine)
The Army Evolved into the Political and Judiciary, intelligence, military, and the military industrial complex. (Masculine)
Such that we still possess all three classes but that most of us participate in more than one. This is why class hierarchies are conflated: one can participate in a role in each, and shift our allegiance to whatever elite as is in our advantage. We are not anchored except by our social, sexual, economic, political, and military value to one group or another.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-25 17:48:00 UTC
THE MURDEROUS JEWS, CHRISTIANS,AND MUSLIMS
—“The Greek-Roman world was not…converted to a new religion, but compelled to embrace it.” The Emperor Theodosian issued a series of decrees or rescripts in the years 341, 345, 356, 381, 383, 386 and 391 CE. They effect of these orders was to “suppress all rival religions, order the closing of the temples, and impose fines, confiscation, imprisonment or death upon any who cling to the older [Pagan] religions.” The period of relative religious tolerance in the Roman Empire ended as Pagan temples were seized and converted to Christian use or destroyed. Priests and Priestesses were exiled or killed. Christianity and Judaism became the only permitted religions. In Spain, bishop Priscillian, who taught some Gnostic beliefs was the first person to be condemned as a heretic and executed by his fellow Christians on religious grounds. The church used the power of the state to begin programs to oppress, exile or exterminate both Pagans and Gnostic Christians. By the end of the century, Pagan temples had been either destroyed or recycled for Christian use. Pagan worship became punishable by death. But government toleration was not without its cost. The Emperor Constantine and later political rulers demanded a major say in the running of the church and in decisions on its beliefs. “—
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-23 12:12:00 UTC
—“You (we) must meet violence for violence and threat for threat. Else you (we) will be overrun by tyrants claiming to be tolerant.”— Stephen Klostermeier
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-22 16:36:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1065645217423024130
LAW CHANGES HUMAN BEHAVIOUR FIRST. SOCIAL SHAMING SECOND, REWARD THIRD.
by Bill Joslin
Law changes human behaviour first. Social shaming second, reward third.
Subsumed in a world of business people who manage by leaning on the crutch of “incentives”(bonuses, commissions etc) I’m often aghast at how blind they are to the strength of disincentives in average workers.
People, when under stress, will gladly take on opportunity costs to avoid pain (lose that bonus to avoid the continual abuse of a shitty client).
We’re wired to avoid costs and mitigate risk almost to the point of death. When disincentives are suppressed (when we’re trained to behave properly), incentives come into play.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-22 13:05:00 UTC
—“You (we) must meet violence for violence and threat for threat. Else you (we) will be overrun by tyrants claiming to be tolerant.”— Stephen Klostermeier
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-22 11:36:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46501222_10156795733877264_5477799498317037568_n_10156795733872264.jpg I’m actually a fairly nice guy. But you know, when the left retreats into socialism and shaming, the libertarian and right must retreat into fascism and threat. I restore that honesty to the discourse. So that’s what you’re seeing. Me restoring war (violence) to the discourse. It’s very hard to be a moral person and disagree with ‘markets in everything’.Stephen ThomasYou must meet violence for violence and threat for threat. Else you will be overrun by tyrants claiming to be tolerant.Nov 22, 2018, 10:14 AMNoah J RevoyMy impression is that you are primarily motivated by love with strong secondary tones of K-selected, masculine disgust for lies.Nov 22, 2018, 10:24 AMAndrew MaughanIts physics really. An object in motion will remain in motion until/unless acted upon by an EQUAL or GREATER opposing force. I find that the same goes for human emotion and behavior. The right of today seems to believe that appeasement and capitulation will somehow stave the onslaught of radical socialism which frankly goes against basic reason.Nov 22, 2018, 10:28 AMJennifer DeanWhen the left advances with replacement and genocide, we must advance with an equal threat.Nov 22, 2018, 11:01 AMSkye StewartI get the same thing all the time. People always assume the worst about us. “Conservative” bastards 🧐Nov 22, 2018, 11:19 AMCurt Doolittlepretty much, yep.Nov 22, 2018, 11:33 AMCurt Doolittle(because of childhood I also have a purely subconscious and inescapable feeling I need to protect people. So thats’ the tird leg of the cognitive stool.)Nov 22, 2018, 11:34 AMCurt DoolittleYep.Nov 22, 2018, 11:34 AMSolomon VolodymyrI get this. I’m not one of these skinhead twats who loves fighting and gets off fantasizing about genocide, far from it – by personality type, I should be a leftist and in fact was once upon a time – but I am drawn to your sort of quasi fascism. Well call me a nationalist and a pragmatist; I altogether loathe ideology.Nov 22, 2018, 12:09 PMSolomon VolodymyrSkye Stewart you’re pretty left on a few topics but you’re still on our level. There can and in fact must be dialogue between left and right but it has to be within a logical framework between sensible, non-lying people – the kind of paradigm we currently sorely lack in mainstream politics.Nov 22, 2018, 12:13 PMSkye StewartSolomon Volodymyr to which leftish propensities do you refer? Out of interest ☝🏼Nov 22, 2018, 12:20 PMSolomon VolodymyrWell generally you seem to care about stuff that alt-righters don’t. You have I’d say a more balanced view, just from what you shareNov 22, 2018, 12:22 PMAndrea RoyallPeace was never an optionNov 22, 2018, 12:56 PMMartin ŠtěpánI too was a leftist. But truth is the truth.Nov 22, 2018, 2:54 PMMartin ŠtěpánJust made me think. Contrary to what Curt says, an individual can actually speak no only honestly but also truthfully, provided he only speaks in tautologies. It’s probably not a very useful insight…Nov 22, 2018, 2:57 PMMartin ŠtěpánDepends. We all have some left-wing ideas to someone who understands right-wing as libertarianism. Like welfare for the childless.Nov 22, 2018, 3:22 PMSkye StewartMartin Štěpán https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z31FQ1_jjlQNov 22, 2018, 3:29 PMCurt DoolittleThat’s not contrary to what I say. On the other hand, speaking exclusively in tautologies is hard to imagine, although different descriptions of the same operations are technically tautologies.Nov 22, 2018, 3:38 PMMartin ŠtěpánIt is what it is.Nov 22, 2018, 3:42 PMJames SantagataNoah J Revoy that’s a great insight but I think most of us, hate the fact that these lies are so bald-faced, and so blatant as to be insulting. And then when we expose the liars as lairs, their arrogance and supremacist chutzpah is so great, so beyond that pale, that it boils the blood.Nov 22, 2018, 5:46 PMNoah J RevoyJames Santagata Don’t take our intolerance for lies for granted. So many people prefer lies, no matter how offensive, rather than a truth that requires them to take an unpleasant action.
We who love truth and hate lies of all sorts. We who would rather suffer the pain of truth than live comfortably in lies. We are the minority and we will remain so for generations to come. We are going to have to drag the masses out of the darkness of their decadent lies by force.Nov 22, 2018, 5:51 PMJames SantagataNoah J Revoy e.g, “can’ t we all just get along”, “be nice”, “let it go”, etc.Nov 22, 2018, 6:35 PMCurt DoolittleWhy can’t we just escalate instead? lolzNov 22, 2018, 7:01 PMJames SantagataCurt Doolittle We should. We should welcome conflict.Nov 22, 2018, 7:17 PMNicola WrightI have an acquaintance who identifies as an actual communist. Even he is labelled a ‘racist nazi’ because he’s outspoken against SJW rhetoric. The racist nazi label used as silencing tactic is quickly losing it’s power.Nov 23, 2018, 2:47 AMSkye StewartArguably the most famous communist/philosopher in the world is Slavoj Žižek. He deconstructs postmodern and SJW beliefs and tendencies better than many anti-communist Right wingers.Nov 23, 2018, 10:46 AMI’m actually a fairly nice guy. But you know, when the left retreats into socialism and shaming, the libertarian and right must retreat into fascism and threat. I restore that honesty to the discourse. So that’s what you’re seeing. Me restoring war (violence) to the discourse. It’s very hard to be a moral person and disagree with ‘markets in everything’.

Source date (UTC): 2018-11-22 10:07:00 UTC
Are you offensively ignorant? CHINA: Racism, Nationalism, Supremacy, Military Expansionism, Single Man Rule, Rubber Stamp Bureaucracy, State Capitalism, Unlimited Credit Expansion, Required Employment, Digital Monitoring of Public Reputation, Zero Tolerance, Reeducation Camps.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-20 19:15:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1064960325697642499
Reply addressees: @Tucsonred
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1064889812824416257
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1064889812824416257
“CHINA HAS SUCCEEDED WITH NATIONAL SOCIALISM”
—“Are you out of your f-cking mind?”—Jeffrey B (twittiot)
Are you offensively ignorant? CHINA: Racism, Nationalism, Supremacy, Military Expansionism, Single Man Rule, Rubber Stamp Bureaucracy, State Capitalism, Unlimited Credit Expansion, Required Employment, Digital Monitoring of Public Reputation, Zero Tolerance, Reeducation Camps.
I don’t make mistakes. It’s my job. Someone has to compensate for the kind of moron that even questions the obvious.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-20 14:18:00 UTC