Theme: Coercion

  • Ok. I’ll say something from deep personal experience with the Project 2 Degrees,

    Ok. I’ll say something from deep personal experience with the Project 2 Degrees, Clinton, Gore, and other unnamed governors, bureaucrats, special interests, bureaucracies (including losing $2M because of Clinton’s dishonesty). There was absolutely no way to determine whether this was a scam or not back in 2009, and when the data came out that they WERE suppressing contradictory data, they destroyed faith in the science going forward. Since then, we’ve learned that the models are improving but not anywhere near the projections. And that population adaptation as we continue sub-replacement reproduction, natural pollution reduction that accompanies wealth, plus conversion to nuclear alone will likely settle the matter before the dramatic predictions take place.
    So I have enough personal experience with these people that I agree we’re increasing the temperature independent of solar, orbital, and tilt cycles, but ‘trust the science’ is done with not only there but in most fields.
    I spend (my organization spends) far too much time filtering bad science.
    And we have done too much work on academic publishing reform legislation to do anything other than take practical measures rather than fall in to funding false promise of extremes.

    Reply addressees: @roberto_mst @RichardDawkins


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-13 04:38:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856557150891585537

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856551226067886450

  • I love women (look at my relationship history). It’s simply a function of not up

    I love women (look at my relationship history). It’s simply a function of not updating our laws to suppress female antisocial, anti-economic, and anti-political warfare as equally as we have the male, whether that feminine warfare is conducted by the biology that evolved it (women) a group that specializes in it (the middle eastern religions), those who express it (cognitively feminine males), or those who use it for commercial, status, and political gains – as a means of manipulation and deception and especially false promise of freedom from responsibility and accountability.

    Reply addressees: @Diasporalgargoy


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-13 03:35:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856541295877206018

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856535231789924747

  • What war did we start rather than seek to settle? How do americans live off anyo

    What war did we start rather than seek to settle? How do americans live off anyone else? Explain it. We have, since the end of the second world war, sought to stop the spread of the plague of communism, stop the spread of its reformation in it’s adoption by islamic fundamentalism, continued the program of ending empires of conquest by fostering responsible cooperation between nation states, and done so by baiting people into international market cooperation and free trade that has lifted the world out of poverty. And we have done it at the expense of the american worker. When we try to withdraw from policing world human rights, borders, finance, and free trade, everyone other than the remaining empires begs us not to. No one wants the american order to end. They want us to end ‘woke’, riding on it, and they want us to soften our use of the economic power of the dollar and sanctions to let them ally with the remaining empires when it suits them. Look at europe terrified that they have to carry their own weight. Look at all the countries that talk trash in public but in private say that they will have an economic and political catastrophe without american defense of finance transport trade and international law.

    The reason americans want to stop is that you’re thankless. No more american lives, no more american jobs, no more american technology gifts, no more spent on those who are thankless for our burden.

    So Trump is stopping it. And the truth is, whether you know it or not, the USA will profit the more chaos that results. The more wars that result. The less trade that results. The more military buildup that results. The better off the USA. Because we are energy and trade autarkic, live on a vast island defended by seas, and have a government for whatever faults it has, that defends property so that private sectors can organize witout fear of governmetn intrusion.

    Reply addressees: @NarataStudio @RichardDawkins


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-13 02:51:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856530347355451392

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856523956800352607

  • It was a deterrent. It was meant to stop them from coming. It was a good idea. B

    It was a deterrent. It was meant to stop them from coming. It was a good idea. But as you suggest the deterrence was insufficient and so the consequences of separation outmoded the strategy.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-13 00:50:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856499881973821619

    Reply addressees: @annaclarity1 @RichardDawkins

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856497679523844252

  • WHY THEY STILL SEPARATE CHILDREN AND WHY THERE ARE CAGES REASONING The policy of

    WHY THEY STILL SEPARATE CHILDREN AND WHY THERE ARE CAGES

    REASONING
    The policy of separating children from their parents at the U.S. border was part of the Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” approach to immigration enforcement, which began in 2018.

    Here are the main reasons cited for this policy:

    Deterrence: The policy was initially framed as a deterrent to illegal immigration. The idea was that if the consequence of illegal entry included family separation, fewer families would attempt to cross the border illegally.

    Prosecution of Parents: Under the zero-tolerance policy, all adults crossing the border illegally were to be criminally prosecuted. Since children cannot be held in criminal facilities, they were separated from their parents for this reason.

    Verification of Relationships: There was indeed an aspect where officials needed to verify the familial relationship between adults and children due to concerns over human trafficking, smuggling, and the use of children by unrelated adults to gain entry or better treatment in the immigration process. This verification process sometimes led to separations when the relationship couldn’t be immediately confirmed.

    Logistical and Legal Challenges: The separation also occurred because of logistical issues, such as insufficient family detention facilities, and due to legal interpretations of how to handle minors under laws like the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008, which mandates special handling for unaccompanied minors.

    However, the implementation of this policy led to widespread criticism for causing significant trauma to children, for lacking adequate procedures to track and reunite families, and for not having a comprehensive plan for reunification post-separation. The policy was reversed in June 2018 via an executive order, but the reunification process has been complex and ongoing, with some children still not reunited with their parents years later due to various reasons including parents being deported without their children.

    The policy of family separation as a deterrent for illegal immigration was officially ended by an executive order in June 2018. However, here are some key points regarding its current status:

    Legal Prohibition: A federal judge has prohibited the separation of migrant families at the U.S. border for eight years as part of a settlement, aimed to prevent the reimplementation of family separations for deterrence purposes. This prohibition was set to last until December 2031.

    Limited Circumstances: Separations can still occur, but under very limited circumstances. These include situations where there’s suspicion of child abuse, if the parent is convicted of serious crimes, or if there are doubts about the familial relationship between the adult and child.

    Ongoing Separations: Despite the formal end of the policy, there have been reports and instances where family separations have continued to occur, sometimes due to misinterpretations of the policy, new policies like Title 42 which led to children being sent back alone if their families were expelled, or when children are deemed unaccompanied due to various reasons like the lack of immediate proof of kinship.

    Reunification Efforts: The Biden administration has been working on reuniting families who were separated under the Trump policy, with some success, but there are still children who remain separated from their parents, many of whom were deported without their children.

    Public and Legal Scrutiny: The practice and its aftereffects continue to be a point of contention, legal battles, and public discourse, focusing on human rights, immigration policy, and the welfare of migrant children.

    While the policy as it was under the Trump administration has been legally curtailed, the broader issues of family unity, verification of relationships at the border, and how children are handled in immigration processes remain complex and subject to ongoing policy adjustments and legal oversight.

    Reply addressees: @annaclarity1 @RichardDawkins


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-13 00:48:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856499368003809280

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856497679523844252

  • Sorry munchkin but you know, I run a legal think tank. The most aggressive punis

    Sorry munchkin but you know, I run a legal think tank. The most aggressive punishment for that same violation was 100 dollars in the past. It is a victimless crime. The two incidents (hooker, banks) were both victimless crimes with all parties satisfied, and who would if presented with the opportunity do so again.

    There is zero chance any case against trump will stand appeal. It’s just an attempt to interfere in the election by means of lawfare.

    I’m just surprised it’s held on this long. And I’m quite certain that those who violated the law by using lawfare of this nature will be punished for it within the year.

    You are just another well meaning person who is too ignorant of these matters and so is easily fooled by shallow words.

    Reply addressees: @gspeth @RichardDawkins


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-13 00:03:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856488128628068352

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856484224691515626

  • No more foreign wars – especially for those who free ride on our defense

    No more foreign wars – especially for those who free ride on our defense.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-13 00:01:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856487437368987735

    Reply addressees: @Frederi65567491 @RichardDawkins

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856484418153574905

  • Yes without question, as he’s largely responsible for the election of prosecutor

    Yes without question, as he’s largely responsible for the election of prosecutors who will not prosecute criminals. Soros is an evil person who hates mankind but hates europeans most of all.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-12 04:04:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856186232247845048

    Reply addressees: @realTrumpNewsX

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856019187891622055

  • My reaction: Put them in jail

    My reaction: Put them in jail.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-12 01:31:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856147887241212382

    Reply addressees: @TRUMP_ARMY_

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1855613605544431833

  • It will be a fight but he has the court and both houses, so at some point people

    It will be a fight but he has the court and both houses, so at some point people won’t be paid, and at some other point he’ll just use one of the services to lock the place down, shut off the power, and remove all the furniture and equipment.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-11 20:54:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856078048296349725

    Reply addressees: @Lukas__Zeman

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856076293348942125