Curt Doolittle

Theme: Class

  • You’re White And You’re The Bad Guy? Rule or Be Ruled. It’s Not Complicated.

    (by Eli Harman) If you’re a f__king white male, you are the bad guy, the cause of all the world’s problems, the personification of historic evil. That’s the role that has been prepared for you and assigned to you. You don’t get to decline the role. The standard of evil has been updated to including denying you are evil. The harder you deny it, the more evil you are. The dialectical traps have been woven and laid to ensure there is no escape.

    The only choice you get to make is how you play the role. The expectation is typically that you will play it badly; that you will apologize for who your ancestors were and what they did, and live your life bowing and scraping and trying vainly to make amends for crimes which can never be forgiven or expunged; that you will take everyone’s side against yourself and give everything away in exchange for nothing. But why do that? That’s stupid. There is nothing in it for us. You could also play it well. Though somewhat degenerated from our heyday, we’re still the baddest motherfuckers who have ever lived, and if we put our heads together and use a little team work we can fuck up everyone else’s shit, take what we want, do what we want, lord over inferior people and not put up with any of their bullshit. They don’t have to like it. They don’t have to like us. They don’t have to understand what we do or why. The only thing they need to understand is that if they fuck with us, they’re going to have a bad time. You couldn’t possibly get any less respect by going off script than you would by playing the role as written.

  • You’re White And You’re The Bad Guy? Rule or Be Ruled. It’s Not Complicated.

    (by Eli Harman) If you’re a f__king white male, you are the bad guy, the cause of all the world’s problems, the personification of historic evil. That’s the role that has been prepared for you and assigned to you. You don’t get to decline the role. The standard of evil has been updated to including denying you are evil. The harder you deny it, the more evil you are. The dialectical traps have been woven and laid to ensure there is no escape.

    The only choice you get to make is how you play the role. The expectation is typically that you will play it badly; that you will apologize for who your ancestors were and what they did, and live your life bowing and scraping and trying vainly to make amends for crimes which can never be forgiven or expunged; that you will take everyone’s side against yourself and give everything away in exchange for nothing. But why do that? That’s stupid. There is nothing in it for us. You could also play it well. Though somewhat degenerated from our heyday, we’re still the baddest motherfuckers who have ever lived, and if we put our heads together and use a little team work we can fuck up everyone else’s shit, take what we want, do what we want, lord over inferior people and not put up with any of their bullshit. They don’t have to like it. They don’t have to like us. They don’t have to understand what we do or why. The only thing they need to understand is that if they fuck with us, they’re going to have a bad time. You couldn’t possibly get any less respect by going off script than you would by playing the role as written.

  • ( All I see around the world is a problem of religion/philosophy and underclass.

    ( All I see around the world is a problem of religion/philosophy and underclass. Fix the religion/philosophy and reduce the underclass and we will have far fewer problems. )

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-02 11:29:00 UTC

  • SIMPLE: ARISTOCRACY +COMMONS, OLIGARCHY -COMMONS An Aristocracy increases the ca

    SIMPLE: ARISTOCRACY +COMMONS, OLIGARCHY -COMMONS

    An Aristocracy increases the capital in the commons and an Oligarchy exploits it. That’s the difference.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-02 04:05:00 UTC

  • Aristocracy Made Us.

    The conservative organizing principle is meritocracy, and a significant percentage of mankind cannot productively compete. The primary reason being that they cannot compete productively is that they are nearly impossible to train, difficult and expensive to train, or more expensive to train than the organization of reproduction, production, and commons can tolerate. The conservative promise that everyone can rise if he so chooses, is false.

    The conservative belief that everyone desires liberty is false – they desire consumption. But they lack the capacity to produce other than by physical means, and under direct instruction. The conservative belief that we all can be raised to join the aristocracy is false – we cannot be – some of us lack the character. The conservative pretense that democracy is possible outside of the natural aristocracy is predicated on these lies: that we can achieve equality through discipline. But we have achieved our relative equality in the west through eugenics: in reproduction, in production, in commons. And commonly through warfare, and consistently through hanging (culling). Conservatism is a eugenic evolutionary strategy and that because of this genetic evolutionary strategy we have culled the ranks of the bottom, and limited our numbers by doing so, thereby concentrating reproduction in our best people. We have been practicing this evolutionary strategy aggressively for 1000, cautiously for 2000, in one way or another for at least 3500 if not 4500, and possibly as long as 7000 years. When in fact, small percentages of the (genetic)upper proletariat, much of the (genetic)lower middle class, most of the (genetic)middle class, and nearly all of the (genetic)upper middle and (genetic)upper classes can do so. This is in fact what ‘class’ means in practice. That we vary by economic class a lot, vary by social class less so, and vary by genetic class very, very little, has no impact on the fact that the primary determinant of social and economic class is genetic class. It is not only the left that lies. Conservatives lie as well. And we lie to ourselves when we try to enfranchise and convert those people without our evolutionary history, and therefore similarly narrow distributions of talents and defects. We – the majority genetic middle class – used the lie of democracy to seized power from the aristocracy. And the left – majority genetic lower class – uses it to seizes power from us. Democracy is a very bad idea. It’s unnatural. It’s dysgenic. And it is incompatible with our civilization. It was just an excuse to use our numbers to defeat the aristocratic minority, rather than preserve them, while ADDING ourselves – the those who organize production – to leadership in aristocratic civiization: those who organize the ability to organize economically. Aristocracy made us.

  • Aristocracy Made Us.

    The conservative organizing principle is meritocracy, and a significant percentage of mankind cannot productively compete. The primary reason being that they cannot compete productively is that they are nearly impossible to train, difficult and expensive to train, or more expensive to train than the organization of reproduction, production, and commons can tolerate. The conservative promise that everyone can rise if he so chooses, is false.

    The conservative belief that everyone desires liberty is false – they desire consumption. But they lack the capacity to produce other than by physical means, and under direct instruction. The conservative belief that we all can be raised to join the aristocracy is false – we cannot be – some of us lack the character. The conservative pretense that democracy is possible outside of the natural aristocracy is predicated on these lies: that we can achieve equality through discipline. But we have achieved our relative equality in the west through eugenics: in reproduction, in production, in commons. And commonly through warfare, and consistently through hanging (culling). Conservatism is a eugenic evolutionary strategy and that because of this genetic evolutionary strategy we have culled the ranks of the bottom, and limited our numbers by doing so, thereby concentrating reproduction in our best people. We have been practicing this evolutionary strategy aggressively for 1000, cautiously for 2000, in one way or another for at least 3500 if not 4500, and possibly as long as 7000 years. When in fact, small percentages of the (genetic)upper proletariat, much of the (genetic)lower middle class, most of the (genetic)middle class, and nearly all of the (genetic)upper middle and (genetic)upper classes can do so. This is in fact what ‘class’ means in practice. That we vary by economic class a lot, vary by social class less so, and vary by genetic class very, very little, has no impact on the fact that the primary determinant of social and economic class is genetic class. It is not only the left that lies. Conservatives lie as well. And we lie to ourselves when we try to enfranchise and convert those people without our evolutionary history, and therefore similarly narrow distributions of talents and defects. We – the majority genetic middle class – used the lie of democracy to seized power from the aristocracy. And the left – majority genetic lower class – uses it to seizes power from us. Democracy is a very bad idea. It’s unnatural. It’s dysgenic. And it is incompatible with our civilization. It was just an excuse to use our numbers to defeat the aristocratic minority, rather than preserve them, while ADDING ourselves – the those who organize production – to leadership in aristocratic civiization: those who organize the ability to organize economically. Aristocracy made us.

  • How Did I End Up In This Intellectual Market Position?

    (irony) [A]s a libertarian, my prescriptions were often Friedmanite solutions to social democratic preferences. As an alt right libertarian I advocate paying the lower classes not to reproduce at replacement levels, and to limit immigration to 115 and above IQ’s in technical disciplines. The reason being that I prefer to live in a high trust society with many commons and high redistribution, including ‘dividends’ on the economy (variable and unpredictable basic income) because the labor market pricing structure is out of balance with productivity. And I have come to understand that ‘retirement’ and ‘delayed adulthood’ are catastrophes. The single reason I’m associated with the ‘hard’ right is that I’ve come out so aggressively against the great lies of the 19th and 20th century. And that those great lies are just deception constructed as a pseudoscientific version of the prior deception constructed in Judeo-Christian-Muslim mysticism. But that’s not my central argument. I also state that the enlightenment philosophies from all European cultures: Anglo(Empirical/Legal), French(Moral), and German(rationalist) philosophies were equally false and contradictory to what made Europa exceptional and ‘faster than the rest’. It’s true the anglo and german philosophical frameworks were false, but at least they were beneficial, while the french and Jewish frameworks were catastrophes for mankind. I’m happy I’ve given young men a language with which to communicate the feelings of their internal voices. And I’m proud that I succeeded in my life’s ambition: to create a language for the rational, scientific comparison of ethical, political, and group competitive strategies. So our generation is armed to the rhetorical teeth so to speak. But let’s not lose sight of the broader insight, that TRUTHFULNESS dictated that I return the philosophy of liberty to its aristocratic origins as the TRADITIONAL DISCIPLINE – if not science – of the western aristocratic excellence in the application of organized violence to domesticate mankind by the incremental suppression of parasitism – thus forcing him into productive labor in order to survive and reproduce, and converting the proceeds from our efforts into Truth, Goodness, and Beauty. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • How Did I End Up In This Intellectual Market Position?

    (irony) [A]s a libertarian, my prescriptions were often Friedmanite solutions to social democratic preferences. As an alt right libertarian I advocate paying the lower classes not to reproduce at replacement levels, and to limit immigration to 115 and above IQ’s in technical disciplines. The reason being that I prefer to live in a high trust society with many commons and high redistribution, including ‘dividends’ on the economy (variable and unpredictable basic income) because the labor market pricing structure is out of balance with productivity. And I have come to understand that ‘retirement’ and ‘delayed adulthood’ are catastrophes. The single reason I’m associated with the ‘hard’ right is that I’ve come out so aggressively against the great lies of the 19th and 20th century. And that those great lies are just deception constructed as a pseudoscientific version of the prior deception constructed in Judeo-Christian-Muslim mysticism. But that’s not my central argument. I also state that the enlightenment philosophies from all European cultures: Anglo(Empirical/Legal), French(Moral), and German(rationalist) philosophies were equally false and contradictory to what made Europa exceptional and ‘faster than the rest’. It’s true the anglo and german philosophical frameworks were false, but at least they were beneficial, while the french and Jewish frameworks were catastrophes for mankind. I’m happy I’ve given young men a language with which to communicate the feelings of their internal voices. And I’m proud that I succeeded in my life’s ambition: to create a language for the rational, scientific comparison of ethical, political, and group competitive strategies. So our generation is armed to the rhetorical teeth so to speak. But let’s not lose sight of the broader insight, that TRUTHFULNESS dictated that I return the philosophy of liberty to its aristocratic origins as the TRADITIONAL DISCIPLINE – if not science – of the western aristocratic excellence in the application of organized violence to domesticate mankind by the incremental suppression of parasitism – thus forcing him into productive labor in order to survive and reproduce, and converting the proceeds from our efforts into Truth, Goodness, and Beauty. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • sorry. Misunderstood the question. MOST Catholics below hanjal line and were fro

    sorry. Misunderstood the question. MOST Catholics below hanjal line and were from lower classes. But Germanic is Germanic.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-29 08:10:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/781405775738638336

    Reply addressees: @Ava1683

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/781206720181735425

    IN REPLY TO:

    @Glanceaustere

    @curtdoolittle Liecehnstein, etc., where would they be in your trust system? Would they be between medium trust Catholic familism and

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/781206720181735425

  • MERIT AND MERITOCRACY In the general sense then, merit does not necessarily refe

    MERIT AND MERITOCRACY

    In the general sense then, merit does not necessarily refer to the reward one obtains, but that when one obtains a reward he has done so because of his merits, as long as he has done so morally.

    A meritocracy is one in which gains from moral action are not guaranteed, but possible, and gains from immoral actions are prohibited.

    (always try to get the negative in there)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-27 02:30:00 UTC