Curt Doolittle

Theme: Class

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542928005 Timestamp) NAIL IN THE OBVIOUS COFFIN…. LATER MARRIAGE LEADING TO PAIRING OFF, AND INCREASING INCOME DIFFERENCES The best results on assortative mating and inequality I have seen by Tyler Cowen This paper studies the evolution of assortative mating in the permanent wage (the individual-specific component of wage) in the U.S., its role in the increase in family wage inequality, and the factors behind this evolution. I first document a substantial trend in assortative mating, as measured by the permanent wage correlation of couples, from 0.3 for families formed in the late 1960s to 0.52 for families formed in the late 1980s. I show that this trend accounts for more than one-third of the increase in family wage inequality across these cohorts of families. I then argue that the increase in marriage age across these cohorts contributed to the assortative mating and thus to the rising inequality. Individuals face a large degree of uncertainty about their permanent wages early in their careers. If they marry early, as most individuals in the late 1960s did, this uncertainty leads to weak marital sorting along permanent wage. But when marriage is delayed, as in the late 1980s, the sorting becomes stronger due to the quick resolution of this uncertainty with work experience. After providing reduced-form evidence on the impact of marriage age, I build and estimate a marriage model with wage uncertainty and show that the increase in marriage age can explain almost 80% of the increase in assortative mating. https://sites.google.com/site/alparslantuncay2018/research

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543186124 Timestamp) TRIPARTISM Tripartism: Those who Rule (Army) – Force: Freedom/Threat . Those who Teach (Academy) – Words: Oppy./Ostracization. Those who Labor (Family) – Trade: Consumption/Deprivation. Labor divided into the hierarchy we call the economy: Investment, Finance, Banking, Organizing, Managing, Laboring, Trading, Distributing. (Libertarian) The Academy evolved into the Academy, Media, State (clerical), Bureaucracy. (Feminine) The Army Evolved into the Political and Judiciary, intelligence, military, and the military industrial complex. (Masculine) Such that we still possess all three classes but that most of us participate in more than one. This is why class hierarchies are conflated: one can participate in a role in each, and shift our allegiance to whatever elite as is in our advantage. We are not anchored except by our social, sexual, economic, political, and military value to one group or another.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543186124 Timestamp) TRIPARTISM Tripartism: Those who Rule (Army) – Force: Freedom/Threat . Those who Teach (Academy) – Words: Oppy./Ostracization. Those who Labor (Family) – Trade: Consumption/Deprivation. Labor divided into the hierarchy we call the economy: Investment, Finance, Banking, Organizing, Managing, Laboring, Trading, Distributing. (Libertarian) The Academy evolved into the Academy, Media, State (clerical), Bureaucracy. (Feminine) The Army Evolved into the Political and Judiciary, intelligence, military, and the military industrial complex. (Masculine) Such that we still possess all three classes but that most of us participate in more than one. This is why class hierarchies are conflated: one can participate in a role in each, and shift our allegiance to whatever elite as is in our advantage. We are not anchored except by our social, sexual, economic, political, and military value to one group or another.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543529647 Timestamp) HOW DID THEY DO IT AND WHY CAN’T WE? Having divorced themselves from the burden of carrying territory, the classes necessary to defend it, police it, govern it, and the classes necessary to engage in production to pay for it, they were free to specialize in predation upon the host – primarily through various forms of usury, rent seeking, and conspiracy with the state against the people, and just as we redistributed lower class reproduction to the upper classes, they invested ALL of their reproduction in the parasitic classes. That’s the net of it right there. We can’t do that because we need to hold territory, fight for it, and pay for fighting for it, while continuously improving our condition. Ergo we produce commons and they parasitically consume and destroy commons. I mean. That’s the economics of it right there.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543529647 Timestamp) HOW DID THEY DO IT AND WHY CAN’T WE? Having divorced themselves from the burden of carrying territory, the classes necessary to defend it, police it, govern it, and the classes necessary to engage in production to pay for it, they were free to specialize in predation upon the host – primarily through various forms of usury, rent seeking, and conspiracy with the state against the people, and just as we redistributed lower class reproduction to the upper classes, they invested ALL of their reproduction in the parasitic classes. That’s the net of it right there. We can’t do that because we need to hold territory, fight for it, and pay for fighting for it, while continuously improving our condition. Ergo we produce commons and they parasitically consume and destroy commons. I mean. That’s the economics of it right there.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543636376 Timestamp) THE ABUSE OF THE TERM “NATION” IN ITS HISTORICAL AND MARXIST-POSTMODERN-FEMINIST CONTEXT (Note: I try to collapse one of the major the cycles of history here, and repeat the same idea from different angles because while the underlying causes are not that difficult, it seems relatively difficult for most of us. Repetition solves that problem.) So Nation = A Race or Subrace or Tribal Group of Similar Genetics, Language, Culture, Traditions, Institutions, and Group Evolutionary Strategy. Period. Everything Else is Just more sophomoric postmodern term abuse. |KIN| Individual > Family > Clan > Tribe > Nation > Race > Man. |TERRITORY| Land > Lands > Country > Empire |RULE| Warriors > Militia > Military (Insurers of Last resort) > Rule(Decidability, monopoly on power) > Government (Management, monopoly on commons) > State (Corporation holding Assets, monopoly on foreign relations) > Empire. In the context of this discussion, either you have a Nation-State, or an Empire. Nation (people), Nation-State (political order), Empire (multi-national political order). We use the term International as a shorthand for inter-imperial, stat, and national. Largely because our terminology evolved during the era of nation states dominated by european nation states – each of which was and always has been an empire, forcibly created by napoleon in france, by the invention of total war, and causing the rest of the world to react to scale in order to produce militaries of capability to resist them. America, Russia, China, and India are Empires. The UK is either a Federation or an Empire, and increasingly demonstrably a Federation. Italy consists of the north and the south – although Federated or Imperial a question unresolved. Spain because – because of her regional conflicts, an empire. France because of Brittany and algeria an empire. The Universalist (pseudoscientific-marxist and sophist-postmodernist and denialist-feminist) movements attempt to construct a redefinition of terms to fool the idiots into working against their interests by reversing eugenic paternalism. The Particularist (scientific, empiricist, paternalist) order simply states what exist, and asks us to choose which order is in our interests, advocating the preservation of eugenic paternalism. It’s not complicated. It’s the pseudoscientists, sophists, denialists, and outright liars and idiots that make the current world APPEAR complicated by layers of loading, framing, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, and deceit. These questions are all open to simple answer. But the dysgenic left kleptocracy attempts to achieve by pseudoscience sophism denialism and deceit, that which the jewish, christians, and islamists achieved by supernaturalism, sophism, denialism and deceit: another dark age, in the multi-millennial war between the eugenic indo europeans, and the dysgenic afro-asiatics. REVOLT ONE Indo European Expansion by Heroic Paternal Militarism vs Semitic invention of Religious Resistance REVOLT TWO Greco Roman Expansion of Empiricism vs Semitic Religious Resistance REVOLT THREE Anglo-European Expansion of Science, Law, Accounting, and Technology vs Semitic Pseudoscientific, Sophist (pseudo-rational), Denialist, Resistance. Just the eugenic masculine heroic aristocracy against the dysgenic feminine resistance. Male vs Female at Scale. Males fight ingroup for position (pack strategy ). Females fight ingroup to Destroy and never stop (herd strategy). Males fight outgroup to cooperate or destroy. Females encourage outgroup to undermine ingroup. None of this rational choice but purely genetic and evolutionary in influence. Surviving Europeans, the Conquered Persians, and Lost Indo-Aryans applied the male strategy of colonize and domesticate for profit. Semites (afro-asiatics), apply the female strategy and use disapproval, shaming, ridicule, gossip, and reputation destruction to excite the underclasses to rebel against those who have made their circumstance possible. The story of Cain and Able is the story of paternal urban agrarian vs maternal herding wanderer. And the different moral intuitions between them and between men and women continue to determine our cyclical competition. Unfortunately, the female intuition is only useful at social scale, and the male intuition at political scale. And when the feminine wins, as we have seen, the great civilizations are destroyed, just as much from plague and war without but from undermining within. Version Two Jews (undermine) > Christians (acquiesce) > Muslims (conquer and replace) Version Three Marxists (undermine) > Postmodernists (acquiesce) > Islamists (conquer and replace) The test of Racial competition of whom only the east asians and indians seem willing to resist by cultural means in india(culturo-centrism), and by state means in china, japan, and Korea (ethnocentrism) That is the explanation of the cycles of history at scale. Cheers

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543636376 Timestamp) THE ABUSE OF THE TERM “NATION” IN ITS HISTORICAL AND MARXIST-POSTMODERN-FEMINIST CONTEXT (Note: I try to collapse one of the major the cycles of history here, and repeat the same idea from different angles because while the underlying causes are not that difficult, it seems relatively difficult for most of us. Repetition solves that problem.) So Nation = A Race or Subrace or Tribal Group of Similar Genetics, Language, Culture, Traditions, Institutions, and Group Evolutionary Strategy. Period. Everything Else is Just more sophomoric postmodern term abuse. |KIN| Individual > Family > Clan > Tribe > Nation > Race > Man. |TERRITORY| Land > Lands > Country > Empire |RULE| Warriors > Militia > Military (Insurers of Last resort) > Rule(Decidability, monopoly on power) > Government (Management, monopoly on commons) > State (Corporation holding Assets, monopoly on foreign relations) > Empire. In the context of this discussion, either you have a Nation-State, or an Empire. Nation (people), Nation-State (political order), Empire (multi-national political order). We use the term International as a shorthand for inter-imperial, stat, and national. Largely because our terminology evolved during the era of nation states dominated by european nation states – each of which was and always has been an empire, forcibly created by napoleon in france, by the invention of total war, and causing the rest of the world to react to scale in order to produce militaries of capability to resist them. America, Russia, China, and India are Empires. The UK is either a Federation or an Empire, and increasingly demonstrably a Federation. Italy consists of the north and the south – although Federated or Imperial a question unresolved. Spain because – because of her regional conflicts, an empire. France because of Brittany and algeria an empire. The Universalist (pseudoscientific-marxist and sophist-postmodernist and denialist-feminist) movements attempt to construct a redefinition of terms to fool the idiots into working against their interests by reversing eugenic paternalism. The Particularist (scientific, empiricist, paternalist) order simply states what exist, and asks us to choose which order is in our interests, advocating the preservation of eugenic paternalism. It’s not complicated. It’s the pseudoscientists, sophists, denialists, and outright liars and idiots that make the current world APPEAR complicated by layers of loading, framing, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, and deceit. These questions are all open to simple answer. But the dysgenic left kleptocracy attempts to achieve by pseudoscience sophism denialism and deceit, that which the jewish, christians, and islamists achieved by supernaturalism, sophism, denialism and deceit: another dark age, in the multi-millennial war between the eugenic indo europeans, and the dysgenic afro-asiatics. REVOLT ONE Indo European Expansion by Heroic Paternal Militarism vs Semitic invention of Religious Resistance REVOLT TWO Greco Roman Expansion of Empiricism vs Semitic Religious Resistance REVOLT THREE Anglo-European Expansion of Science, Law, Accounting, and Technology vs Semitic Pseudoscientific, Sophist (pseudo-rational), Denialist, Resistance. Just the eugenic masculine heroic aristocracy against the dysgenic feminine resistance. Male vs Female at Scale. Males fight ingroup for position (pack strategy ). Females fight ingroup to Destroy and never stop (herd strategy). Males fight outgroup to cooperate or destroy. Females encourage outgroup to undermine ingroup. None of this rational choice but purely genetic and evolutionary in influence. Surviving Europeans, the Conquered Persians, and Lost Indo-Aryans applied the male strategy of colonize and domesticate for profit. Semites (afro-asiatics), apply the female strategy and use disapproval, shaming, ridicule, gossip, and reputation destruction to excite the underclasses to rebel against those who have made their circumstance possible. The story of Cain and Able is the story of paternal urban agrarian vs maternal herding wanderer. And the different moral intuitions between them and between men and women continue to determine our cyclical competition. Unfortunately, the female intuition is only useful at social scale, and the male intuition at political scale. And when the feminine wins, as we have seen, the great civilizations are destroyed, just as much from plague and war without but from undermining within. Version Two Jews (undermine) > Christians (acquiesce) > Muslims (conquer and replace) Version Three Marxists (undermine) > Postmodernists (acquiesce) > Islamists (conquer and replace) The test of Racial competition of whom only the east asians and indians seem willing to resist by cultural means in india(culturo-centrism), and by state means in china, japan, and Korea (ethnocentrism) That is the explanation of the cycles of history at scale. Cheers

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544465359 Timestamp) SIMPLE VERSION The problem of trust in a heterogeneous people is both gender, family, tribe, class, and race. In a homogeneous people it is just gender, family, and class. Marriage market solves gender conflict, and commercial market solves familial market, and houses of government solve class markets for commons. So the problem is scale of middle class, and limiting competition in political markets.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544465359 Timestamp) SIMPLE VERSION The problem of trust in a heterogeneous people is both gender, family, tribe, class, and race. In a homogeneous people it is just gender, family, and class. Marriage market solves gender conflict, and commercial market solves familial market, and houses of government solve class markets for commons. So the problem is scale of middle class, and limiting competition in political markets.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544714814 Timestamp) —“Elites developed the industrial revolution, not peasants in the field or sitting around the table at dinner time. Like always elites create innovations and the masses follow along. They weren’t tricked into it, anymore than the elites were tricked into inventing things. It’s natural. The idea that there is some kind of intrinsic abuse of workers by the elites assumes “generational agency” on both parts to get to where we are that doesn’t exist….off the top of my head.”—Mike Harvey