Theme: Civilization

  • The purpose of the marxist program was to bait decivilization with false promise

    The purpose of the marxist program was to bait decivilization with false promise and pseudoscience. It didn’t work. But Women naturally use face-before-truth, and by selling it to women and undesirable men, political correctness is simply undermining Truth before Face.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 12:14:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179731505809104901

    Reply addressees: @SufficientlyWh1 @StefanMolyneux

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179730995261644800


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @SufficientlyWh1 @StefanMolyneux It’s hard to face the fact that you don’t matter. But if you won’t put Truth Before Face, you are in fact, an enemy of the uniqueness of western civilization.Truth before Face is the highest cost we pay, and the left has sought to undermine it – because it’s our civ’s foundation.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179730995261644800


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @SufficientlyWh1 @StefanMolyneux It’s hard to face the fact that you don’t matter. But if you won’t put Truth Before Face, you are in fact, an enemy of the uniqueness of western civilization.Truth before Face is the highest cost we pay, and the left has sought to undermine it – because it’s our civ’s foundation.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179730995261644800

  • It’s hard to face the fact that you don’t matter. But if you won’t put Truth Bef

    It’s hard to face the fact that you don’t matter. But if you won’t put Truth Before Face, you are in fact, an enemy of the uniqueness of western civilization.Truth before Face is the highest cost we pay, and the left has sought to undermine it – because it’s our civ’s foundation.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 12:12:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179730995261644800

    Reply addressees: @SufficientlyWh1 @StefanMolyneux

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179730519162007553


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @SufficientlyWh1 @StefanMolyneux You apparently have been feminized so that you don’t understand the optimum means of masculine education: King of the Hill games. You also don’t understand the enemy’s undermining by GSRRM and how Stefan countersignals it all day long. If you are turned off then you don’t matter.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179730519162007553


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @SufficientlyWh1 @StefanMolyneux You apparently have been feminized so that you don’t understand the optimum means of masculine education: King of the Hill games. You also don’t understand the enemy’s undermining by GSRRM and how Stefan countersignals it all day long. If you are turned off then you don’t matter.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179730519162007553

  • TALEB AS SCAM ARTIST UNDERMINING WESTERN CIVILIZATION (tough talk from twitter)

    TALEB AS SCAM ARTIST UNDERMINING WESTERN CIVILIZATION

    (tough talk from twitter)

    (read at your own risk)

    —“Taleb, like Gould, is trying to demonise mainstream psychology–but he’s only successful in creating a folk demon for the lay public. He knows that anyone with any technical expertise thinks he’s a clown. But he doesn’t care, because accuracy is less important to him than fame.”—Claire Lehmann @clairlemon

    I don’t want to be the front man on this subject but he’s not trying to take down psychology, he’s trying to justify arab immigration to the west, and satisfy the chip on his shoulder as a christian arab. His empirical work was a dead end, and he can’t tolerate the truth: Trust.

    West and east used tests successfully to filter out corruption for positions in government. Same for military, then same for academy. Wealth is available across the bell curve, with complexity (IQ) determining your market. You need conscientiousness to accumulate that wealth.

    What taleb is attempting to obscure is west can create large complex organizations because of trust and trust under rule of law, and rule of law by filtering out corruption granting privilege to IQ. He can’t face that because levantines cannot create trust, rule of law or …

    … large complex organizations, because they thing lying is a tool, cunning is of merit, outwitting by cunning superior than outwitting by increase in productivity, quality, or innovation, and that the commons is to be pilfered rather than invested in at every opportunity.

    So taleb is missing the whole point: that he is only able to use his techniques of via-negativa risk invstment, becuase he is in the only high trust polity, using IMMORAL MEANS OF GAIN, and so is his alter ego “Fat Tony”. These men are, by western ethics and morality ‘Scammers”.

    Yet Taleb’s entire literature is devoted to lionizing scamming while ridiculing those who hold positions of privilege (influence) precisely because they are not in the scamming business. Now, this analysis will expose the primary difference between middle eastern and western…

    … people and it will explain why certain groups profit in certain industries: because they are immoral, and westerners are not.Morality requires reciprocity: productive, fully informed,warrantied, voluntary transfer, free of imposition of costs by externality against interests.

    It is quite profitable to engage in immorality among moral people, just as it is less so among immoral people. And the finance business is by and large unproductive. In other words a westerner would never engage in the tactic used by Georg Soros, which was extractive. He did.

    So whether you cast these people as amoral or immoral, intentional or unintentional, or genetically or culturally different,the reality is that only westerners practice material Reciprocity and verbal reciprocity Truth,and because we do we produce high trust and large complex …

    … disproportionately productive organizations from the family to the enterprise to the state. And lower trust people that do NOT sort for trust and grant privilege to people who have ability in complexity to PRESERVE that TRUST. That is what the chinese and the west did.

    What institutions did the middle east foster instead? Cunning, Cheating, Lying, Rent seeking, taxing trade routes rather than producing. They lauded inbreeding, familiasm, tribalism, and not trust and productivity – and they rewarded dogmatists not talent.

    As such they could not produce a middle class, middle class majority population, and middle class ethics, and as such they could not push trustworthiness down into the middle, working, and lower classes. Which is why they remained poor despite taxing world trade and …

    … consuming the genetic, cultural, institutional, knowledge and aesthetic capital of five great civilizations and reducing them to ignorance, poverty and dysgenia.

    So yes you can make money if your conscientious at every point in the IQ curve …

    … but you cannot push trust, reciprocity, truth, and duty, judge and jury, contract and rule of law, down into a population and produce the multiples of scale, unless you FILTER upward for both intelligence (complexity) and conscientiousness, and you reward the combination …

    … with status and income, forcing a status hierarchy that must be imitated. And that’s before we get to the fact that smarter people are better at suppressing error – which strangely, Taleb, as another proponent of via-negativa seems to overlook. And that as we scale …

    … opportunities are not scarcer, but more plentiful, but so are the increasing cascades of error.

    So you know, basically, Taleb has been trying to teach the west how to devolve into a low trust bunch of middle eastern scam artists and calling it ‘smart’. …

    Meanwhile, he fails to grasp that those ‘educated but unintelligent people’ are in their position to eliminate error and low trust, not to maximize profits. Which if you have been following along this argument I’m making, means that not maximizing personal profit maximizes ALL.

    So let me reduce Taleb’s life’s work as an essayist in ridicule of western civilization to its foundations: (a) Mandelbrot was right that the stock market is just noise so w/o inside information just invest in funds. … (and here comes the big one) …

    …. (b) rule of law and involuntary warranty must be extended from commercial goods and services to all information in the marketplace. yes that’s right. We gave license to people to not warranty their words in the 20th, and that’s the reason we are where we are today. Period.

    Did you make that leap with me? Well, then follow me.

    Taleb is a Charlatan who at first glance popularized Mandelbrot’s insights through humorous ego-inspiring essays making us feel smart like it made him feel smart. But the reality is, we have been smart for 5000 years: …

    … warranty of one’s words, martial testimony “reporting” in all walks of life. The RETURNS ON COMMONS make Private returns possible, and commons require high trust and that’s why europeans are the only people to have produced them.

    We call it the civil society.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 11:51:00 UTC

  • Why did Rothbard (and Hoppe) choose intersubjectively verifiable property, rathe

    Why did Rothbard (and Hoppe) choose intersubjectively verifiable property, rather than the vast empirical evidence of law for thousands of years in so many civilizations? Why do you rely on a principle rather than a complete declarative and testable sentence (law)?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-02 20:43:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179497119603929088

    Reply addressees: @StefanMolyneux @philosophicart @MrsMMissy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179494418317021184


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @StefanMolyneux @philosophicart @MrsMMissy That is why we should have a conversation – so that you can move on. It’s the conversation many have asked us to have. Start: What is the market demand for definition of morality categorized as property, sufficient to resolve disputes vs end in retaliation cycles? For Polities?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179494418317021184


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @StefanMolyneux @philosophicart @MrsMMissy That is why we should have a conversation – so that you can move on. It’s the conversation many have asked us to have. Start: What is the market demand for definition of morality categorized as property, sufficient to resolve disputes vs end in retaliation cycles? For Polities?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179494418317021184

  • MR PRESIDENT, Revolution Comes. We will write our names in history. It’s an oppo

    MR PRESIDENT, Revolution Comes. We will write our names in history. It’s an opportunity for an even GREATER LEGACY than the one you intended. Not just for you, but for all of us.

    To start it, just ask us for “A Show of Support”.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-02 03:53:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179243037110738947

    Reply addressees: @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179179575059927040


    IN REPLY TO:

    @realDonaldTrump

    ….People, their VOTE, their Freedoms, their Second Amendment, Religion, Military, Border Wall, and their God-given rights as a Citizen of The United States of America!

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179179575059927040

  • MR PRESIDENT, you are finally catching up with the rest of us, and losing hope.

    MR PRESIDENT, you are finally catching up with the rest of us, and losing hope. You hoped you could continue to build your legacy, end the war against our people and civilization, and you are finally, like us, losing HOPE. The reason for American failure? Hope before diligence.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-02 03:52:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179242639016763396

    Reply addressees: @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179179573541511176


    IN REPLY TO:

    @realDonaldTrump

    As I learn more and more each day, I am coming to the conclusion that what is taking place is not an impeachment, it is a COUP, intended to take away the Power of the….

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179179573541511176

  • “Any ‘new right’ must recognize ancient western liberal tradition of ‘noble indi

    —“Any ‘new right’ must recognize ancient western liberal tradition of ‘noble individualism’ & liberal education, etc. to avoid throwing it out with the bathwater of ‘egalitarian… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=476407716289457&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-02 02:59:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179229390795935749

  • The underclasses once again rebel against western truth for this reason, as do s

    The underclasses once again rebel against western truth for this reason, as do single women.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-02 02:56:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179228701571080192

    Reply addressees: @demontage2000 @JohnMarkSays @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179227821513814018


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @demontage2000 @JohnMarkSays @TOOEdit The left invented desirable denial, sophism and pseudoscience. The postwar right doubled down on moralizing, b/c they were as afraid of admitting western civ is eugenic as the left was of eugenics. It invalidated democracy as national virtue narrative, in addition to the church.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179227821513814018


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @demontage2000 @JohnMarkSays @TOOEdit The left invented desirable denial, sophism and pseudoscience. The postwar right doubled down on moralizing, b/c they were as afraid of admitting western civ is eugenic as the left was of eugenics. It invalidated democracy as national virtue narrative, in addition to the church.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179227821513814018

  • This inflection and the failure to continue eugenics will be seen in history lik

    This inflection and the failure to continue eugenics will be seen in history like the failure of the greek to bring about the industrial revolution. it is the basis for all problems of humanity in the post agrarian era. Vast numbers of people and cultures are detrimental to man.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-02 02:55:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179228464186118145

    Reply addressees: @demontage2000 @JohnMarkSays @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179227821513814018


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @demontage2000 @JohnMarkSays @TOOEdit The left invented desirable denial, sophism and pseudoscience. The postwar right doubled down on moralizing, b/c they were as afraid of admitting western civ is eugenic as the left was of eugenics. It invalidated democracy as national virtue narrative, in addition to the church.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179227821513814018


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @demontage2000 @JohnMarkSays @TOOEdit The left invented desirable denial, sophism and pseudoscience. The postwar right doubled down on moralizing, b/c they were as afraid of admitting western civ is eugenic as the left was of eugenics. It invalidated democracy as national virtue narrative, in addition to the church.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179227821513814018

  • The left invented desirable denial, sophism and pseudoscience. The postwar right

    The left invented desirable denial, sophism and pseudoscience. The postwar right doubled down on moralizing, b/c they were as afraid of admitting western civ is eugenic as the left was of eugenics. It invalidated democracy as national virtue narrative, in addition to the church.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-02 02:53:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179227821513814018

    Reply addressees: @demontage2000 @JohnMarkSays @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179225859368067072


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @demontage2000 @JohnMarkSays @TOOEdit The right loves the feeling of moral righteousness as much as the left loves outrage. But that is why conservative thinkers failed. We must like the founders, but better than they, create institutions and processes that provide shared incentives, not that require shared belief.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179225859368067072


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @demontage2000 @JohnMarkSays @TOOEdit The right loves the feeling of moral righteousness as much as the left loves outrage. But that is why conservative thinkers failed. We must like the founders, but better than they, create institutions and processes that provide shared incentives, not that require shared belief.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179225859368067072