Curt Doolittle

Theme: Civilization

  • 7) So if you want to feel harmony in suicide and bring about another dark age of

    7) So if you want to feel harmony in suicide and bring about another dark age of ignorance, this time with social construction of the myth of possible equality,the only result of which will be dysgenia and decline – we are fine with it.
    But you can’t take the rest of us with you.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 21:54:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227350146196942849

    Reply addressees: @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227349818911186945

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy 6) Because while you are of the opinion that you reason, you have very little agency. And if you did, and you had knowledge, you would know that the female strategy is dysgenic,the left’s strategy is dysgenic, and standard of living is dependent on the center of the distribution.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1227349818911186945

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy 6) Because while you are of the opinion that you reason, you have very little agency. And if you did, and you had knowledge, you would know that the female strategy is dysgenic,the left’s strategy is dysgenic, and standard of living is dependent on the center of the distribution.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1227349818911186945

  • Nom I just do my civic duty which is to speak the truth regardless of cost. It’s

    Nom I just do my civic duty which is to speak the truth regardless of cost. It’s

    Nom I just do my civic duty which is to speak the truth regardless of cost. It’s called the Kantian imperative. It’s also the foundation of western civilization’s competitive advantage. You on the other hand used GSRRM, the female technique of equating disapproval with argument. https://t.co/WKszSkLSw8

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 21:10:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227339214905380865

    Reply addressees: @jenniferpierson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227335212608126976

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227335212608126976

  • THE RIGHT TO SELF DETERMINATION We either have the right to self determination –

    THE RIGHT TO SELF DETERMINATION

    We either have the right to self determination – or we have the right to extermination. So choose. (I’m happy either way.)

    Genomes, genetic distributions, institutions, culture, traditions, norms, manners, ethics, morals, laws, history, myth, legend, monuments, territory, are all assets. Some assets are valuable. Some are not. Some are harmful. If we choose to preserve an asset, we do so.

    1) We know that moral intuition is genetic, sex biased, and that only trauma can change it – even then only slightly. We know that all traits are somewhere between 70-80% heritable and the rest is idiosyncratic accumulation rather than patterns of environment.

    2) We know that class is genetic, with lower classes accumulating more loads (defects), upper middle the fewest, and aside from noble families, the upper classes random lottery results from the middle – but otherwise there is little to no class rotation.

    3) We know that moral biases reflect female (herd, infant-equality, devotion, consumption) strategy and the male (pack, mature-hierarchy, loyalty, capitalization) instinct and that females use social superpredation by undermining, and males political superpredation by violence.

    4) We know that each of us is born with a bias in female (lateral breadth) vs male(longitudinal velocity) brain structures, and that the stereotype of male analytic and female empathic is physical construction, and that given freedom to do so we pursue interests fitting our bias.

    5) We know that at present we are wealthy enough to want to diverge by the female, empathic, equalitarian, consumptive, infantilized, and underdeveloped strategy and some by the male, analytic, hierarchical, capitalizing, and mature strategy. And so we must separate or civil war.

    6) Because while you are of the opinion that you reason, you have very little agency. And if you did, and you had knowledge, you would know that the female strategy is dysgenic, the left’s strategy is dysgenic, and standard of living is dependent on the center of the distribution.

    7) So if you want to feel harmony in suicide and bring about another dark age of ignorance, this time with social construction of the myth of possible equality, the only result of which will be dysgenia and decline – we are fine with it.

    But you can’t take the rest of us with you.

    8) Some of us are more than semi domesticated animals sensing, perceiving, feeling, experiencing intuiting, and responding to incentives to hyper consume.

    And some of us are willing to let you turn your cities into dysgenic favelas.

    Which is what we plan to let you do.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 17:34:00 UTC

  • ROMAN AFERLIFE Much more like ghosts. This is our natural religion in both pre-I

    ROMAN AFERLIFE

    Much more like ghosts. This is our natural religion in both pre-IE and IE eras. The Underworld. We are not promised anything per se. It is more that if our wishes are not repected, our ghosts will influence the lives of the living unfavorably.

    In other words. “debts”.

    Religion is debt.

    Why?

    Morality is debt.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 15:14:00 UTC

  • WHAT DO PAGAN(ANCESTOR) AND HEATHEN (NATURE) RELIGIONS ASK OF US? The only thing

    WHAT DO PAGAN(ANCESTOR) AND HEATHEN (NATURE) RELIGIONS ASK OF US?

    The only thing heathen (nature) and pagan(archetype) religions ask of us is to acknowledge debts of our inheritance so that we pass that inheritance ‘unspent’ on to others.

    The rest is an excuse to find relaxation, comfort, entertainment and and joy with others in some activity other than running, hunting, or eating.

    What you call spiritual is the result of two biological processes.

    The first is just auto association that is constantly going on in your brain. The human part of our brain never stops, we merely regulate attention or wakefulness to increase or decrease its activity – but it’s always working even in sleep. If It is always engaged in transforming perception into a world model, predicting from that world model, focusing our attention to narrow on some prediction or other, or when not doing so, it’s in continuous rehearsal of short term memory to convert it to long term, and auto association of stimuli to find opportunities.

    Auto association is like daydreaming. It’s cheap. It’s relaxing. While thinking, reasoning, calculating, and computing with reason is expensive and hard.

    The second is the old brain constantly worrying about (calculating) social status, advantage, safety.

    So the experience we call spiritual is the ritual act of sedating the auto-association function of the brain (which is very deep in the bottom center, so that it can fucking relax, and we can feel the safety we feel resting or sleeping with the well fed pack of males (herd of females).

    Meditation can do this, ritual can do it, prayer can do it exercise can do it, dancing, singing, any group activity that doesn’t force you to calculate status and hierarchy can do it.

    That’s all it is.

    A purely mechanical process by which we manage the primitive parts of our brain that evolved prior to reason, and that we gracefully fall back upon when we don’t want to think very hard, or cannot solve a problem, or must act rapidly by instinct.

    Now how does abrahamic religion work? It creates a false debt to a false god, for false crimes, and asks for us to submit and surrender our reason aspiration and transcendence and instead to ‘stay in place’.

    So if you wish to worship your evil semitic gods, whose sole purpose is to prevent you from transcendence of man, rather than just to use Jesus as another philosopher that is fine. But for the rest of us Jesus is just another philosophy, and gods are archetypes of our ancestors, and all those archetypes serve as proxies that we can through prayer (conversation), communicate with and obtain wisdom from.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 14:51:00 UTC

  • THE FUTURE IS OURS IF WE TAKE IT I started working on a commensurable language i

    THE FUTURE IS OURS IF WE TAKE IT

    I started working on a commensurable language in 92. I had understood the basic problem by 2001. I started working on the european group strategy in ’06. I started the equivalent of full time in ’09-’10 on a constitution. I started ‘going public’ in ’12. Just Eli and a few others were involved (those that promoted us I do know and appreciate). I started getting traction in ’14. You can see from the videos in ’14 that the system is pretty much outlined. Since 14 it’s been incremental improvement in precision and depth every year. I can’t remember when Bill and SN started up but that group’s been how we train people. A year and a half ago in ’18-19 we got John’s help promoting us. A year ago we launched the institute – although, given the rate of acceleration, and demand for the constitution, I’m having trouble with the volume of work. Hopefully we will grow people enough to help us with it this year. Hopefully I will finish the constitution and the big book this year (please god, help me). And hopefully we will ‘launch’ this year (please god help me some more). I dunno. I’m overloaded as usual.

    My point here is that if you follow Brandon Hayes’ feed, where he collects all our posts by topic, you will see what one guy can do if he works hard enough and long enough to produce value enough to interest others in the development of a new axis of agency.

    This is how Marx did it, and its how we’re doing the anti-Marx restoration of western civilization with a few people slowly gaining knowledge skill and momentum.

    Revolution comes.

    Renaissance Comes.

    The future is ours if we just take it.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 09:22:00 UTC

  • RESTORING BEAUTY —-“As a carpenter/tradesman, I’m mostly disappointed in the d

    RESTORING BEAUTY

    —-“As a carpenter/tradesman, I’m mostly disappointed in the decline of architecture. It would be much more rewarding to build beautiful structures, to say nothing of the furtherance of learning involved to do it. As beneficial as the “assembly line” model of building has been to economics, I believe it has been equally detrimental in that it has lowered basic educational requirements to attaining, and retaining, employment. Combine this with the governments takeover of educating our children, and you have the masses being minimally educated to do menial tasks. All the while they’re being spoon-fed woefully one sided, jingoistic propaganda. But I digress… #BeautyMatters “—Marc Kaller

    It’s something trump is trying to put thru in government architecture. It’s something I’ve put in the constitution.

    Efficiency in the aesthetic is a dirty word. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 08:08:00 UTC

  • “WHAT’S YOUR VISION FOR POST MAJORITARIAN AMERICA, EUROPE, WESTERN CIVILIZATION?

    “WHAT’S YOUR VISION FOR POST MAJORITARIAN AMERICA, EUROPE, WESTERN CIVILIZATION?”

    —“Do you wish to implement a caste system in America? And, if so what would it be regarding: racial based or social status based?”—Amit Patel

    Are parties castes? No. Are tribes castes? no. Are classes castes? Close but no – a class is alterable by demonstrated behavior, but a caste isn’t.

    The reason for european success in the ancient and modern world is sovereignty, and sovereignty requires markets in every aspect of life, and markets produce continuous adaptation and evolution without political consensus and intervention.

    I want to create markets in everything, where we may not seek to circumvent those markets in display word or deed without severe consequences.

    In politics i want to recreate the market between the classes for the production of commons – using houses of the classes in the traditional British european model.

    And a market for polities that produce those commons suitable to the needs of different people, in the traditional european model – particularly the hundreds of princedom’s in the german holy roman empire.

    For some of us we will prefer the English, Prussian, Germanic, orderly, clean, aesthetic, homogenous, redistributive, civil society where most of our investments are in the commons.

    For others they will prefer the ‘latin, catholic, leisurely, communal life of the family with state (feudal) responsibility for the commons.

    For others the individual they prefer the cosmopolitan (jewish) urban, high stimulation, high consumption, high opportunity, low responsibility, low investment in the commons.

    For others they will prefer the close membership and mutual insurance of the semitic hyper familial tribe, at the high cost of the many externalities, including demand for authoritarian religion and state.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 08:06:00 UTC

  • Ruining Good Art is explicitly written in the goals for communism: 23. Control a

    Ruining Good Art is explicitly written in the goals for communism:

    23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. “Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.”

    https://www.citizenreviewonline.org/2010/Jun/communism.html

    —Alfred Wittmann

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 07:37:00 UTC

  • THE COST OF NON EUROPEAN CIVILIZATIONS TO THEMSELVES —“Do you think being a eu

    THE COST OF NON EUROPEAN CIVILIZATIONS TO THEMSELVES

    —“Do you think being a european or not can be measured by the volume of the hazards of the externalities a person causes while coercing/persuading one’s self? And how the community constantly arranges to insure the externalities and and cover the damages?”— Mea Culba

    Non european communities seek to minimize stress of adaptation through relative equality and harmony – producing relative stasis – rather than adaptive competitive excellence – producing relative evolution, and the continuous distribution of the benefits of innovation and adaptation.

    Well, that’s the inverse of saying european civilization’s realism, naturalism, operationalism, empiricism, identity, logic, rational choice, reciprocity, together that constrain our logics, sciences and laws, collected in the physical laws of nature, the natural law of man, and the laws of testimonial thought and speech, place the highest burden on our conscientiousness and reason in exchange for eliminating frictions personal interpersonal political and external, and therefore the least frictions of innovation adaptation and evolution.

    We (europeans) evolve the fastest because we minimize the personal, interpersonal, social, political, and external hazards of falsehoods, each of which seeks to avoid the cost of stress required by continuous competition, innovation, adaptation, limited to reciprocal, truthful, and productive means.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 07:32:00 UTC