Theme: Coercion

  • The only thing protecting “YOU” (urban, biased female, underclass, immigrant) fr

    The only thing protecting “YOU” (urban, biased female, underclass, immigrant) from “US” (Suburban, Rural, biased Male, middle, working, and laboring classes) is that Trump prevents furthering your left-wing attempts at turning the USA into South Africa causing a revolution.

    Reply addressees: @BlancheKnox5 @bydavidcrow @KatrinaManson @kadhim @WhiteHouse

  • The only thing protecting “YOU” (urban, biased female, underclass, immigrant) fr

    The only thing protecting “YOU” (urban, biased female, underclass, immigrant) from “US” (Suburban, Rural, biased Male, middle, working, and laboring classes) is that Trump prevents furthering your left-wing attempts at turning the USA into South Africa causing a revolution.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-14 19:39:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1305591922401185794

    Reply addressees: @BlancheKnox5 @bydavidcrow @KatrinaManson @kadhim @WhiteHouse

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1305590405384241152

  • In Paul Krugman’s case he is usually weaving together three or four categories o

    In Paul Krugman’s case he is usually weaving together three or four categories of lies. 1-The myth of oppression; 2-the false promise of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and 3-pseudoscientific econ evades full accounting of all changes in capital.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-14 19:15:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1305586047867387907

    Reply addressees: @bill_m_to @paulkrugman

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1305572523455787008

  • In Paul Krugman’s case he is usually weaving together three or four categories o

    In Paul Krugman’s case he is usually weaving together three or four categories of lies. 1-The myth of oppression; 2-the false promise of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and 3-pseudoscientific econ evades full accounting of all changes in capital.

    Reply addressees: @bill_m_to @paulkrugman

  • THERE IS NO CAVALRY COMING Yet another stalker who threatened to come “teach me

    THERE IS NO CAVALRY COMING

    Yet another stalker who threatened to come “teach me a lesson” (visit violence upon me), was a no-show today. My understanding is that Facebook policy prohibits identifying these lunatics, or I’d share the photos and information. So far, one individual came from new jersey without saying would in advance, and created a little video of his escapade. And every other tough-talking man hasn’t shown. Like I said. Men show up. Pretend-men talk. And not-men talk sh-t about better men. The loser-right uses the internet as a video game – not purposefully, but because they’re insufficiently able to disambiguate fantasy from reality.

    Funny how many people came after me for saying (a) we’re going to have a civil war (b) we’re going to have an economic collapse ( c) they’re going to roughly coincide. (d) the state is not able to suppress insurrection on a national level without losing it’s legitimacy home and abroad. (e) the country’s infrastructure is the strategic vulnerability. (f) that the currency system is even more vulnerable than the grid (but I seem to be the only one that sees that weakness).

    The state has again, this spring, issued a report that the primary vulnerability is the grid, and that they aren’t able to secure it. That the military has no (magic) weaponry. That we still cannot handle even the most trivial of emergencies. That it’s not ‘powerful’ except in combined arms against other combined arms armies. That we can’t even supply our own military or medical any longer because the supply chain is lost. but it’s worse than that: there is no ability to militarily mobilize the people (outside of the south). (I published a The Choice episode on WHY demilitarization (feminization) of the polity has these strategic impacts on rapid response to threats. And that analysis was correct.)

    So, while the opportunity is there. I can’t see the left losing. Because they’re willing to fight. The right isn’t even willing to show up.

    And the stalkers are a symptom of a greater nonsense – the ‘middle-easterning’ of men’s words, and men.

    Before he was ‘disappeared’ I talked to a very frustrated Augustus who felt resigned that the right was, like little women, waiting for the men to save them. And they are waiting for each other in the greatest circle-j–k in human history.

    There is no cavalry. They were the aristocracy. And in our democratic vanity – in selling our virtues of egalitarianism, we ended them without understanding that those few people – those few hundred thousand people were what made our civilization possible.

    And while the rifle disempowered them as warriors, it did not disempower their tradition – until this century when we let the barbarians achieve what weapons could not.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-10 22:13:00 UTC

  • I want a war so whatever gets us there – even if it’s left-wing intimidation of

    I want a war so whatever gets us there – even if it’s left-wing intimidation of ethnic Europeans via the media, that’s fine.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-08 20:42:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1303433667369472000

    Reply addressees: @ryanmcdonaldusa

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1303433234483679232

  • I want a war so whatever gets us there – even if it’s left-wing intimidation of

    I want a war so whatever gets us there – even if it’s left-wing intimidation of ethnic Europeans via the media, that’s fine.

    Reply addressees: @ryanmcdonaldusa

  • 5) So the usual solution is (a) have a war, (b) hope you win (c) copy the french

    5) So the usual solution is (a) have a war, (b) hope you win (c) copy the french revolution and Chinese, perform a thorough purge, (d) update the constitution and therefore common knowledge, so that (e) it doesn’t happen again.

    (I just wanted to do it systematically. lol)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-08 00:26:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1303127520217366533

    Reply addressees: @DudeMaximus

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1303126766874243072


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @DudeMaximus 4) The problem was (as I’ve stated in the new constitutional recommendations) the founders didn’t even state anything about our civilization and our common law, or its foundations in the constitution and only poetically in the declaration. So how do you demarcate debate vs fraud?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1303126766874243072

  • 5) So the usual solution is (a) have a war, (b) hope you win (c) copy the french

    5) So the usual solution is (a) have a war, (b) hope you win (c) copy the french revolution and Chinese, perform a thorough purge, (d) update the constitution and therefore common knowledge, so that (e) it doesn’t happen again.

    (I just wanted to do it systematically. lol)

    Reply addressees: @DudeMaximus

  • 3) Realistically, the pagans protected against it. The church protected against

    3) Realistically, the pagans protected against it. The church protected against it. The monarchies did. The pre-war countries did. Other countries protect against it. And they use our ‘openness’ exploit this vulnerability in our civilization. …


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-08 00:21:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1303126311423094786

    Reply addressees: @DudeMaximus

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1303125793468489728


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @DudeMaximus 2) … outside the constitutional framework, because that framework was constrained by guarantees (a) freedom of speech even if fraudulent and harmful, (b) freedom of religion, even if pseudoscientific and harmful, (c) and treason, sedition, and defamation, undermined postwar.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1303125793468489728