Theme: Coercion

  • Tactics

    [T]hese posts are an illustration of the current form of warfare – fourth generation warfare. This is the dominant form of warfare – as illustrated by iran – because military action is no longer possible by most actors. Therefore the use of “irregulars” is once again returning to norm after the long ‘rules of war’ institutionalized by europeans to the point where we assumed our ‘pacification of warfare’ was a given. TACTICS Washington DC caved to the civil rights movement in just three weeks. As soon as fires started. Why? Control is an illusion. A tiny number of people create the pretense. The state cannot tolerate the illusion of loss of control. This is why Baltimore and Kansas City and such were let go: the force necessary would result in the loss of political legitimacy and the evidence of the illusion of institutional control. FAILED TACTICS For those of us who remember the marxists and civil rights movements of the sixties and seventies, bombings were a daily if not weekly occurrence. We are reminded of a few right wing activists frequently, but we are never reminded of the fact that marxists of all sorts and the civil rights movement was a continuous campaign of ATTENTION-SEEKING violence, with as many as five bombings per day. Civil terrorism doesn’t work. It never works. Revolts against the institutions do work. Revolts with SPECIFIC DEMANDS work – if those demands are JUST. Self determination is just. FROM TIME MAGAZINE

    —“Nearly a dozen radical underground groups, dimly remembered outfits such as the Weather Underground, the New World Liberation Front and the Symbionese Liberation Army, set off hundreds of bombs during that tumultuous decade—so many, in fact, that many people all but accepted them as a part of daily life. As one woman sniffed to a New York Post reporter after an attack by a Puerto Rican independence group in 1977: “Oh, another bombing? Who is it this time?’” The underground groups of the 1970s were a kind of grungy, bell-bottomed coda to the protests of the 1960s; their members were mostly onetime student leftists who refused to give up the utopian dreams of 1968. While little remembered today, there was a time during the early 1970s when the U.S. government—the Nixon Administration—considered these groups a genuine threat to national security. Alarmed by a series of Weatherman attacks, Nixon told J. Edgar Hoover during a June 1970 Oval Office meeting that “revolutionary terror” represented the single greatest threat to American society. Hoover promised to do what he could, which wasn’t much. As paranoid as Nixon could be, it was hard to argue with his line of thinking: Bombing attacks were growing by the day. They had begun as crude, simple things, mostly Molotov cocktails college radicals hurled toward ROTC buildings during the late 1960s. The first actual bombing campaign, the work of a group of New York City radicals led by a militant named Sam Melville, featured attacks on a dozen buildings around Manhattan between August and November 1969, when Melville and most of his pals were arrested. Weather’s attacks began three months later, and by 1971 protest bombings had spread across the country. In a single eighteen-month period during 1971 and 1972 the FBI counted an amazing 2,500 bombings on American soil, almost five a day. Because they were typically detonated late at night, few caused serious injury, leading to a kind of grudging public acceptance. The deadliest underground attack of the decade, in fact, killed all of four people, in the January 1975 bombing of a Wall Street restaurant. News accounts rarely carried any expression or indication of public outrage.”—

    TACTICS Governments require economies. Economies require people, People require consumption. Consumption requires money. Commerce requires electronic transfer. Where they don’t have electronic transfer, it requires cash. Under duress demand for cash increases. Deprive the system of cash, and its value multiplies for those that have it. ISIS, with ex-Ba’ath party members, took out all the banks – fast. Source: ISIS TACTICS Their confidence comes from controlling the discourse, security in anonymity, and plausible deniability. This is a false confidence. Easily reversed. And commercial organizations lack coercive power. Or defensive resources. Source: napolitano mafia TACTICS Their confidence comes from communication, mobility, rallying nearby resources, and the concentration of forces. That confidence is easily eradicated by attrition of equipment. After that it’s just calling, and telling them to stay put. Don’t make an enemy. Appeal to incentives. Source? ISIS. TACTICS They are only in control until the third trap, and they figure out they’re involuntarily in the business of delivering supplies. Then they aren’t. Source: Mexican Cartels TACTICS The primary use of fifties is: helicopters. Ground or Air. Source: Taliban.

  • Tactics

    [T]hese posts are an illustration of the current form of warfare – fourth generation warfare. This is the dominant form of warfare – as illustrated by iran – because military action is no longer possible by most actors. Therefore the use of “irregulars” is once again returning to norm after the long ‘rules of war’ institutionalized by europeans to the point where we assumed our ‘pacification of warfare’ was a given. TACTICS Washington DC caved to the civil rights movement in just three weeks. As soon as fires started. Why? Control is an illusion. A tiny number of people create the pretense. The state cannot tolerate the illusion of loss of control. This is why Baltimore and Kansas City and such were let go: the force necessary would result in the loss of political legitimacy and the evidence of the illusion of institutional control. FAILED TACTICS For those of us who remember the marxists and civil rights movements of the sixties and seventies, bombings were a daily if not weekly occurrence. We are reminded of a few right wing activists frequently, but we are never reminded of the fact that marxists of all sorts and the civil rights movement was a continuous campaign of ATTENTION-SEEKING violence, with as many as five bombings per day. Civil terrorism doesn’t work. It never works. Revolts against the institutions do work. Revolts with SPECIFIC DEMANDS work – if those demands are JUST. Self determination is just. FROM TIME MAGAZINE

    —“Nearly a dozen radical underground groups, dimly remembered outfits such as the Weather Underground, the New World Liberation Front and the Symbionese Liberation Army, set off hundreds of bombs during that tumultuous decade—so many, in fact, that many people all but accepted them as a part of daily life. As one woman sniffed to a New York Post reporter after an attack by a Puerto Rican independence group in 1977: “Oh, another bombing? Who is it this time?’” The underground groups of the 1970s were a kind of grungy, bell-bottomed coda to the protests of the 1960s; their members were mostly onetime student leftists who refused to give up the utopian dreams of 1968. While little remembered today, there was a time during the early 1970s when the U.S. government—the Nixon Administration—considered these groups a genuine threat to national security. Alarmed by a series of Weatherman attacks, Nixon told J. Edgar Hoover during a June 1970 Oval Office meeting that “revolutionary terror” represented the single greatest threat to American society. Hoover promised to do what he could, which wasn’t much. As paranoid as Nixon could be, it was hard to argue with his line of thinking: Bombing attacks were growing by the day. They had begun as crude, simple things, mostly Molotov cocktails college radicals hurled toward ROTC buildings during the late 1960s. The first actual bombing campaign, the work of a group of New York City radicals led by a militant named Sam Melville, featured attacks on a dozen buildings around Manhattan between August and November 1969, when Melville and most of his pals were arrested. Weather’s attacks began three months later, and by 1971 protest bombings had spread across the country. In a single eighteen-month period during 1971 and 1972 the FBI counted an amazing 2,500 bombings on American soil, almost five a day. Because they were typically detonated late at night, few caused serious injury, leading to a kind of grudging public acceptance. The deadliest underground attack of the decade, in fact, killed all of four people, in the January 1975 bombing of a Wall Street restaurant. News accounts rarely carried any expression or indication of public outrage.”—

    TACTICS Governments require economies. Economies require people, People require consumption. Consumption requires money. Commerce requires electronic transfer. Where they don’t have electronic transfer, it requires cash. Under duress demand for cash increases. Deprive the system of cash, and its value multiplies for those that have it. ISIS, with ex-Ba’ath party members, took out all the banks – fast. Source: ISIS TACTICS Their confidence comes from controlling the discourse, security in anonymity, and plausible deniability. This is a false confidence. Easily reversed. And commercial organizations lack coercive power. Or defensive resources. Source: napolitano mafia TACTICS Their confidence comes from communication, mobility, rallying nearby resources, and the concentration of forces. That confidence is easily eradicated by attrition of equipment. After that it’s just calling, and telling them to stay put. Don’t make an enemy. Appeal to incentives. Source? ISIS. TACTICS They are only in control until the third trap, and they figure out they’re involuntarily in the business of delivering supplies. Then they aren’t. Source: Mexican Cartels TACTICS The primary use of fifties is: helicopters. Ground or Air. Source: Taliban.

  • The Cause of Hierarchy and State

    May 3, 2020, 6:58 PM [M]an desires consumption, consumption is increased by opportunity, and opportunity is increased by liberty, but so is irresponsibility. And so is free riding, parasitism, fraud, crime, immigration, conversion, conquest, and genocide. The state evolved to incrementally suppress local parasitism decreasing local transaction costs, in exchange for paying taxes to pay the cost of decreasing local transaction costs. This made markets possible where only primitive trade previously existed. Man is amoral by nature, and pragmatic. By the institution of parenting, acculturation, indoctrination, training, laws, restitution, punishment, and prevention we invest in his domestication. Man develops theology, philosophy, ideologies, rationalizations, myths, fantasies, and various other forms of frauds, to attempt to obscure and justify his free riding, parasitism, fraud, crime, and organized crime. In order to produce the suppression of free riding, parasitism, fraud, crime, and organized crime, requires a power law of institutions of prevention, investigation, dispute resolution, prosecution, restitution, punishment and prevention. In order to produce a market requires a pareto distribution of assets, so that the organization of networks in an market can produce a complex division of labor and its returns without which the terms freedom and liberty have no meaning. In order to produce a society that tolerates market competition and the suppression of free riding, parasitism, fraud, crime, and organized crime, requires the resulting distribution of rewards satisfy a marginal nash equilibrium. Given three possible means of coercion: force-defense (Military-police, government), trade-boycott(commerce-law), and advocacy+insurance-undermining+ostracization(social,education,religion), elites will combine to use and misuse these skills in a competition. Given that Man varies greatly from barely human to superhuman in physical, social, and intellectual ability, and sexual, social, economic, political, and military value, and given the power, pareto, and nash necessities of distributions, man will sort by value to others by his value in those markets – producing networks of competing and overlapping hierarchies that we call sexual, social, economic, and political class. As such, rule of law and the independent judiciary provide a market for the suppression of criminality by not only individuals and groups of individuals, but elites in all three dimensions of elites, such that sovereignty, liberty and freedom are maintained DESPITE the presence of necessary hierarchies.

  • The Cause of Hierarchy and State

    May 3, 2020, 6:58 PM [M]an desires consumption, consumption is increased by opportunity, and opportunity is increased by liberty, but so is irresponsibility. And so is free riding, parasitism, fraud, crime, immigration, conversion, conquest, and genocide. The state evolved to incrementally suppress local parasitism decreasing local transaction costs, in exchange for paying taxes to pay the cost of decreasing local transaction costs. This made markets possible where only primitive trade previously existed. Man is amoral by nature, and pragmatic. By the institution of parenting, acculturation, indoctrination, training, laws, restitution, punishment, and prevention we invest in his domestication. Man develops theology, philosophy, ideologies, rationalizations, myths, fantasies, and various other forms of frauds, to attempt to obscure and justify his free riding, parasitism, fraud, crime, and organized crime. In order to produce the suppression of free riding, parasitism, fraud, crime, and organized crime, requires a power law of institutions of prevention, investigation, dispute resolution, prosecution, restitution, punishment and prevention. In order to produce a market requires a pareto distribution of assets, so that the organization of networks in an market can produce a complex division of labor and its returns without which the terms freedom and liberty have no meaning. In order to produce a society that tolerates market competition and the suppression of free riding, parasitism, fraud, crime, and organized crime, requires the resulting distribution of rewards satisfy a marginal nash equilibrium. Given three possible means of coercion: force-defense (Military-police, government), trade-boycott(commerce-law), and advocacy+insurance-undermining+ostracization(social,education,religion), elites will combine to use and misuse these skills in a competition. Given that Man varies greatly from barely human to superhuman in physical, social, and intellectual ability, and sexual, social, economic, political, and military value, and given the power, pareto, and nash necessities of distributions, man will sort by value to others by his value in those markets – producing networks of competing and overlapping hierarchies that we call sexual, social, economic, and political class. As such, rule of law and the independent judiciary provide a market for the suppression of criminality by not only individuals and groups of individuals, but elites in all three dimensions of elites, such that sovereignty, liberty and freedom are maintained DESPITE the presence of necessary hierarchies.

  • (a) This is why you are the enemy of the world, (b) China can’t fight anyone, it

    (a) This is why you are the enemy of the world, (b) China can’t fight anyone, it can only defend against american naval power. Russia can seize territory but not hold it. (c) I don’t believe America is interested in wars. World Chaos is now in our strategic interest. Soon.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 13:13:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259109294613696512

    Reply addressees: @HaiTaoYang9

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259107662047764481

  • Chinese have murdered more of their own people than all others combined. You hav

    Chinese have murdered more of their own people than all others combined. You have no claim on morality. You just use slow violence. Just like today. China is conducting ‘total war’ on Europeans. What did we do? We didn’t conquer you. We invested in bringing you out of barbarism.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 13:00:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259105874427228161

    Reply addressees: @HaiTaoYang9

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259105342048415747


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @HaiTaoYang9 Chinese way is “Delay, Deceive, Undermine, Accumulate, and Defeat without Conflict”. European way is the opposite “Defeat problems quickly and violently before they grow.” Why? Many small “FREE” european states and people, vs One large “NOT FREE” chinese state and people.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1259105342048415747

  • Chinese way is “Delay, Deceive, Undermine, Accumulate, and Defeat without Confli

    Chinese way is “Delay, Deceive, Undermine, Accumulate, and Defeat without Conflict”. European way is the opposite “Defeat problems quickly and violently before they grow.” Why? Many small “FREE” european states and people, vs One large “NOT FREE” chinese state and people.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 12:58:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259105342048415747

    Reply addressees: @HaiTaoYang9

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259104635857571840


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @HaiTaoYang9 Civilized? When people run over children in the street and do nothing? Let crime happen before you and do nothing? Put face before truth? Dishonest negotiations and trade? China uses slow violence (sun tzu, lying). We use fast violence (the greeks, truth). We civilize honestly.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1259104635857571840

  • Your leadership is scared. Because all we have to do is sink ships while you sta

    Your leadership is scared. Because all we have to do is sink ships while you starve.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 12:07:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259092719411924992

    Reply addressees: @HaiTaoYang9 @ZhiYeC

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259091184422514691

  • We have to regulate FB before they try to regulate public speech even more so. T

    We have to regulate FB before they try to regulate public speech even more so.

    This year.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-08 18:56:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1258833180519514121

  • DOH! —“If I could get you alone in a room tied to a chair (comfortable of cour

    DOH!

    —“If I could get you alone in a room tied to a chair (comfortable of course) and fitted with a shock collar, I could get a lot of good education out of you.”–Daniel Roland Anderson

    I love that man. lol


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-02 14:52:00 UTC