Curt Doolittle

Theme: Class

  • YOU CAN LOVE AND RESPECT THE MORAL BUT MALINVESTED. BUT IN THE END, THERE IS ONL

    YOU CAN LOVE AND RESPECT THE MORAL BUT MALINVESTED. BUT IN THE END, THERE IS ONLY ONE METHOD OF OBTAINING SOVEREIGNTY, LIBERTY, FREEDOM, AND SUBSIDY.

    1) People who don’t LIKE Jeff Tucker have no soul. He’s eminently likable, charming, intelligent and admirable.

    2) People who AGREE with Tucker’s prescription for order are profoundly hopeful in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary

    3) People who ARGUE for left libertinism as does Tucker suffer from both ignorance and arrested development.

    4) People who Like Tucker, Empathize with his hopefulness, but have Matured because of the evidence, argue AGAINST Tucker (and all left libertines).

    5) People who argue against left libertines either fall back on HISTORICAL (Reactionary) means of argument (Fascism), or argue forward on EVOLVING the european SOVEREIGN order by incrementally increasing suppression of social, economic, and political parasitism, via the natural, common, judge discovered law. Because by incremental suppression of innovations in the means of parasitism, we force people back in to the markets for cooperation: the market for association, market for reproduction(marriage), market for production of goods, services, and information, market for the production of commons, and the market for the productions of polities that vary in the commons that they produce – since different groups, due to distributions of abilities, require different commons.

    6) This EVOLUTIONARY means of expanding the suite of markets through denial of parasitism, by the incremental (evolutionary) means of suppression, using natural, judge discovered, common law, refers to NATURAL LAW NOMOCRACY: Rule by Natural Law of Sovereign Men.

    INTERMISSION

    One obtains sovereignty in FACT by the exchange of the contract of sovereignty with ever-increasing numbers. One obtains liberty by purchase (permission) from the sovereigns because one is unwilling or unable to pay the cost of sovereignty in fact. One obtains freedom (permission) from the sovereign and the liberated, by the promise of maintaining one’s productivity without parasitism. One obtains redistribution(dependence) from the sovereign, the liberated, and the free, by the promise of non-interference and the promise of maintenance of the territorial, physical, institutional, cultural, and normative commons. In other words, people are paid to maintain the commons in exchange for access to the market, and dividends from the market.

    7) One obtains Sovereignty, liberty, freedom, or redistribution(dependence) by the following means:

    a) Denying falsehoods the informational and argumentative field, through falsification and if necessary prosecution.

    b) Advocating for Sovereignty, liberty, freedom and subsidy (redistribution) under the natural, judge discovered, common law, and the creation of markets for the production of all cooperative goods: association, reproduction, production of goods, services and information, and the production of commons, and the production of polities that produce commons necessary for tribes, families, and nations with similar needs.

    c) Paying the price of Sovereignty (violence and the fee of risk), liberty (law and fees), freedom (policing and fees), subsidy (maintenance and fees).

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-22 10:50:00 UTC

  • THE ANGLO GRAVE —“First the anglo imported cheap indentured labor, then black

    THE ANGLO GRAVE

    —“First the anglo imported cheap indentured labor, then black labor, then the scotch Irish settled the west, then the Hungarians were sent to the coal mines and steel mills, the Irish used as cannon fodder, the Chinese as railroad work, the Mexicans as cheap landscapers and construction labor, and now the Indians for cheap tech support.

    The Anglo has dug his own grave.”—Danny Bogdan Polishchuk

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-21 14:07:00 UTC

  • “I’ve been saying for a while now “pathological altruism” is not a trait of Arya

    –“I’ve been saying for a while now “pathological altruism” is not a trait of Aryans. It’s a fraudulent virtue signal by the bourgeoisie, attempting to appear like the nobility above them in status, but not having the resources to corroborate that false status signal.”—Josh Jeppson

    Yeah, But it’s so pervasive it’s got to be more than JUST class. I think the behavior is the result of Bourgeoise class interests (everyone is a potential customer), Puritanism (the puritan ethic), Christianity (universalism), and Feminism (or simply the enfranchisement of women – acting as a multiplier on all the above.) So perhaps I see it more as ‘as we raise the volume of the female, we will see evidence of consumption and the commercial exploitation of women’s desire for consumption).

    So of the spectrum of ‘bourgeoise’ influences, I see Fiat Money + Female Enfranchisement as conflationary: merging the market and the state(excellences, capital, limits) overly so, where you see the merchant class as responsible.

    But I feel it’s (a) demilitarization/demasculination of the western male, as much as (b) the rise of the bourgeoise’s influence due to the increase in their economic influence, to (c) the enfransisement of women as peers instead of competitors, and (d) the use of fiat money to enable enfranchised women to work and consume, and (e) the consumption of taxes by putting woman to work and then taxing all their income from the family unit, thereby committing genocide by credit.

    So while consumer values … is that the best description? (is that the same thing as bourgeoise values, or are we talking about the fact that only someone with bourgeoise values would open up government under the ‘ruse’ of equality?).

    hmm…

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-21 05:43:00 UTC

  • CLASS AND MARRIAGE TYPES Think of ANF as an upper middle class or upper class ma

    CLASS AND MARRIAGE TYPES

    Think of ANF as an upper middle class or upper class marriage where there is a lot of property. It’s an aristocratic marriage technology.

    Think of NF as a middle class marriage.

    Think of Traditional Families as a working class marriage.

    Think of Serial Marriages as a lower class marriage.

    Marriage types evolved to balance insurance from families without much property (Traditional) to insurance from property (ANF).

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-20 10:21:00 UTC

  • THE LEFT’S CASTING OF GENDER SPECIALIZATION AS CLASS WARFARE – BUT MASCULINITY I

    THE LEFT’S CASTING OF GENDER SPECIALIZATION AS CLASS WARFARE – BUT MASCULINITY IS A VIRTUE NOT A VICE

    January 11, 2017 by Alberto Zambrano

    —“The left has to use indignation and offenses because it is absolutely incapable of using the truth without exposing itself.

    So, given the inability to use the truth, the leftists extract their cooperative procedures and threaten to withdraw.

    We must respond to the threats of retreat as severely as we respond to threats or to those who cheat or cheat us.

    This is deeply important as a concept to study in the sick behavior of the leftists.

    There is a lot of research that confirms how we react to such lies and rejections, those differences are biological, existent and widely diffused. And those same researches have shown that the female sex is more sensitive to them, which is why the left has sought to seize the vanguard of women.

    As men we must fight at all costs to retain the integrity of our group. We are genetically programmed by nature to do so. And it affects us at cognitive levels in the same way that music affects us.

    The influence of our force is the ultimate strategy to defeat the left, to sabotage its norms, to challenge its conventions by being brutally honest causes the mass withdrawal of the lies that the leftists throw at us daily.

    If we raise not only the level of debate, but our ability to create a vanguard that borders the left, we will have won the ideological war by default. The cost of cohesion and internal preferences for our own group, cooperating with our peers, and caring for our women and children creates in the left a series of doubts that they consider dangerous threats for their survival since the leftists appeal to what We do not protect as a group for them to create avant-garde.

    The left rejects the masculine character of the struggle and substitutes it for the class struggle, putting us in a terrain where we are equal in a struggle that does not exist. If we reject the class struggle and rejoice at the true meaning of the blood, sweat and tears that men have shed in order to make their nations great, we will have made our great nations again and we will have gained them to the left.

    Masculinity is positive, desirable and attractive to the opposite sex

    Just as femininity is fundamental to civilization, to preserve the species, and to cultivate lasting relationships, masculinity is necessary to preserve the character and moral fiber of our nation.

    The left with its lies seeks to separate us from our women and children and put them against us.

    Leftist elites, with their false intelligentsia, produce silly and deceptive ideas that gain their status as a result of the merit of those who spit them out, and that these ideas (feminism, gender ideology) parasitize our nation’s superior order of trust. These elites and those who follow them believe that they will win, and may do so unless we have patience and do not alter the conditions under which they are able to exploit the higher order of trust upon which our nation depends.

    If our superior order of trust is so superior that it is impassable for the left, we will preserve a society and nation that can flourish homogeneously, a tactic that the left, so ethnically, morally, and ideologically heterogeneous, is incapable of preserving without entering into Fundamental contradictions of their own ideals.

    It is for this reason that the left is unable to obtain and maintain the loyalty of the interests of the other classes without maintaining a proper warrior and masculine class of its own.”—

    Alberto R. Zambrano U.

    In collaboration for The Propertarian Institute.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-18 13:32:00 UTC

  • THIS AS LEGIT? If it’s true I’m making cupcakes and celebrating. Thieves. Guess

    http://worldpoliticus.com/2017/01/16/hillary-clinton-decided-fire-employees-clinton-foundation-done/CONFIRM THIS AS LEGIT?

    If it’s true I’m making cupcakes and celebrating. Thieves.

    Guess i’ll never get my 2m back from them now… lol

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-18 03:22:00 UTC

  • What Kinds Of Job Opportunities Are Available For People With A Phd In Political Economy?

    Just as the American and British Economies experienced purges of middle management built up between the period 1920–1980 because of the influence of ‘managerialism’ (socialism), the entire world is about to go through a set of severe employment contractions between now and at least 2025.

    1 – political management – on a vast scale.
    2 – much more of lower middle management – on a vast scale.
    3 – a little more labor due to automation – perhaps on a perceptible scale.
    and (possibly)
    4 – much, much, much, of the financial sector on a frightening scale.

    In my (rather informed I think) opinion, if you do not possess a STEM degree for employment purposes, and perhaps a philosophy/law minor (so you think clearly), you have very little chances of employability other than “gee I have a degree”.

    Like most things, it’s more (a) who you know, and (b) what industry you can get into early, and (c) how much you can save of your income and invest before you are 30.

    Why? Because the west has held a 500 year military, technical, legal, financial, cultural, literacy, and knowledge advantage over the world, and Because Americans inherited the British empire’s institutions of world finance, trade, and oil. It is quite possible that Americans will descend to european standards of living (which are much lower unfortunately), and even more possible that europeans will descend as well.

    We no longer hold those advantages, and what we have seen since about 1992, a brief boom as we collected the post-cold-war (world communism) dividend, but by 2006 it was fairly evident that ‘the great leveling’ in the world economy would occur at the same time as ‘the great sort’ was occurring in the US population.

    ie: minimum bar for a college degree with any employability is a STEM degree. College degree only tells employers you can follow direction. It is the same bar as a high school diploma used to be before they discounted the high school diploma by lowering the standards. The same has occurred in colleges and universities. This is because while only about 15% of the work force has the IQ necessary to obtain a ‘legit’ college degree, about 50% of our people go to college. Ergo, 2/3 of the people who hold college degrees are meaningless. And of the remaining 1/3, only those with a STEM degree are employable.

    Worse, a PhD is a liability not an asset when seeking employment outside of research or STEM classes.

    Employers need to know you have a degree worth having from a school worth issuing it. The degree itself is now just a permission slip to seek work. Not a criteria for creating demand.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle

    https://www.quora.com/What-kinds-of-job-opportunities-are-available-for-people-with-a-PhD-in-political-economy

  • What Kinds Of Job Opportunities Are Available For People With A Phd In Political Economy?

    Just as the American and British Economies experienced purges of middle management built up between the period 1920–1980 because of the influence of ‘managerialism’ (socialism), the entire world is about to go through a set of severe employment contractions between now and at least 2025.

    1 – political management – on a vast scale.
    2 – much more of lower middle management – on a vast scale.
    3 – a little more labor due to automation – perhaps on a perceptible scale.
    and (possibly)
    4 – much, much, much, of the financial sector on a frightening scale.

    In my (rather informed I think) opinion, if you do not possess a STEM degree for employment purposes, and perhaps a philosophy/law minor (so you think clearly), you have very little chances of employability other than “gee I have a degree”.

    Like most things, it’s more (a) who you know, and (b) what industry you can get into early, and (c) how much you can save of your income and invest before you are 30.

    Why? Because the west has held a 500 year military, technical, legal, financial, cultural, literacy, and knowledge advantage over the world, and Because Americans inherited the British empire’s institutions of world finance, trade, and oil. It is quite possible that Americans will descend to european standards of living (which are much lower unfortunately), and even more possible that europeans will descend as well.

    We no longer hold those advantages, and what we have seen since about 1992, a brief boom as we collected the post-cold-war (world communism) dividend, but by 2006 it was fairly evident that ‘the great leveling’ in the world economy would occur at the same time as ‘the great sort’ was occurring in the US population.

    ie: minimum bar for a college degree with any employability is a STEM degree. College degree only tells employers you can follow direction. It is the same bar as a high school diploma used to be before they discounted the high school diploma by lowering the standards. The same has occurred in colleges and universities. This is because while only about 15% of the work force has the IQ necessary to obtain a ‘legit’ college degree, about 50% of our people go to college. Ergo, 2/3 of the people who hold college degrees are meaningless. And of the remaining 1/3, only those with a STEM degree are employable.

    Worse, a PhD is a liability not an asset when seeking employment outside of research or STEM classes.

    Employers need to know you have a degree worth having from a school worth issuing it. The degree itself is now just a permission slip to seek work. Not a criteria for creating demand.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle

    https://www.quora.com/What-kinds-of-job-opportunities-are-available-for-people-with-a-PhD-in-political-economy

  • SCREWED AMERICA THE ‘CANCEROUS’ GENERATION

    https://www.amazon.com/Barbarians-Boomers-Immigrants-Screwed-Generation/dp/1541136942/BOOMERS SCREWED AMERICA

    THE ‘CANCEROUS’ GENERATION

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-15 21:09:00 UTC

  • Nicholas Herndon: —“They’re (Democrats) missing the idea that many Americans w

    http://www.salon.com/2017/01/15/dont-think-of-a-rampaging-elephant-linguist-george-lakoff-explains-how-the-democrats-helped-elect-trump/Via Nicholas Herndon: —“They’re (Democrats) missing the idea that many Americans who depend on health care, affordable health care, for example, have strict-father positions and voted for Trump against their interests. And this is something has been known for ages, that a lot of poor conservatives vote against their material interests, because they’re voting for their worldview. And the reason for it is that their moral worldview defines who they are. They are not going to vote against their own definition of who they are.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-15 13:14:00 UTC