THE INCOMPATIBILITY OF IMMIGRATION
Another topic via Nick Dahlheim:
Just as social safety (redistribution) is incompatible with immigration, Abortion is incompatible with immigration.
I’m fine with social safety and abortion as long as it’s not suicide by immigration.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-28 12:00:00 UTC
As Martin van Creveld said, build a wall. kill every one that comes over it. eventually they will stop coming. hence, israel’s wall.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-27 00:08:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089314098104414213
Reply addressees: @mediocrecroat
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089313249357717504
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089313249357717504
If I could do it all again, I would tell the Romans to leave the levant and its trade routes to Persia, and build a wall at the bosphorus, caucuses and urals and kill every single soul that tried to come over them, and burn every ship that circumvented them.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-27 00:07:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089313788946468865
Reply addressees: @mediocrecroat
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089313249357717504
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089313249357717504
“IF YOU WON’T FIGHT YOU DON’T MATTER”
(orwoll’s latest shot)
OK. This is rather silly. Here is your entire argument:
“I don’t think it’s gonna work.
The government is scary.
I don’t wanna take the risk.
I don’t want you guys to take the risk.
There won’t be enough of you to take the risk.
I don’t care about my people or the future just the present.
I’m gonna pretend that christ will save me.
I don’t understand your stuff but I’m gonna call you a cult (religious) leader – even if I would’t call marxists, postmodernists, feminists, cults but philosophical movements.
I don’t understand the policy demands, or the changes to the constitution and the laws and the practical results that they would produce.
I wanna do nothing – just like we’ve been doing.”
You don’t offer anything to counter the epistemology, formal law, the constitution changes, or the set of policies.
you only say “I dunno but I am ignorant and scared and I don’t want anything to do with it.”
Which I agree with. Because you don’t matter.
You can thank us if we are successful.
And virtue signal yourself if we are not.
And unless you are going to offer something substantive this is not worth my time. So let’s run a test: Let’s see how everything plays out. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-24 15:08:00 UTC
Asylums were good for the rest of us.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-23 18:54:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1088148011417563137
Asylums were good for the rest of us.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-23 13:54:00 UTC
In law, one causes harm or not and is responsible for failure of due diligence, not intent, and must pay restitution for the failure of due diligence. If intentional an additional punishment is levied on top of the restitution. However the entire marx/rothbard/trotsky-strauss …
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-23 02:59:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1087907642088046592
Reply addressees: @NationalAnarchy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1087874890169049088
IN REPLY TO:
@NationalAnarchy
@curtdoolittle Youve been repeating that Rothbard is a liar recently though in the past you said he couldn’t have been a liar, just mistaken. Whats the lie?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1087874890169049088
( Every time I deal with the government in even the most trivial of ways I re-experience each rage of each injustice that they have done to me, and to my people on a scale that comes very close to making me lose all care for life, and use of reason. The exception? Really wealthy communities tend to provide pretty good customer service. It was WAAAAY easier to find someone to bribe in eastern europe than it is to get some slacker in the USA to do her job. )
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-22 18:57:00 UTC
Um. Let me help you. This is what modern revolution looks like from the outside:
And of course, there is the alternative of the status quo. This is what revolutionaries around the world are doing. They are not trying to get control of government and to use it for territorial expansion. Because the era of 4GW is here, and the Peace of Westphalia has ended, and the western way of war cannot concentrate forces on men in sneakers, flip flops, among the citizenry.
https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/NIAC%20Catastrophic%20Power%20Outage%20Study_508%20FINAL.pdf?NIAC Catastrophic Power Outage Study_508 FINAL
—“The NIAC was challenged to think beyond even our most severe power disruptions, imagining an outage that stretches beyond days and weeks to months or years, and affects large swaths of the country. Unlike severe weather disasters, a catastrophic power outage may occur with little or no notice and result from myriad types of scenarios: for example, a sophisticated cyber physical attack resulting in severe physical infrastructure damage; attacks timed to follow and exacerbate a major natural disaster; a large-scale wildfire, earthquake, or geomagnetic event; or a series of attacks or events over a short period of time that compound to create significant physical damage to our nation’s infrastructure. An event of this severity may also be an act of war, requiring a simultaneous military response that further draws upon limited resources. For the purpose of this study, the NIAC focused not on the cause, but rather on the consequences, which are best categorized as severe, widespread, and long-lasting. The type of event contemplated will include not only an extended loss of power, but also a cascading loss of other critical services—drinking water and wastewater, communications, financial services, transportation, fuel, healthcare, and others—which may slow recovery and impede re-energizing the grid. Most importantly, the scale of the event—stretching across states and regions, affecting tens of millions of people—would exceed and exhaust mutual aid resources and capabilities. The ability to share public and private resources across businesses and jurisdictions underpins our nation’s emergency response plans and strategies today. (See Appendix C for a more detailed definition of a catastrophic outage). This profound threat requires a new national focus. The NIAC found that our existing plans, response resources, and coordination strategies would be outmatched by an event of this severity.”—
Um. Let me help you. This is what modern revolution looks like from the outside:
And of course, there is the alternative of the status quo. This is what revolutionaries around the world are doing. They are not trying to get control of government and to use it for territorial expansion. Because the era of 4GW is here, and the Peace of Westphalia has ended, and the western way of war cannot concentrate forces on men in sneakers, flip flops, among the citizenry.
https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/NIAC%20Catastrophic%20Power%20Outage%20Study_508%20FINAL.pdf?NIAC Catastrophic Power Outage Study_508 FINAL
—“The NIAC was challenged to think beyond even our most severe power disruptions, imagining an outage that stretches beyond days and weeks to months or years, and affects large swaths of the country. Unlike severe weather disasters, a catastrophic power outage may occur with little or no notice and result from myriad types of scenarios: for example, a sophisticated cyber physical attack resulting in severe physical infrastructure damage; attacks timed to follow and exacerbate a major natural disaster; a large-scale wildfire, earthquake, or geomagnetic event; or a series of attacks or events over a short period of time that compound to create significant physical damage to our nation’s infrastructure. An event of this severity may also be an act of war, requiring a simultaneous military response that further draws upon limited resources. For the purpose of this study, the NIAC focused not on the cause, but rather on the consequences, which are best categorized as severe, widespread, and long-lasting. The type of event contemplated will include not only an extended loss of power, but also a cascading loss of other critical services—drinking water and wastewater, communications, financial services, transportation, fuel, healthcare, and others—which may slow recovery and impede re-energizing the grid. Most importantly, the scale of the event—stretching across states and regions, affecting tens of millions of people—would exceed and exhaust mutual aid resources and capabilities. The ability to share public and private resources across businesses and jurisdictions underpins our nation’s emergency response plans and strategies today. (See Appendix C for a more detailed definition of a catastrophic outage). This profound threat requires a new national focus. The NIAC found that our existing plans, response resources, and coordination strategies would be outmatched by an event of this severity.”—