Curt Doolittle

Theme: Class

  • are the US political party manifestos?— THE MOST ACCURATE AND COMPLETE STATEME

    https://t.co/mcYRlaw9qG—Where are the US political party manifestos?—

    THE MOST ACCURATE AND COMPLETE STATEMENT YOU WILL FIND.

    The left’s manifesto has been public for over a century, and is represented in the ten planks. And the left has been successful and (a) a complete canon of pseudoscience in the social sciences (b) conquest of the primary education and secondary education systems, (c) conquest of the media, and entertainment businesses (d) invasive immigration of the underclasses, (e) financialization of the economy (f) systematic intentional destruction of our constitution of natural law, by selective advocacy of cases that expose the weaknesses in created by the initial draft’s compromise with the southern states, and the violations of natural law added to the constitution after the conquest and defeat of the southern states.

    The right’s manifesto CANNOT be made public under majoritarian democracy since the right’s program is entirely EUGENIC. There is a reason the right speaks metaphorically and morally – if they spoke scientifically it would be challenging.

    Now, the right (as usual) is ‘right’. But its unacceptable under democracy to state that the entire reason we lifted Europe out of ignorance and poverty was that northern Europe like greco-roman civilization was terribly meritocratic, and northern Europe additionally heavily eugenic.

    The puritans who founded the USA were pursuing a eugenic strategy.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-16 14:53:00 UTC

  • So I am tolerant of class signals, and merely intolerant of fallacy and disutili

    So I am tolerant of class signals, and merely intolerant of fallacy and disutility. Each class has it’s sacred cows. But they must be slain

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-16 10:43:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/765499247114485761

  • But when you target compatibilism between multiple classes you must tolerate (hu

    But when you target compatibilism between multiple classes you must tolerate (humor or explain) the fantasy signals used within each class.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-16 10:42:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/765498952678506496

  • So I am tolerant of class signals, and merely intolerant of fallacy and disutili

    So I am tolerant of class signals, and merely intolerant of fallacy and disutility. Each class has it’s sacred cows. But they must be slain

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-16 06:43:00 UTC

  • But when you target compatibilism between multiple classes you must tolerate (hu

    But when you target compatibilism between multiple classes you must tolerate (humor or explain) the fantasy signals used within each class.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-16 06:42:00 UTC

  • WHY DO I CARE ABOUT THE WORKING CLASS? We are compatible, and we need each other

    WHY DO I CARE ABOUT THE WORKING CLASS?

    We are compatible, and we need each other. Some of us work, some of us manage, some of us calculate and design, some of us organize, and some of us decide what to organize, calculate and design, manage, and labor upon.

    It is when we successfully determine a method by which each of us benefits by cooperating with the rest rather than cooperating with others on competing opportunities to perform labor, management, calculation, organization and decision, that we are not only compatible but necessary to one another.

    Aristocracy operated empirically: by compatibilism. Compatibility in reproduction (the family as unit of reproduction), in defense (the hierarchy of command), in production (the hierarchy of organization of production), and in politics (the hierarchy of the classes) while preserving voluntary participation in the selection of mates, in the joining of the army, in the participation in the work force, and between the houses of government.

    Voluntary compatibilism as a method of ‘calculating’ the optimum Nash outcome on an ongoing basis.

    The western aristocratic model was scientific. Until the 20th century.

    I care about the working class because THEY WILL FIGHT. Why? becasue elites create the competitive difference for the working classes, and if they fight for their elites, and they choose the right elites, then they will live under better conditions than if others choose better elites, or if they themselves choose worse elites.

    The problem of american life is that the socialists successfully enfranchised the labor movement and converted compatitiblity to incompatibility – they choose to divide and conquer us, forcing our elites to abandon our working classes.

    If we want a revolution we must act compatibly. We must have elites that decide and organize, middle classes that calculate and theorize, and working classes that manage and act.

    Our name is Legion. And we are many.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-16 04:46:00 UTC

  • Look at the rise in disability payments, number of people, and classes (reasons)

    Look at the rise in disability payments, number of people, and classes (reasons) they claim disability.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-16 00:54:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/765350987687137280

    Reply addressees: @CliffordSAtton

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/765350239960199168

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/765350239960199168

  • Why Is Neo-progressivism So Reliant Upon The Re-appropriation Of Marxist Doctrine And Critical Theory?

    1) Conservatism must speak in historical, moral, allegorical, and religious language because if stated ratio-scientifically it’s reducible to ‘eugenics in everything’, just as all of western civilization has been since the Kurgan invasions. So conservatives do not lie they just do not speak the truth.

    2) Neo-Liberalism is just an attempt to turn america into the levant or south america so that an upper managerial caste can form and profit from administration of a vast underclass, just as the cosmopolitans did in eastern Europe before migrating to the states. They cannot say this. And there is no way to speak truthfully. Since they failed at pseudo-rational marxist religion, pseudoscientific economics and social science, and just gave up advocacy and started attacking western civilization at every level (cultural marxism / postmodernism / the frankfurt school).

    Democracy creates incentives to lie. Rule of law (constitutionalism) creates incentives to tell the truth. But conservatives don’t tell the truth, and neo-liberals just lie.

    Humans are vastly unequal and our evolution has been 5x that of the difference between humans and chimpanzees over the past 30k years alone. These differences are largely visible as differences in rates of maturity, depth of maturity, and sexual dimorphism, and the relative sizes of the lower and upper classes.

    This means that conservatism is true but a large domestic empire is impossible. It means that progressivism is false, and that a large domestic empire will produced colored casts very much like india with little or no rotation.

    Everyone lies.

    The only solution is to break up the empire and continue the BIG SORT.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-is-neo-progressivism-so-reliant-upon-the-re-appropriation-of-Marxist-doctrine-and-Critical-Theory

  • Why Is Neo-progressivism So Reliant Upon The Re-appropriation Of Marxist Doctrine And Critical Theory?

    1) Conservatism must speak in historical, moral, allegorical, and religious language because if stated ratio-scientifically it’s reducible to ‘eugenics in everything’, just as all of western civilization has been since the Kurgan invasions. So conservatives do not lie they just do not speak the truth.

    2) Neo-Liberalism is just an attempt to turn america into the levant or south america so that an upper managerial caste can form and profit from administration of a vast underclass, just as the cosmopolitans did in eastern Europe before migrating to the states. They cannot say this. And there is no way to speak truthfully. Since they failed at pseudo-rational marxist religion, pseudoscientific economics and social science, and just gave up advocacy and started attacking western civilization at every level (cultural marxism / postmodernism / the frankfurt school).

    Democracy creates incentives to lie. Rule of law (constitutionalism) creates incentives to tell the truth. But conservatives don’t tell the truth, and neo-liberals just lie.

    Humans are vastly unequal and our evolution has been 5x that of the difference between humans and chimpanzees over the past 30k years alone. These differences are largely visible as differences in rates of maturity, depth of maturity, and sexual dimorphism, and the relative sizes of the lower and upper classes.

    This means that conservatism is true but a large domestic empire is impossible. It means that progressivism is false, and that a large domestic empire will produced colored casts very much like india with little or no rotation.

    Everyone lies.

    The only solution is to break up the empire and continue the BIG SORT.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-is-neo-progressivism-so-reliant-upon-the-re-appropriation-of-Marxist-doctrine-and-Critical-Theory

  • Why are the worst cities to live in, in the areas with the highest democratic co

    Why are the worst cities to live in, in the areas with the highest democratic concentrations?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-15 21:06:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/765293687773523968

    Reply addressees: @magicbravosolo @mmurraypolitics @dmataconis

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/765288283345604608

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/765288283345604608