Theme: Coercion

  • We had laws against scolds (what you’re doing), and under the duel you would be

    We had laws against scolds (what you’re doing), and under the duel you would be silenced by threat, and until mid 20th you would be silenced by defamation laws for your action. When, in retrospect, this is a group strategy of females, jews, muslims and christians: undermining.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 20:27:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174057349197258752

    Reply addressees: @Simon_Whitten

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174056778583162880


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Simon_Whitten I mean, you don’t know that you’re doing it right now. You think (as would all cognitively female humans) that you’re making an argument but you’re just engaging in reputation destruction rather than argument, and from a position of presumption bias and ignorance.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174056778583162880


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @Simon_Whitten I mean, you don’t know that you’re doing it right now. You think (as would all cognitively female humans) that you’re making an argument but you’re just engaging in reputation destruction rather than argument, and from a position of presumption bias and ignorance.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174056778583162880

  • Abortion? Ok. One Immoral Trade for Another

    Abortion? Ok. One Immoral Trade for Another. https://propertarianism.com/2019/09/17/abortion-ok-one-immoral-trade-for-another/


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 18:50:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174032975882850310

  • Abortion? Ok. One Immoral Trade for Another.

    —“I have been fighting for reproductive rights for over 40 years, yet some forced birthers still appear to think that their justifications (exclusively religiously based) are so persuasive they will magically change my mind. Save your emails people, I’ve heard ’em all.”—Jane Caro @JaneCaro

    An excellent example of Pilpul (Sophism). So, you want to restore the right of mothers alone to kill fetuses, just as women have killed newborns, and young children for thousands of years by exposure, suffocation, and strangulation when they were too much of a burden. Women have murdered more children then all the wars of men combined. In fact, women’s murder of children is outdone only to the great plagues and Islamic conquest. But let’s not pretend it’s not murder. It is. It’s just justifiable murder in a woman’s eyes. How about a trade? End alimony and child support in exchange for juridical license to murder before their born, rather than after? Restore man’s choice if we are going to restore woman’s? That is a Just trade. Men want their offspring and their genetic lines to survive because they have no other choice. Women don’t want the burden of bearing, birthing, surrendering to adoption, or caring. If women will not pay to birth them then men should not pay to raise them. That is a reciprocal exchange. Trade license for one immorality for another. Or is your moralizing just a shallow attempt to obscure the underlying costs and privileges? Are you just seeking another privilege for women at another cost born by men?    

  • Abortion? Ok. One Immoral Trade for Another.

    —“I have been fighting for reproductive rights for over 40 years, yet some forced birthers still appear to think that their justifications (exclusively religiously based) are so persuasive they will magically change my mind. Save your emails people, I’ve heard ’em all.”—Jane Caro @JaneCaro

    An excellent example of Pilpul (Sophism). So, you want to restore the right of mothers alone to kill fetuses, just as women have killed newborns, and young children for thousands of years by exposure, suffocation, and strangulation when they were too much of a burden. Women have murdered more children then all the wars of men combined. In fact, women’s murder of children is outdone only to the great plagues and Islamic conquest. But let’s not pretend it’s not murder. It is. It’s just justifiable murder in a woman’s eyes. How about a trade? End alimony and child support in exchange for juridical license to murder before their born, rather than after? Restore man’s choice if we are going to restore woman’s? That is a Just trade. Men want their offspring and their genetic lines to survive because they have no other choice. Women don’t want the burden of bearing, birthing, surrendering to adoption, or caring. If women will not pay to birth them then men should not pay to raise them. That is a reciprocal exchange. Trade license for one immorality for another. Or is your moralizing just a shallow attempt to obscure the underlying costs and privileges? Are you just seeking another privilege for women at another cost born by men?    

  • But let’s not pretend it’s not murder. It is. It’s just justifiable murder in a

    But let’s not pretend it’s not murder. It is. It’s just justifiable murder in a woman’s eyes. How about a trade? End alimony and child support in exchange for juridical license to murder before their born, rather than after?Restore man’s choice if we are going to restore woman’s.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 18:44:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174031347469430785

    Reply addressees: @JaneCaro

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174030835361755136


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @JaneCaro Excellent example of Pilpul (Sophism). You want to restore the right to kill fetuses, just as women have killed newborns, and young children for thousands of years by exposure, suffocation, and strangulation. Women have murdered more children then all the wars of men combined.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174030835361755136


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @JaneCaro Excellent example of Pilpul (Sophism). You want to restore the right to kill fetuses, just as women have killed newborns, and young children for thousands of years by exposure, suffocation, and strangulation. Women have murdered more children then all the wars of men combined.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174030835361755136

  • Read this today: “How to Become a Federal Criminal: An Illustrated Handbook for

    Read this today:

    “How to Become a Federal Criminal: An Illustrated Handbook for the Aspiring Offender”

    Simon and Schuster Digital Sales Inc

    Took about twenty minutes. Collection of absurd legislation and regulation. Supposed to be funny. But not.

    99% of law is not in fact ‘law’ but findings and application of the law. And because these findings and applications of law have no means of expiry they don’t vaporize.

    1. The law can’t change. There is only one: reciprocity.

    2. A constitution’s articles provide organizations and processes for administering that law.

    3. A constitutional Amendments include rights constructed under the law under the constitution.

    4. legislation can only exist of contract between members of the polity to produce a commons, and all contracts must

    expire either in time or when the objective is concluded.

    5. Regulation is dependent upon the legislation it seeks to enforce by prior or post constraint.

    6. Findings of the court are dependent upon regulation, legislation, rights, and of course, the law itself.

    In other words, there must be a surviving chain of relations for findings, regulation, legislation, rights, constitution, and the law.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 17:08:00 UTC

  • The only means of conflict resolution when one side decides to war by underminin

    The only means of conflict resolution when one side decides to war by undermining, is to war by violence. And that is what must and will happen. And within the next ten to twenty four months.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-16 23:39:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173743242749403141

    Reply addressees: @DineshDSouza

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173377453466644480


    IN REPLY TO:

    @DineshDSouza

    Enough of this nonsense about how we’re “better” than the Left and can’t stoop to their tactics. As Lincoln knew, when moderate men find themselves in an immoderate situation, they must adopt tactics appropriate to defeating their vicious adversaries. If not, the bad guys win

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173377453466644480

  • The Government? It’s Weak.

    —“Your little AR-15 isn’t going to do shit to protect you from the government — who has tanks and nuclear weapons. That is a pathetic fantasy.”—Matt Rogers @Politidope

    Matt. What will happen to urban centers without electricity, cash machines, cash, rail, and truck transport in the depth of winter or heat of summer? What happened in Baltimore, LA, St Louis? How many days before people with AR15’s don’t have to do anything but wait? Why will police do anything under those circumstances except stay in the barracks and defend themselves and their families? What makes you think the military will do anything at all against its own people? What happened each time they have? What will foreign powers do? Our soldiers have lost every 4GW war that they’ve fought. Why do you think they won’t lose this one? How long did the government last before collapsing due to violence in the 60’s? 3 Weeks. The USA’s standing in the world is predicated on an illusion of power rapidly dispelled. You see, you think of marches in the streets. We think of the gradual sieging of population centers dependent on trade networks, power, communication, and redistribution checks. It takes 500 men to end american dominance in the world in just 90 days. And then we come for enemies. The roman empire like the american was destroyed in about seventy years, by the same people by the same method. Fool us once shame on you. We will not be fooled twice. Either we end the liberal program and fundamentalism like we did communism, or we lose 100m people. Choose. There are at least 6M men like me. There are as many as 22M. There are less than 2M active forces, of which only 200k are available, and they cannot use combined arms on populations in population centers. Only two cities, NY and DC have police forces that can hold out for 3 days So do not speak in confidence of grave matters, as if you have any idea what you speak about. You want a revolution you are probably going to get one. And everyone knows it. You know what else they know? The right wing always wins in every simulation and war game. If you think you can get rid of guns door to door why don’t you think we can get rid of every illegal immigrant, and revoke the citizenship of every immigrant legal or not back to the 1965 Hart Cellar immigration act door to door? What will you do when those men with AR15’s get $2000 per person to deliver these illegals to work and deportation camps? Why do you think it’s not possible when the chinese are doing it today. We are done with you – and you’re sitting ducks.

  • The Government? It’s Weak.

    —“Your little AR-15 isn’t going to do shit to protect you from the government — who has tanks and nuclear weapons. That is a pathetic fantasy.”—Matt Rogers @Politidope

    Matt. What will happen to urban centers without electricity, cash machines, cash, rail, and truck transport in the depth of winter or heat of summer? What happened in Baltimore, LA, St Louis? How many days before people with AR15’s don’t have to do anything but wait? Why will police do anything under those circumstances except stay in the barracks and defend themselves and their families? What makes you think the military will do anything at all against its own people? What happened each time they have? What will foreign powers do? Our soldiers have lost every 4GW war that they’ve fought. Why do you think they won’t lose this one? How long did the government last before collapsing due to violence in the 60’s? 3 Weeks. The USA’s standing in the world is predicated on an illusion of power rapidly dispelled. You see, you think of marches in the streets. We think of the gradual sieging of population centers dependent on trade networks, power, communication, and redistribution checks. It takes 500 men to end american dominance in the world in just 90 days. And then we come for enemies. The roman empire like the american was destroyed in about seventy years, by the same people by the same method. Fool us once shame on you. We will not be fooled twice. Either we end the liberal program and fundamentalism like we did communism, or we lose 100m people. Choose. There are at least 6M men like me. There are as many as 22M. There are less than 2M active forces, of which only 200k are available, and they cannot use combined arms on populations in population centers. Only two cities, NY and DC have police forces that can hold out for 3 days So do not speak in confidence of grave matters, as if you have any idea what you speak about. You want a revolution you are probably going to get one. And everyone knows it. You know what else they know? The right wing always wins in every simulation and war game. If you think you can get rid of guns door to door why don’t you think we can get rid of every illegal immigrant, and revoke the citizenship of every immigrant legal or not back to the 1965 Hart Cellar immigration act door to door? What will you do when those men with AR15’s get $2000 per person to deliver these illegals to work and deportation camps? Why do you think it’s not possible when the chinese are doing it today. We are done with you – and you’re sitting ducks.

  • There are at least 6M men like me. THere are as many as 200M. There are less tha

    There are at least 6M men like me. THere are as many as 200M. There are less than 2M active forces, of which only 200k are available, and they cannot use combined arms on populations in population centers. Only two cities, NY and DC have police forces that can hold out for 3days


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-16 20:47:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173699883087421441

    Reply addressees: @Politidope

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173699351035686913


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Politidope The roman empire like the american was destroyed in about seventy years, by the same people by the same method. Fool us once shame on you. We will not be fooled twice.
    Either we end the liberal program and fundamentalism like we did communism, or we lose 100m people. Choose.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173699351035686913


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @Politidope The roman empire like the american was destroyed in about seventy years, by the same people by the same method. Fool us once shame on you. We will not be fooled twice.
    Either we end the liberal program and fundamentalism like we did communism, or we lose 100m people. Choose.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173699351035686913