Curt Doolittle

Theme: Class

  • Monopoly=bad. democracy=monopoly. return to anglo: markets between classes

    Monopoly=bad. democracy=monopoly. return to anglo: markets between classes.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-29 18:09:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803662214607630336

    Reply addressees: @Anti_Gnostic @blahblahblah9tn @charlesmurray @JonHaidt @nntaleb

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803661931009769473

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803661931009769473

  • Democracy is a means of distributing the spoils of conquest. Period

    Democracy is a means of distributing the spoils of conquest. Period.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-29 18:05:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803661288932974593

    Reply addressees: @blahblahblah9tn @Anti_Gnostic @charlesmurray @JonHaidt @nntaleb

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803661129293541376

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803661129293541376

  • We choose between leadership by the martial-legal caste, leadership by the pries

    We choose between leadership by the martial-legal caste, leadership by the priestly-moral caste, and the commercial-class. Martial is safer.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-29 13:48:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803596394787434496

  • We choose between leadership by the martial-legal caste, leadership by the pries

    We choose between leadership by the martial-legal caste, leadership by the priestly-moral caste, and the commercial-class. Martial is safer.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-29 08:48:00 UTC

  • INTELLECTUALS ARE THE VEHICLE FOR SUBVERSION 85% Of KGB funding was for subversi

    INTELLECTUALS ARE THE VEHICLE FOR SUBVERSION

    85% Of KGB funding was for subversion: undermining trust in the enemy’s class structure. Subversion is LEGAL in western countries. It is ILLEGAL in Japan and China. They are right and we are wrong.

    The Academy, The Media, The State, and our Women, have been subverted by both the soviets and the cosmopolitans.

    Religion, pseudo-rationalism, pseudoscience, shaming, gossip and propaganda are used for subversion.

    And the vehicle for distribution is intellectuals who seek status in and attention return. And the customers are numerous members of the underclasses and women.

    We must force an involuntary warranty on information, just as we have on services and goods.

    Until Testimonialism we had no method of testing information.

    Now we do.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-28 10:30:00 UTC

  • The Racist Paul Krugman – Wishing White People Dead Even Sooner

    (profound) (read) (share) —“Searching for economic and cultural reasons why middle-aged white Americans are dying sooner.”— Paul Krugman Because you destroyed the family – intentionally, through policy that favored moving labor to capital instead of capital to labor? Because you destroyed the family by ideologically mobilizing women in the workforce, rather than ending their prohibition on it? Because you increased and consumed all the taxes that were produced by women’s entry into the work force so that they cannot afford to stay home and have children, build strong durable families? Teach civilization and civilized behavior? Even if they choose to? Because cheap underclass immigration has displaced white youth and white post-career labor, resulting in over fed-ed, over-told, over-sold, overweight, under-exercised people, lacking any culture and tradition? Because you destroyed our rule of law by intentional assault on the constitution through selective attempts to exploit weaknesses in the fourteenth amendment,and along with education and economic policies, burned down our 4000 years of accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional, and informational capital? Because you and your ideology destroyed our culture, our arts, our civic society, our families, and through hyper-consumption in youth confined our people to lonely, illness, in nursing and retirement death-farms? You and yours have made death camps just as heinous, but killing more softly and slowly the civilization that hosts you? Using the same excuse that your predecessors were initially sold? What will happen to civil rights (Legally Granted Non-Meritocratic Privileges to displace white people)? We restore them to exchanges of performance rather than grants in exchange for rents? If we changed from FREE speech to FREE TRUE speech, that would only silence pseudoscientific and pseudo-rational speech. If we relied on TRUTHFUL speech that would mean only warrantied, an operationally stated speech (Science). No economics then. Well sewing straw men via gossip is a form of deceit, isn’t it? Why don’t we just restore rule of law and strict construction? With Rule of Law, Strict Construction from Fully Informed Voluntary transfer, and Warrantied Truthful Speech, we’re good right? We just saw the end to Cosmopolitan Pseudoscience Paul. Late, but not too late. Boaz, Marx, Freud, Adorno, and Krugman. There is only one empirical social science: Judge Discovered, Natural, Common, Law. Productive, Fully informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer, Limited To Productive Externalities. That’s Natural Law:Social Science. Hopefully, my generation will repair economics by legal and logical compatibility with natural law, ending a century of pseudoscience. And when combined with direct redistribution of liquidity to consumers via electronic banking, we will end Rule By Fiat Credit. And by ending Rule By Fiat Credit will end the century of spending down accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional capital. And we will relegate Marxist, Keyesian, Postmodern, Pseudoscientific leftist economics of cherry picking by selective measurement of changes in capital to the successor to phlogiston theory. And you will be the subject of equal ridicule for centuries. I understand what just happened. The genetic, cultural, and institutional loans were non-performing, and the investors just sold. WE SOLD. AND YOU’RE BANKRUPT. AND NOW YOU’RE GOING TO PRISON FOR YOUR PYRAMID SCHEME ECONOMIC FRAUD Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine.

  • The Racist Paul Krugman – Wishing White People Dead Even Sooner

    (profound) (read) (share) —“Searching for economic and cultural reasons why middle-aged white Americans are dying sooner.”— Paul Krugman Because you destroyed the family – intentionally, through policy that favored moving labor to capital instead of capital to labor? Because you destroyed the family by ideologically mobilizing women in the workforce, rather than ending their prohibition on it? Because you increased and consumed all the taxes that were produced by women’s entry into the work force so that they cannot afford to stay home and have children, build strong durable families? Teach civilization and civilized behavior? Even if they choose to? Because cheap underclass immigration has displaced white youth and white post-career labor, resulting in over fed-ed, over-told, over-sold, overweight, under-exercised people, lacking any culture and tradition? Because you destroyed our rule of law by intentional assault on the constitution through selective attempts to exploit weaknesses in the fourteenth amendment,and along with education and economic policies, burned down our 4000 years of accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional, and informational capital? Because you and your ideology destroyed our culture, our arts, our civic society, our families, and through hyper-consumption in youth confined our people to lonely, illness, in nursing and retirement death-farms? You and yours have made death camps just as heinous, but killing more softly and slowly the civilization that hosts you? Using the same excuse that your predecessors were initially sold? What will happen to civil rights (Legally Granted Non-Meritocratic Privileges to displace white people)? We restore them to exchanges of performance rather than grants in exchange for rents? If we changed from FREE speech to FREE TRUE speech, that would only silence pseudoscientific and pseudo-rational speech. If we relied on TRUTHFUL speech that would mean only warrantied, an operationally stated speech (Science). No economics then. Well sewing straw men via gossip is a form of deceit, isn’t it? Why don’t we just restore rule of law and strict construction? With Rule of Law, Strict Construction from Fully Informed Voluntary transfer, and Warrantied Truthful Speech, we’re good right? We just saw the end to Cosmopolitan Pseudoscience Paul. Late, but not too late. Boaz, Marx, Freud, Adorno, and Krugman. There is only one empirical social science: Judge Discovered, Natural, Common, Law. Productive, Fully informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer, Limited To Productive Externalities. That’s Natural Law:Social Science. Hopefully, my generation will repair economics by legal and logical compatibility with natural law, ending a century of pseudoscience. And when combined with direct redistribution of liquidity to consumers via electronic banking, we will end Rule By Fiat Credit. And by ending Rule By Fiat Credit will end the century of spending down accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional capital. And we will relegate Marxist, Keyesian, Postmodern, Pseudoscientific leftist economics of cherry picking by selective measurement of changes in capital to the successor to phlogiston theory. And you will be the subject of equal ridicule for centuries. I understand what just happened. The genetic, cultural, and institutional loans were non-performing, and the investors just sold. WE SOLD. AND YOU’RE BANKRUPT. AND NOW YOU’RE GOING TO PRISON FOR YOUR PYRAMID SCHEME ECONOMIC FRAUD Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine.

  • Peter Boettke On The Reveal: Partisan Cheerleaders Not Social Critics

    —“Observation — journalists and other intellectuals freaking out over the outcome of the election reveal that they were never really “students” of society, or even “social critics”, but were instead partisan cheerleaders. Also, it appears that many are completely incapable of asking themselves whether it might be possible that the consensus of the progressive elite in public policy is perhaps neither as accurately descriptive of how the world works or as normatively appealing as they sincerely believe. Rather than critical self-reflection we see outrage, blame, and emotional expression of pain.There are many reasons to be concerned, but the responsible response from intellectuals is to think through rationally, to ask what I was wrong about, try to force yourself to pass an ideological Turning Test, and to recognize that if there are institutional problems the answer requires institutional solutions.Liberal democratic traditions do not work based on the “good” and the “wise” being in power, but were designed so that “bad men can do least harm”. Let’s hope those liberal democratic institutions are still in operation after so many years of sustained critique by progressive intellectuals.Democratic governance (liberalism) is a different beast from bureaucratic governance (progressivism). Bureaucratic governance requires trained experts immune from democratic checks and balances, democratic governance requires responsible citizens and institutions that empower as well as constrain.”– Peter Boettke (NOTE: I would say they are all engaged in customer seeking – a long form of rent seeking. The interesting question not discussed is that because we humans make use of law, religion, and market, but we choose a dominant bias with which to employ them in our social orders, yielding: (1)kin/law, (2)cult/religion, or (3)state/corporatism; Depending upon homogeneity or heterogeneity of the population; to overcome resistance to the creation and preservation of commons – so that why is it that one bias in the order is always better off than the others? And why does not social-criticism and intellectual-decidability limit itself to the order desired by the population? of course, we know the answer is genetic in both desire for construct, and in the expression of that desire for construct as a will to power. I frequently ask the same question: why do economists vary in bias of decidability? for the same reason: austrian-social-science and rule of law preserving sovereignty, freshwater limits of rule of law as a commons against harm, and saltwater abandonment of rule of law in favor of preferential discretion in order to acquire customers for the state. If it isn’t clear to you, then the answer is this: anything other than kin/law is nothing more than an act of war by slower means. – CD )

  • Peter Boettke On The Reveal: Partisan Cheerleaders Not Social Critics

    —“Observation — journalists and other intellectuals freaking out over the outcome of the election reveal that they were never really “students” of society, or even “social critics”, but were instead partisan cheerleaders. Also, it appears that many are completely incapable of asking themselves whether it might be possible that the consensus of the progressive elite in public policy is perhaps neither as accurately descriptive of how the world works or as normatively appealing as they sincerely believe. Rather than critical self-reflection we see outrage, blame, and emotional expression of pain.There are many reasons to be concerned, but the responsible response from intellectuals is to think through rationally, to ask what I was wrong about, try to force yourself to pass an ideological Turning Test, and to recognize that if there are institutional problems the answer requires institutional solutions.Liberal democratic traditions do not work based on the “good” and the “wise” being in power, but were designed so that “bad men can do least harm”. Let’s hope those liberal democratic institutions are still in operation after so many years of sustained critique by progressive intellectuals.Democratic governance (liberalism) is a different beast from bureaucratic governance (progressivism). Bureaucratic governance requires trained experts immune from democratic checks and balances, democratic governance requires responsible citizens and institutions that empower as well as constrain.”– Peter Boettke (NOTE: I would say they are all engaged in customer seeking – a long form of rent seeking. The interesting question not discussed is that because we humans make use of law, religion, and market, but we choose a dominant bias with which to employ them in our social orders, yielding: (1)kin/law, (2)cult/religion, or (3)state/corporatism; Depending upon homogeneity or heterogeneity of the population; to overcome resistance to the creation and preservation of commons – so that why is it that one bias in the order is always better off than the others? And why does not social-criticism and intellectual-decidability limit itself to the order desired by the population? of course, we know the answer is genetic in both desire for construct, and in the expression of that desire for construct as a will to power. I frequently ask the same question: why do economists vary in bias of decidability? for the same reason: austrian-social-science and rule of law preserving sovereignty, freshwater limits of rule of law as a commons against harm, and saltwater abandonment of rule of law in favor of preferential discretion in order to acquire customers for the state. If it isn’t clear to you, then the answer is this: anything other than kin/law is nothing more than an act of war by slower means. – CD )

  • To a general we are all uniform. To an entrepreneur we’re all gold. To a financi

    To a general we are all uniform. To an entrepreneur we’re all gold. To a financier we’re all interest rates. To the government we’re races. https://twitter.com/Pamela_Moore13/status/802644868220600322