Curt Doolittle

Theme: Class

  • “A pattern on the left emerges and repeats itself, that manifests as idealism an

    —“A pattern on the left emerges and repeats itself, that manifests as idealism and ends in nihilism, that starts with a rent-seeking reproductive strategy.

    It’s success depends on cooperating with productive classes, but it tends to get full enough of itself to think it can take the helm, before running aground. It has no realistic positive ethic, and now and again refuses to acknowledge natural law. When the left tries to reconcile it’s failure, all it can muster is intellectual nihilism and sometimes literal suicide.

    Leftists in America needed labor unions, the place where it’s idealism accomplished something mutually beneficial. It betrayed those union constituents because it got full of its own global cosmopolitan rhetoric. Like the Russians inciting class guilt to incite hate for the kulaks when the proletariat didn’t bring itself round to revolution. Luckily instead of creating famine, this time it created a Trump presidency.”—Steve Lacasse

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-12 08:00:00 UTC

  • Alt right rhetoric in a nutshell ” Fuck you, Pay Me”

    Alt right rhetoric in a nutshell ” Fuck you, Pay Me”

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-11 17:34:00 UTC

  • “Fallacies do not curtail considerable plutocratic tendencies just because fasci

    —“Fallacies do not curtail considerable plutocratic tendencies just because fascistic aristocracies fail to maintain religious hegemony. Hierarchies are only plausible when there is a presence of theocratic organic infrastructure to support the underlying anti-dialogist systems.”—

    —“Take everything Curt says with a grain of salt. Better yet, an entire saltlick.”—Eugene Ix

    You will need the salt – for eating your straw man.

    I don’t say a mythology wasn’t necessary.

    I didn’t say religion wasn’t necessary.

    I said, one consisting of falsehoods isn’t.

    🙂

    Hierarchies always exist always and everywhere. The question is which means of rule are used to achieve them. Force is the most expensive but most truthful method of rule. Religion of lies is cheaper than force, but more expensive than markets. So whether we are ruled by some narrative, some law, some market is a matter of demographics, productivity, cost, institutions of cooperation.

    Just as people evolved to negotiate not to tell the truth, and we require the scientific method to assist us, Religions evolved to excuse or explain, but it is law that causes behavior.

    One can conflate religion and law. One can deconflate them as the west has always done. I recommend we maintain deconflation, and create religion our of founding myths, and our long history of heroes.

    In other words: YOU CREATE LIES IF YOU ARE WEAK. AND TRUTH IF YOU ARE STRONG. And you use truth (history, trade, law) if you want wealth. Lies are cheaper if you have ignorant people at the cost of impoverishing them. Small numbers that wish to rule, require advanced technology and professional warriors.

    Hierarchies always exist everywhere and every-‘when’. All that differs is the manner in which we excuse them so that the classes can operate cooperatively. But the lesson of history is simple: truth out-competes lies. Everyone who adopted reason (truth) benefitted from it. greeks->romans->muslims->northern europeans -> much of the world today.

    But each civilization fails to preserve truth because (a) they don’t know how to do otherwise, and (b)they have no institutional method of preserving it sufficiently to prevent re-institution of lies for the purpose of parasitism.

    Ergo, Natural Law Fundamentalism. Heroic Literary myths.

    Or to put it in terms of the western group evolutionary strategy;

    Sovereignty(negative or limit). Heroism(positive or opportunity).

    -Curt Doolittle

    -The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    -The Propertarian Institute

    -Kiev, Ukraine

    BTW: It’s always better to know what the f–k you’re talking about. 🙂

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-10 19:46:00 UTC

  • The Functions of the Classes

    THE FUNCTIONS OF THE CLASSES (propertarian class theory) ——UPPER——- TOOL OF COERCION: FORCE – MILITARY, LAW, SHERIFF
    1) UPPER – PRODUCTION OF ORDER (SOVEREIGNTY) Rule Economyt (Aristocracy Profit from the Organization of Labor+K) ——MIDDLE——- TOOL OF COERCION – REMUNERATION – ORGANIZATION, DISTRIBUTION AND TRADE 2) UPPER MIDDLE – ORGANIZATION OF PRODUCTION (LIBERTY) Capitalism ( Organization of Labor+Knowledge ) 3) MIDDLE – ORGANIZATION OF TRANSFORMATION (FREEDOM) Market Economy ( Voluntarily Organized Labor+K) 4) LOWER MIDDLE (working) TRANSFORMATION (PARTICIPATION) Mixed Economy ( Voluntary + Involuntarily Organized Labor+K) ——LOWER——- TOOL OF COERCION: GOSSIP (RESISTANCE) – PRODUCTION, DIST. AND TRADE 5) LOWER (working) LABOR (PARTICIPATION) Command Economy ( Lower – Involuntarily Organized Labor+K) 6) DEPENDENT – PRODUCTION OF GENERATIONS (POS. FREEDOM) Dependent Economy (Dependents – Redistributions from Labor+K) #NewRight

  • The Functions of the Classes

    THE FUNCTIONS OF THE CLASSES (propertarian class theory) ——UPPER——- TOOL OF COERCION: FORCE – MILITARY, LAW, SHERIFF
    1) UPPER – PRODUCTION OF ORDER (SOVEREIGNTY) Rule Economyt (Aristocracy Profit from the Organization of Labor+K) ——MIDDLE——- TOOL OF COERCION – REMUNERATION – ORGANIZATION, DISTRIBUTION AND TRADE 2) UPPER MIDDLE – ORGANIZATION OF PRODUCTION (LIBERTY) Capitalism ( Organization of Labor+Knowledge ) 3) MIDDLE – ORGANIZATION OF TRANSFORMATION (FREEDOM) Market Economy ( Voluntarily Organized Labor+K) 4) LOWER MIDDLE (working) TRANSFORMATION (PARTICIPATION) Mixed Economy ( Voluntary + Involuntarily Organized Labor+K) ——LOWER——- TOOL OF COERCION: GOSSIP (RESISTANCE) – PRODUCTION, DIST. AND TRADE 5) LOWER (working) LABOR (PARTICIPATION) Command Economy ( Lower – Involuntarily Organized Labor+K) 6) DEPENDENT – PRODUCTION OF GENERATIONS (POS. FREEDOM) Dependent Economy (Dependents – Redistributions from Labor+K) #NewRight

  • The Why of Shrinking Brains

    SHRINKING BRAIN SIZE, PAEDOMORPHIC SELECTION, OR FASTER REPRODUCTION OF THE UNDERCLASSES? http://www.ancient-origins.net/…/scientists-are-alarmed-shr… Given that (a) yes, brain size makes a demonstrable difference in current human intelligence.

    And given that (b) it’s unclear whether our brains are getting smaller or whether more of the smaller humans are breeding in cities. (which appears to be the case since cities are genetic and IQ sinks). And given that (c) we have been selecting for immaturity for 10K years (paedomorphic selection). And given that (d) women generally possess superior verbal skills and weaker modeling skills despite smaller brains. I would hypothesize that all of the above are driving down AVERAGE brain size. I would suggest we will saw additional paedomorphic selection domestication up and until the period of ‘Peak Human’ which I suspect was around 1500 bc. And that at present we are seeing a rapid expansion of dysgenic classes, tilting the data dramatically. Unfortunately I suspect that the initial shift caused by the adoption of general rules (science) rather than rules of specific cases (recipes), as well as the reduction in the malnutrition at the bottom (left) of the curve, means that the downward shift in genetic IQ and brain size from underclass reproduction is being hidden by the Flynn effect. But in real terms, on average we are getting smaller, more verbal brains, and a lot more dumb people breeding. Curt Doolittle

  • The Why of Shrinking Brains

    SHRINKING BRAIN SIZE, PAEDOMORPHIC SELECTION, OR FASTER REPRODUCTION OF THE UNDERCLASSES? http://www.ancient-origins.net/…/scientists-are-alarmed-shr… Given that (a) yes, brain size makes a demonstrable difference in current human intelligence.

    And given that (b) it’s unclear whether our brains are getting smaller or whether more of the smaller humans are breeding in cities. (which appears to be the case since cities are genetic and IQ sinks). And given that (c) we have been selecting for immaturity for 10K years (paedomorphic selection). And given that (d) women generally possess superior verbal skills and weaker modeling skills despite smaller brains. I would hypothesize that all of the above are driving down AVERAGE brain size. I would suggest we will saw additional paedomorphic selection domestication up and until the period of ‘Peak Human’ which I suspect was around 1500 bc. And that at present we are seeing a rapid expansion of dysgenic classes, tilting the data dramatically. Unfortunately I suspect that the initial shift caused by the adoption of general rules (science) rather than rules of specific cases (recipes), as well as the reduction in the malnutrition at the bottom (left) of the curve, means that the downward shift in genetic IQ and brain size from underclass reproduction is being hidden by the Flynn effect. But in real terms, on average we are getting smaller, more verbal brains, and a lot more dumb people breeding. Curt Doolittle

  • DON’T NEED TO ADVOCATE FOR THE ENEMY – YOU ONLY NEED TO FAIL TO DEFEAT THEM. (CO

    http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2016/12/many-people-american-dream-vanishing.htmlYOU DON’T NEED TO ADVOCATE FOR THE ENEMY – YOU ONLY NEED TO FAIL TO DEFEAT THEM. (CONSERVATIVES FAILED)

    —“Goldwater, Reagan, and conservatives delivered the US into socialism?”—

    It’s more that While Darwin, Spencer, Weber and Durkheim were correct in their reevaluation of man, Mises, Popper, Hayek, Brouwer, Bridgman and many others failed to solve the question of social science, and social pseudoscience of Marx and Keynes was more attractive to enfranchised women, underclasses, and empowering of the political classes.

    Moreover, the scientists having failed, we got Goldwater, Kirk, Buckley, Kristol, and Strauss – whose work can be considered, at best pop-moralizing on the german continental model: attempting to recreate the piety of the church in secular verse.

    And they failed. Their work cannot even be considered pseudoscience. Certainly Strauss can be considered pseudo-rationalism. But Kirk, Buckley and Kristol’s very existence as influencers is an admission of failure of the conservative movement to produce a technological equivalent of leftism.

    And why? Because the truth is incompatible with democracy: The function of western civilization was systematically eugenic. We are very conscious of truth. Our preoccupation with Truth is the reason for our civilizatin’s rapid advancement in the ancient and modern worlds. But the application of truth produces eugenic outcomes. Which is why the left must lie, and the right cannot tell the truth.

    —“An ideology functions, like literature, to inspire individuals to action under democracy. A philosophy provides methods of decidability in order to achieve a desired state of affairs. A formal logic provides language for the testing (criticism) of relations for internal consistency (falsification). A science provides a formal process and instrumentation for the elimination of ignorance, error, bias, and deceit.”— Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-10 14:03:00 UTC

  • BRAIN SIZE, PAEDOMORPHIC SELECTION, OR FASTER REPRODUCTION OF THE UNDERCLASSES?

    http://www.ancient-origins.net/news-evolution-human-origins/scientists-are-alarmed-shrinking-human-brain-001446SHRINKING BRAIN SIZE, PAEDOMORPHIC SELECTION, OR FASTER REPRODUCTION OF THE UNDERCLASSES?

    http://www.ancient-origins.net/news-evolution-human-origins/scientists-are-alarmed-shrinking-human-brain-001446

    Given that (a) yes, brain size makes a demonstrable difference in current human intelligence.

    And given that (b) it’s unclear whether our brains are getting smaller or whether more of the smaller humans are breeding in cities. (which appears to be the case since cities are genetic and IQ sinks).

    And given that (c) we have been selecting for immaturity for 10K years (paedomorphic selection).

    And given that (d) women generally possess superior verbal skills and weaker modeling skills despite smaller brains.

    I would hypothesize that all of the above are driving down AVERAGE brain size.

    I would suggest we will saw additional paedomorphic selection domestication up and until the period of ‘Peak Human’ which I suspect was around 1500 bc.

    And that at present we are seeing a rapid expansion of dysgenic classes, tilting the data dramatically.

    Unfortunately I suspect that the initial shift caused by the adoption of general rules (science) rather than rules of specific cases (recipes), as well as the reduction in the malnutrition at the bottom (left) of the curve, means that the downward shift in genetic IQ and brain size from underclass reproduction is being hidden by the Flynn effect. But in real terms, on average we are getting smaller, more verbal brains, and a lot more dumb people breeding.

    Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-09 20:11:00 UTC

  • THE FUNCTIONS OF THE CLASSES (propertarian class theory) ——UPPER——- TOOL

    THE FUNCTIONS OF THE CLASSES

    (propertarian class theory)

    ——UPPER——-

    TOOL OF COERCION: FORCE – MILITARY, LAW, SHERIFF

    1) UPPER – PRODUCTION OF ORDER (SOVEREIGNTY)

    Rule Economyt (Aristocracy Profit from the Organization of Labor+K)

    ——MIDDLE——-

    TOOL OF COERCION – REMUNERATION – ORGANIZATION, DISTRIBUTION AND TRADE

    2) UPPER MIDDLE – ORGANIZATION OF PRODUCTION (LIBERTY)

    Capitalism ( Organization of Labor+Knowledge )

    3) MIDDLE – ORGANIZATION OF TRANSFORMATION (FREEDOM)

    Market Economy ( Voluntarily Organized Labor+K)

    4) LOWER MIDDLE (working) TRANSFORMATION (PARTICIPATION)

    Mixed Economy ( Voluntary + Involuntarily Organized Labor+K)

    ——LOWER——-

    TOOL OF COERCION: GOSSIP (RESISTANCE) – PRODUCTION, DIST. AND TRADE

    5) LOWER (working) LABOR (PARTICIPATION)

    Command Economy ( Lower – Involuntarily Organized Labor+K)

    6) DEPENDENT – PRODUCTION OF GENERATIONS (POS. FREEDOM)

    Dependent Economy (Dependents – Redistributions from Labor+K)

    #NewRight

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-06 08:05:00 UTC