Theme: Class

  • Class Hierarchy and Their Methods of Assertion

    CLASS HIERARCHY AND THEIR METHODS OF ASSERTION by John Mark I like to try to put Curt’s stuff in language the avg IQ tier can understand more easily (forces me to understand it better). Here’s my attempt at this one: Aristocracy: War “We will apply violence in whatever way necessary/beneficial – up to and including war conquest and colonization – in order to suppress parasitism upon our productive group/tribe and to keep it from becoming weak or losing (any form of) capital.” Upper: Law “Due to our wealth and influence we have the opportunity to affect the rules of society in a way that benefits us – sometimes the way we affect the rules can be good, sometimes bad (e.g. buying/owning corrupt politicians to write rules that allow us to privatize gains and socialize losses to everyone else).” Upper Middle: Science (Econ) “We are looking for a competitive advantage so we like to use science/R&D/innovation to give us an edge. We make economic arguments (often libertarian) because we don’t want our efforts to get ahead to be hindered.” Middle Class: Philosophy “We wish we had more power than we do, but we feel we have a shot at getting more power or at least affecting those in power, plus we often don’t like what the upper class does when they act in their own interest, so we put a lot of effort into thinking and talking about how to make sense of the world and what those who have more power than us *should* do (what we wish they would do). (What we often don’t realize is the upper class doesn’t give a rip about what we think they should do.)” Working Class: Religion “We want/need something to make us feel better about life and give us a safe, reassuring sense of community (we don’t have much else). Religion fits the bill.” Underclass: Intuition “We are not smart but we don’t know it (Dunning Kruger), and we are low status, hate being so, and don’t know how to (are unable to) fix it, so we instinctively feel the world is not fair and those more successful than us must be cheating somehow. Thus leftism/socialism/communism/SJWism tells us what we want to hear and we are extremely enthusiastic about it because we have no other strategy in life, or ability to come up with or carry out any other strategy.”
  • Class Hierarchy and Their Methods of Assertion

    CLASS HIERARCHY AND THEIR METHODS OF ASSERTION by John Mark I like to try to put Curt’s stuff in language the avg IQ tier can understand more easily (forces me to understand it better). Here’s my attempt at this one: Aristocracy: War “We will apply violence in whatever way necessary/beneficial – up to and including war conquest and colonization – in order to suppress parasitism upon our productive group/tribe and to keep it from becoming weak or losing (any form of) capital.” Upper: Law “Due to our wealth and influence we have the opportunity to affect the rules of society in a way that benefits us – sometimes the way we affect the rules can be good, sometimes bad (e.g. buying/owning corrupt politicians to write rules that allow us to privatize gains and socialize losses to everyone else).” Upper Middle: Science (Econ) “We are looking for a competitive advantage so we like to use science/R&D/innovation to give us an edge. We make economic arguments (often libertarian) because we don’t want our efforts to get ahead to be hindered.” Middle Class: Philosophy “We wish we had more power than we do, but we feel we have a shot at getting more power or at least affecting those in power, plus we often don’t like what the upper class does when they act in their own interest, so we put a lot of effort into thinking and talking about how to make sense of the world and what those who have more power than us *should* do (what we wish they would do). (What we often don’t realize is the upper class doesn’t give a rip about what we think they should do.)” Working Class: Religion “We want/need something to make us feel better about life and give us a safe, reassuring sense of community (we don’t have much else). Religion fits the bill.” Underclass: Intuition “We are not smart but we don’t know it (Dunning Kruger), and we are low status, hate being so, and don’t know how to (are unable to) fix it, so we instinctively feel the world is not fair and those more successful than us must be cheating somehow. Thus leftism/socialism/communism/SJWism tells us what we want to hear and we are extremely enthusiastic about it because we have no other strategy in life, or ability to come up with or carry out any other strategy.”
  • Aristocracy: War Upper Class: Law Upper Middle: Science (Econ) Middle Class: Phi

    Aristocracy: War
    Upper Class: Law
    Upper Middle: Science (Econ)
    Middle Class: Philosophy
    Working Class: Religion
    Underclass: Intuition.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-05 14:09:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1014874015096295425

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. Aristocracy: War Upper Class: Law Upper Middl

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    Aristocracy: War
    Upper Class: Law
    Upper Middle: Science (Econ)
    Middle Class: Philosophy
    Working Class: Religion
    Underclass: Intuition.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-05 14:09:43 UTC

  • Aristocracy: War Upper Class: Law Upper Middle: Science (Econ) Middle Class: Phi

    Aristocracy: War

    Upper Class: Law

    Upper Middle: Science (Econ)

    Middle Class: Philosophy

    Working Class: Religion

    Underclass: Intuition.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-05 10:09:00 UTC

  • Strange Question – the Correct Answer

    —“As a conservative, would you prefer a hypothetical effeminate capitalist society or a hypothetical masculine socialist society?”— Hmmm…. Socialism(equality) is the result of the female reproductive strategy, and capitalism(markets) is the result of a young (ascendent) male reproductive strategy, and classical liberalism(hierarchy) is the result of the established male reproductive strategy, and authoritarianism (command) regardless of redistributive, market, or extractive, is the result of dominant male reproductive strategy. As far as I know fascism has won the postwar competition as the means of rule, and markets as the means of production, and redistribution as the means of gaining the publics permission to rule. All nations of any scale are now fascists (intolerant) mixed economies, with minor variations in corruption and liberty. https://www.quora.com/As-a-conservative-would-you-prefer-a-hypothetical-effeminate-capitalist-society-or-a-hypothetical-masculine-socialist-society/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=418aaf6d&srid=u4Qv
  • Strange Question – the Correct Answer

    —“As a conservative, would you prefer a hypothetical effeminate capitalist society or a hypothetical masculine socialist society?”— Hmmm…. Socialism(equality) is the result of the female reproductive strategy, and capitalism(markets) is the result of a young (ascendent) male reproductive strategy, and classical liberalism(hierarchy) is the result of the established male reproductive strategy, and authoritarianism (command) regardless of redistributive, market, or extractive, is the result of dominant male reproductive strategy. As far as I know fascism has won the postwar competition as the means of rule, and markets as the means of production, and redistribution as the means of gaining the publics permission to rule. All nations of any scale are now fascists (intolerant) mixed economies, with minor variations in corruption and liberty. https://www.quora.com/As-a-conservative-would-you-prefer-a-hypothetical-effeminate-capitalist-society-or-a-hypothetical-masculine-socialist-society/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=418aaf6d&srid=u4Qv
  • The conversion of political parties from of class to race is nearly complete. Th

    The conversion of political parties from of class to race is nearly complete.

    The US’s first-past-the-post model forces two parties: a dominant and a resistance party.

    It’s deterministic.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-30 12:34:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1013038106503770112

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. The conversion of political parties from of c

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    The conversion of political parties from of class to race is nearly complete.

    The US’s first-past-the-post model forces two parties: a dominant and a resistance party.

    It’s deterministic.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-30 12:34:27 UTC

  • The conversion of political parties from of class to race is nearly complete. Th

    The conversion of political parties from of class to race is nearly complete.

    The US’s first-past-the-post model forces two parties: a dominant and a resistance party.

    It’s deterministic.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-30 08:34:00 UTC