Simple: Mother-sister(Consumption)….Brother(Trading)….Father (Saving) –> Progressive, Libertarian, Conservative.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 09:42:00 UTC
The American constitution created a system wherein the natural aristocracy could not be DISEMPOWERED by other classes, but where none of the natural aristocracy could obtain SUFFICIENT power to deprive other members of it. Ergo, the American model could not sustain expansion of the franchise.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-19 02:36:00 UTC
To get status signals and attention in a country where everyone is desperately lonely, lives an an illusion of their own making created out of consumer goods, and lacks any kind of validation from others because everyone else is doing the same thing.
Yes, that’s really the reason.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-19 01:38:00 UTC
The problem began when india ‘came of age’ they sent the new class to french, german, and soviet universities for education, but lacked the Russian and Chinese military on the one end, and lacked the french and german cultural mores on the other. India is then, perhaps the country outside of south America that will suffer most severely for its association with socialism. Because between its lack of an ideological and committed military bureaucracy (Russia, china, turkey, iran, egypt, isreael), and between a still archaic culture (hindu irrational optimism and tolerance for disorder) it will be extremely problematic to ‘fix’ india without dividing it into smaller more manageable states. Or without an ideiolgical or religous group with militant intent, to eradicate corruptoin from what remains a familial if not tribal state.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-18 09:49:00 UTC
Opinions on this are irrelevant, since the data is overwhelming, the resarch substantial, and it’s quite clear that people vote race, gender, and marital status. In other words – their reproductive strategy.
https://www.quora.com/As-a-voter-do-your-values-inform-your-politics-or-do-your-politics-remodel-your-values
[W]e are compatible, and we need each other. Some of us work, some of us manage, some of us calculate and design, some of us organize, and some of us decide what to organize, calculate and design, manage, and labor upon.
It is when we successfully determine a method by which each of us benefits by cooperating with the rest rather than cooperating with others on competing opportunities to perform labor, management, calculation, organization and decision, that we are not only compatible but necessary to one another.
Aristocracy operated empirically: by compatibilism. Compatibility in reproduction (the family as unit of reproduction), in defense (the hierarchy of command), in production (the hierarchy of organization of production), and in politics (the hierarchy of the classes) while preserving voluntary participation in the selection of mates, in the joining of the army, in the participation in the work force, and between the houses of government.
Voluntary compatibilism as a method of ‘calculating’ the optimum Nash outcome on an ongoing basis.
The western aristocratic model was scientific. Until the 20th century.
I care about the working class because THEY WILL FIGHT. Why? becasue elites create the competitive difference for the working classes, and if they fight for their elites, and they choose the right elites, then they will live under better conditions than if others choose better elites, or if they themselves choose worse elites.
The problem of american life is that the socialists successfully enfranchised the labor movement and converted compatitiblity to incompatibility – they choose to divide and conquer us, forcing our elites to abandon our working classes.
If we want a revolution we must act compatibly. We must have elites that decide and organize, middle classes that calculate and theorize, and working classes that manage and act.
Our name is Legion. And we are many.
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
[W]e are compatible, and we need each other. Some of us work, some of us manage, some of us calculate and design, some of us organize, and some of us decide what to organize, calculate and design, manage, and labor upon.
It is when we successfully determine a method by which each of us benefits by cooperating with the rest rather than cooperating with others on competing opportunities to perform labor, management, calculation, organization and decision, that we are not only compatible but necessary to one another.
Aristocracy operated empirically: by compatibilism. Compatibility in reproduction (the family as unit of reproduction), in defense (the hierarchy of command), in production (the hierarchy of organization of production), and in politics (the hierarchy of the classes) while preserving voluntary participation in the selection of mates, in the joining of the army, in the participation in the work force, and between the houses of government.
Voluntary compatibilism as a method of ‘calculating’ the optimum Nash outcome on an ongoing basis.
The western aristocratic model was scientific. Until the 20th century.
I care about the working class because THEY WILL FIGHT. Why? becasue elites create the competitive difference for the working classes, and if they fight for their elites, and they choose the right elites, then they will live under better conditions than if others choose better elites, or if they themselves choose worse elites.
The problem of american life is that the socialists successfully enfranchised the labor movement and converted compatitiblity to incompatibility – they choose to divide and conquer us, forcing our elites to abandon our working classes.
If we want a revolution we must act compatibly. We must have elites that decide and organize, middle classes that calculate and theorize, and working classes that manage and act.
Our name is Legion. And we are many.
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Why is neo-progressivism so reliant upon the re-appropriation of Marxist doctrine and Critical Theory? https://www.quora.com/Why-is-neo-progressivism-so-reliant-upon-the-re-appropriation-of-Marxist-doctrine-and-Critical-Theory/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=aafd25ea
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-16 19:50:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/765636826430316544
Why is the black race judged off of its least successful members? https://www.quora.com/Why-is-the-black-race-judged-off-of-its-least-successful-members/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=eee78e6c
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-16 19:09:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/765626514171920384
https://t.co/zmzW323aWkWhy is the black race judged off of its least successful members?
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-16 15:09:00 UTC