—“So why do lefties default to socio-economics when debating “equality”? That’s not the definition.”—Quinn Patrick
They have escalated from equality of defense under the law, to equality of access, to equality of opportunity, to equality of outcomes. And we cannot yet internalize that the left is cognitively female and unconsciously hyper-consumptive with NO END OF WANTS. It’s never enough for them. They’re parasites.
—“I can only unite the libertarian, conservative, and religious if I restore responsibility of the militia of every able bodied man to bear the cost of the organized use of violence to enforce our demand for sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, excellence and beauty, jury and law, family and kin, commons and capitalization as the central objects of social organization and political policy. To do that we require an intellectual vanguard. The classical libertarians have always been our intellectual wing, the conservatives decidedly anti-intellectual, and the religious conservatives hostile to the intellectual. I have to deprive the libertarian intellectual class of false promise of freedom from the cost of organized violence in a universal militia of kin, and to together we must bear the cost of depriving the left of freedom from the cost of hyper-consumption and dysgenic reproduction and the hedonism of the individual’s maximization of consumption as the central object of policy and social organization. The left is cancerous growth of man on both this planet, mankind, man’s future, and the possibility of the transcendence of man into the gods we might yet be.”— Curt Doolittle (repost)
—“I can only unite the libertarian, conservative, and religious if I restore responsibility of the militia of every able bodied man to bear the cost of the organized use of violence to enforce our demand for sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, excellence and beauty, jury and law, family and kin, commons and capitalization as the central objects of social organization and political policy. To do that we require an intellectual vanguard. The classical libertarians have always been our intellectual wing, the conservatives decidedly anti-intellectual, and the religious conservatives hostile to the intellectual. I have to deprive the libertarian intellectual class of false promise of freedom from the cost of organized violence in a universal militia of kin, and to together we must bear the cost of depriving the left of freedom from the cost of hyper-consumption and dysgenic reproduction and the hedonism of the individual’s maximization of consumption as the central object of policy and social organization. The left is cancerous growth of man on both this planet, mankind, man’s future, and the possibility of the transcendence of man into the gods we might yet be.”— Curt Doolittle (repost)
Cancel Culture (marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and difference-denialism) are just christianity v2: undermining meritocracy, reason, evidence, and testimony by replacing the false promise of life after death with the false promise of equality after replacement.
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-24 12:49:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264539027425955841
Reply addressees: @HanielAzzi @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264534819305861121
Feb 3, 2020, 1:11 PM You are conservatives. You want to be in control. I understand. But there is only one kind of control you can have that is meaningful rather than purely psychological. And that is to be fit, armed, with food stored for your family, and ready to show up when and if the opportunity arises. Everything else you will collect along the way. And you will go home with ‘earnings’ so to speak, like our ancestors. … If you are incapable of this then say so. But you will not obtain control over anything if you run. You will just be delaying your destruction. Because you will deprive us of one more body we need to win. And we will curse you for it.
Feb 3, 2020, 1:11 PM You are conservatives. You want to be in control. I understand. But there is only one kind of control you can have that is meaningful rather than purely psychological. And that is to be fit, armed, with food stored for your family, and ready to show up when and if the opportunity arises. Everything else you will collect along the way. And you will go home with ‘earnings’ so to speak, like our ancestors. … If you are incapable of this then say so. But you will not obtain control over anything if you run. You will just be delaying your destruction. Because you will deprive us of one more body we need to win. And we will curse you for it.
Feb 3, 2020, 4:15 PM (as of 2003) (via a friend) Summary. If the queen has the loyalty of the armed forces she can do anything she wishes. The only practical means of her action is in crisis, if the government fails. The Monarch is Sovereign People are her subjects (family, wards) Above the law and immune from prosecution Diplomatic immunity anywhere on earth Exempt from FOI requests No passport nor driving license No taxes Commander in chief of all armed forces, who are sworn to her, not the state The making of treaties Declaration of war Deployment of armed forces overseas Recognition of foreign states Accreditation and reception of diplomats Appointment of Queen’s Counsel (Cabinet) The appointment and regulation of the civil service The appointment and dismissal of ministers, including the prime minister. The summoning, prorogation and dissolution of Parliament Royal assent to bills (or veto) Consent before any law that affects the monarchy can be even discussed. BUT!!! …. Cannot create law, only assent or veto – this is the cornerstone. (And can bring in the army if she wants to enforce it) Issue and revoke passports Arrest, seize, anything commander anything at will Administer punishments at will prerogative to keep the peace Creation of corporations by Charter Granting honours Prerogative of mercy Even over their souls – head of the church. Only revolution can replace her. Which is how it should be. Devoted to public service Limits her opinions to saying nothing Specializes in ‘soft power’. Most powerful woman in the world. The commissioning of officers in the armed forces Directing the disposition of the armed forces in the UK
Feb 3, 2020, 4:15 PM (as of 2003) (via a friend) Summary. If the queen has the loyalty of the armed forces she can do anything she wishes. The only practical means of her action is in crisis, if the government fails. The Monarch is Sovereign People are her subjects (family, wards) Above the law and immune from prosecution Diplomatic immunity anywhere on earth Exempt from FOI requests No passport nor driving license No taxes Commander in chief of all armed forces, who are sworn to her, not the state The making of treaties Declaration of war Deployment of armed forces overseas Recognition of foreign states Accreditation and reception of diplomats Appointment of Queen’s Counsel (Cabinet) The appointment and regulation of the civil service The appointment and dismissal of ministers, including the prime minister. The summoning, prorogation and dissolution of Parliament Royal assent to bills (or veto) Consent before any law that affects the monarchy can be even discussed. BUT!!! …. Cannot create law, only assent or veto – this is the cornerstone. (And can bring in the army if she wants to enforce it) Issue and revoke passports Arrest, seize, anything commander anything at will Administer punishments at will prerogative to keep the peace Creation of corporations by Charter Granting honours Prerogative of mercy Even over their souls – head of the church. Only revolution can replace her. Which is how it should be. Devoted to public service Limits her opinions to saying nothing Specializes in ‘soft power’. Most powerful woman in the world. The commissioning of officers in the armed forces Directing the disposition of the armed forces in the UK
“GSRRM IS WITNESS INTIMIDATION” https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/24/gsrrm-is-witness-intimidation/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-24 07:02:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264451812813352961
Feb 3, 2020, 4:17 PM
GSRRM = Under Natural Law is Witness Intimidation Threatening me with social penalty if I speak the truth (witness) is witness intimidation. We need shorthand for every concept. And those shorthands need to be directly tied to centuries held western male beliefs. —Greg Hamilton