Theme: Class

  • Call it Traditionalism, call it Conservatism, call it reactionary, or just own u

    Call it Traditionalism, call it Conservatism, call it reactionary, or just own up to it and call it Aristocracy.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-27 14:29:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/736202692410920960

    Reply addressees: @AliceTeller

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/735107460231532545


    IN REPLY TO:

    @AliceTeller

    I am not a neoconservative, neoconfederate, neoreactionary or neo-anything. I am a Traditionalist. The alt-right joined me, not the reverse.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/735107460231532545

  • So the challenge is not making more smart people, it’s shifting the distribution

    So the challenge is not making more smart people, it’s shifting the distribution by decreasing the underclass.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-26 07:02:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/735727715005792256

    Reply addressees: @themightypuck @charlesmurray

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/735724202683027457


    IN REPLY TO:

    @themightypuck

    @curtdoolittle @charlesmurray Is this Gregory Clark’s argument?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/735724202683027457

  • Hey, I’m a 1%’er and raised with noblesse oblige. Take care of the little people

    Hey, I’m a 1%’er and raised with noblesse oblige. Take care of the little people or they won’t fight for you. Fair Trade.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-26 06:43:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/735723074515963904

    Reply addressees: @charlesmurray

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/726892024901832706


    IN REPLY TO:

    @charlesmurray

    Just the ones who are willing to vote for Trump. And their wealthier brethren. https://t.co/amtC0nhHr8

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/726892024901832706

  • Rewards from Consumer Capitalism and Rewards from Aristocratic agrarianism provi

    Rewards from Consumer Capitalism and Rewards from Aristocratic agrarianism provide opposite incentives. Dysgenic vs Eugenic.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-26 06:34:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/735720840474460162

    Reply addressees: @charlesmurray

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/733412991534665728


    IN REPLY TO:

    @charlesmurray

    I get pretty irritated about that too. https://t.co/6EtklMG7qI

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/733412991534665728

  • Perfect Government

    NOT ONLY CAN WE HAVE A PERFECT GOVERNMENT – WE HAD IT. We had the perfect government: Monarchy, Multi-House Parliaments with one house per class, and the Common Law under Rule of law, under Nationalism (tribalism). The Monarch had only power of veto. The houses functioned as a market for trading commons between the different socio-economic classes. And an homogenous polity can act redistributively because everyone is a near relation (kin) and not a competitor. This is why the Nordic countries are as they are: small homogenous protestant nations that have practiced eugenic reproduction for more than a thousand years, and perhaps as long as 3500 years. They bypassed the empire phase during colonialism and so they did not develop state corporatism, and therefore the ability to commercially and militarily profit from heterogeneous polities. Nordic countries then produce the ideal because they are small homogenous eugenic nation states with common interests, little diversity, and lack the population, territorial, economic, and military scale needed to engage in conquest by immigration, territorial expansion, economic conquest, or military conquest. The dirty secret of the Human Genome project is that our tribes and races are vastly unequal, largely because some of our tribes and races have been better at suppressing the rates of reproduction of the lower classes (eugenics). And the reason is that the northern climates do not allow marginal individuals to survive under agrarianism. And that most northern peoples aggressively used hanging, delayed marriage and childbirth, regulated access to farmland to people of good character, and effectively engaged in active upward redistribution of reproduction. If you want a Denmark you need to fill it with Danes. The northeast of Europe developed “Bipartite Manorialism” earliest, and the church’s ban on cousin marriage the earliest, and that is one of the significant reasons for northern europe’s advantage. Why? Because while you need to reach the Pareto optimum of both 80% of resources in the control of your top 20%, AND your top 20% must have IQ’s above 106, this cannot be done by improving the intelligence of your best, but by by reducing the numbers of your worst, until your best are the top 20% of your population. This is counter-intuitive. But the point being that your lower classes are a tragic burden on your people. This is the dirty secret of the west’s success: we hung 1% of the population every year. Over twenty years, this has a profound effect. Over five hundred years it will raise a people out of ignorance and poverty. How can we do the same without hanging our troublemakers? We can do it by preventing their births. Otherwise there is no way to get to Denmark. And instead, under normative dysgenia we will decline just as the entire Arab world has declined under islam: through dysgenic reproduction, that depresses the reproduction of our best, and increases the reproduction of our worst. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Science and Uncomfortable Truth The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Perfect Government

    NOT ONLY CAN WE HAVE A PERFECT GOVERNMENT – WE HAD IT. We had the perfect government: Monarchy, Multi-House Parliaments with one house per class, and the Common Law under Rule of law, under Nationalism (tribalism). The Monarch had only power of veto. The houses functioned as a market for trading commons between the different socio-economic classes. And an homogenous polity can act redistributively because everyone is a near relation (kin) and not a competitor. This is why the Nordic countries are as they are: small homogenous protestant nations that have practiced eugenic reproduction for more than a thousand years, and perhaps as long as 3500 years. They bypassed the empire phase during colonialism and so they did not develop state corporatism, and therefore the ability to commercially and militarily profit from heterogeneous polities. Nordic countries then produce the ideal because they are small homogenous eugenic nation states with common interests, little diversity, and lack the population, territorial, economic, and military scale needed to engage in conquest by immigration, territorial expansion, economic conquest, or military conquest. The dirty secret of the Human Genome project is that our tribes and races are vastly unequal, largely because some of our tribes and races have been better at suppressing the rates of reproduction of the lower classes (eugenics). And the reason is that the northern climates do not allow marginal individuals to survive under agrarianism. And that most northern peoples aggressively used hanging, delayed marriage and childbirth, regulated access to farmland to people of good character, and effectively engaged in active upward redistribution of reproduction. If you want a Denmark you need to fill it with Danes. The northeast of Europe developed “Bipartite Manorialism” earliest, and the church’s ban on cousin marriage the earliest, and that is one of the significant reasons for northern europe’s advantage. Why? Because while you need to reach the Pareto optimum of both 80% of resources in the control of your top 20%, AND your top 20% must have IQ’s above 106, this cannot be done by improving the intelligence of your best, but by by reducing the numbers of your worst, until your best are the top 20% of your population. This is counter-intuitive. But the point being that your lower classes are a tragic burden on your people. This is the dirty secret of the west’s success: we hung 1% of the population every year. Over twenty years, this has a profound effect. Over five hundred years it will raise a people out of ignorance and poverty. How can we do the same without hanging our troublemakers? We can do it by preventing their births. Otherwise there is no way to get to Denmark. And instead, under normative dysgenia we will decline just as the entire Arab world has declined under islam: through dysgenic reproduction, that depresses the reproduction of our best, and increases the reproduction of our worst. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Science and Uncomfortable Truth The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • THIS ARTICLE A DISINGENUOUS JOURNALISTIC JUSTIFICATIONISM WITH A HEAVY DOSE OF P

    http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/article79165287.html#fmpIS THIS ARTICLE A DISINGENUOUS JOURNALISTIC JUSTIFICATIONISM WITH A HEAVY DOSE OF PSYCHOLOGISM THROWN IN FOR EXTRA MEASURE?

    People don’t like or trust the Clintons

    1) Hillary-care vs Obama-care. We still hold her responsible for the first failure as much as we will soon hold Obama accountable for the second: imposing controls on our largest industry against the will of the voters.

    2) Clinton-era devolution of the military. Against the will of the voters.

    3) Dead Soldiers. Did we say “Dead Soldiers?” Did we say lying about dead soldiers? Against the will of the voters.

    4) The Clinton Foundation’s behavior. (I have personal experience – they lied and stole 2M from my company)

    5) Tolerating a husband’s serial-sex-predator problems. And not honestly addressing it.

    6) “More of the Same Policy” instead of the end of empire-under-the-rubric of-globalism.

    7) Racial and Minority Pandering in an era where the parties represent racial divides.

    8) The most scandalous presidency on record – and she covered for it.

    9) Taking credit for 1990’s economy which was entirely the result of the end of world socialism and the universal adoption of consumer capitalism.

    10) Did we say ‘flagrant disregard for the rule of law, and a failure to come clean, apologize, and correct the behavior”.

    11) Total absence of any creativity, innovation, policy, to address the current world and domestic stresses.

    12) The backing of wall street, which is no longer providing a necessary function of distributing physical currency, or marshaling hard-money-credit in an economy of digital currency created from the issuance of shares in the economy: what we call fiat money.

    13) The boomers killed america. She’s a typical lower middle class boomer social climber, and she bears every unlikeable property of her generation.

    Our rule of law is sacred. Our Truthfulness in speech is sacred. Our military and our soldiers are sacred. Our marriages and our families are sacred. And the presidency functions as the sacred moral steward of the country. But, what does sacred mean? It means that no matter what good we wish to achieve in private or the commons we may not violate those rules in achieving it – because our ability to create those commons

    She has no respect for the sacred. And so we have no respect for her.

    She’s a professional pandering, Boomer politician. A product of the postmodern anti-scientific, ant-rational, anti-moral generation.

    She represents all that is sick with our nation.

    Of course she is not trusted, disliked, and by some, openly despised.

    Because she’s deserving of it.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-24 05:23:00 UTC

  • One cannot buy indulgences from either the church to enter heaven, or academy to

    One cannot buy indulgences from either the church to enter heaven, or academy to enter the upper middle class. Sorry. #libertarian #newright


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-23 19:19:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/734826179505586176

  • One cannot buy indulgences from either the church to enter heaven, or academy to

    One cannot buy indulgences from either the church to enter heaven, or academy to enter the upper middle class. Sorry. #libertarian #newright


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-23 15:19:00 UTC

  • We are compensated for our organization of production. Almost none of us labor a

    We are compensated for our organization of production. Almost none of us labor any longer in the original sense. (Marxist hangover.)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-23 12:55:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/734729525385416704

    Reply addressees: @pmarca

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/734516865813250048


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/734516865813250048