Ugh. What’s P-Law on Taboo Subjects in Public Speech? https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/27/ugh-whats-p-law-on-taboo-subjects-in-public-speech-2/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-27 14:11:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233031960886489091
—“How would holocaust denial be dealt with under P-law?”– A Friend
How would any public speech be dealt with under P-law? In public, to the public, in matters public, suppression of the truth, or attempts at discovering the truth are prohibited under P-law. Conversely, falsehood is prohibited under P. The difference is that under P-law, speech in public, to the public, in matters public, is involuntarily warrantied. Including the dishonest use of statements masquerading as questions. So, public trial by propaganda, sophistry, and falsehood is illegal and expensive for any party since the cost of correcting public speech is prohibitively expensive. As such one can investigate, and report findings, like we do in any science, but we cannot make claims or imply claims without liability for error, bias, and deceit. Personally I’m far less concerned about this subject than I am the destruction and death by marxism, bolshevism, Leninism, maoism; the current civilizational destruction under postmodernism and denialism; and the ancient world’s destruction by judaism, Christianity and especially the billion dead under islam. So, sure, I tend to think the holocaust industry has gotten out of hand but I don’t know truth from falsehood myself, and I think it would be useful to discover what’s true and what’s false in order to stop both sides from propagandizing. I hate this topic. I try to avoid it at all costs. But I do my job. My job is to answer the tough questions. That’s what y’all pay me for with those donations.
—“How would holocaust denial be dealt with under P-law?”– A Friend
How would any public speech be dealt with under P-law? In public, to the public, in matters public, suppression of the truth, or attempts at discovering the truth are prohibited under P-law. Conversely, falsehood is prohibited under P. The difference is that under P-law, speech in public, to the public, in matters public, is involuntarily warrantied. Including the dishonest use of statements masquerading as questions. So, public trial by propaganda, sophistry, and falsehood is illegal and expensive for any party since the cost of correcting public speech is prohibitively expensive. As such one can investigate, and report findings, like we do in any science, but we cannot make claims or imply claims without liability for error, bias, and deceit. Personally I’m far less concerned about this subject than I am the destruction and death by marxism, bolshevism, Leninism, maoism; the current civilizational destruction under postmodernism and denialism; and the ancient world’s destruction by judaism, Christianity and especially the billion dead under islam. So, sure, I tend to think the holocaust industry has gotten out of hand but I don’t know truth from falsehood myself, and I think it would be useful to discover what’s true and what’s false in order to stop both sides from propagandizing. I hate this topic. I try to avoid it at all costs. But I do my job. My job is to answer the tough questions. That’s what y’all pay me for with those donations.
Separate, Regroup, Restrain, Domesticate, or ….inate.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-26 18:40:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232737147033194501
Reply addressees: @MartianHoplite
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232729806242033666
You dont understand. Without him buying you time, we would have eradicated leftists by the millions.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 23:33:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232448529840275459
Reply addressees: @KTdidntdoit @swingleft
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232430383343509510
Three means of human coercion or more gently, weapons of influence. https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/25/three-means-of-human-coercion-or-more-gently-weapons-of-influence/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 21:36:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232419073683791872
One more time. Three means of human coercion or more gently, weapons of influence. The Physical: Body and Movement Using Force or Violence The fear of harm or promise of defense. By the Dominant or Established Male The Material: Resources and Opportunity Using Bribe or Trade The fear of loss of gains, or promise of gains By the Brother, Ally, or Ascendant Male The Social: Cooperation and Insurance Using Undermining or Advocacy The fear of ostracization or promise of inclusion By the female and especially dominant female Personality: Big5/6 Personality Traits with 10/12 Personality facets. Where One Traits differs Dominance Expression. Where all Facets differ by Gender Bias. Where all personalities cluster by three types: Dominant or Established Male. Ascendant Male. Female. Gender: Where sex is genetically determined and either male or female. Where the brain evolves a dominant lateral, female, associative (wide association in the present) and longitudinal male a narrow, association over time and space). Where the resulting brain structure favors temporal interpersonal emotion in the female necessary for child rearing, and intertemporal political analytic in the male necessary for holding territory, resources, females, and children from capture by competing males. Where sexual preference is for the opposite sex, either male, female, but a small percentage of the population is subject to developmental defect in utero and can express almost any gender distribution. Conflict: Where developmental defect can cause failure to produce sufficient agency for self control. Where genders demonstrate differences in self control by antisocial, disruptive or hostile behavior. Where females demonstrate sexual, psychological(interpersonal), social(group), antisocial behavior, by continuous undermining and manipulation. Where males demonstrate sexual and physical antisocial behavior by continuous harm to self, others, and property.
One more time. Three means of human coercion or more gently, weapons of influence. The Physical: Body and Movement Using Force or Violence The fear of harm or promise of defense. By the Dominant or Established Male The Material: Resources and Opportunity Using Bribe or Trade The fear of loss of gains, or promise of gains By the Brother, Ally, or Ascendant Male The Social: Cooperation and Insurance Using Undermining or Advocacy The fear of ostracization or promise of inclusion By the female and especially dominant female Personality: Big5/6 Personality Traits with 10/12 Personality facets. Where One Traits differs Dominance Expression. Where all Facets differ by Gender Bias. Where all personalities cluster by three types: Dominant or Established Male. Ascendant Male. Female. Gender: Where sex is genetically determined and either male or female. Where the brain evolves a dominant lateral, female, associative (wide association in the present) and longitudinal male a narrow, association over time and space). Where the resulting brain structure favors temporal interpersonal emotion in the female necessary for child rearing, and intertemporal political analytic in the male necessary for holding territory, resources, females, and children from capture by competing males. Where sexual preference is for the opposite sex, either male, female, but a small percentage of the population is subject to developmental defect in utero and can express almost any gender distribution. Conflict: Where developmental defect can cause failure to produce sufficient agency for self control. Where genders demonstrate differences in self control by antisocial, disruptive or hostile behavior. Where females demonstrate sexual, psychological(interpersonal), social(group), antisocial behavior, by continuous undermining and manipulation. Where males demonstrate sexual and physical antisocial behavior by continuous harm to self, others, and property.
RECIPROCITY AND IRRECIPROCITYReciprocity: productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer, of demonstrated interests, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality, and warranted, within the limits of restitutability. Irreciprocity: Failing any one of the criteria for Reciprocity. MORAL(ETHICAL) SPECTRUM … … … … Evil – interpersonal, extrapersonal, irreciprocity without gain (harm for harm’s sake) … … … Immoral – extrapersonal irreciprocity at gain … … Unethical – interpersonal irreciprocity at gain … Criminal – direct irreciprocity at gain Amoral – no affect on others at gain. … Recirpocal – direct reciprocity at gain … … Ethical – interpersonal reciprocity at gain … … … Moral – extrapersonal reciprocity at gain … … … … Good – interpersonal, extrapersonal, reciprocity without gain (investment, for investment’s sake) The constant relation in the spectrum is reciprocity by distance self, direct, indirect Reciprocity: productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer, of demonstrated interests, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality, and warranted, within the limits of restitutability. Irreciprocity: Failing any one of the criteria for Reciprocity.
RECIPROCITY AND IRRECIPROCITYReciprocity: productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer, of demonstrated interests, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality, and warranted, within the limits of restitutability. Irreciprocity: Failing any one of the criteria for Reciprocity. MORAL(ETHICAL) SPECTRUM … … … … Evil – interpersonal, extrapersonal, irreciprocity without gain (harm for harm’s sake) … … … Immoral – extrapersonal irreciprocity at gain … … Unethical – interpersonal irreciprocity at gain … Criminal – direct irreciprocity at gain Amoral – no affect on others at gain. … Recirpocal – direct reciprocity at gain … … Ethical – interpersonal reciprocity at gain … … … Moral – extrapersonal reciprocity at gain … … … … Good – interpersonal, extrapersonal, reciprocity without gain (investment, for investment’s sake) The constant relation in the spectrum is reciprocity by distance self, direct, indirect Reciprocity: productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer, of demonstrated interests, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality, and warranted, within the limits of restitutability. Irreciprocity: Failing any one of the criteria for Reciprocity.