RT @whatifalthist: What would you do if you lived under an oppressive government which discriminated against your people? They use a secre…
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-24 00:28:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1815906846106083525
And no, I don’t think impeaching clinton for philandering with an overweight unattractive intern was permissible any more than the fabricated lawfare against Trump, or going after Obama for clearly accepting a book deal as a bribe for passing legislation. I don’t even believe… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1812956626196046028
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-23 04:06:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1815599448313192601
RT @ThruTheHayes: THE CIVIL RIGHTS LEGISLATION OF THE SIXTIES WAS AN ACT OF WAR
The results backwards speak for themselves.
Intentions; t…
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-22 16:12:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1815419685438906763
Where do you get that nonsense?
Republicans demand individual responsibility and only tolerate charity in the case of support for responsibility even if one lacks ability. Democrats demand evasion of responsibility and demand charity despite the evasion of responsibility.
The difference between the sexes, and the difference between the moral biases, and the difference between the parties now that women are fully integrated into polity economy and origination of family, is the feminine and progressive demand for subsidy of and of commons despite evading responsibility for the cost of those behavioral and physical commons thus encouraging degeneration of responsibility ability and trust, vs the masculine and conservative demand for production and capitalization and responsibility for those informational, behavioral, and physical commons.
Note that no feminine consumptive irresponsible society has ever survived for more than a moment in time, and never can. Not only is it impossible, it is merely hyperconsumption of locusts on the commons, and, devolutionary and dysgenic.
Because society and civilization consist of the production of the demand for the maximization of individual responsibility for private and common.
The left is either Virtue Signaling, Responsibility Evading, Or Parasitic depending upon class.
And left discourse is nothing more than the institutional means by which the feminine and the abrahamic and the marxist claim victimhood as a false pretence by which to escape the costs of constructing and maintaining civilization.
Reply addressees: @Captain_Potcard @David_Leavitt @elonmusk
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-21 22:30:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1815152311770976257
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1815055686725779521
It’s not the ruling class, it’s the activists who threaten to organize the whining class with brand harm.
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-20 02:39:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1814490324602859799
Reply addressees: @ChrisWenzel2
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1814487272999289045
RT @znfrey: @JoshuaLisec Communists call those who resist them “Fascists”.
It’s a three-step dance:
1. Communist try to take over
2. Huma…
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-18 18:45:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1814008521471803505
–“The Genie is out of the bottle.”–
That’s an opinion, one that allows you the least effort, and presumes voting has any say in the matter. Assimilation does not happen except with near neighbors.
Two intentional groups intentionally seek NOT to assimilate. one heterogenous group is sufficiently large in certain regions that they have no incentive to. One group seeks assimilation but is not capable of equal economic productivity and is a mandatory lower class. The other group has given up on assimilation and has already formed a permanent underclass.
If, you live under the illusions that people are equal, or that groups are equal, or have the capacity to be, or that they can continue integration into the most psychologically and emotionally demanding civilization, and that developed civilizations and countries can tolerate heterogeneity and still maintain their quality of life, or that heterogeneous populations can preserve participatory government and rule of law, they you don’t know the science, only christian dogma and marxist sedition. 🙁
Reply addressees: @3NaHalfBrownMen @eyeslasho
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-17 21:33:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1813688445434204160
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1813604185503592812
–“Is organized violence the only way to achieve this reversal [of the conquest of the USA]?”–
Given the accumulated malincentives of the postwar Credentialist takeover of the academy and state, as well as their dependence upon the clientele that succeeded in the takeover of the financial sector, academy, and media, there are at least three remaining options in the field of possibilities.
The first is dependent on random external forces producing enough disruption. This is certain to occur, with the best predictions giving us about six to eight years. But depending upon it consists of ‘handing our fate over to chance’.
The second is dependent upon the willingness of the court to see completion of its attempts at reversing postwar lawfare the bypassed the people and the legislatures.
In the absence of a monarchy as a judge of last resort (what served the founders), then as the third option, we have only then the threat of believable violence to achieve the reversal.
This would mean first, repeating the actions of the founders with a common law suit against the state (letters, declaration, constitutional reforms), then repeating the same processes as the civil rights era, in which the threat of escalation would provide justification for the reorganization of the government, financial sector, economy, policy, code, and of course fixing the six to eight holes in the constitution through which the ‘march through the institutions of cultural production’ by the left was intentionally prosecuted in an attempt to destroy the modern world as it did the christian destruction of the ancient world.
The escalation would be, not a repetition of the american civil war, or the french revolution, but one closer to syria and the arab spring on one hand and the re-conquest of spain on the other. And while I have worked rather extensively on both scenarios, and while I have no doubt ‘conservative america’ would win – it would come at a cost we, and those in govt, should seek to avoid by overturning the intentional destruction of civilization by the left, and the rather silly people who easily fall victim to the seductions of the left as their ancestors did to the abrahamic religions that created an dark age of ignorance superstition poverty starvation disease and suffering.
Cheers
CD
Reply addressees: @i63556 @eyeslasho
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-17 21:26:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1813686628206223360
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1813610458664038908
I’m not sure what point you’re making, but I suspect you’re committing a common fallacy of failing to disambiguate a term by how it’s enforced.
Laws of Nature: Enforced by the laws of the universe.
Command Law: Enforced by a political monopoly on power (PMoP).
Legislation, Regulation, Findings of the Court: Enforced by a PMoP.
Normative Laws: Enforced by social and economic ostracization.
Rules: enforced by private actors.
Guidelines: enforced by self regulation.
Reply addressees: @cryptohodler16
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-16 02:54:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1813044596668051456
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1813033991102246938
Of course. But it is still a legal document, still insured by the state, and meaningless without the permission of that insurer. There are no exceptions to violence determining control.
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-15 05:35:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812722738282266690
Reply addressees: @cryptohodler16
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812709484000666093