RT @WerrellBradley: PSYOP ALERT
“Capitalism” represents psychological operations designed to justify the interests of bankers.
“Communism…
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 18:07:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744420628046725566
RT @WerrellBradley: PSYOP ALERT
“Capitalism” represents psychological operations designed to justify the interests of bankers.
“Communism…
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 18:07:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744420628046725566

Standard Diagram Of Types of Rulers
What’s missing? That’s a spectrum across the top from disorder to order – the privilage of an economic ruler is the result of the four previous types of rulers implementing rule of law that deviates as little as possible from the Natural Law… https://t.co/JH5vTRDE4o

Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 16:39:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744398333936795952
Correct. Urban city states and suburban and rural territorial states. For the simple reason that they have opposing interests in the rules of the commons because they are polar opposites in opportunity costs and responsibility for commons.
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 14:02:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744358974391042465
Reply addressees: @ShorterboyMs @JDPARIZEE70
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744304427270648192
WHY THE SENSE OF INEQUALITY INCREASES AS EQUALITY INCREASES
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/STFeyu-Q_oE
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 12:42:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744338673733157313
Classes are a natural genetic consequence. No castes are necessary in an homogenous polity. In a heterogeneous polity like india the caste system defended the upper classes from outbreeding – which is why it was imposed, but also makes possible an intergenerational military division of responsibility with clear rights obligations and inalienations for members of the cast (rank). This is useful in a large poor, genetically heterogeneous population especially when like in india there is a large disparity in IQ.
Reply addressees: @AmitPat09117930 @Zamicol @cryptogeni
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 01:55:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744175901791645696
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744170494339731517
Actually, it is the democratic party that serves the billionaires. Look it up. That’s called a fact. Single mothers and single women are responsible for decay as I stated. That’s also a fact. Look it up. Women are overwhelmingly prone to emotive and magical thinking – which is why their testimony in courts was historically discounted worldwide. That’s a fact. Look it up. Women, even today, often cannot distinguish between true/not and desirable/not, and presume their emotions are facts – as you have demonstrated here.
Reply addressees: @madebybadcode @evanfeenstra @evilpersists @naval
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-07 21:33:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744110052292636672
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744093721900024028
RT @KirkegaardEmil: There we have it. The Marxist conspiracy theory that is the go-to explanation of race relations fails when we look at c…
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-07 03:25:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1743836203873358329
I always find it fascinating when some commoner tries to inform me about which party pays taxes, almost seventy percent of taxes are paid by the wealthy. The fact that tiny fraction of the populace, the wealthy, are most often attracted to the democratic party, has more to do…
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-06 17:39:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1743688692030443679
Reply addressees: @madebybadcode @evanfeenstra @evilpersists @naval
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1743684264078533036
I always find it fascinating when some commoner tries to inform me about which party pays taxes, almost seventy percent of taxes are paid by the wealthy. The fact that tiny fraction of the populace, the wealthy, are most often attracted to the democratic party, has more to do with their asset composition and ability to buy access and influence with that party than it does with their political instincts. Conversely, this does not convey any meaning at all to the non-wealthy participants in either party other than the primary difference between the party affliations is degree of responsibilty for private and common. In other words, the only reason the democratic party wins is single and childless women who always and everywhere vote to escape responsibility. Otherwise the country is solid red. SO the question remains for the rest of the polity, why, if a woman is a hyperconsumer, and not contributing to the production of anotehr generation, or, sometimes worse, a single mother which is reducible to producing infantilized children, and who are universally worse parents than single fathers because of it, then why should the rest of us subsidize this destructive behavior?
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-06 17:39:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1743688691904614400
THE NORTH-SOUTH DIVIDE IS A WORLD NORM – WE AREN’T SPECIAL
Just as northern italy is middle class germanic and southern italy is underclass greek, just as canada is a soft war between the underclass catholic french of quebec, and the middle class protestant english in the rest of the country, or in the UK the scotts in the north, and the english in the south, the USA is, at least on the north south divide, a soft war between the middle class culture of the english in the north and working class culture of the scotts irish in the south, with the germans more often than not split between them.
The nine (or eleven) nations of north america is about right. But more than that, we are now in a position where the basic political structures necessary for urban centers vs suburban and rural territories is such that we require city states to divorce from territorial states in addition to dividing into sub-nations.
So while there was value in a central government in order to conquer the territory and drive out the europeans so that we would be militarily safe (one of the smart moves in human history) and this is the purpose of empires, at this point there is far less value in the central government for other than it’s original intent as defense, trade policy, dispute resolution between states. So just as say, in china and russia, south america, and the middle east, people want smaller governments with shorter power distance, that more directly address their wants and needs – americans want local control of social policy even if strategic and military policy (as well as emergency services) are centralized. After all, the sole purpose of Republican (rule of law) government is the insurer of last resort.
Cheers
Reply addressees: @Flavus59
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-31 14:46:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741470892834643968
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741460280721182748