Theme: Coercion

  • So state large enough to survive conquest, or empire large enough to defend ‘fre

    So state large enough to survive conquest, or empire large enough to defend ‘free states’ but there is no ‘borderland’ left except the arctic.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 21:14:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181316951454433282

    Reply addressees: @LLaddon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181316335671881728


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @LLaddon It doesn’t matter. That’s the middle east under the Muslims. It’s the ghettos under the monarchies. Either you can compete for territory, resources, people, and control in in the market for all of the above, – or you can’t. If you can’t operationally construct one -it’s nonsense.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1181316335671881728


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @LLaddon It doesn’t matter. That’s the middle east under the Muslims. It’s the ghettos under the monarchies. Either you can compete for territory, resources, people, and control in in the market for all of the above, – or you can’t. If you can’t operationally construct one -it’s nonsense.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1181316335671881728

  • It doesn’t matter. That’s the middle east under the Muslims. It’s the ghettos un

    It doesn’t matter. That’s the middle east under the Muslims. It’s the ghettos under the monarchies. Either you can compete for territory, resources, people, and control in in the market for all of the above, – or you can’t. If you can’t operationally construct one -it’s nonsense.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 21:12:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181316335671881728

    Reply addressees: @LLaddon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181282420940791808


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181282420940791808

  • PHYSICAL REMOVAL HUMOR —“Don’t forget to consider that the ocean is a possible

    PHYSICAL REMOVAL HUMOR

    —“Don’t forget to consider that the ocean is a possible location for said physical removal… so to speak.”— Jarrod Marma

    —“Ocean pollution! ;)”—Alba Rising

    —“Yes, and unlike plastic, they’re fully biodegradeable…”–James Dmitro Makienko


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 10:02:00 UTC

  • So in the constitution I’ve restored everything right up to extrajudicial punish

    So in the constitution I’ve restored everything right up to extrajudicial punishment and the duel.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 21:39:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180960717807202306

    Reply addressees: @fryskefilosoof

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180960608470159360


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @fryskefilosoof I don’t ‘believe’ much, but in general, it appears capital punishment is certainly preferable than its absence. Our ancient ancestors didn’t practice it until the romans except for adultery and cowardice in battle – they called it sacrifice instead, and put criminals to good use.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180960608470159360


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @fryskefilosoof I don’t ‘believe’ much, but in general, it appears capital punishment is certainly preferable than its absence. Our ancient ancestors didn’t practice it until the romans except for adultery and cowardice in battle – they called it sacrifice instead, and put criminals to good use.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180960608470159360

  • I don’t ‘believe’ much, but in general, it appears capital punishment is certain

    I don’t ‘believe’ much, but in general, it appears capital punishment is certainly preferable than its absence. Our ancient ancestors didn’t practice it until the romans except for adultery and cowardice in battle – they called it sacrifice instead, and put criminals to good use.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 21:38:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180960608470159360

    Reply addressees: @fryskefilosoof

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180896965661474817


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180896965661474817

  • I would consider a unified revolt impossible and foolish. However, neither the g

    I would consider a unified revolt impossible and foolish. However, neither the government nor the world thought leadership considers that a threat. Instead a distributed, cyclically self reinforcing conflict – like the one we are seeing evolve every single day. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 21:34:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180959642152837126

    Reply addressees: @LLaddon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180928256884854787


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180928256884854787

  • The Western Group Strategy is to produce markets in every aspect of life while u

    The Western Group Strategy is to produce markets in every aspect of life while using incremental evolution of the law of Tort to suppress every and all means of parasitism, including the parasitism of dysgenic reproduction, and opening the leadership to any family who succeeds.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 14:37:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180854531963404289

    Reply addressees: @mattyglesias

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180854026772066305


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @mattyglesias Judaism, Christianity, Islam, in the old world and Marxism, Socialism, Feminism, Postmodernism, are simply theological vs pseudoscientific versions of the female strategy of undermining the eugenic dominance hierarchy but instilling conflict and envy between gender, class, race.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180854026772066305


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @mattyglesias Judaism, Christianity, Islam, in the old world and Marxism, Socialism, Feminism, Postmodernism, are simply theological vs pseudoscientific versions of the female strategy of undermining the eugenic dominance hierarchy but instilling conflict and envy between gender, class, race.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180854026772066305

  • So you mean we could restore slavery? We could pay $5000 a head for illegals liv

    So you mean we could restore slavery? We could pay $5000 a head for illegals living or dead? We could create concentration camps for Liberals? The constitutional process, while difficult and time consuming, requires an idea survive all member states. On purpose. (Idiot)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 11:54:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180813467231633414

    Reply addressees: @TomSteyer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1172911635779870725


    IN REPLY TO:

    @TomSteyer

    A national referendum would empower the American people to pass popular reforms without relying on Congress to take action. https://t.co/076sOfFqg4

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1172911635779870725

  • DOMESTICATION OF WARFARE IS OVER. THE WAR OF ALL AGAINST ALL HAS RETURNED When W

    DOMESTICATION OF WARFARE IS OVER. THE WAR OF ALL AGAINST ALL HAS RETURNED

    When William Wallace defeated the english at Sterling Bridge, it was because the english assumed the Scotts would wait until they crossed and stood formation – as was custom – before the fight. Instead, Wallace waited until a defeatable number of the english crossed the bridge and then massacred them. They did not conform to the ritualization of warfare between aristocratic families and clans fighting over territories to tax at the minimum losses to the people and assets. Nor did they want to disincentive the common people from fighting.

    Western peoples have practiced ritualized warfare in order to domesticate our wars, pretty much forever – with the Westphalian peace that limited war to actions between states our most dominant present influence, and the false heroism of our European Civil Wars, and our current heroism by economic warfare, only slightly influencing our tradition.

    The supermajority of our people and our statesmen maintain a current obsession with the presumption of the continued domestication of warfare, both abroad and in the coming second American civil war. They presume we have not, by the restoration of Marxist Terrorism, and their imitators using Islamic Terrorism, observed that the Westphalian peace has ended; and our heroism in dragging mankind out of ignorance, poverty, hard labor, suffering, and disease is ignored because of slavery practiced by every civilization back into eternity, with the muslims the most avid practitioners.

    This coming civil war will be more like Lebanon and Syria than the American civil war, and less disorganized than the second world war. It will be region by region, neighborhood by neighborhood, house to house, in spontaneously escalating, unorganized destruction of individual lives, leaving dense urban areas favelas, the near complete loss of industrial capacity, communications, and power. Russians can lose a third of their economy and resort to farming. If Americans lose a third of their economy we will lose a third of our people. And we will certainly lose more. If it lasts six months we will never recover.

    I work tirelessly to provide a constitution that will resolve this civil war by peaceful means, and incrementally escalate only upon failure to resolve it by peaceful means. But one thing is certain – the left will not survive as a movement. Ever. And this country will return to rule of law, or it will be reduced to a wasteland if we fail.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 09:55:00 UTC

  • PLEASE STOP BEING A USEFUL IDIOT ON BEHALF OF THE LEFT: LIBERTARIAN MEANS ‘USEFU

    PLEASE STOP BEING A USEFUL IDIOT ON BEHALF OF THE LEFT: LIBERTARIAN MEANS ‘USEFUL IDIOT”

    —“For me the last part best manifests itself within the ideas of libertarianism.”—psionin @psionin

    Libertarianism is just common property marxism. So “For me” means you don’t understand that the only source of Sovereignty, Liberty, Freedom and Prosperity is rule of law, producing markets for everything, including *commons*, or what we call ‘government’.

    Rothbardians turned ‘libertarianism’ from Classical Liberalism under Rule of Law to Ghetto Ethics of diasporic peoples having no, and taking no, responsibility for commons. It’s just common property parasitism rather than private property parasitism.

    So Rothbardians destroyed the term liberty as the left destroyed the term liberal. Either we have a militia in which every man holding the franchise defends rule of law under sovereignty and reciprocity, and produces commons necessary for survival of the polity – or not.

    If not, then the polity cannot survive competition in the market for territories, population and social, economic, and political order. Which is why there are no libertarian polities, and never will be.

    Libertarianism is just demand for a commune of private rather than common property at best, or an excuse to fool high trust european peoples into hosting parasitic peoples who specialize in profit from baiting into moral hazard, under the pretense of doing no harm.

    So please stop being a useful idiot. I use Sovereigntarian, or rule of law of reciprocity, or rule of law monarchy, or classical liberal. Libertarian in the hayekian sense means Classical Liberalism. Libertarianism in the Rothbardian sense just means “useful idiot”.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 08:07:00 UTC