Curt Doolittle

Theme: Class

  • Aristocracy?

    October 30th, 2018 3:12 PM

    —“Should the aristocracy that governs us be ultimately meritocratic or reproduce through birth.”—

    [N]ot necessarily an either-or proposition. Given: Monarchy, Aristocracy (military /territory), Nobility (church /governance /ability); the reason for inheritance of the MONARCHY evolved to be inheritable as (a) demand for singular rule decreased as participation by the aristocracy (territory) and nobility (ability) in rule increased, (b) demand for limiting competition over secession between the aristocracy and nobility increased. So via positiva meritocracy and via negativa aristocracy just rotate at different rates, and the monarchy slowest of all (if at all). In this context the elite intellectual families are doing a pretty good job of self perpetuation and maybe we should subsidize them a bit more.

  • ARISTOCRATIC (PROPERTARIAN) MARKETS 5 – Established Males (industry/politics): C

    ARISTOCRATIC (PROPERTARIAN) MARKETS

    5 – Established Males (industry/politics): Curt’s View

    4 – Lightly Established Males (family/smb): Bill’s View

    3 – Warrior Males (individuals/craftsmen): Eli Harman’s View.

    2 – Occultists (outcasts/literary) … so far we don’t market there. Someone undoubtably will….

    1 – Traditionalists … (Religion/Tradition) … interested largely in the outputs not the history.

    (from bill and I discussing what’s going on … )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 15:33:00 UTC

  • COMBATTING THE PARASITE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX. by Luke Weinhagen The Parasite Indus

    COMBATTING THE PARASITE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX.

    by Luke Weinhagen

    The Parasite Industrial Complex branches:

    – Military Industrial Complex (masculine parasitism, right establishment politics)

    – Narrative Industrial Complex (feminine parasitism, left establishment politics)

    Many models of thought and politic have been proposed to combat either the Military Industrial Complex or the Narrative Industrial Complex.

    Propertarianism recognizes and combats the Parasite Industrial Complex.

    (excellent)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 15:14:00 UTC

  • “Should the aristocracy that governs us be ultimately meritocratic or reproduce

    —“Should the aristocracy that governs us be ultimately meritocratic or reproduce through birth.”—

    Not necessarily an either-or proposition. Given: Monarchy, Aristocracy (military /territory), Nobility (church /governance /ability); the reason for inheritance of the MONARCHY evolved to be inheritable as (a) demand for singular rule decreased as participation by the aristocracy (territory) and nobility (ability) in rule increased, (b) demand for limiting competition over secession between the aristocracy and nobility increased.

    So via positiva meritocracy and via negativa aristocracy just rotate at different rates, and the monarchy slowest of all (if at all).

    In this context the elite intellectual families are doing a pretty good job of self perpetuation and maybe we should subsidize them a bit more.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 15:12:00 UTC

  • I’ve seen this somewhere before. The entire aristocratic project “…never inclu

    I’ve seen this somewhere before. The entire aristocratic project “…never included more than 25000 people…., or 250,000 in total.”

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 13:03:00 UTC

  • (Which doesn’t matter in a signal economy, right? And, outside of Venezuela and

    (Which doesn’t matter in a signal economy, right? And, outside of Venezuela and Mexico that’s the problem. Certainly is in the USA. Perception – meaning perception of relative condition in the face of signal uncertainty – is reality. it’s all people have to measure by.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-29 21:32:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057022376859312128

    Reply addressees: @GeolibGeorge @Septeus7 @Slysneak @Lord_Keynes2 @jappleby123 @Noahpinion @ProfSteveKeen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057020582649364482

    IN REPLY TO:

    @GonzoGeorgism

    @curtdoolittle @Septeus7 @Slysneak @Lord_Keynes2 @jappleby123 @Noahpinion @ProfSteveKeen …. doing is an economic and therefore unavoidably empirical one. And especially if the question at hand is how well policy is affecting said correlating variables.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057020582649364482

  • The Destruction of Property at All Levels

    October 29th, 2018 10:11 AM MARXISM IN EVERYTHING: THE DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY AT ALL LEVELSMarxism: suppression of private property in the means of production, vs, Libertarianism: suppression of common property as the means of production, vs, Neo-conservatism: suppression of nations as the means of production. All three promote MONOPOLIES (equalities) of the HERD (feminine reproductive strategy and intuition) rather than MARKETS (inequalities) of the PACK (make reproductive strategy and intuition). An expression of:

    —“the psychometric literature indicates, in regards to the masculine vs feminine, and the conservative vs liberal.

    Low openness/high conscientiousness (orderly, sensitive to disgust, will to create borders and demarcate categories, committed to his/her own covenants) High openness/low conscientiousness (imaginative, creative, disorderly, chaotic, tolerant of mess, fickle, temperamental, resistant of borders etc) It’s masculine vs feminine. A noun-use bias is masculine because it’s a label for an actual solid thing (order) A verb-use bias feminine because it’s the label for word describing an occurrence or something happening ie transformative ie chaotic – feminine. Masculine – order (Pack)Feminine – chaos. (Herd)”— Joel Harvey Because of the brain structure variation between female and male brains (although we can, each of us, exist along this spectrum including the middle of it). With Brandon Hayes and Joel Harvey

  • (Why? Because I have been lucky in life. And because I love the common man. He i

    (Why? Because I have been lucky in life. And because I love the common man. He is the only moral man. And I want to roast these people who prey upon him and his fellows – slowly on a landscape of pyres.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-28 01:10:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1056352381204598785

  • (Why? Because I have been lucky in life. And because I love the common man. He i

    (Why? Because I have been lucky in life. And because I love the common man. He is the only moral man. And I want to roast these people who prey upon him and his fellows – slowly on a landscape of pyres.)

    (euphemistically of course)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-27 21:09:00 UTC

  • Leadership should peak by organizational scale, and AFIK it’s closer to 130s. AF

    Leadership should peak by organizational scale, and AFIK it’s closer to 130s. AFAIK leadership forms in every socio-economic class at the 15 and 30 marks.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-27 19:48:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1056271362975825923

    Reply addressees: @AdamaZvi @robinhanson @DegenRolf

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1056243677306200064

    IN REPLY TO:

    @AdamaZvi

    @robinhanson @DegenRolf Doesn’t leadership peak at iq 120? And say we definite good leadership as judgement and effectiveness combined. Then it seems like iq fits the same pattern.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1056243677306200064