RT @curtdoolittle: —“I think we’re fifty years into the next dark ages. Time to turn the light on before we forget where the switch is.”-…
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-22 15:17:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220002593054785536
Theme: Civilization
-
“Behold Europa, maker of heavens. Behold Semitia, maker of hells.”
“Behold Europa, maker of heavens. Behold Semitia, maker of hells.”
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-22 13:22:00 UTC
-
It came from us 5000 years ago, and 3500 years ago when we combined horse, bronz
It came from us 5000 years ago, and 3500 years ago when we combined horse, bronze, wheel, maneuver, and entrepreneurial warfare by raiding – and martial epistemology: Sovereignty. Results? Rule of law of tort. Jury. Truthful testimony, Markets in everything.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-21 22:05:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1219742805536444422
Reply addressees: @scprsp @WorMartiN @textortexxel
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1219740253314895872
IN REPLY TO:
@scprsp
@WorMartiN @curtdoolittle @textortexxel Haha righto. So there was a secret sauce inside European genetics (wtf is European? Vandal? Goth? Anglo? Saxon? Aryan?) that didn’t come out until after 1600 years of Christianity which came from Jews. Case closed!
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1219740253314895872
-
OUR PROGRESSIVES VS THE ENEMY’S “PROGRESSIVES” Christians (Europeans) Use “Love”
OUR PROGRESSIVES VS THE ENEMY’S “PROGRESSIVES”
Christians (Europeans) Use “Love”. That’s what ‘progressive’ meant. They continued the work of the church in secular prose. This allowed us to slowly decide if we could a given charity or not, and then ‘feel christian’ in that we had accomplished a good.
But It was the ENEMY that used ‘Undermining”, divisiveness. Marxism to create a monopoly of power to undermine the classes. Postmodernism to create a monopoly of power by undermining truth, reason, and cooperation. Feminism to undermining the ‘Militia of Everyone’ and our militarized society where one could have respect regardless of class simply by doing his or her duty.
Denialism to create a monopoly herd of conformity to the lowest common denominator. Feminism to create a female monopoly of power over men in order to destroy the compromise between the genders in the only society ever to give women freedoms.
Behold europa, maker of heavens. Behold semitia, maker of hells.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-21 16:37:00 UTC
-
Good luck finding someone of higher IQ, who understands economic history’s relat
Good luck finding someone of higher IQ, who understands economic history’s relationship with supernatural, ideal, and real paradigms.Judaism, Christianity and islam created a dark age that we barely escaped from by the restoration reason in europe. Today’s left is a repeat of it.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 19:25:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218977739677536258
Reply addressees: @PeterAl09732414 @Fisted
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218969759003312129
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218969759003312129
-
READING FOR THE INFORMED by Göran Dahl (I fking love this man 😉 ) A great docum
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LPWAEC3dbAEDu8aBAAcxIOa5CQjuflt0f0cvhCpZ_ME/htmlview?fbclid=IwAR0wwf4GP8kyLLr52pU98ik-tisbsqJlwXWFi3JE1ozg6sDneKADdGGpNd0NECESSARY READING FOR THE INFORMED
by Göran Dahl (I fking love this man 😉 )
A great document with lots of information regarding admixture events, ancestry proportions, what modern people are made up of etc.
The Modern sections with “Yamnaya” proportions are somewhat misleading, because they don’t use actual Yamnaya people as proxies for Yamnaya ancestry, but rather two of the three components that Yamnaya people are made up of: CHG (Caucasian Hunter-Gatherer) and EHG (Eastern Hunter-Gatherer). There is also a third component that has been left out: EEF (Early European Farmer), which is why Yamnaya proportions in modern Europeans and even ancient post-Yamnaya populations seem lower across the board.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LPWAEC3dbAEDu8aBAAcxIOa5CQjuflt0f0cvhCpZ_ME/htmlviewUpdated Jan 19, 2020, 3:43 PM
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 15:43:00 UTC
-
The hardest subject I have still to promote into P-vernacular is the structural
The hardest subject I have still to promote into P-vernacular is the structural composition of tradition and religion as debts of inheritance both to us, and from us, and the economics of that transfer.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 15:35:00 UTC
-
WELL THAT FITS BUT IT’S A BIG SURPRISE!!! by Göran Dahl Up until very recently,
WELL THAT FITS BUT IT’S A BIG SURPRISE!!!
by Göran Dahl
Up until very recently, it was thought that Eastern Europeans (in the form of Poles, Belarusians, Ukrainians, Russians and Balts) were the genetically closest to Proto-Indo-Iranians and, indeed, to Proto-Indo-Europeans. However, it appears that these ethnic groups had ever so slightly inflated Steppe ancestry percentages due to having higher levels of so-called Narva_HG admixture. Narva_HG belongs to the Mesolithic Narva culture, whose members were a mixture of EHG (Eastern Hunter-Gatherer) and WHG (Western Hunter-Gatherer).
Today, we can say that the people closest to Proto-Indo-Iranians and Proto-Indo-Europeans in terms of genetic distance (and Steppe ancestry) are Norwegians, Irishmen and Icelanders; the latter due to being a composite of the two former. Irishmen tend to be the closest fit for typical Proto-Indo-Iranian cultures such as Srubnaya and Sintashta, whereas Norwegians are the closest to Yamnaya_Kalmykia (a subset of Yamnaya) and Potapovka, which is thought to be ancestral to the forementioned Srubnaya.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 15:33:00 UTC
-
European means what remains constant over time
European means what remains constant over time.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 14:34:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218904591343013888
Reply addressees: @scprsp @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218903390521937920
IN REPLY TO:
@scprsp
@curtdoolittle @WorMartiN Apples, oranges and god knows what else. It looks like Western (European) just means dominant at the time; the winner. You don’t mean the fallen European empires do you? With survivorship bias it just doesn’t mean anything looking backwards. You are tying into a false concept.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218903390521937920
-
That’s just one case. The entirety of the jewish body of thought demonstrates it
That’s just one case. The entirety of the jewish body of thought demonstrates it, the chinese, the hindu (not so bad), and the white. There is no comparison to the aristotelian (european). There is a great deal of overlap with the philosophical(pretense) and theological (deceit).
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 13:49:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218893129107091457
Reply addressees: @scprsp @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218892679641214978
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@scprsp @WorMartiN This appears to survive in every group regardless of integration into new host environments. Even in the muslim world, we see certain thoughts in intellectual history only from caucasians. Ibn Khaldun claims Yemeni arab ancestry from mohammed but his thinking is clearly berber.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1218892679641214978
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@scprsp @WorMartiN This appears to survive in every group regardless of integration into new host environments. Even in the muslim world, we see certain thoughts in intellectual history only from caucasians. Ibn Khaldun claims Yemeni arab ancestry from mohammed but his thinking is clearly berber.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1218892679641214978