Theme: Coercion

  • It won’t take nukes. It will take conventional forces, and about three months, a

    It won’t take nukes. It will take conventional forces, and about three months, and he will install a puppet government in kiev, and simply endure ten or tewenty years of insurgency against the puppet government and russian insurgents.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-29 21:56:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1487545307369979909

    Reply addressees: @PaulWartenberg @soonergrunt @JasonKirell

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1487542739248070660

  • 2022.01.29 Teaching P Law Pt 7 – Incremental Suppression

    2022.01.29 Teaching P Law Pt 7 – Incremental Suppression

    https://youtu.be/CF_F1TCZwVo


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-29 19:58:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1487515490419359747

  • 2) There are only three means of human coercion (seduction, exchange, force) ->

    2) There are only three means of human coercion (seduction, exchange, force) -> three sets of institutions (religion, contract law, state) -> the sequence of institutions determines the hierarchy of influence.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-28 02:20:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486886775104716808

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486886773846384640


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    Yes.
    1) ME did not develop trifunctionalism because despite the center of world trade, the supply of a sequence of ‘hill people, desert people, then steppe people’ caused rotation of conqueres of concentrated capital production along the rivers preventing trust formation.
    … https://twitter.com/elbanna101/status/1486818087210995717

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1486886773846384640

  • @Weiss_Drache Does anyone really deny that the camps existed, that they were imi

    @Weiss_Drache

    Does anyone really deny that the camps existed, that they were imitations of the Jewish bolshevik use of camps of Russia, or that the prisoners were put to work as forced labor, or that by the end of the war the prisoners were starved to death or murdered in large numbers because the state decided no longer to pay for their maintenance and care?

    As far as I know the only debate is over whether the jews were practicing corruption by the usurpation of institutions of cultural production (as they had repeatedly elsewhere), whether the numbers of dead were dramatized, whether or not there was use of gas chambers, whether the original intent was relocation or extermination, and that the natural economics of any such program by a country losing a war would be to maximize resources directed to the people and military rather than ‘undesirables’, resulting in the camps we saw at the end of the war.

    In other words, who is being honest or dishonest? what is the truth. The truth is rather obvious from the evidence. The untruth is rather obvious from t he evidence, and the motivated reasoning, and motivated propaganda. AFAIK every objector is just demanding the truth. (And yes, there may be some fking crazies who deny it all, just as there are crazies that fictionalize it all. )

    As far as I can tell when the postwar generation has died off, which will occur shortly, the public understanding will adjust to the evidence, and the evidence is pretty clear that camps were created with the intent of relocation, that the war caused need for slave labor, then drove deprivation, starvation, and killings. That smaller numbers died than claimed. That postwar propaganda was used for political purposes. That the Germans were organizing to prevent the expansion of Jewish bolshevism from Russia into Germany (and anglo liberalism as well). That the postwar jewish marxists moved from germany to the usa and converted from class warfare that caused russian and german conflict, to race warfare that caused broader european and american social conflict. As such, there was no different intention of a purge of the jews this time than any other, or any different from the exit of the Moors from Spain, and that the original rather optimistic nature of the camps degenerated as the war pressed on for rather ordinary reasons that would occur and have occurred in history as resources are depleted.

    As far as I know, that’s the empirical evidence, and it’s all rational, it’s not dramatic, or especially ‘evil’ at all. It’s nothing compared to the Albegentsian crusades, the Inquisition, or even the protestant use of claims of witchcraft as a proxy for continuing the dominance of Protestantism over catholicism and other ‘heretics’.

    ( continued in next comment … )


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 19:48:41 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107696155632141287

  • @WesternChauvinist1 The FBI (who I have more experience with than I’d like) cons

    @WesternChauvinist1 The FBI (who I have more experience with than I’d like) consists of an overloaded minority of competent guys who follow orders, and a not-so-competent majority of ‘cops’ who do the footwork – often on loan from local and state police departments who hire avg IQ of just 105.

    Most crime isn’t difficult. I’ve organized prosecution with postal, justice, fbi, and irs, and you know, it’s actually pretty hard to get them to act on someone. The crimes they need to solve are those that remove the career criminals and networks from society. Or those criminals that threaten the illusion of government control, and public safety – almost all of which is cultural, not admnistrative.

    The problem in my experience (much like working with justice, vs intel, vs DOD) is that like the rest of life, you end up dealing with the nitwits who want to show that they have the metal to climb the ladder into midwits which their intellect prevents them from, and they engage by throwing you into ‘the process’ with other nitwits and midwits, and the people with talent work on what really matters.

    So the few competent people provide the illusion of competency at the extremes while the nitwits and midwids use process to grind the population like every other bureaucracy. And this is just another example of why the ‘professional bureaucracy’ theory fails when the demographic distribution of the population can no longer supply the ratio of competent people the job requres – because the population is oversupplying people who are nitwits and midwits.

    (Yes I have worked for or with Justice, CIA, and DOD – as well as a good number of the Fortune 150.)


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 04:27:31 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107692533432125517

  • @Teamsaveamerica It’s because you’re dumb fucks that piss on any adult discourse

    @Teamsaveamerica It’s because you’re dumb fucks that piss on any adult discourse. The fact that you can mass a thousand yipping infantile morons to destroy a conversation and cancel someone is evidence that you’re using the same strategy of the enemy. As such you’re no better than the enemy. Because the whole purpose the rest of us are seeking is to prohibit the strategy of the enemy: the female method of warfare by gossiping, shaming, rallying, ridiculing, psychologizing, morlizing, othering, cancelling, doxxing, reputation destruction, denial of science and reality,and worse, you add superstitious nonsense to the pile of idiocy. In other words, we can’t restore our civilization because you’re simply amplifying the enemy’s strategy of political influenc einstead of replacing it by restoring adult conversation, informing, education, adapting, transforming, maturing, and evolving agency in the population. That’s what’s necessary for our civilization. You’re the enemy too. “The Optics Morons”


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 02:26:41 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107692058295107858

  • @Teamsaveamerica It’s because you’re dumb fucks that piss on any adult discourse

    @Teamsaveamerica It’s because you’re dumb fucks that piss on any adult discourse. The fact that you can mass a thousand yipping infantile morons to destroy a conversation and cancel someone is evidence that you’re using the same strategy of the enemy. As such you’re no better than the enemy. Because the whole purpose the rest of us are seeking is to prohibit the strategy of the enemy: the female method of warfare by gossiping, shaming, rallying, ridiculing, psychologizing, morlizing, othering, cancelling, doxxing, reputation destruction, denial of science and reality,and worse, you add superstitious nonsense to the pile of idiocy. In other words, we can’t restore our civilization because you’re simply amplifying the enemy’s strategy of political influenc einstead of replacing it by restoring adult conversation, informing, education, adapting, transforming, maturing, and evolving agency in the population. That’s what’s necessary for our civilization. You’re the enemy too.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 02:26:21 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107692057011213191

  • Russia murdered millions of ukrainians in the past. I’ve met dozens of people wh

    Russia murdered millions of ukrainians in the past. I’ve met dozens of people who have had realatives ‘disappear’. Russia invaded ukraine by deceptive means. Russian agents frequently commit terrorist acts against ukrainians. RU was moving in thousands of troops on the 18th.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-25 18:31:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486044036452470793

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2 @FaXistic

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486043177190850562

  • So Russia fked it up, by invading and conquering with deception and little green

    So Russia fked it up, by invading and conquering with deception and little green men, and terrorism against the people, and destruction of Ukraine’s army and government – when we wanted to get rid of them and would have done it for a discount on gas prices alone.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-25 18:24:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486042343144894464

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2 @FaXistic

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486042060549509128


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Lord_Keynes2 @FaXistic The unstated issue here is that (a) we (including myself as a Ukrainian resident) wanted to get rid of eastern ukraine b4 2014 anyway because we thought of the Russians there as the equivalent of USA’s “white trash”. (b) but Ukraine also needs port access to the black sea.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1486042060549509128

  • You mean, who shows up, gets others to show up,has a strategy and plan for victo

    You mean, who shows up, gets others to show up,has a strategy and plan for victory, shows how not to take the bait, to embrace the Ghandi strategy disempowering the enemy and depriving the enemy of power. I just sweat a lot doing it. 😉
    You canceled us for showing how it’s done.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-25 17:43:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486031891178430466

    Reply addressees: @Shorbie9 @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486029063806455819