THE TRUTH: … but continuous evolution through the restriction of underclass reproduction, and culling of the underclasses by ‘hanging’.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-15 06:59:00 UTC
THE TRUTH: … but continuous evolution through the restriction of underclass reproduction, and culling of the underclasses by ‘hanging’.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-15 06:59:00 UTC
THE TRUTH: But Aristocracy (meritocracy) is incompatible with universal democracy because the vast majority cannot survive meritocratically.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-15 06:57:00 UTC
The great lies were invented in the ancient and modern world for the underclasses who were domesticated out of barbarism – not oppressed.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-15 06:48:00 UTC
Pseudoscience, Marxism, Scientific Socialism, Cultural Marxism, Political Correctness: Revolt atainst Aristocracy that domesticated man.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-15 06:46:00 UTC
(from a pm on drug dealers)
We have a lot of data on certain classes of drug dealers, and in fact, they range across the racial spectrum. Although for the past half century it’s been dominated by Hispanics. As far as I know there have been black major drug dealers but as you’ve observed, they are statistically smaller in number. Hispanics create and transport, blacks distribute to their people, and whites to their people. It’s harder to prosecute whites because their distribution network is better hidden, while the black network is on the street. SO it’s better to say that these networks exist based upon trust levels than it is to say the exist by intelligence levels.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-14 04:59:00 UTC
(laughter)(generation snowflake)
GENERATION JOB-SHY Millennials are lazy, self-indulgent and lack the initiative to be successful. They’re feckless, molly-coddled youngsters who live off the bank of mum and dad.
Too many members of “Generation Snowflake” are still living with their parents rather than getting out into the world and making something of their lives
The millionaire lifestyle guru Martha Stewart has issued a stinging criticism of the millennial generation and claimed youngsters are too LAZY to get ahead.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-13 10:20:00 UTC
DID THE MARXIST/SOCIALIST-LIBERTARIAN-NEOCONS GIVE US THE INCENTIVE TO FINALLY OVERCOME OUR HUMILITY?
From one perspective, the Marxist-Socialists and the Ashkenazi Pseudoscientific Enlightenment combined with protestant feminists (less attractive women), catholics (the lower classes), blacks (the underclasses) created a successful series of revolts against the productive classes (military, legal, financial, entrepreneurial, agrarian), by co-opting media(selling consumer goods to all of their constituents), education (indoctrinating generations into the false narrative), and academy(selling false narratives to new constituents in exchange for economic rewards) in a successful attempt to overthrow our aryan(eugenic) experiment in formalizing contractualism (constitutional natural law) into a new civilization.
From another, without this crisis would we have every discovered, written down, our reasons for excellence in the ancient and modern worlds?
Have they not given us the excuse to finally formulate, articulate, document, and institutionalize our ancient traditions as a new world order – not just for ourselves, but for all mankind?
If the liars can create three books of lies, then why cannot the truth-speakers create a book of truths?
If lies can be spread by the sword, why cannot truths be spread by the contemporary weaponry?
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-09 06:14:00 UTC
THE ORIGINS OF THE LEFT’S EFFEMINATE R-SELECTION BIAS
I think what is abhorrent to leftists is that business and productivity are innately competitive and consist of attempting to outwit other tribes of males for market territory.
This is antithetical to the r-selection instincts of females and their effeminate offspring and the sexually inverted ((( tribes ))).
In their world the cannot compete and seek consensus and non-conflict and reciprocality.
They do not see competition as calculation by trial and error of efficiencies in the interest of all.
They sense only the short term experience rather than judge long term consequences.
Hence why we must never take the feminine or effeminate opinion seriously.
It is a temporal blindness and a moral blindness just like Color blindness.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-05 04:30:00 UTC
ON IQ:
Sorry but I did the research.
Liberals test higher than Conservatives
Republicans test higher than Democrats
Libertarians test highest of all.
Notice that the media doesn’t compare liberals with libertarians but with conservatives. Notice that they don’t compare democrats with republicans. That would mean comparing apples to apples. Instead they compare apples and oranges.
What separates these groups is the size of the group, and the size of the underclass that self-identifies with the label. There are a LOT of self-identifying democrats, republicans, and conservatives, but there are very few self-identifying libertarians and liberals.
Statistics are like our imaginations. They help us see patterns. But like our imaginations they help us see patterns we wish to see. Its up to us to use criticism and operationalism to determine whether what we wish to see is what exists, or whether we use what we wish to see to lie to ourselves and others.
Statistical correlation is the most effective means of lying in modernity because the claims are not subjectively testable – which is why we use statistics in the first place: to attempt to sense patterns that we cannot sense on our own.
But, If you cannot explain a statistical correlation operationally and existentially then you don’t know what you’re talking about.
And by the use of miscategorization, one can easily be an outright liar, a wishful-thinking fool, or the tool of liars and wishful thinking fools.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-04 01:52:00 UTC
TIME TO TEACH ELITES THEY ARE NOTHING WITHOUT THEIR PEOPLE
(by Eli Harman )
Elites are naturally less racist, less ethnocentric, more cosmopolitan, than the lower classes. Elites can interact with *other* elites as peers. They don’t have to squabble over pieces of pie because they can make pie.
But the lower classes are justifiably racist, nationalistic, xenophobic, because they are in direct competition over resources they don’t create, infrastructure, services, social spending, jobs, and so on and so forth.
Additionally, the higher impulsivity of the lower classes increases the frictions that arise from differences and proximity. And they can’t afford to isolate themselves from these.
The classes can cooperate on common interests. And elites can cooperate with foreign elites. But in order for these two imperatives not to conflict, and for classes not to conflict, elites must stop claiming, defending, exercising, and sacralizing a “right” to betray and sacrifice their lower classes to others.
A people are less without their elites. But elites are nothing without their people.
Time to teach them.
H/t Curt Doolittle
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-04 01:34:00 UTC