Theme: Class
-
At incomes of $32,000 a year white Westerners, by an large, are the global one p
At incomes of $32,000 a year white Westerners, by an large, are the global one percent (https://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/050615/are-you-top-one-percent-world.asp) The rest of the world is being indoctrinated on French Revolutionary ethos and tactics of human rights (https://qz.com/462264/how-the-rest-of-the-world-learns-about-the-american-revolution-in-school/) Does this storming of the proverbial Bastille begin to make a little more sense https://youtu.be/LY_Yiu2U2Ts -
While it is the fashion in this era to act out the pretense of humoring the peas
While it is the fashion in this era to act out the pretense of humoring the peasantry, for those of us with long family histories and centuries of responsibility to bear the high cost of Paternal exercise in defense of the normative commons the peasantry takes for granted.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-20 22:29:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976224167736545281
Reply addressees: @EliRadninyc
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976222783314235396
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976222783314235396
-
When the underclass decides that it will violate the class contract for peaceful
When the underclass decides that it will violate the class contract for peaceful negotiations and resorts to name calling, shaming and rallying, it is the upper class’ responsibility -the obligation of the nobility- to exercise good paternal judgment and discipline the children.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-20 22:26:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976223531796193281
Reply addressees: @EliRadninyc
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976222783314235396
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976222783314235396
-
I’m avery public person. Research is easy. I don’t hide. ALthough If I had your
I’m avery public person. Research is easy. I don’t hide. ALthough If I had your social, sexual, economic, and political market value I suppose I might wear a virtual bag over my head as you do. I mean. I’m compassionate. I can understand your embarrassment. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-20 22:23:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976222682495594496
Reply addressees: @AndreasOpinions @EliRadninyc @dvalls1006 @LolitaResist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976221705659146240
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976221705659146240
-
( I am a 1%er. I just go slumming with the proles now and then. ) Did you know t
( I am a 1%er. I just go slumming with the proles now and then. ) Did you know that we can tell your Gender and IQ from your vocabulary and method of argument? Really. Certain combinations aren’t capable of argument so they try to shut down debate instead. Like schoolchildren. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-20 22:13:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976220141582241794
Reply addressees: @EliRadninyc @AndreasOpinions @dvalls1006 @LolitaResist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976218851078787072
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976218851078787072
-
You know, I still don’t understand why we don’t give men like Tiger Woods, Derek
You know, I still don’t understand why we don’t give men like Tiger Woods, Derek Jeter, George Clooney, Charlie Sheen, Donald Trump, and Jack Kennedy who ‘bag’ a lot of social climbers, their own walk of fame. I mean, theses guys are our heroes: Women jump at every opportunity.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-20 19:18:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976176050945384448
Reply addressees: @4everNeverTrump
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976156561398628354
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976156561398628354
-
You know, I still don’t understand why we don’t give men like Tiger Woods, Derek
You know, I still don’t understand why we don’t give men like Tiger Woods, Derek Jeter, George Clooney, Charlie Sheen, Donald Trump, and Jack Kennedy who ‘bag’ a lot of social climbers, their own walk of fame. I mean, theses guys are our heroes: Women jump at every opportunity.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-20 19:17:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976175956317626368
Reply addressees: @NewYorker @RonanFarrow
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976155643127189505
IN REPLY TO:
@NewYorker
Revisit @RonanFarrow on the former Playboy model Karen McDougal’s story, which provides a detailed look at the way Donald Trump and his allies used clandestine hotel-room meetings, payoffs, and complex legal agreements to keep his affairs out of the press: https://t.co/sHCI6VfPPx https://t.co/ESZRKE3Vae
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976155643127189505
-
I dunno. I’m grateful to Springer for showing the world what the room temperatur
I dunno. I’m grateful to Springer for showing the world what the room temperature IQ crowd does with their privilege of exiting poverty, freedom of expression, and their ability to vote.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-20 19:11:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976174331872063488
Reply addressees: @adamcbest
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976121979043532800
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976121979043532800
-
(taunts to a prole girl) You have clearly never had responsibility, power, or we
(taunts to a prole girl)
You have clearly never had responsibility, power, or wealth, because if you did, you’d understand that competition just makes the entire process more exciting. The weak worry. The strong bait the weak for amusement while they achieve their goals.
Now, you see, name calling, is an admission that one cannot participate in a discourse because of inadequate vocabulary, available knowledge, available paradigms, and the ability to organize them into a set of constant relations that we call ‘argument’ – what humans do.
When the underclass decides that it will violate the class contract for peaceful negotiations and resorts to name calling, shaming and rallying, it is the upper class’ responsibility -the obligation of the nobility- to exercise good paternal judgment and discipline the children.
While it is the fashion in this era to act out the pretense of humoring the peasantry, for those of us with long family histories and centuries of responsibility to bear the high cost of Paternal exercise in defense of the normative commons the peasantry takes for granted.
Now, any good parent, relative, kin, neighbor or nobility will exercise some modicum of patience – usually to let the children vent their energies – at some time we must invest a bit of our energies in necessary disciplinary action. otherwise the children will never mature.
And one of the lessons that we can best provide is to make an example of a particularly infantile child just to remind the rest of the vermin that grownups do exist, and there is a limit to our paternal tolerance.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-20 18:36:00 UTC
-
FALSE. Personality Traits (the big five) neutralize differences between genders
FALSE. Personality Traits (the big five) neutralize differences between genders and classes. This is why the discipline has (a) developed the dimensions (compositions) for each of those traits,(b) mapped those traits to our biology (reward systems). Because Big-5 hid differences.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-20 18:17:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976160901303865344
Reply addressees: @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976039826192584704
IN REPLY TO:
@DegenRolf
Personality traits account for only 5% of the individual differences in political orientation. https://t.co/7PiyHQQxpJ https://t.co/MfFX5SQtD7
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976039826192584704