The violence of a T90 exploding is terrifying.
(Why is RU using lone armor for patrol? It’s like the “pick-me” tactic of war.)
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-12 19:16:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1569404495792054276
Theme: Coercion
-
The violence of a T90 exploding is terrifying. (Why is RU using lone armor for p
-
I think the correct interpretation is that Christianity spread through women and
I think the correct interpretation is that Christianity spread through women and slaves, and was the first political organization that caused women to defect from males, undermining aristocratic tradition, values, institutions, creating organized opposition to the IE expansion. https://twitter.com/CCallaicus/status/1569372299811332097
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-12 17:20:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1569375438983647234
-
What you mean is you demand a via positiva unification of incentives and rewards
What you mean is you demand a via positiva unification of incentives and rewards, and that you presume your instinct that such a monopoly would be as desirable for others as for you. But via critique you don’t propose an alternative subject to equal criticism (you decieve).
😉
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-11 19:56:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1569052288060215299
Reply addressees: @AndIlkley @cavaller_humil @raff_karva @Anoraky4Cymru
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1569047687395442688
-
@Humbledozer @Afterrthought @AffirmativeRight @JFGariepy @occdissent @AndrewAngl
@Humbledozer@Afterrthought@AffirmativeRight@JFGariepy@occdissent@AndrewAnglin@kingofallnads
Stop reading propaganda. I know people in Azov. No such evidence.
RU couldn’t carpet bomb anything. RU is reserving planes (a) too many are non-functional (b) too few pilots have too little air time b/c RU can’t afford training costs, (c) jets are 100m each instead of 5M each for tanks etc. (b) they need them to defend Moscow and st Petersburg if nato response to RU aggression.
All they can do is resort to nukes. RU army is a paper tiger. US fear since March has been that US alone would destroy entire RU military in under five days, but this would cause RU nuke retaliation. Use of nukes means the end of RU civilization. So US/UA Strategy has been to exhaust them instead. It’s been working. UA has just executed one of the best strategic maneuvers since the second world war. They have Nato training, nato weapons, Nato signal intelligence, and their own morale and incentives.No one is stupid enough to use nukes – though I can see a future with Taiwan-China and Israel-Iran exchanging nukes.
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-11 18:45:36 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/108981252018444152
-
2.What you are reacting to is your presumption that such non-imposition is natur
2.What you are reacting to is your presumption that such non-imposition is natural, combined with your preference that the commons produced by family, clan, and tribe, are exclusively for the benefit of one’s family clan and tribe – not for that of others.
“ie: America first” etc
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-11 18:01:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1569023227590053893
Reply addressees: @cavaller_humil @AndIlkley @raff_karva @Anoraky4Cymru
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1569021749022318598
-
1.Familism, Clannism, Tribalism in context refers to the willingness to aggress
1.Familism, Clannism, Tribalism in context refers to the willingness to aggress against non-near-kin, sufficiently to prohibit the formation of a polity, manners, ethics, morals, and norms, that allow for the productivity of a commons and division of labor w/low transaction cost.
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-11 17:59:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1569022816237887489
Reply addressees: @cavaller_humil @AndIlkley @raff_karva @Anoraky4Cymru
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1569021749022318598
-
Would you be willing to produce a libertarian world by authoritarian application
Would you be willing to produce a libertarian world by authoritarian application of aggressive eugenics, necessary to produce mildly autistic, highly neotenic, non-aggression whether by reproductive limits and demands, or direct genetic manipulation?
I’m not. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1568971973388025856
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-11 14:39:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1568972560544550915
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1568971973388025856
-
Just coming back to this because it’s actually a beautiful aesthetic – if it wer
Just coming back to this because it’s actually a beautiful aesthetic – if it were only possible. It’s possible through aggressive eugenics. Would you be willing to forcibly implement aggressive eugenics (limits to reproduction for some and demand for reproduction from others)?
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-11 14:37:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1568971973388025856
Reply addressees: @phi50 @PhilipProudfoot
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1568663227609018370
-
Note that UA has adopted (or been trained to adopt) US strategy of minimizing en
Note that UA has adopted (or been trained to adopt) US strategy of minimizing enemy casualties, by the destruction of command, control, storage, supply, and transport – especially their will. (Surprised me).
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-11 04:28:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1568818846663933954
-
You are probably one of the many well-meaning ‘fools’ who are too lacking in cou
You are probably one of the many well-meaning ‘fools’ who are too lacking in courage conviction and solutions to suppress the current version of the bolshevik revolution in the west, and hold the folly that RU authoritarianism, despite its failures, is daddy coming to save you.
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-11 01:53:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1568779839796310018
Reply addressees: @SalientQuips_ @ElectionWiz @TruthSpasmMedia
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1568777978154463232