Curt Doolittle

Theme: Class

  • As the middle class wanes, you must choose New Right or Old Left

    As the middle class wanes, you must choose New Right or Old Left.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-04 11:38:00 UTC

  • THE POSTMODERN ALT-RIGHT vs. THE MODERN NEW-RIGHT —“One may say that my use of

    THE POSTMODERN ALT-RIGHT vs. THE MODERN NEW-RIGHT

    —“One may say that my use of “alt-right” is misleading since those who call themselves alt-right do not necessarily agree. Some are just sick of the SJWs, some are nazi’s, a few are disaffected libertarians, others are socialists …. but all of them are anti modernist. They simply reject the pillars of the western philosophical cannon. This is what makes them quintessentially post/anti-modern. To hell with the categorical imperative. To hell with classical liberalism. To hell with moderation. And to hell with judge discovered law.”—Ayelam Valentine Agaliba

    REPEAT THAT. The Alt Right:

    – is post/anti-modern, because it:

    – abandons the categorical imperative.

    – abandons classical liberalism.

    – abandons moderation.

    – abandons judge discovered law.

    I haven’t done this in Propertarianism. I’ve merely extended the suppression of parasitism in product(property) and service(action) to information(speech).

    So in my opinion, I have COMPLETED the modern program – finally.

    And made postmodern discourse into prosecutable fraud.

    The *ONLY* painful bit is that christianity must complete it’s transition to hero worship of jesus and abandon the lies of ‘god’.

    There are no exceptions to truth. Truth is truth.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-03 06:30:00 UTC

  • “The alt right’s coalition crosses multiple classes. The manosphere is right abo

    —“The alt right’s coalition crosses multiple classes. The manosphere is right about the nature of women, the HBD people are right about the difference in Race, the identitarians are right about the necessity of tribe and scale, the traditionalists are empiricists, going with what has worked. We need some combination of all these disparate groups’ differing solutions, to get ourselves out of the Marxian problems.”– Ryan Williams

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 16:41:00 UTC

  • “The black conservatives’ critiques of leftism are correct: leftists are emotion

    —“The black conservatives’ critiques of leftism are correct: leftists are emotional children mentally dominated by the desire for the state to make up for their own lack of capital(of all kinds). What the conventional color blind right fails to see is that while not all members of group x utilize the group evolutionary strategy as is the norm in group x, the vast majority DO use that strategy. If group X’s strategy is parasitic, it becomes necessary to exclude members of group x, regardless of personal merit. People are both individuals AND members of groups.”— Ryan Williams

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 16:27:00 UTC

  • OPPRESSION LIT. Feminism: The Women Marxism: The Laborers Identitarianism: The S

    OPPRESSION LIT.

    Feminism: The Women

    Marxism: The Laborers

    Identitarianism: The Slaves

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 15:00:00 UTC

  • If impulse suppression, meritocracy, equal opportunity, and kin selection are th

    If impulse suppression, meritocracy, equal opportunity, and kin selection are the values of “white supremacy” why NOT be white supremacists?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 05:39:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/892620858757394432

    Reply addressees: @LisaBloom

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/892568799798538240

    IN REPLY TO:

    @LisaBloom

    After discriminating against LGBTs, Muslims & immigrants, Trump wants DOJ civil rights lawyers to protect whites. https://t.co/6xikC7PLAR

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/892568799798538240

  • SURE. LET ME HELP YOU: EVOLUTION OF ARGUMENTATION —“So I’ll ask the big guy: I

    SURE. LET ME HELP YOU: EVOLUTION OF ARGUMENTATION

    —“So I’ll ask the big guy: Is libertarianism just economic determinism for the middle-class? Doesn’t it act as protectionist platform keep the welfare whores from both ends of the spectrum off backs of the productive middle class?”— A Friend

    Sure.

    THE EVOLUTION OF RESISTANCE MOVEMENTS

    Sovereignty arose in our earliest eras as a resistance against equalitarianism (free riding)

    Slavery arose in the era of farming, and liberty as a resistance against slavery. (free riding)

    Liberty arose in the era of cities, as a rebellion against over taxation. (free riding)

    Libertarianism in both european puritan and jewish anarchist forms, arose as a rebellion against *misuse of taxation* in the classical liberal and social democratic era.

    1) Equalitarianism > Sovereignty > Law and truth

    2) Slavery > Freedom > Abrahamism and deception

    3) Taxation > Liberty > Philosophy and idealism

    4) Classical Liberalism/Social Democracy > Libertarianism > Pseudo-science, pseudo-rationalism, pseudo-moralism.

    These are all means of resistance, which is why libertarianism is argued using moral language and shaming rather than the language of violence and law (aristocracy). Just as marxism and socialism and abrahamism (christianity/judaism) are argued using shaming using false narrative of oppression, superstition, idealism, and fictionalism (fictionalism is a technical term).

    The underclass was not oppressed, it was domesticated against it’s will into meritocracy and the pastoralists (lowest classes) resisted (ie:judaism and christianity and islam).

    The middle classes claimed overtaxation, as did the american colonists, in order to free ride on the aristocracy.

    Libertarianism is just restating jewish separatism and false narrative of oppression, when the jews were parasites upon the land holding classes.

    American libertarianism was just an attempt to obtain the benefits of seizing the opportunity of the new continent without paying for its (expensive) conquest and defense.

    Libertarianism is valid in the sense that it is a resistance movement that prevents downward redistribution. It is invalid in the sense that it opens borders, resists taxation, and seeks not to fight to hold the territory upon which the institutions of law and order make commerce possible.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-01 14:11:00 UTC

  • Do the men in each civilization conduct a competition for dominance (monopoly) o

    Do the men in each civilization conduct a competition for dominance (monopoly) or a competition for status (market)?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-01 09:09:00 UTC

  • CLASS LANGUAGE ARISTOCRACY, LIBERTY, FREEDOM (important) By Bill Joslin Isn’t th

    CLASS LANGUAGE ARISTOCRACY, LIBERTY, FREEDOM

    (important)

    By Bill Joslin

    Isn’t this a matter of class perspective?

    Aristrocrat – Heorism-Sovereinty-oath/jury/rule of law/markets in everything

    Upper middle class – Duty-oath/granted lands(property)/protection of lands (property rights)/participation in markets (liberty)

    Lower Classes – Obedience/protection/production/liberty by permission

    Something like that?

    Libertarians (current fashion) are lower classes demanding liberty on moral grounds, libertarians of old (Nobility) demand of liberty on religious grounds… both pleading while ignoring the source of liberty?

    In other words only after agency has been developed downward into the middle class can liberty be distributed downward through the classes – The same responsibility/freedom (poor words) relation I spoke of last week.

    West Civ cultivates agency across scale by creating and preserving conditions required for agency to develop (protection, insurance, restitution against impositions upon agency from other actors – property being the external manifestation and thus measure of agency).

    Only by demonstrating the responsibility to handle liberty (obedience/oath to sovereigns to not impose upon the property of others -rule of law) allows liberty be extended.

    In this context – left and libertarians, by denying the legitimacy or even presence of sovereignty in the equation demonstrate the inability to maintain responsible use of liberty. The result being a decay of agency across the whole (lies, inability to hold a territory, inconsistent – incoherent application of law etc)

    (Curt Doolittle — my point exactly. you can’t get liberty until you have a middle class and you don’t get a middle class until well after western civ has developed. BUT OMG I SEE WHERE YOU ARE GOING WITH ACCOUNTING FOR AGENCY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 14:37:00 UTC

  • UNDERSTANDING TRUMP A *productive* Soldier, Entrepreneur, and a Monarchist (Trum

    UNDERSTANDING TRUMP

    A *productive* Soldier, Entrepreneur, and a Monarchist (Trump) trying to reform a *parasitic* Priesthood, consisting of Bureaucrats, and Supreme Soviet (US Govt) , all pretending they’re *neutral* Lawyers, limited by Judges practicing Rule of Law (Jefferson and Adam’s ambitions). The third way (jefferson/adams market govt) failed because a market government cannot make law, only negotiate binding contract – otherwise there is no method by which a judiciary and military can limit the government sufficiently to prevent the destruction of rule of law.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 07:46:00 UTC