@brannon1776 Minorities cannot cause change by boycott unless it can be coupled with ostracizaton (canceling).
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-13 00:54:16 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107091489995660322
@brannon1776 Minorities cannot cause change by boycott unless it can be coupled with ostracizaton (canceling).
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-13 00:54:16 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107091489995660322
The concept of training men in natural law (P-Law) and martial arts, and running a security firm has legs – if combined with low-cost housing (dorms). This results in a sort of Epicurean Monastery of a soldiery. It would be impossible for other firms to compete.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-12 13:55:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1447923909098156037
MEN DOING THEIR JOB: CONTROLING KARENS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anNXTinSJyY
This is how it’s done.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-12 13:35:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1447918895122239495
Be careful what you say.
It’s my body I can do what I want: Seduction.
It’s my polity I can do what I want: Force.
The only solution is suppression of our weapons of anti-social behavior. Men devote aggression to sport, biz, war.
Women devote aggression to beauty, family, society
The polity is the male means of reproductive control.
The body is the female means of reproductive control.
This reciprocity has made our evolution possible despite the vast differences in our reproductive interests and resulting cognitive, emotional, and instinctual differences.
In this sense, females are reproductively individualistic but socially egalitarian, and males are reproductively egalitarian and socially individualistic.
These are the necessary differences that require amelioration by reciprocity (Trade) rather than service of either exterme.
We are just ‘liberating’ sex differences in instincts by not making use of the period of malleability to compromise between the sexes that should and does maximize in the teens.
We are delaying our period of marriage to the point of exhaustion of our adaptability without recognizing that the utility of early marrage between supporting extended families maximizes our adaptation to one another with minimum ‘bait’ into selfishness.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-11 16:34:52 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107083864000218823
We cannot tolerate the truth because the truth requires we pay the cost of defense, and we all seek to free-ride on sunk costs like defense (which is why military service must be universal). We do not want to pay the social costs of defense of institutions of cultural production.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-11 16:20:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1447597961488343044
Be careful what you say.
It’s my body I can do what I want: Seduction.
It’s my polity I can do what I want: Force.
The only solution is suppression of our weapons of anti-social behavior. Men devote aggression to sport, biz, war.
Women devote aggression to beauty, family, society
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-11 16:08:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1447594903983345671
8. We allowed a competing completely inverse and hostile elite, and enfranchised their natural genetic audience into economy and polity, without equally suppressing the female method of anti-social behavior in our laws and institutions. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1447580318781820932
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-11 15:11:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1447580727701381121
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1447580318781820932
It took me a long time to evolve all the way from inclusion to seduction in weapons of coercion. But that’s the first cause of feminine coercion.
……………..Bribery<->Trade
……………./………………….\
Seduction<->Care……Force<->Defense
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-09 14:43:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446848828045463552
The difference is it’s a ‘maybe’ vs an ‘or else’.
The threat is necessary
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-09 14:02:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446838583701217282
Reply addressees: @MichaelSurrago
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446806243151073280
That’s intellectually dishonest.
There is a case to be made for the vaccine.
There is a case to be made against it.
It’s undecidable.
So the solution is choice.
Violation of choice is political.
Some cog biases favor the herd.
They follow their instinct just like you do.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-09 03:13:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446675063927971840
Reply addressees: @hoeberian @VeritateIn
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446671758321459200