Theme: Class

  • I speak and write as if I don’t respect you because you’re enaging in shaming, w

    I speak and write as if I don’t respect you because you’re enaging in shaming, which is an aritifact of your guilt over your class and culture.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-30 22:33:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674909044463611905

    Reply addressees: @NafetsNez @KonstantinKisin

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674907523202297856

  • You missed the point. I didn’t. Educating you in your instictual, religious, cul

    You missed the point. I didn’t.

    Educating you in your instictual, religious, cultural, and class motivations to react with altuistic punishment against different values, expecially between feminine serf slave values of evading responsibilty for the commons to evade conflict, and masculine aristocratic values of bearing responsibility for the advancement of the commons despite potential conflict, is very likely beyond your capacity and certainly my patience.

    Facts are not a conceit, responsibilty is not a pretense, and arrogance is dependent upon one’s committing an error.

    And worse, the pretense of equality is the most vain of conceits.

    Now good luck in your journey. 😉

    Reply addressees: @NafetsNez @KonstantinKisin


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-30 10:25:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674725894710075392

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674636253395058688

  • It’s an inequality signal. Yes. Some people find inequality signals offensive. Y

    It’s an inequality signal. Yes. Some people find inequality signals offensive. Yet inequality signals are often true. Which is why some people object to them. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-30 04:00:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674629034515345413

    Reply addressees: @NafetsNez @KonstantinKisin

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674627811590680576

  • RT @VivekGRamaswamy: Affirmative action is the single greatest form of instituti

    RT @VivekGRamaswamy: Affirmative action is the single greatest form of institutional racism in America today. The Supreme Court just struck…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-29 17:24:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674468875298123794

  • (Food For Thought) –“One fundamental problem with a purely meritocratic system

    (Food For Thought)
    –“One fundamental problem with a purely meritocratic system in a multi-racial society is that some races will become effectively locked out of positions of power.”–

    Riffing off Jayman’s usual insight:

    In the Western tradition
    1) We prohibit authority, and…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-29 17:10:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674465269719216132

    Reply addressees: @JayMan471

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674440343427620866

  • (Food For Thought) –“One fundamental problem with a purely meritocratic system

    (Food For Thought)
    –“One fundamental problem with a purely meritocratic system in a multi-racial society is that some races will become effectively locked out of positions of power.”–

    Riffing off Jayman’s usual insight:

    In the Western tradition
    1) We prohibit authority, and grand only powers of decidability.
    (This forces us into markets)

    2) So we practice trifunctionalism. With Military(masculine), Religious(feminine), and Law(Neutral) elites where the common (empirical) law (tradition) is the referee.
    (This is a market)

    3) We practice concurrency(not democracy) in decision making. Meaning consensus among the Regions(nobility) and classes (houses).
    (This is a market)

    4) To do so we created houses (markets for concurrency between the classes). We had, and should still have, houses for the classes:
    … i) Monarchy (judge of last resort) for the territory,
    … ii) Nobility(senate) for the region,
    … iii) House of Commons (Property owners(really: businesses)), for the producers
    … iv) Lower House (Church) for women, dependents.
    (These houses constitute a market.)

    5) There is no evidence that multicultural and or multi racial societies can survive given the demographic differences in traits, and the resulting demographic differences in wants and needs for norms, traditions, values, and institutions.
    … a) this is because, with kin preference alone, and demographic differences more so, there will always either be extraction by the more competitive group to the less – directly or indirectly; or there will be redistribution (extraction) from the more competitive group by the less competitive group – and the value of political unity is never offset by extraction.
    … b) So, instead we have had federations of defense and trade because separate states may produce different internal institutions and economies but cooperate extra-politically.
    … c) But, It may be possible to create a house or modify a house to try to maintain concurrency between ethinic and racial groups through political rather than just economic trades.
    … d) but there is no evidence at all, that this experiment would be preferable in any way over returning to pre-civil-war federation of states, just in the European tradition, and in particular the tradition of the holy roman empire that had not just many small states but free cities with even greater flexibility given their international (sometimes hostile) interests vs the rest of the polity.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-29 17:10:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674465269421420564

  • Great question. 1. commercial markets for private production and consumption. 2.

    Great question.
    1. commercial markets for private production and consumption.
    2. legislation as a market between classes for the production of public commons.
    3. courts for the resolution of disputes.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-27 03:26:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1673533138788659202

    Reply addressees: @SClaus1984

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1673529803515764737

  • RT @JayMan471: Actually, ala Gregory Clark, they’re more heavily descended from

    RT @JayMan471: Actually, ala Gregory Clark, they’re more heavily descended from wealthier folks


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-24 00:11:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1672396908868911104

  • PATH TO POWER, REVOLUTION, AND REFORM In a revolution, caused by opposing intere

    PATH TO POWER, REVOLUTION, AND REFORM
    In a revolution, caused by opposing interests, economic inequality, and a parasitic credentialist (clerical) class, with a surplus of single males, entering a period of economic and strategic contraction, crisis is an opportunity, and people in crisis are a resource. 😉

    As I’ve said for over a decade now, this has all be predictable since the early 2000s, because it’s deterministic. And I’ve worked, and our organization has worked to produce a solution preferable to bloodshed. But people will not buy into that solution, even if it’s extremely good for them, on all sides, other than the government bureaucrats, until they understand that the choice *IS* between solution and bloodshed.

    So our mission is to convince enough of the population to demand the solution and its reforms that allow us all to go our own way, pay for doing so, obtain the reward and losses of doing so, before we trip into bloodshed which will include house to house warfare on a scale that we haven’t seen since the reformation’s wars of religion.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-23 16:54:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1672286927423143937

  • “In economic terms, software translates labor into capital. So Marx is rolling o

    –“In economic terms, software translates labor into capital. So Marx is rolling over in his grave right now. Because it’s the complete refutation of his entire theory.” – Marc Andreeson

    Hmmm… I would say that software reduced capital costs to nothing but labor, and as such financing costs, organizing costs, and risks to just labor costs and risks, that can be born by the laborers alone.

    Most capital production requires financing and organizing costs and risks, and laborers don’t share in that contribution or risk – thats why they’re paid whether profit or loss.. Whereas in software, in a startup, the labor (developers) do share in that investment and risk.

    Software isn’t new. It’s just fairly easy to capture value in software vs writing a book.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-22 23:57:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1672031136694902785