Red flag law will be thrown out by the supreme court. We just need to get a case to the court. That will happen. However, I think we are going to have either a revolution or civil war start before that happens.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-17 12:09:00 UTC
WIN IN VIRGINIA
Looks like we just won in Virginia. Four democrats switched. Bill failed to pass the legislature.
WHY IT MATTERS: It means if we show up we win. So show shut up and show up.
Yes, we need an escalation event. Yes this would be the best one we can organized because of geography. But at least we get to stomp on the hand-wringing cowards, that showing up matters. So shut up and show up.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-17 10:44:00 UTC
UGH. WHAT’S P-LAW ON TABOO SUBJECTS IN PUBLIC SPEECH?
—“How would holocaust denial be dealt with under P-law?”– A Friend
How would any public speech be dealt with under P-law?
In public, to the public, in matters public, suppression of the truth, or attempts at discovering the truth are prohibited under P-law. Conversely, falsehood is prohibited under P.
The difference is that under P-law, speech in public, to the public, in matters public, is involuntarily warrantied. Including the dishonest use of statements masquerading as questions. So, public trial by propaganda, sophistry, and falsehood is illegal and expensive for any party since the cost of correcting public speech is prohibitively expensive. As such one can investigate, and report findings, like we do in any science, but we cannot make claims or imply claims without liability for error, bias, and deceit.
Personally I’m far less concerned about this subject than I am the destruction and death by marxism, bolshevism, Leninism, maoism; the current civilizational destruction under postmodernism and denialism; and the ancient world’s destruction by judaism, Christianity and especially the billion dead under islam. So, sure, I tend to think the holocaust industry has gotten out of hand but I don’t know truth from falsehood myself, and I think it would be useful to discover what’s true and what’s false in order to stop both sides from propagandizing.
I hate this topic. I try to avoid it at all costs. But I do my job.
My job is to answer the tough questions.
That’s what y’all pay me for with those donations. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-16 14:59:00 UTC
OUR OFFER OF FORBEARANCE
By Luke Weinhagen (via Brandon Hayes)
The lies end.
Peace as it is understood today carries with it a payload of tolerance, an acceptance of the current state of things. This is not what we demand. The lies end. We extend to you some measure of forbearance as an opportunity to end your lies yourselves. Refuse this and we will end the lies.
We appeal to you to choose well.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-16 14:08:00 UTC
YES EUGENICS WORKS. PERIOD. SO DO MANY THINGS WE DON”T DO.
—“No he’s not, he’s offering support to eugenics. It’s not scientifically, ethically, or socially valid AT ALL. Go read some bioethics.”—Dr Julie Blommaert @drjulie_b
Julie you are a typical product of the feminist postmodern pseudoscience movement.
(a) Eugenics would work.
(b) So would many other things we don’t do. Even genocide works – it’s the most effective historical means of evolutionary competition.
We don’t do it.
SO STOP LYING.
We have lost a full standard deviation of intelligence above the Hajnal Line in the past 150 years due to reversal. We’re just about to cross the line of 97 in the USA, and evidence is that 95 and 93 are cliff effects that are unrecoverable. That’s before personality trait diffs.
So go read bio-ethics yourself. Not propaganda. Not marxist, feminist, postmodernist pseudoscience and sophistry.
What is the human cost of reversing thousands of years of soft eugenics by taxation and credit expansion in the middle to profit the top and expand the bottom?
Economics (in the Beckerian tradition) should be required to get any degree and any pretense of conception of what ‘ethics’ means.
People like you are a cancer for mankind.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-16 12:28:00 UTC
Think of it this way. It’s better to have the SWAT teams deport you than it is to have the rest of us come through and do even worse.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-15 01:44:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1228495368867979265
Reply addressees: @RashidaTlaib
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1228461796610248706
Feb 12, 2020, 12:14 PM [I]f you want socialism, and open borders, then leave – open borders work both ways. And you have a whole world offering socialism that is willing to take you. Canada alone wants 100M people in this century and there are as many as 100M of you that want Canadian Socialism. But If you want western civilization, and in particular anglo American high trust institutions, and the proceeds from them, then there is only one country left to get them. And we are going to keep it that country and those institutions, no matter what the cost – including no matter what cost to you – including the greatest cost.
Feb 12, 2020, 12:14 PM [I]f you want socialism, and open borders, then leave – open borders work both ways. And you have a whole world offering socialism that is willing to take you. Canada alone wants 100M people in this century and there are as many as 100M of you that want Canadian Socialism. But If you want western civilization, and in particular anglo American high trust institutions, and the proceeds from them, then there is only one country left to get them. And we are going to keep it that country and those institutions, no matter what the cost – including no matter what cost to you – including the greatest cost.
TALKING YOU OUT OF LIBERTARIANISM
by Brandon Hayes
—“I’ve frankly been leaning towards Libertarianism…Talk me out of it?”—Connie
Good morning Connie, talk you out of Libertarianism you say… 🙂
Perhaps we can just go to the root of it.
The libertarians don’t have a plan for your protection. They rely on the NAP; which relies on people being relatively advanced (moral); people aren’t. So, you’d be relying on the same mechanisms of power and protection that we have now. Meaning the power distance remains large and chances of miscarriage of justice remains high.
The only way to ensure a sovereign nation (a libertarian nation even) is through a militia of sovereign men. P is the only political group looking to decrease power distance and increase robustness of fellow its men; we insist every man is a sheriff (part of the militia, a craftsman, a father, etc)[resiliency, ownership, and mastery].
See, it’s not so much that you ought be thinking “I’d like to be a libertarian” (be able to live freely without others imposing cost and have everyone obey the NAP [they won’t]) BUT, it’s more that you should be thinking “I want MY MEN to be Propertarians”; otherwise the choice to live a life free from imposition of cost (like a libertarian believes she ought) ceases to exist.
{hope that helps; I can answer questions}
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-14 09:47:00 UTC
RT @whyvert: The more ethnic hierarchy in an army, the worse its battlefield performance since 1800: lopsided casualties, mass desertion an…
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 03:20:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227794688968732672