Theme: Coercion

  • Secuction <> Exchange <> Force Those who pray <> those who work <> those who fig

    Secuction <> Exchange <> Force
    Those who pray <> those who work <> those who fight
    Female <> ascendent male <> dominant male
    communism <> libertarianism <> authoritarianism

    and a mlllion further variations


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-12 04:05:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1492348998988013570

    Reply addressees: @GovtIssue1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1492330630645903361

  • @BasedTreecko Imagine the middle east factionaism, house to house, all sorts of

    @BasedTreecko Imagine the middle east factionaism, house to house, all sorts of assassinations, fires everywhere, bombings, baiting first responders into traps so that the refuse to act, making it impossible for military forces to create order by forcing them to stay in their camps, and the inabiilty to govern, not the north and south of our past civil war. And if it gets out of hand the destruction of bridges, rail lines, creating peril of takeoff and landing, and as a last resort, fuel, gas, and electricity – and making it impossible to repair what’s destroyed. This is the present generation of warfare. Now, imagine that you think nazis are gonna take over, vs you imagine that someone is offering a solution to the problem that makes most people happy. Will the population burn the financial sector, federal government employees, and the academy and media instead of letting the country go down? Of course they will.

    BTW: this isn’t my prediction. It’s what the best people in the country have predicted.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-11 23:08:05 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107781874330254177

  • @Snidely_Whiplash @LegionnaireBear @Black_Rabbi @RenegadeScoutr @voxday We don’t

    @Snidely_Whiplash@LegionnaireBear@Black_Rabbi@RenegadeScoutr@voxday

    We don’t give a criminal the choice of opinion, once convicted, as you have been then you are subject to the sentencing, restitution, and punishment for your crimes against mankind by your lies.

    You don’t need to ‘accept’ your conviction or sentencing. Your opinion doesn’t matter.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 19:24:22 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769670040105507

  • And I don’t like it. I don’t like it at all. It means our entry of women into wo

    And I don’t like it. I don’t like it at all. It means our entry of women into work, media, politics without constraining their antisocial behavior (as we have of men) combined with the J-problem of industrializing it, is even worse than we thought. and INCURABLE.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-07 23:52:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1490835772010037248

    Reply addressees: @Blooo12901107

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1490835151244333056


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Blooo12901107 I”m going to test it out in a video soon. It’ll take me a few tries to explain it correctly and clearly. But it means the evidence that women are more aggressive and ‘mean’ than men is true, and that claims of ‘care’ are masks for externalizing costs. ie: everything is deception.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1490835151244333056

  • The problem: it’s probably as genetic as female behavior is genetic in females.

    The problem: it’s probably as genetic as female behavior is genetic in females. If that’s as true as it appears from all the evidence then we have to outlaw female antisocial behavior which changes the nature of law itself. High cost for women in the polity, workplace, media.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-07 21:17:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1490796777183879172

    Reply addressees: @Aaronyourface

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1490796273443786753

  • Boost of @WesternChauvinist1 No, brown shirts were created because communists an

    Boost of @WesternChauvinist1 No, brown shirts were created because communists and Antifa were assassinating and beating Nationalists in the streets of weimar Germany. The National Socialists faced the same tyranny we do today, and they organized against it and won their country back for a brief time.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-07 04:33:38 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107754875467711195

  • Because crypto is an engine of voluntary transfer. The question is how we ensure

    Because crypto is an engine of voluntary transfer. The question is how we ensure the relation between any claim of title, to the external world enforcement of title. As such crypto coins are convertible into real-world assets. But expansion of crypto depends on ensuring titles.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-06 22:56:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1490459339437477888

    Reply addressees: @Lord__Sousa @bryanbrey @LukeWeinhagen @bierlingm

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1490453174943199240

  • RE: TRUCKERS IN THE STATES? Yes. Truckers + Linemen and its over. Just because y

    RE: TRUCKERS IN THE STATES?

    Yes. Truckers + Linemen and its over.

    Just because you bring it up: The strategic ‘crippling’ of the federal government is route 95 from south of Richmond va to the maryland border. I’d published a few examples of how to do it, resulting in the FBI in my kitchen.

    While we think of DC as key, most of the critical infrastructure a revolution movement would be interested in is in and around Richmond. That includes certain ‘axis of evil’ data centers, telecom centers, and the federal reserve branch, and is within reach of the majority of media and ngo’s that are operating the postwar project to destroy our instituions, culture, and genetics.

    Hence my strategic interest in Richmond.

    There are three civil-war weak points in the US.
    1. DC-Richmond
    2. Denver
    3. The State of Texas as a whole.

    The secessionist weak points in the are
    1. the northwest (nw ports)
    2. the center from texas to alberta (gulf ports)
    But, the strategic weakness of gulf ports is equal to the south china sea.

    No I don’t do details, but I assume those who know me understand that winning a civil war is not difficult. The question is doing it by demonizing the federal government, the globalists, the financial, media, and academic sectors. (Not that their recent over-reach hasn’t caused a backlash already) And not turning the population against any such movement, but offering the population a solution to the problems unleashed by the prosperity of modernity.

    The right fucks up that last point at every opportunity. IT’s easy not to fuck it up. But the right fucks it up every single time at every single opportunity. And without a leader to stop the right from fucking it up every single time at every single opportunity, I don’t see any chance of victory. Because the right is presently (and likely always) in its present state of incompetence, a greater threat to the center majority than the left and the status quo.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-06 15:28:24 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107751755233879722

  • @Dessi @Afterrthought @ramzpaul @kingofallnads @CounterCurrents Just because you

    @Dessi@Afterrthought@ramzpaul@kingofallnads @CounterCurrents

    Just because you bring it up: The strategic ‘crippling’ of the federal government is route 95 from south of Richmond va to the maryland border. I’d published a few examples of how to do it, resulting in the FBI in my kitchen.

    While we think of DC as key, most of the critical infrastructure a revolution movement would be interested in is in and around Richmond. That includes certain ‘axis of evil’ data centers, telecom centers, and the federal reserve branch, and is within reach of the majority of media and ngo’s that are operating the postwar project to destroy our instituions, culture, and genetics.

    Hence my strategic interest in Richmond.

    There are three civil-war weak points in the US.
    1. DC-Richmond
    2. Denver
    3. The State of Texas as a whole.

    The secessionist weak points in the are
    1. the northwest (nw ports)
    2. the center from texas to alberta (gulf ports)
    But, the strategic weakness of gulf ports is equal to the south china sea.

    No I don’t do details, but I assume those who know me understand that winning a civil war is not difficult. The question is doing it by demonizing the federal government, the globalists, the financial, media, and academic sectors. (Not that their recent over-reach hasn’t caused a backlash already) And not turning the population against any such movement, but offering the population a solution to the problems unleashed by the prosperity of modernity.

    The right fucks up that last point at every opportunity. IT’s easy not to fuck it up. But the right fucks it up every single time at every single opportunity. And without a leader to stop the right from fucking it up every single time at every single opportunity, I don’t see any chance of victory. Because the right is presently (and likely always) in its present state of incompetence, a greater threat to the center majority than the left and the status quo.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-06 15:27:32 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107751751827668285

  • The problem is people who want power. And there are groups, tribes, enthnicities

    The problem is people who want power.
    And there are groups, tribes, enthnicities that want to preserve advantage by power. And they will give people who want power that power.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-06 04:06:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1490175107926474755

    Reply addressees: @DavidOgbu17 @AdetolaOlutosin

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1490174494631211008