Theme: Class

  • Well, they have A Class, they just don’t have Class. 😉 WHAT DOES ‘HAVING CLASS”

    Well, they have A Class, they just don’t have Class. 😉

    WHAT DOES ‘HAVING CLASS” MEAN?

    –“Having class is a phrase that refers to displaying good manners, being respectful and considerate of others, and having a certain level of sophistication and elegance in one’s behavior and appearance. It is often associated with a high level of social grace and refinement.”–

    What’s Missing:
    “The observable effects of behaving with responsibiilty, intention, and deliberiate decision, in demonstrating excellence within one’s capacities.”

    ie: It means you are no risk because you demonstrate exhaustive self regulation.

    Reply addressees: @ThruTheHayes @Hrafnskall @alsey_miller @PaulGottfried6 @ConceptualJames


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-20 20:32:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671254828205453312

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671253179038846978

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @Hrafnskall @alsey_miller @PaulGottfried6 @ConceptualJames “I

    RT @curtdoolittle: @Hrafnskall @alsey_miller @PaulGottfried6 @ConceptualJames “IM NOT AN EQUALITARIAN. CLASSES MATTER. THIS IS WHY:”
    I am a…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-20 20:23:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671252399103832065

  • (yes) Or at least after the middle class arose

    (yes) Or at least after the middle class arose.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-20 20:20:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671251736466432001

    Reply addressees: @patriciamdavis

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671251304407240704

  • “IM NOT AN EQUALITARIAN. CLASSES MATTER. THIS IS WHY:” I am an Anglo (English) A

    “IM NOT AN EQUALITARIAN. CLASSES MATTER. THIS IS WHY:”
    I am an Anglo (English) American, of the upper middle classes, of New England Puritain descent, and before that the upper middle class of educated property owning classes in Central Western England, and before that of the same class in Avranches Normandy which is our oldest recorded history in the early part of the eleventh century (1000ad).

    As such, I am also a product of that legalistic, and as such empirical, scientific, and logical tradition. In other words I’m a scientist. In that sense my ‘religion’ is truth. I am a product of the empirical restoration of pre-christian reason, and not of the continental (french) optimism of the ‘enlightenment’.

    That is why my work seeks to save our people from another dark age of religious superstition whether another supernatural or the present pseudoscientific, by the use of truth to prevent and reverse the present ‘acts of conquest by conversion’ that repeat the destruction of the west by the jews and christians, and the present attempt by jews and muslims.

    Though I do observe loyalty and respect for the lower classes who of necessity need less demanding means of comprehension of life and the world around them, and the mindfulness that results from the sensation of comprehension no matter how much it diverges from consistency and correspondencde with the laws of nature.

    I’m loyal to you ‘folks’ because I was brought up in the culture of noblesse oblige: the obligations of the natural aristocracy to care for the common people.

    That does not mean I must hold to the comforting superstitions and falsehoods that commoners find necessary and with which you identify potential allies in class cooperation – an act which I would find vulgar in the traditional meaning of the term: beneath me, and a property of the comon classes.

    Ergo european culture is not homogenous but includes class differences, as much or perhaps more so than even the Hindu – though we open that aristocracy, middle class, working class to the lower classes for rotation by mertitocracy whenever it’s possible.

    In anglo civilization, of west germanic civilization, of germanic civilization, in the long history of european civilization, we practice aristocratic egalitarianism not equality, and any and all demonstrations and expressions of equality are only expressions of loyalty between the classes out of Noblesse Oblige: respect and care for doing your duty to the best of your ability for the benefit of all of us.

    Get over it.

    Classes matter as much as races and sexes. Ignoring classes is what causes the friction between the classes because we are not and cannot be equal in other than duty to one another in production and defense of private and common, within the limits of our abilities and competencies. We can neither demand the lower classes express the agency of the upper, nor demand the upper diminish themselves to the behavior and intersts of the lower.

    “ita finitur lectio.”
    Thus ends the lesson

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle

    Reply addressees: @Hrafnskall @alsey_miller @PaulGottfried6 @ConceptualJames


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-20 19:59:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671246497436909571

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671237937210556417

  • Yes, well now we have the other dimension of the new right european christian ‘p

    Yes, well now we have the other dimension of the new right european christian ‘peasantry’ vs the progressive new england christian upper middle class (lower aristocracy). So everyone makes the same mistake: what works for their class and historical political bias, they assume is generalizable. When, in fact, classes have and always will follow the same spectrum that corresponds to capacity for responsibility and systematizing.

    Reply addressees: @alex_raynor1968


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-20 12:19:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671130543813951488

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671127515467849728

  • “Either the Communists win and destroy America, or we destroy the Communists,” (

    “Either the Communists win and destroy America, or we destroy the Communists,” (seemingly referring to democrats) — Trump

    via Yarvin.

    Curtis is jewish-american so he blames the new england progressives. Just as european americans blame jewish americans and jewish europeans for socialism , communism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, anti-family feminism, and Woke race marxism. Both christian and jewish do-goodery have similar roots, in the feminine abrahamic religions. But progressivism was an american interpretation of communism and socialism, but coming from the christian tradition and noblesse oblige, it was eugenic and productive and capitalizing not dysgenic and by subsidy and undermining. It was after all progressives that invented eugenics, and maintained the ethnic homogeneity of the country.

    I don’t care about ethnicity and religion even if perhaps I should, but I do care about the left in all it’s stripes, destroying america.

    And we must destroy them forever.
    And we know how.
    And it will take a french revolution to do so, not an american.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-20 11:42:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671121416740130816

  • RT @EPoe187: The elimination of merit will not eradicate status hierarchies. It

    RT @EPoe187: The elimination of merit will not eradicate status hierarchies. It will merely make them more arbitrary and nepotistic, vulner…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-18 11:14:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670389500541796352

  • Think of it this way: the smart fraction determines competitiveness, and the rat

    Think of it this way: the smart fraction determines competitiveness, and the ration between them and the rest of the population determines the general advantage or drag on it.

    We have something like 170M Europeans who have on average a 100-103 IQ depending upon the original ethnic group. Japan has 125M. They have an advantage in smart fraction over us. AND they’re a homogenous high trust culture.

    Think of India. 1.3B people and eight times our population, but an IQ (debated) of 76 (max 83). That means despite a much lower IQ (more than a standard deviation at least, as high as 1.6 lower. But they produce an absurd number of people over 125 anyway, because of the size of the population. And despite that they have trouble governing and producing an economy because of the drag.

    We can’t trust any numbers coming out of China, and academic performance in US universities show their academic records are largely nonsense. We don’t even really know their population. It looks vastly overstated. We know that aside from government ‘leaders’ and a few elites they’re desperately poor. Even so with that population they are producing CITIES of engineers.

    Reply addressees: @MudKevin


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-18 02:18:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670254658718257152

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670251254424158210

  • Q: “ARE THE EDUCATED LESS SMART” (YES) 1) It’s true statistically, and it has to

    Q: “ARE THE EDUCATED LESS SMART” (YES)

    1) It’s true statistically, and it has to be, because in the first part, pre 1960 it required at least a 115 IQ to enter any college, and now it’s possible for people with a 100 IQ and half the population to get into college.

    2) The second is due to the marxification of education in all the behavioral pseudosciences and the liberal (literary) arts, populated with these people. So we are seing the marxificadtion of civilization into pseudoscience, just as the christian’s overhwlemed the greek academies, and ushered in the ages of ignorance and decline.

    3) The third is the marxification of professors who not only seek self aggrandizement, but teach sedition against western civilization’s rule of law and individual responsibility.

    4) The fourth is decline in IQ due to urbanization, asymmetric reproduction, and non-selective imigration.

    5) The fifth is sortition largely due to urbanization and separation of the classes in the work force, which is the deprivation of the working and lower classes of access to the intelligent and educated – and visa versa, the deprivation of the educated from the demands of the lower middle to lower classes.

    6) Worse we are still ‘working off’ (casting off) the institutionalized ignorance of the introgression of semitic, jewish, female magical thinking and pseudoscience into the academy both pre and postwar, not only in marxism but in the assault on rule of law, meritocracy, responsibility by boaz, freud, marx, lewontin and gould, the entire frankfurt(culturla marxism) and postmodern(anti-truth) traditions, the anti family feminists in friedan, the libertarians rand and rothbard, the legal positivists rez, kelsen, dworkin, the mathematicians and physicists cantor, bohr, and einstien. And hundreds more. The two disasters that were ethnically european were both of southern european stock with the hunchback italian Gramsci, and the despondent brazilian Freire.

    So the evidence is that we have the same number of contributors to intellectual progress as we had in 1963 but we have many more people who ‘think’ they are educated.

    I’m not normal, but I eat most PhDs like pringles with beer. Because the academy is an ideological pseudo-religious disaster outside of the stem fields, and even there is questionable.

    No I don’t like working on this subject because it’s depressing and exasperating to realize we are living in an age of new mysticism – a pseudoscientific religious revolt against european civilization because the intellectual, psychological, and emotional demands of european civilization that produce the gains of european civilization are higher than the demands of all other civilizations combined.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @diplodink @digitildream @realdanstilwell


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 13:54:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670067479526232065

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670061562218926081

  • (Maybe. It’s more that the world wars combined with the success of the communist

    (Maybe. It’s more that the world wars combined with the success of the communists and socialists prohibited the brits from overcoming their class status, where almost everyone in the states who has a job and home considers himself middle class and not ‘oppressed’. The british…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 13:35:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670062567509704705

    Reply addressees: @digitildream @realdanstilwell

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670060643204976640