Theme: Coercion

  • Is it permissible to beat people, especially “big, f-t, f-cks” who chew with the

    Is it permissible to beat people, especially “big, f-t, f-cks” who chew with their mouths open in restaurants? I am pretty sure that falls under “accumulated capital of manners, ethics, morals, norms, and traditions.” and it falls under my ‘duty of care’ as ‘ warrior, soldier, sheriff, judge, sovereign and insurer of demonstrated interests both private and common”.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-03 08:14:00 UTC

  • The Origins of Political Conflict in Women’s Genetic Strategy

    [M]others must talk to their children in moral language in order to control them at low cost – their approval and disapproval – when children are dependent upon mother for cognitive processing and security. Women try to scale this technique to men where it only works in exchange for sex and affection instead of shared cognitive processing and security. Women try to scale this technique to politics where it only works by undermining political orders, by obscuring the physical and economic reality of parasitism they’re pursuing as if they are still feeding their own children, or trading sex with men for resources and security. This is why politics has become impossible. Because women have made us compete by undermining and lying rather than informing and educating the public. Because emotional appeals that justify intuitions of the ignorant semi-domesticated animal is much easier to distribute than knowledge, understanding, and necessity. This wouldn’t be possible if we had given women a separate house of commons, and retained the historical competition between women’s emotionality, manipulation, half-truths, and undermining, and men’s calculation under threat of physical retaliation. We cannot any longer use violence against our women for gossiping, rallying, ridiculing, shaming, moralizing, psychologizing to create deceit by obscuring truth with disapproval, in matters of truth and falsehood. So without a market for exchange-and-compromise on truthful contract terms, and without the ability to punish women’s approval before truth, and punish men’s face before truth, we are reduced to a small number of men perpetuating the origins of the success of western civilization and women’s privileges that derive from them, by demanding truth before face, truth before approval or disapproval, and contractual exchange on truthful reciprocal terms. The same is true for the jewish (feminine lying) and muslim (masculine lying) means of undermining western civilization’s universal demand for truth regardless of cost in all circumstances. We are the only people who practice truth before face, and truth before approval, forcing contractual exchange on truthful reciprocal terms, dragging humanity out of ignorance and poverty. And expansion of the franchise to those who have not yet demonstrated truth before face (masculine), and truth before approval (feminine), was our only substantial mistake. And we made that mistake because we did not understand the oath of adulthood, the jury, the size of the jury, the thang, the senate, the senate and house of commons, the house of lords and house of commons, as markets between classes with different responsibilities and abilities and demonstrated FAMILY competencies, just as we had produced markets for goods, services, and information. And we have only realized today that the market for information is as, if not more important, than the market for goods and services in an information economy. As such we must restore our past mistakes, restore our markets, and restore our prosecution, and our zero tolerance, for anything other than truth before face, regardless of the cost to self or others, so that we may produced contracts of reciprocity. Thus Endeth The Lesson  

  • The Origins of Political Conflict in Women’s Genetic Strategy

    [M]others must talk to their children in moral language in order to control them at low cost – their approval and disapproval – when children are dependent upon mother for cognitive processing and security. Women try to scale this technique to men where it only works in exchange for sex and affection instead of shared cognitive processing and security. Women try to scale this technique to politics where it only works by undermining political orders, by obscuring the physical and economic reality of parasitism they’re pursuing as if they are still feeding their own children, or trading sex with men for resources and security. This is why politics has become impossible. Because women have made us compete by undermining and lying rather than informing and educating the public. Because emotional appeals that justify intuitions of the ignorant semi-domesticated animal is much easier to distribute than knowledge, understanding, and necessity. This wouldn’t be possible if we had given women a separate house of commons, and retained the historical competition between women’s emotionality, manipulation, half-truths, and undermining, and men’s calculation under threat of physical retaliation. We cannot any longer use violence against our women for gossiping, rallying, ridiculing, shaming, moralizing, psychologizing to create deceit by obscuring truth with disapproval, in matters of truth and falsehood. So without a market for exchange-and-compromise on truthful contract terms, and without the ability to punish women’s approval before truth, and punish men’s face before truth, we are reduced to a small number of men perpetuating the origins of the success of western civilization and women’s privileges that derive from them, by demanding truth before face, truth before approval or disapproval, and contractual exchange on truthful reciprocal terms. The same is true for the jewish (feminine lying) and muslim (masculine lying) means of undermining western civilization’s universal demand for truth regardless of cost in all circumstances. We are the only people who practice truth before face, and truth before approval, forcing contractual exchange on truthful reciprocal terms, dragging humanity out of ignorance and poverty. And expansion of the franchise to those who have not yet demonstrated truth before face (masculine), and truth before approval (feminine), was our only substantial mistake. And we made that mistake because we did not understand the oath of adulthood, the jury, the size of the jury, the thang, the senate, the senate and house of commons, the house of lords and house of commons, as markets between classes with different responsibilities and abilities and demonstrated FAMILY competencies, just as we had produced markets for goods, services, and information. And we have only realized today that the market for information is as, if not more important, than the market for goods and services in an information economy. As such we must restore our past mistakes, restore our markets, and restore our prosecution, and our zero tolerance, for anything other than truth before face, regardless of the cost to self or others, so that we may produced contracts of reciprocity. Thus Endeth The Lesson  

  • “Politicide” Eliminate all of the enemy as well as traitors. And ending doing bo

    “Politicide” Eliminate all of the enemy as well as traitors. And ending doing both saves us a few centuries of eugenic suppression of outliers. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 20:14:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190361416726908928

    Reply addressees: @papaalejandro3 @EmperorInvictus @realjoshneal

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186978582687469568


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186978582687469568

  • “Believing” in force doesn’t tell us much. Demanding we organize to produce forc

    “Believing” in force doesn’t tell us much. Demanding we organize to produce force to defend ourselves from the enemy; to produce commons by common investment by a central state; by private industry; by individuals; with zero tolerance for harms to our people is a good thing.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 20:11:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190360790089523202

    Reply addressees: @EmperorInvictus @SandraLeeKoeni2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187137014359085056


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187137014359085056

  • Hmmm. I ‘believe’ in the use of force, to create a natural hierarchy (aristocrac

    Hmmm. I ‘believe’ in the use of force, to create a natural hierarchy (aristocracy) with zero tolerance for imposition upon the interests of our (or any) people, when we are organized into nation states.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 20:10:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190360432575483905

    Reply addressees: @EmperorInvictus @SandraLeeKoeni2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187137014359085056


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187137014359085056

  • Authoritarianism = Borrowing by individuals, Investment by individuals, in indus

    Authoritarianism = Borrowing by individuals, Investment by individuals, in industries producible by individuals, producing returns for individuals, that is appropriated (stolen) by the state, and redistributed to non-borrowers, investors, producers.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 19:36:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190352047998029824

    Reply addressees: @ironpatriot2016 @whysuspectus @AndrewYang

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190351589724295174


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @ironpatriot2016 @whysuspectus @AndrewYang Rule of law = Sovereignty, Property(Demonstrated Interest), Reciprocity, Court,Testimony, Jury, Resulting in markets.

    Socialism = Borrowing by the state, to make investments by the state, in industries producible by the state, and the redistribution of earnings into the commons.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1190351589724295174


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @ironpatriot2016 @whysuspectus @AndrewYang Rule of law = Sovereignty, Property(Demonstrated Interest), Reciprocity, Court,Testimony, Jury, Resulting in markets.

    Socialism = Borrowing by the state, to make investments by the state, in industries producible by the state, and the redistribution of earnings into the commons.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1190351589724295174

  • GUNS ARE THE LAST PHASE OF A CIVIL WAR, NOT THE FIRST —“Some historian, I don’

    GUNS ARE THE LAST PHASE OF A CIVIL WAR, NOT THE FIRST

    —“Some historian, I don’t remember who, said, guns are only involved in the last phase of a civil war. What’s gone on here’s not… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=497377387525823&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 11:55:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190236010728304640

  • THE ORIGINS OF POLITICAL CONFLICT IN WOMEN’S GENETIC STRATEGY Mothers must talk

    THE ORIGINS OF POLITICAL CONFLICT IN WOMEN’S GENETIC STRATEGY

    Mothers must talk to their children in moral language in order to control them at low cost – their approval and disapproval – when children are dependent upon mother for cognitive processing and security.

    Women try to scale this technique to men where it only works in exchange for sex and affection instead of shared cognitive processing and security.

    Women try to scale this technique to politics where it only works by undermining political orders, by obscuring the physical and economic reality of parasitism they’re pursuing as if they are still feeding their own children, or trading sex with men for resources and security.

    This is why politics has become impossible. Because women have made us compete by undermining and lying rather than informing and educating the public. Because emotional appeals that justify intuitions of the ignorant semi-domesticated animal is much easier to distribute than knowledge, understanding, and necessity.

    Tis wouldn’t be possible and we had given women a separate house of commons, and retained the historical competition between women’s emotionality, manipulation, half-truths, and undermining, and men’s calculation under threat of physical retaliation. We cannot any longer use violence against our women for gossiping, rallying, ridiculing, shaming, moralizing, psychologizing to create deceit by obscuring truth with disapproval, in matters of truth and falsehood.

    So without a market for exchange-and-compromise on truthful contract terms, and without the ability to punish women’s approval before truth, and punish men’s face before truth, we are reduced to a small number of men perpetuating the origins of the success of western civilization and women’s privileges that derive from them, by demanding truth before face, truth before approval or disapproval, and contractual exchange on truthful reciprocal terms.

    The same is true for the jewish (feminine lying) and muslim (masculine lying) means of undermining western civilization’s universal demand for truth regardless of cost in all circumstances.

    We are the only people who practice truth before face, and truth before approval, forcing contractual exchange on truthful reciprocal terms, dragging humanity out of ignorance and poverty.

    And expansion of the franchise to those who have not yet demonstrated truth before face (masculine), and truth before approval (feminine), was our only substantial mistake.

    And we made that mistake because we did not understand the oath of adulthood, the jury, the size of the jury, the thang, the senate, the senate and house of commons, the house of lords and house of commons, as markets between classes with different responsibilities and abilities and demonstrated FAMILY competencies, just as we had produced markets for goods, services, and information.

    And we have only realized today that the market for information is as, if not more important, than the market for goods and services in an information economy.

    As such we must restore our past mistakes, restore our markets, and restore our prosecution, and our zero tolerance, for anything other than truth before face, regardless of the cost to self or others, so that we may produced contracts of reciprocity.

    Thus Endeth The Lesson

    Curt Doolittle

    November 1, 2019


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 08:48:00 UTC

  • I am pretty sure I’ve eliminated the ability to engage in rent seeking and corru

    I am pretty sure I’ve eliminated the ability to engage in rent seeking and corruption within the means available in the current era and on the current horizon – that does not mean someone won’t invent a new way that they can get away with for a time.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 20:21:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189638352137523201

    Reply addressees: @natrolleon @ClownBa73413423

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189638103352467464


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @natrolleon @ClownBa73413423 The pareto distribution has to exist in proportion to the competition the population is capable of in the international market. The question is whether one is contributing to innovation, productivity and profitability or whether on is profiting from rent seeking corruption.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1189638103352467464


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @natrolleon @ClownBa73413423 The pareto distribution has to exist in proportion to the competition the population is capable of in the international market. The question is whether one is contributing to innovation, productivity and profitability or whether on is profiting from rent seeking corruption.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1189638103352467464