This is why an inescapable law of zero tolerance is necessary to prevent the left’s destruction of civilization once again. https://twitter.com/Sardaukar1337/status/1316797292763115521
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-16 00:32:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316899724226711554
https://twitter.com/Sardaukar1337/status/1316797292763115521
Are you sure that makes sense? Does that mean that we should satisfy the demand for criminality? That’s what you’re saying.
There is a difference between trying to get humans to do something unequally good and prohibiting them from doing things that are equally bad (crime)
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-15 18:38:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316810652141449217
Reply addressees: @ZombieS64249650
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316809956700704774
RT @Heritage: These violent leftwing groups sure are well-funded.
In Grand Rapids, Michigan, the Michigan Solidarity Bail Fund posted $12…
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-15 01:45:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316555660713177088
Saying the Nazis were bad is different from saying they were wrong. China is, in every possible way, equivalent to Nazi Germany in strategy and practice. It’s Fascist: (Intolerant, Statist, Nationalist, Ethnocentric, State Capitalism. And it’s winning AGAIN. It works. Why? (bait)
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-14 16:44:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316419663639781376
It is the triangle of three possible methods of human coercion, overlaid with the institutions, classes, genders whose reproductive strategy favors that method of coercion.
This is the foundation of P-Sociology (Cooperativism)
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-14 15:13:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316396793232527361
Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316391908164472832
THOUGHTS
Strategy, like morality, is almost impossible to discuss because the first principles are not established. Only Militaries and Kings understand strategy because only Militaries and Kings can operationally afford to.
Those states that most have to fear instability and insurrection within – and where the military’s primary responsibility is internal stability rather than out of area wars.
Most strategic writing is nonsense because it doesn’t tell you what you need to know if you’re running 90% of the countries in the world throughout history. its only for those who can externally project power.
Once you know what the natural law requires, you build a military that will make it possible internally by creating rule of law, so that you can build a military that will transform to make it possible externally.
This is why only those civilizations (only Europeans) that develop rule of law as their first institution, state as their second, and religion only as their third can develop a high trust polity. And the second dirty secret is that this can only occur in a homogenous polity, where the incentives to respect natural law already exist, and the contrary incentives (tribalism) don’t.
ONE NEEDS RULE OF LAW INTERNALLY. ONE NEEDS STRATEGY EXTERNALLY.
P-Law establishes the first principles of law, politics, group strategy, strategy, and war.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-14 14:46:20 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105033680810251698
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105033676711832456
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
VIDEO: MILITARY STRATEGY – A GLOBAL HISTORY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bq5lemhX6vo COMMENTS Smart speaker. Well done. The west strategically won Vietnam. The consequence of the west’s strategy is that we drove Russia and China together. … The great failure was not uniting with Russia WHEN THEY ASKED FOR IT. (CD: We anglos are always strategically stupid) All the south had to do to win is to make the north not win. (CD: Politics is not (yet) empirical. Democracy is anti-empirical. Republics and Democracies are Terrible at strategies. ) … With present pressures, we are likely to see more internal stresses (violence). … We see those not using external forces as peaceful, but if we look at the suppression of Marxists in India, that’s war. (CD: Why isn’t the left’s prosecution of white males and western civilization by institutional means not war?) …. Jomini or Clausewitz don’t tell you much useful about 19th, 20th, or 21st-century states where conflicts are largely internal. (CD: I think this is better stated as the history of western evolution of the domestication of warfare is an intellectual prison still constraining the western mind when Leftists, Islam and China, do not have this same error. The Chinese do not play rules-based-strategy they rely only on power of self-interest.) Americans love to think of themselves as living in a failed state, it is still the most successful state. (CD: I disagree and I am certain that we will have a civil war very shortly.) The military does not have a practice of interfering in government, but the government does in the military and the reason the military hasn’t to date (CD: but will). … (more)
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105033676711832456
I used to work for Justice. And a certain other ‘federal agency’. Do you want to take a bet that if I investigated your life I couldn’t find something on you? I could. Easily. Trump’s policies have been excellent for the country.
You’re the problem. So we separate or war. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-13 21:04:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316122549688950785
Reply addressees: @DWrightMBA @MattC03 @ezraklein
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316121653672370183
OPEN CLASSROOM: YES I TEACH ALL DAY LONG … 😉
INSTITUTIONS:
1) There are only three means of coercion, and so only three institutions of political organization: Force (State, Military), Law (Judiciary, Economy), and Ostracization (Religion, Tradition Norm, and Family).
2) The first institution a civilization develops will remain more influential than their second, and second more influential than third.
3) Europeans developed law first,state second, and Philosohpy not religion. The Chinese developed the State first, Philosophy Second and never law. The Semites developed Religion first, religous law second, and failed at the state (at leat, outside of egypt – whose state was strong because of odd geography of the nile and its natural borders.
4) The order of development of those institutions determined the spectrum of truth(Europeans), to face before truth (Chinese), to Deceit (Semites). There is a high cost of each hierarchy of institutions.
5) The First Organized Religion (Mesopotamia) was a scam. It worked. It spread lying as the first institution. From that point forward, the middle east was doomed to the limits of religion and the fact that religions is a lie. The chinese were doomed to the limits of the state, and the fact that the state can only command. The europeans were lucky: the law adapts fastest as long as the state is still strong enough to defend the territory against invaders. This is the problem of the west – we are vulnrable to invasion (rome, and postwar europe). Why? Commercial interests (law) can easily overwhelm the intersts of the state (the capital of the people).
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-13 18:31:09 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105028902497745958
1) There are only three means of coercion, and so only three institutions of political organization: Force (State), Law (Economy), and Ostracization (Norm and Religion).
2) The first institution you develop will remain more influential than second, and second more than third.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-13 18:21:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316081588468318210
1) There are only three means of coercion, and so only three institutions of political organization: Force (State), Law (Economy), and Ostracization (Norm and Religion).
2) The first institution you develop will remain more influential than second, and second more than third.