RT @curtdoolittle: @StephenKing @StephenKing
The second amendment, which prohibits the State from interfering in the requirement that all a…
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-27 18:47:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1773059349952291090
Bravo. I’m not sure it can be said better, more simply, and more clearly. So yes. This is excellent ’10k foot view’ of the problem.
You might add also that:
(a) that’s a distribution between consumption in time and capitalizing over time.
(b) This means that the distribution provides ‘coverage’ for seeking opportunity across the ‘opportunity surface’ of time and space.
(c) In other words it allows us to make use of human hyper-adaptability (compared to all other life forms) to exploit maximum opportunities – all these ‘biases’ are better thought of as a division of cognitive and instinctual labor satisfying hyper-adaptability which is the human evolutionary advantage.
(d) So the distribution preserves the evolutionary direction AND the potential to adapt to changing circumstances – in other words we don’t want everyone to be the same.
(e) All that’s necessary is that a sufficient number of systematizing capitalizing men maintain direction while some other part of the distribution is expressed as a current (temporary) advantage.
(f) and the problem of the age is that we have allowed women into economy and polity and institutions without regulating against their hyperconsumption – and that they’ve destroyed capitalizatino across the entire spectrum.
(g) and this number of women is sufficient to overload the dominant male capitalizing bias – only because we have used law to privilege the feminine and constrain the masculine – in precisely those areas (capital over time) that we should not.
(h) but as I’ve illustrated, this female antisocial behavior which they falsely intuit is virtuous can be legislated against just like male antisocial behavior.
(i) The difference is that we must prohibit female irresponsibility and antisocial behavior as thoroughly as we have the male.
And that’s what my work does.
Cheers
Reply addressees: @FatherIsTalking
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-27 00:03:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772776425604419584
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772724483435966534
RT @MarioNawfal: 🇺🇸 Florida Sheriff Tells Homeowners To Shoot Burglars
“If someone is breaking into your house, you’re more than welcome t…
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-25 22:41:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772393436571734351
How do we stop Islam?
Via: https://t.co/cVHJS0TgN1
To stop Islam, we must accept the reality, stop pretending, make an overdue decision, and take common sense measures. Here are the steps to stop the spread of Islam in America, Canada, UK & Europe.
1. Stop believing what Muslims tell us about Islam (see Taqiyya). Instead, believe what they do, what they tell each other (see Muslim Brotherhood), what the Sharia law prescribes, and factually discern the truth about the “Religion of Peace.”
2. Reject the unwarranted accusations of “Islamophobia!” and make the courageous decision to stop Islam now before it spreads even farther and irreversibly deeper into the West (see Spread of Islam).
3. Close or block all Jihadist websites, blogs, video, photo and social media accounts that are being used to incite terrorism and recruit terrorists.
4. Stop the army of young Muslim men flooding into the West as fake refugees, prosecute those who sexuaIIy assault our women (see Taharrush), and deport those who blow their cover (see Muslim refugees).
5. Block Muslim imams’ access to our public schools, college campuses, armed forces and prisons; we would block any other group with ties to Adolf Hitler (see Hitler & Islam).
6. Outlaw the seditious Sharia law and prosecute for sedition all groups that promote it. Also pass laws to ban Hijab, which is the targeting tool for Taharrush and other sexual assaults, and to stop the islamization of our food supply (see Halal).
7. Require reciprocity of religious freedom from Islamic governments (e,g., Saudi Arabia) that are financing and building mosques in the West; if churches can’t be built there, they shouldn’t be building mosques here.
( CD: This is effectively a ‘silencing’ and is what I’ve recommended for the feminine > abrahamic > marxist sequence of seditions and treasons against civilization, mankind, and evolution itself. )
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-25 15:29:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772284799828299776
RT @EPoe187: The US spends billions of dollars a year on diversity. And “diversity” is more or less a polite word for an anti-white ideolog…
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-25 10:25:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772208251674800157
(Content Warning)
The Russians caught one of the muslim terrorists from yesterday’s mass murder in Moscow. He speaks with a limited russian vocabulary. My understanding is that they entered Russia from the central asian republics.
Reports say he ‘cut his ear’ running through the… https://t.co/WnLxzVJLox
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-24 18:16:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1771964310719283354
(lol…. doubling down…)
So, you don’t have an answer how to distinguish what should, can, or must be done to others even if they don’t want it done unto them? What’s the criteria for disambiguation of yes and no? 😉
(or are you ok with the prison penetration thing?) ;)…
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-23 00:44:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1771337086970352074
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1771330280801865947
–“Q: WHY IS THE GOLDEN RULE FALSE?”–
If the Golden Rule is “do unto others as you would have them do unto you” (which assumes equality), what is the name for the rule “do not unto others that which they do not want done unto them” (which assumes inequality)?
The principle “do not unto others that which they do not want done unto them” is closely associated with the concept known as the “Silver Rule.”
While the Golden Rule focuses on proactive behavior (doing to others what you would want done to you), the Silver Rule emphasizes restraint or the avoidance of doing harm based on others’ preferences or desires.
The Silver Rule can be found in various philosophical and religious traditions, highlighting a more passive form of ethical consideration that stresses not imposing harm or discomfort on others.
It is an important principle in ethical systems that prioritize non-interference and respect for the wishes and boundaries of others, recognizing differences in desires, circumstances, or status that might make equality-based assumptions problematic.
The Silver Rule acknowledges the potential for inequality in relationships or interactions by emphasizing respect for the autonomy and wishes of others, rather than presuming a universal standard of desirable treatment.
It’s a fundamental ethical guideline that promotes empathy and consideration in interpersonal relations, taking into account the diverse needs and preferences of individuals.
The golden rule is a derivation of slave (female) morality, vs the Silver rule is a derivation of aristocratic (male) morality.
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-22 23:57:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1771325361915129856
Again, the obvious: criminal behavior is by a tiny minority (that conservatives want fully purged … permanently.) https://twitter.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1770582810924822598
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-22 22:12:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1771298941591597538
https://twitter.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1770582810924822598
You are silly. The Russian military would not survive the first week. The only ‘strength’ of Russia is a nuclear arsenal, petroleum reserves, and the willingness to send its population to slaughter in vast numbers.
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-22 19:04:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1771251664919400608
Reply addressees: @JackOfAwlTrades
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1771250057364287562