Curt Doolittle

Theme: Class

  • “The short history of Neo-Marxism was apparently motivated by the obvious failur

    —“The short history of Neo-Marxism was apparently motivated by the obvious failure of the communist East to build a better world, as evidenced by their brutal expansionism and mass slaughters of civilians. They also realized that the West was moving further and further away from appropriating Marx’s doctrines, so they started to concoct new plans. Just as Mao replaced Marx’s concept of the proletariat (trained factory workers) with the masses of unskilled survival farmers, the neo-Marxists foresaw that the Western “proletariat” would never go that route. Hence they started pushing the idea of the revolutionary potential of ALL MINORITY FRINGE GROUPS, such as the Unskilled Third World masses, the feminists and gender benders, the SJW, and lately also the BLM’s and others. They set up the dialectics in such a way that there is one core enemy: whites (esp attacking the traditional concepts of masculinity and feminity). What whites must learn if they are to survive, is that the debate about white survival has been put on the table by people with only one purpose in mind: destruction. The Muslim masses have come to play a central role in this. The core lessons are that these radicals should not be allowed to debate it (well they don’t really debate but shout and cry), and also that the ballot is NOT the forum to decide this.”—Tobie Louw

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-12 14:29:00 UTC

  • ***Boys fight, young men go to war, men build businesses, grown men use finance,

    ***Boys fight, young men go to war, men build businesses, grown men use finance, and senior men use politics, and those of us who can, use pure ideas.***

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-11 11:41:00 UTC

  • The Poor Want To Survive, The Privileged Talk Politics

    THE POOR WANT TO SURVIVE. THE PRIVILEGE TALK POLITICS. –“Are the People of the Donbas Communist Sympathisers?”— Again, a privileged bit of silliness. The people in the donbas are fucking dirt poor and it sucks like hell, and the technological revolution that is floating ukraine in the other cities is not there. Right now it is a depopulated wasteland. Think detroit after a civil war. Think of the donbas as say, coal mining regions of wales, or the hills of kentucky, or any of the cities in america that live off state financed military (naval) production, all rolled into one. in 1992 their freaking world fell apart and without the organized redistribution of commerical activity to their region by state military investment, they have NO HOPE. They want pensions, redistribution, and they remember the REAL GOOD that was done for them by the soviet union. THe soviets were TERRIBLE for eastern europe but they were not terrible for many rural russian peasants. PEOPLE REACH FOR WHAT THEY UNDERSTAND. what they just want is food, clothing, shelter, security, family and to have a few hopes that are within reach of achievement. A middle or working class privileged person is a communist sympathizer. He has a luxury. A poor person is just DESPERATE.

  • The Poor Want To Survive, The Privileged Talk Politics

    THE POOR WANT TO SURVIVE. THE PRIVILEGE TALK POLITICS. –“Are the People of the Donbas Communist Sympathisers?”— Again, a privileged bit of silliness. The people in the donbas are fucking dirt poor and it sucks like hell, and the technological revolution that is floating ukraine in the other cities is not there. Right now it is a depopulated wasteland. Think detroit after a civil war. Think of the donbas as say, coal mining regions of wales, or the hills of kentucky, or any of the cities in america that live off state financed military (naval) production, all rolled into one. in 1992 their freaking world fell apart and without the organized redistribution of commerical activity to their region by state military investment, they have NO HOPE. They want pensions, redistribution, and they remember the REAL GOOD that was done for them by the soviet union. THe soviets were TERRIBLE for eastern europe but they were not terrible for many rural russian peasants. PEOPLE REACH FOR WHAT THEY UNDERSTAND. what they just want is food, clothing, shelter, security, family and to have a few hopes that are within reach of achievement. A middle or working class privileged person is a communist sympathizer. He has a luxury. A poor person is just DESPERATE.

  • The problem? The lie of democracy, the lie of equality, the lie of equality of i

    The problem? The lie of democracy, the lie of equality, the lie of equality of interest, and the lie of corporatism(globalism) over genes

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-10 14:22:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/851440131542265856

    Reply addressees: @Communism_Kills @mongoosenewyork

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/850805205235113984

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/850805205235113984

  • People vote by Race, Class, Gender, Age, in that order. JUST AS YOU WOULD EXPECT

    People vote by Race, Class, Gender, Age, in that order. JUST AS YOU WOULD EXPECT IF YOU WERE RATIONAL.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-10 14:20:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/851439854198153216

    Reply addressees: @Communism_Kills @mongoosenewyork

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/850805205235113984

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/850805205235113984

  • Explaining the Church of TED to a college student: “It’s Oprah for the over-educ

    Explaining the Church of TED to a college student:

    “It’s Oprah for the over-educated classes”.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-10 14:00:00 UTC

  • “There is no greater decadence than virtue signalling against those less fortuna

    —“There is no greater decadence than virtue signalling against those less fortunate than you.”—Julian le Roux

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-10 13:08:00 UTC

  • THE POOR WANT TO SURVIVE. THE PRIVILEGE TALK POLITICS. –“Are the People of the

    THE POOR WANT TO SURVIVE. THE PRIVILEGE TALK POLITICS.

    –“Are the People of the Donbas Communist Sympathisers?”—

    Again, a privileged bit of silliness.

    The people in the donbas are fucking dirt poor and it sucks like hell, and the technological revolution that is floating ukraine in the other cities is not there. Right now it is a depopulated wasteland. Think detroit after a civil war.

    Think of the donbas as say, coal mining regions of wales, or the hills of kentucky, or any of the cities in america that live off state financed military (naval) production, all rolled into one. in 1992 their freaking world fell apart and without the organized redistribution of commerical activity to their region by state military investment, they have NO HOPE.

    They want pensions, redistribution, and they remember the REAL GOOD that was done for them by the soviet union. THe soviets were TERRIBLE for eastern europe but they were not terrible for many rural russian peasants.

    PEOPLE REACH FOR WHAT THEY UNDERSTAND.

    what they just want is food, clothing, shelter, security, family and to have a few hopes that are within reach of achievement.

    A middle or working class privileged person is a communist sympathizer. He has a luxury. A poor person is just DESPERATE.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-10 12:23:00 UTC

  • Thanks to the success of the Marxists and Critical Theorists in the occupation a

    Thanks to the success of the Marxists and Critical Theorists in the occupation and conquest of the academy, Academic discourse in philosophy, politics, economics, what passes for ‘social science’, using books, journals, papers, blogs, and classrooms appears at least in retrospect as indifferent from seeking the approval of the church fathers prior to publication. There isn’t any difference between offense of the pretenses of the church, and offence of the pretense of the marxists, feminists, and snowflakes. They are both hostile to truth.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-09 18:53:00 UTC