Theme: Coercion

  • “When something shocks and is too immoral for even Curt, it must be pretty damn

    —“When something shocks and is too immoral for even Curt, it must be pretty damn bad. It’s like when Himmler wrote to fascist Croatia, asking them to tone down the ultraviolence as it was making the Axis look bad… when you’re too violent for the SS or CD, you really are fucked.”—Schlaam Alaam


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 00:55:51 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425752455674333

  • (… continued) Men feel as they do for the simple reason that not all of us are

    (… continued)

    Men feel as they do for the simple reason that not all of us are of merit, but that we must preserve collective care taking while at the same time limiting the reproduction of the undomesticated animal classes who would reverse the past 50K years of evolutionary progress from animal to human.

    Women are the greatest mass murderers in history, since exposure and dumping of babies and children is the most common source of mortality in human history. Men and their wars are nothing by comparison. The great plagues are nothing by comparison. Yet when women and betas like you are able to force costs upon the rest of us, to produce and immigration dysgenia, you no longer limit your reproduction, no longer delay your reproduction, no longer are denied reproduction, no longer face the hard choice of harsh winters or sexual impulse.

    So no. I’s not an ‘opinion’.
    I’m not stating a difference of opinion or value – I’m stating a FACT.
    Dysgenia is measurable.
    The consequences are measurable.

    You are nothing more than a repeat of the jewish-christian-muslim destruction of the ancient world using the same vocabulary arguments and strategy differing only in using pseudoscience and sophism this time versus supernaturalism and sophism the last.

    You and all like you are the source of dark ages.

    You and all like you are a cancer upon this earth – an uncontrolled dysgenic out-of-control, resource consuming disease consuming society, civilization, man, the planet, and the entirety of human potential with your infantilism.

    You and all like you are a disease upon us all.
    A Cancer. A Cancer we are willing to separate from and let run its course.
    But a cancer we must isolate, inoculate, prevent, and cure our people of.

    So when we say ‘be a man’ we mean ‘save yourselves, our people, our civilization, mankind, the planet and the entirety of human potential from that cancerous non-rational infantilized dysenic group we call marxists, socialists, feminists, postmodernists, politically correct, and inadequate.’

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 00:11:03 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425576276514819

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425573316009260


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    (… continued) So you do not know what and why you feel the way you do. You only sense it is a good. The libertarian does not know why he feels the way he does, he only senses it is good. The conservative does not know why he feels the way he does, only that he senses it is good. However, in the long run the conservative is the only one making use of all available knowledge over the long run. Everything liberals thought would be true in their pseudoscientific rage against the darwinian machine has been false. Man was no oppressed. Semi domesticated human animals like all other animals we domesticated, have been eugenically governed in eastern and western civilization – largely through climate, competitors, and manorialism to produce society with superior distributions. ANd your ‘privilege’ of hyperconsumption and violation of the many compromises between the generations, genders, classes, and masculine-feminine minds, was made and still is made, possible by those who domesticated your ancestors – and apparently failed to domesticate your line. What do we do? We are sufficiently wealthy to separate and go our own ways, and return to our process of speciation. You may pursue your dysgenic goals, and we will pursue our eugenic goals, and we will rapidly see what occurs to a ‘liberal, feminine, redistributionist, equalitarian’ order without the libertarians and conservatives striving at all times to preserve what they and their ancestors have made, while you do nothing but continue to overpopulate a planet, drive down the averages, and reduce you and yours to yet another failed effeminate equalitarian utopia. You will not however take us down with you. (We would rather …. revolt and end you.) We will continue to rebuild our society from the catastrophe of century of pseudoscience (marx, freud, adorno, cantor, derrida, chomsky et al) and their marxism, postmodernism, neoliberalism, feminism, and denialism – and we will continue to build ours on the centuries of western tradition (aristotle, hume, darwin, menger, and the common law of reciprocity. So that is what noah and I are talking about. Him about finding happiness in the present, and I about how to solve the political problem of your feminine dysgenic animal desire to reverse our evolutionary progress and turn us to state of animals, ignorance, and poverty. So no it is not an act of GSRRM to state what I have stated. It is a scientific description of the cognitive processes and their dysgenic (herd) outcomes that you seek to implement despite knowing very little, thinking very little, and feeling only what an animal feels. Women feel as they do for the simple reason that at maturity their nervous system develops into a shared one so that they are willing to bear any cost to preserve a costly offspring regardless of merit. (continued…)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425573316009260

  • THE GAINS TO BE HAD FLUSHING AND CUTTING TIES WITH WEAKNESS AND TREACHERY —“Th

    THE GAINS TO BE HAD FLUSHING AND CUTTING TIES WITH WEAKNESS AND TREACHERY

    —“The harder you go against enemies; the more of your own, moved by sympathy or weakness, will defect to the other side. This too, can have positive returns, up to a point. But there is probably also a limit beyond which it is counter productive. The main risk is endangering the eventual achievement of any kind of victory. The secondary risk is of achieving one at too high a cost. But to the side of the optimum on which we presently find ourselves, there are still gains to be picked up in flushing out and cutting ties with weakness and treachery among our supposed ingroup.”—Ely Harman

    We don’t want ALL our own. This is an OPPORTUNITY to exit them not a challenge to be overcome.

    (eli as master of the game, writing in poetry)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 00:06:32 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425558507118949

  • @joehemp One does not have such a choice, since all territory is always and ever

    @joehemp One does not have such a choice, since all territory is always and everywhere held by force and only by force sufficient to deter the strongest group willing to act to seize it.

    I don’t do silly people.

    Libertarians are supposed to be the people that understand markets.

    Polities are a product like any other.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 21:53:54 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425037015447586

  • DEFINE “POWER” The ability to alter the probability of outcomes by force, remune

    DEFINE “POWER”
    The ability to alter the probability of outcomes by force, remuneration, promise of inclusion-exclusion, or combination thereof, in competition with others able to do the same.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:34:37 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424725273197721

  • The difference is in whether you view the police doing your job for you, or you

    The difference is in whether you view the police doing your job for you, or you view the police doing a job you wouldn’t do, and don’t want them to.

    “Commons.”


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:34:17 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424723961373802

  • “There is nothing wrong with Hartford that bullets, fire, and bulldozers won’t f

    —“There is nothing wrong with Hartford that bullets, fire, and bulldozers won’t fix.”—

    Yes, well, that applies to most urban toilets.
    .
    .
    .
    (FYI: it’s how napoleon made paris a beautiful city from a slum. Which the french have no returned to slum…)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:29:57 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424706898818210

  • “Russian Military Plans Swarms Of Lethal ‘Jihadi-Style’ Drones Carrying Explosiv

    —“Russian Military Plans Swarms Of Lethal ‘Jihadi-Style’ Drones Carrying Explosives”— Peter Zeihan

    Yeah, but I mean, what is the difference between lots of cluster bombs and lots of autonomous grenades except the ability to ‘wait?’

    Well, the ability to wait around, fly indoors, etc is pretty useful.

    The russian method is saturation with artillery first and always has been. Only brits and germans depend on maneuver.

    This just provides portable mines, pursuit mines, and piloted grenades.

    Artillery, then cleanup (this new tech), then tanks with infantry.

    Nobody does land war like Russians.

    I wrote about this in the 80’s and thought I might make a career out of it, but the tech wasn’t there yet. Mostly because of battery power and material weight.

    We have the tech now so it’s just going to happen.

    Land mines that can:
    1. explode if touched or exhausted;
    2. wait until they see an opportunity and still have energy
    2. or hunt opportunity, until they conserve energy.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:22:56 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424679289266993

  • INTOLERANT RATHER THAN FASCIST OR FACISM —“So I get the idea from your above d

    INTOLERANT RATHER THAN FASCIST OR FACISM

    —“So I get the idea from your above definitions that Propertarianism is Fascism without calling it that?”—Roy Baehr

    Well, you know, the problem is I don’t know what that means to you. And if I said that, then some group of assholes would start claiming equivalency between dictatorship regardless of rule of law and monarchy under rule of law.

    Lets just stay that my path to ethnocentrism and intolerance for parasitism is legal, logical and scientific, rather than wishful thinking, ideological or supernatural.

    I don’t blame the people in the past for being ignorant. I blame people in the present for trying to repeat what was done in ignorance rather than adopt what is done by science, logic, and law. 😉

    P-law is intolerant as hell. It’s more intolerant than sharia. It’s just an expression of the productive group strategy of europeans rather than the parasitic group strategy of the semites.

    Transcendence of many from animal to the gods we imagined by the continuous production of Agency, by continuous competition in continuous markets producing continuous eugenics, producing continuous evolution.

    Excellence and Heroism, Truth and Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Rule of Law and Jury, and Markets In Everything: Association, Cooperation, Production, Reproduction, Commons, Policies.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:22:24 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424677183428850

  • WHEN INTELLECTUAL DISHONESTY FAILS, ONLY VIOLENCE REMAINS (Problem for my “antag

    WHEN INTELLECTUAL DISHONESTY FAILS, ONLY VIOLENCE REMAINS

    (Problem for my “antagonists” on both the left and right is that I don’t really have insecurities to exploit. I am however, easy to frustrate when wasting my time defending against straw men and sophisms. And intellectual dishonesty makes me very angry. The problem is, intellectual dishonesty is the default mode of critique. When intellectual dishonesty fails then there is no means of negotiation to pursue, and only violence remains. So the online and macro environments are in parallel.)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:05:23 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424610287276691