Theme: Class

  • I know hollywood and the fashion media were trying to ‘internationalize’ beauty

    I know hollywood and the fashion media were trying to ‘internationalize’ beauty a bit, and are now they’re trying ‘odd’ looks in order to further downmarket to the emerging prole market. Marketing chases those spending on signals and the prole market is now the big source of cheap volume signal revenue.

    But I mean once you’ve seen Anita Ekberg, Grace Kelly, Ann Margaret, Brooke Shields, Charlize Theron, and for good measure, Monica Bellucci, and realize it’s all the math of genetic symmetry, being raised well, and the brains to use what god gave you.

    Now, personally, I go for the more diminutive jaw lines: Hepburn, Sophie Marceau, Megan Fox kinda thing. But I know that’s preference not fact.

    Beauty is a science.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-17 13:34:00 UTC

  • Dude if you want to live in a communist(anarchic), socialist(authoritarian), red

    Dude if you want to live in a communist(anarchic), socialist(authoritarian), redistributivist(center-left), commons-ist (conservative), libertarian (aristocratic), anarchic (diasporic) polity, then I am in total support of YOUR desires as long as you are in equal support of MY desires. But I will tell you that in the end, the first three will suffer because the talent will flee to the second three.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-15 13:24:00 UTC

  • Venezuela is just going from desperate to terrifying. Brazil isn’t all that far

    Venezuela is just going from desperate to terrifying.

    Brazil isn’t all that far behind.

    No one has any idea what to do.

    Modernity cannot compensate for asymmetric classes.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-14 12:37:00 UTC

  • THE CONVERSION OF ANGLO CIVILIZATION FROM PRODUCTIVE AND MORAL TO COMMERCIAL AND

    THE CONVERSION OF ANGLO CIVILIZATION FROM PRODUCTIVE AND MORAL TO COMMERCIAL AND FINANCIAL

    Think of how hard it is to convert a hunter gatherer people to an agrarian economy. From where you know everyone to where you don’t.

    Think of how hard it is to convert an agrarian economy to a mixed-craft merchant economy. You don’t need much trust but you need to at least be able to secure your territory and capital. Where you don’t know who produces what or where it came from. And where organization of production becomes invisible to you.

    Think of how hard it is to convert your economy to consumer capitalism because your trust is high enough that you can create long term contracts. Where cooperation is achieved through the pooling of capital in large amounts so that it can be concentrated to produce lots of goods and services cheaply.

    Think of how hard it is to convert your economy to a financial economy, where you make money from the process of credit alone. Where you are in fact assisting in organizing the production of goods and services as your primary method of production.

    In each of these cases you are making wealth because you’ve produced the commons we call TRUST : reciprocal insurance, and evolved from a laborer, to a craftsman, to an entrepreneur, to a financier. And you’ve moved your entire economy through that same evolution.

    But as your people evolve through this hierarchy, you produce institutions that assist you in producing records, in resolving disputes, and in developing habits that make resolution of disputes unnecessary.

    What you LOSE is the ability to observe externalities.

    Financialization has produced profound externalities that we have no learned how to RECORD, and ACCOUNT for.

    The cumulative effect of our financialization, which in itself may not be a bad thing but an heroic thing, is that we do not account for the externalities produced under the various transactions.

    Why? well off the gold standard we have no method of measurement. And secondly, the progressives have ‘gambled’ upon the fallacy that technology and growth would persist forever – which it hasn’t, won’t, and can’t.

    We departed the empirical society. We became a society of ‘hope’ or ‘wishful thinking’ or ‘fanciful thinking’, instead. The germans remained an empirical people. We became a moral (british) and utopian(american) rather than empirical people.

    It’s fixable. But it won’t be pretty. a 30 year bear market is a pretty understandable thing.

    (h/t: Benjamin Steigmann)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-13 07:25:00 UTC

  • ECONOMIC METHODOLOGIES AS EXPRESSIONS OF CLASS PHILOSOPHIES

    ECONOMIC METHODOLOGIES AS EXPRESSIONS OF CLASS PHILOSOPHIES

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/11/08/economic-methodologies-as-expressions-of-class-philosophy-and-reproductive-strategy/


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-12 13:11:00 UTC

  • Keeping others out and down (Jewish elitism) -vs- bringing others up and in (Ary

    Keeping others out and down (Jewish elitism) -vs- bringing others up and in (Aryan Elitism) #NewRight ie: Western Aristocratic Egaliarianism


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-12 08:03:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/730669632068169728

  • “The notion that Menger wrote as Middle-Class German Jew is easily dispelled if

    —“The notion that Menger wrote as Middle-Class German Jew is easily dispelled if you realize that Middle-Class German Jews do not usually tutor Austrian Crown princes, as Menger did with Rudolf.”— Johannes

    Well, I wasn’t making that statement.

    The point that I was making was that it’s ‘borderland’ thinking. And that the jews were central in the development of eastern ‘borderland thinking’ and that libertarianism and Jewish “Austrianism” arises out of eastern ‘borderland thinking’ for the same reason that “americanism” rises out of western ‘borderland thinking’.

    Borderlands have the privilege of a protectorate without the obligations and institutions of a state.

    We cannot confuse circumstantial privilege with intentional result.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-12 05:27:00 UTC

  • Keeping others out and down (Jewish/Persian elitism) -vs- bringing others up and

    Keeping others out and down (Jewish/Persian elitism) -vs- bringing others up and in (Aryan Elitism) #NewRight ie: Western Aristocratic Egaliarianism


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-12 04:03:00 UTC

  • Restoring #Libertarian -ism to aristocracy did teach me how the colorful comfort

    Restoring #Libertarian -ism to aristocracy did teach me how the colorful comforting cosmopolitan lies were constructed: suggestion.#NewRight


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-11 14:26:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/730403713530089472

  • That’s why I had to restore #libertarian -ism to aristocracy by demonstrating Ro

    That’s why I had to restore #libertarian -ism to aristocracy by demonstrating Rothbardian libertinism is colorful comforting lies.#NewRirght


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-11 14:25:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/730403471795589120