Curt Doolittle

Theme: Civilization

  • The Choice of Gods

    Feb 13, 2020, 11:20 AM [E]uropeans are the gods among men, and first among men. Not because we are yet gods ourselves. But because we think, speak, write, work, create, and spread the evidence of God’s words, his hands, and his will in the language of god’s words, hands, and will: Mathematics (geometry), Science, and Natural Law of Sovereign Men. For gods must be Sovereign, Omniscient and Omnipotent. And only Sovereign men may transcend into peerage with gods. And that’s why European man has almost exclusively dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, and early death by mastery of god’s word, written in god’s hand – against other’s false gods, failed translations, and men’s lies. And if European man did not drag a people out of ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, diseases, suffering and early death using god’s words, then those people are suffering because God punishes them for their false gods, failed translations, and men’s lies. And for all people, we are challenged to choose which god is the true god: an impersonal god who tests our ability to achieve sovereignty, omniscience and omniscience by learning his words, hands, and will; a god with whom we trade as allies; or a god who we obey as slaves. Will you transcend into gods, remain a client, or obey as a slave?

    (That is about the net of it.)

  • CD: COMBINE (holding place) Stupid American mistakes 1) War of independence, rat

    CD: COMBINE (holding place)

    Stupid American mistakes

    1) War of independence, rather than paying our debt for the french and indian war to the crown. (Beneficial outcome: writing down the common law in a constitution)

    2) Not buying and paying for the repatriation of the slaves.

    3) Not letting the south secede, civil war, and the catastrophe of the 14th amendment. No beneficial outcome.

    4) Joining WW1 rather than letting Germany restore herself after Napoleon’s destruction of the holy roman (German) empire (France’s equivalent of the war of northern aggression)

    3) The Versailles treaty granting France it’s wishes to destroy the holy roman empire and de-prussianize germanic civilization – the heart of european civilization for all of our history.

    4) Joining WW2

    5) Taking over rather than reinforcing and restoring the British empire, as the primary global defense of western civilization.

    6) Taking over the pound as the world reserve currency

    7) Not letting loose our generals Macarthur in china and Patton in Russia.

    8) Not suppression the jewish postwar movements – particularly communism, marxism, cultural marxism, and postmodernism

    9) Tolerating libel slander and gossiping under the pretense of free speech.

    8) No fault divorce, child support and alimony, and removing liability for interference in the marraige.

    Not helping Russia after the fall

    Stupid British Mistakes

    1) Not creating a house of the colonies)

    2) allowing jews into the state, academy…

    The greatest mistakes our country made were not letting the south secede, expanding the franchise to those unproductive and lacking responsibility, and the hart cellar act to open the gates to the underclasses – destroying the American experiment in a third way: middle class civ. These are followed closely by tolerating the postwar suppression of the american eugenics movement, and not brutally crushing the communist movement, marxist-postmodernist movements.

    We were tolerant in greek, roman, germanic, and british civilizations.

    Tolerance is a weakness not a virtue.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-14 10:51:00 UTC

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @Sov3r3ignSoul @JohnMarkSays Europeans are the gods among men

    RT @curtdoolittle: @Sov3r3ignSoul @JohnMarkSays Europeans are the gods among men, and first among men. Not because we are yet gods ourselve…

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 16:04:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227986895529029633

  • THE CHOICE OF GODS Europeans are the gods among men, and first among men. Not be

    THE CHOICE OF GODS

    Europeans are the gods among men, and first among men. Not because we are yet gods ourselves. But because we think, speak, write, work, create, and spread the evidence of God’s words, his hands, and his will in the language of god’s words, hands, and will: Mathematics (geometry), Science, and Natural Law of Sovereign Men.

    For gods must be Sovereign, Omniscient and Omnipotent. And only Sovereign men may transcend into peerage with gods.

    And that’s why European man has almost exclusively dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, and early death by mastery of god’s word, written in god’s hand – against other’s false gods, failed translations, and men’s lies.

    And if European man did not drag a people out of ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, diseases, suffering and early death using god’s words, then those people are suffering because god punishes them for their false gods, failed translations, and men’s lies.

    And for all people, we are challenged to choose which god is the true god: an impersonal god who tests our ability to achieve sovereignty, omniscience and omniscience by learning his words, hands, and will; a god with whom we trade as allies; or a god who we obey as slaves.

    Will you transcend into gods, remain a client, or obey as slave?

    —-

    (That is about the net of it.)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 11:20:00 UTC

  • Alexander Brown The March 06, 1957 independence of Ghana was the product of an a

    https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/482762-utah-senate-committee-unanimously-approves-bill-to-decriminalizeby Alexander Brown

    The March 06, 1957 independence of Ghana was the product of an act of parliament in England. The Ghana Independence Act 1957 was passed on February 07, 1957 to take effect on March 06, 1957. Were this law to be repealed today in England, Ghana may remain a sovereign and thanks to international recognition of it’s statehood.

    In 1896, the United States Congress extended statehood to Utah on condition that it would end POLYGAMY. Given that the State of Utah is in the process of decriminalising polygamy [ 1 ] in our times, could this constitute a violation of the congressional mandate of 1896? And if it does, would Utah revert to a territory and no longer a state? Or like Ghana’s recognition, US federal recognition may supersede the consequence of violating the 19th century congressional mandate?

    INSIGHT: There is a brewing right wing wave that aim to fracture and separate the United States into agreeable, homogenous states of all markets possible from the cosmopolitan, globalism – welcoming leftist states. Could happenings in Mitt Romney’s Utah illuminate the coming re – structuring of the United States?

    I do not know for certain. But, this could be very interesting overall.

    [ 1 ].Updated Feb 13, 2020, 9:47 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 09:47:00 UTC

  • “I believe an alternative name for Corded Ware culture was ‘Battle Axe’ culture

    –“I believe an alternative name for Corded Ware culture was ‘Battle Axe’ culture but political correctness won the day.”–Arno Kæland

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 09:33:00 UTC

  • “You reason that people are fundamentally economic agents, and therefore the who

    —“You reason that people are fundamentally economic agents, and therefore the whole of human history and sociology is downstream from economics, which Curt himself has declared the highest sociology.”— Josef Kalinin

    That’s false. Are you lying or erring?

    Instead, all human incentive, thought, and action can be expressed in value neutral economic terms, thereby uniting the physical, psychological, and social sciences in a single commensurable paradigm, vocabulary, and logic, with demarcation dependent upon the absence or presence of memory of state.

    This is demonstrably true.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 08:05:00 UTC

  • WHAT OUR PRIESTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR Reminds me of how European civilisation way

    WHAT OUR PRIESTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR

    Reminds me of how European civilisation way back to the Indo-Europeans and the various subcultures have always had a tripartite class structure, with separate functions and incentives. Is that what you’re getting at with trifunctionalism?

    — Reece Haynes

    Exactly: Priests, judges, scientists

    — Curt

    Responsible for:

    Priest – what we do not know that we do not know

    Judge – what we know that we do not know

    Scientist – what we know.

    —Luke Weinhagen

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-12 15:22:00 UTC

  • (SORRY for stomping on the thread, but Klein’s article is such an excellent exam

    (SORRY for stomping on the thread, but Klein’s article is such an excellent example of the Semitic Method of civilizational destruction it was hard to pass up.)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-12 15:21:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227613777291567106

    Reply addressees: @raysawhill @Steve_Sailer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227613427868340224

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @raysawhill @Steve_Sailer https://t.co/rrs3Iq5F8b

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1227613427868340224

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @raysawhill @Steve_Sailer https://t.co/rrs3Iq5F8b

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1227613427868340224

  • PIVIOTING A BIT TO IMPROVE COMPATIBILISM (HARMONY) Bill suggests he’s pivoting t

    PIVIOTING A BIT TO IMPROVE COMPATIBILISM (HARMONY)

    Bill suggests he’s pivoting to emphasize P’s description of western civilization as ” Via-Positiva Maximum Velocity of Adaptability and Via-Negativa Graceful Failure”

    This solves many of the conflicts due to class and gender differences in ability(genetic load) and reproductive cognitive bias. This solution restores compatibilism across the class spectrum as long as our ‘markets’ are regulated by the natural law of reciprocity within the limits of proportionality (defection).

    I’m going to modify P-Compatibilism (Sociology), The Three choices of cooperation, The Three Means of Coercion, Three classes of elites to add european Trifunctionalism, and european Opportunity Maximizing Via-Positiva Maximum Velocity of Adaptability and Fault Tolerant Via-Negativa Graceful Failure. This should provide as complete a description of sociology as we have in ethics and testimony.

    What I see happening is the SN group is specializing in developing personal philosophy, and i’m working on political philosophy. Now if we can solved the damned religious problem (I think I know how btw) we’ll have the spectrum 😉

    John and I will continue to work the revolutionary and political and legal angle. Hopefully personal philosophy will continue to be a major draw.

    —

    attn:

    Bill Joslin Brandon Hayes Martin Štěpán Alain Dwight Luke Weinhagen (and everyone else … although there are some new names I’m going to start adding to this list.)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-12 14:17:00 UTC