Theme: Coercion

So we can fuss around with terms. But the bias in private capitalism is non inte

So we can fuss around with terms. But the bias in private capitalism is non interference in forces except by treating the state as just another customer, while state capitalism places higher priority on state as a customer than the market – particularly international market.

Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 15:03:24 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223985274159497218

Reply addressees: @Hauptgefreiter1

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223984954746511361

IN REPLY TO:

Unknown author

@Hauptgefreiter1 Hitler wasn’t the only fascist – he was just the last. So yes, the state (a) prevents contra-autarkic arbitrage for profit and exploitation of state resources (the same thing), (b) biases production to commons by use of state financing,(c) overrides market incentives when needed.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223984954746511361

IN REPLY TO:

@curtdoolittle

@Hauptgefreiter1 Hitler wasn’t the only fascist – he was just the last. So yes, the state (a) prevents contra-autarkic arbitrage for profit and exploitation of state resources (the same thing), (b) biases production to commons by use of state financing,(c) overrides market incentives when needed.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223984954746511361

February 2, 2020
Hitler wasn’t the only fascist – he was just the last. So yes, the state (a) pre

Hitler wasn’t the only fascist – he was just the last. So yes, the state (a) prevents contra-autarkic arbitrage for profit and exploitation of state resources (the same thing), (b) biases production to commons by use of state financing,(c) overrides market incentives when needed.

Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 15:02:08 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223984954746511361

Reply addressees: @Hauptgefreiter1

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223983309233033219

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223983309233033219

February 2, 2020
FYI: Mandatory Conformist is a via positiva and that’s wrong. Instead, the via-n

FYI: Mandatory Conformist is a via positiva and that’s wrong. Instead, the via-negativa term is Zero Tolerance for Defection. In other words, you can do whatever you want as long is it’s not resistance, defection, or treason against the polity.
(We have rule of law – they don’t)

Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 14:49:43 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223981828438183936

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223979547848323075

IN REPLY TO:

Unknown author

This is the value of a Fascist State (Where fascist means Ethnonationalist, Authoritarian, State Capitalist, Mandatory Conformist.) And people prefer it.

China demonstrated that Fascism won the 20th. Heterogeneous Immigration demonstrated that Democracy lost the 20th.
#newright https://twitter.com/Tobeech/status/1223886335729115137

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223979547848323075

IN REPLY TO:

@curtdoolittle

This is the value of a Fascist State (Where fascist means Ethnonationalist, Authoritarian, State Capitalist, Mandatory Conformist.) And people prefer it.

China demonstrated that Fascism won the 20th. Heterogeneous Immigration demonstrated that Democracy lost the 20th.
#newright https://t.co/XXx0xcA254

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223979547848323075

February 2, 2020
Doesn’t bother me. I’m happy to return you all to subjugation;)

Doesn’t bother me. I’m happy to return you all to subjugation;)

Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 01:24:49 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223779272730562565

Reply addressees: @laufvet @MadisonKittay @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223764744693329920

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223764744693329920

February 2, 2020
Because only YOUR team ANTIFA engages in violence. Our team is mostly ex-militar

Because only YOUR team ANTIFA engages in violence. Our team is mostly ex-military or from military families, or from families with centuries of experience with weapons. See Richmond VA and Charlottesville. Left starts all violence – single death was from ANTIFA attacking a car.

Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 23:38:42 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223752567311736832

Reply addressees: @ryelle62 @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223353027807019009

IN REPLY TO:

@ryelle62

@GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto Okay, serious question:

How is a cop, armed security guard or generic “good guy with a gun” expected to turn a corner, come upon these MASKED men with assault weapons, and not draw their own guns & possibly shoot over a “reasonable, imminent threat” defense?

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223353027807019009

February 1, 2020
Apparently you don’t remember the same people of color breaking into universitie

Apparently you don’t remember the same people of color breaking into universities and threatening to kill professors if they didn’t stop teaching western history. (See Cornell)

Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 23:36:14 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223751943237054470

Reply addressees: @MadisonKittay @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223362954575384577

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223362954575384577

February 1, 2020
TO VIOLATE OUR SOVEREIGNTY IS TO INVITE US TO WAR See, you don’t get it. The onl

TO VIOLATE OUR SOVEREIGNTY IS TO INVITE US TO WAR

See, you don’t get it. The only reason not to conquer, deprive, exploit, enserf, enslave, or end – or worse, is reciprocity.

You see, ‘sovereign means’ capable of defense – every man a sovereign: a king, a legislature, a knight, a husband, a craftsman and all else he might be.

That is why natural law and international law are the same: because no man has say over another unless he violates the sovereignty of another – and if so then they may war. If they choose not to war they may duel. If they choose not to duel they may seek decision from the people in a jury. If they do not abide by the jury they have lost the insurance of their sovereign peers, and are limited to their own defense. And as such, they will easily be the victims of war by the polity rather than just their prior enemy.

We are the men of Europa.

We are sovereigns – all.

And to violate that sovereignty is to invite us into war.

Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 19:45:00 UTC

February 1, 2020
GOVERNMENTS DO HAVE CURRENCY IF NOT MONEY —“Governments don’t have money, citi

GOVERNMENTS DO HAVE CURRENCY IF NOT MONEY

—“Governments don’t have money, citizens do. Will the state fund [whatever] through mandatory force derived taxes or will state funding be purely voluntary on the part of interested citizens (non mandatory tithing).”—

Hmmm… that’s not entirely true. Just as a thought experiment, assume a government over a territory that is fully autarkic and has no need of foreign currency or trade.

This government can issue a currency (each unit a tradable share in the economy), demand it as legal tender for all debts private and public, and it can equidistribute X amount of this currency to every citizen every day, week, month, quarter, year or whatever directly to a bank account.

It can then collect some percentage of that in taxes and repeat the process.

This is what governments already do. They just put the banks in the middle requiring us to borrow it and giving the banks interest, thereby having the banks inflate 9x times the amount.

We are not fully autarkic so the process limits the state’s powers of monetary distribution.

Modern monetary theory won’t work, but this will, it will just require collecting and measuring better information than we do now

Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 17:40:00 UTC

February 1, 2020
One does not negotiate with them. But with fellow citizens

One does not negotiate with them. But with fellow citizens.

Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 08:52:35 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223529568113393665

Reply addressees: @Gyrocunt

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223469940398649344

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223469940398649344

February 1, 2020
i went thu a revolution in 2014. What would happen in the american government at

i went thu a revolution in 2014. What would happen in the american government attacked it’s people in the open?

It would be over.

Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 08:52:04 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223529435179159553

Reply addressees: @Gyrocunt

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223470756538933249

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223470756538933249

February 1, 2020