Curt Doolittle

Theme: Civilization

  • Agency vs Submission.

    Curt Doolittle 1st November 2018 at 6:08 pm It’s a very simple difference. Agency vs Submission. Heathens (Pagans in the pejorative) in western civilization are imagined heroes in competition with the spirits(dead), non-humans(green man, primitive man), demigods(powerful but mortal), and gods (powerful and immortal), and can, by effort and cunning outwit them – or – negotiate (bribe) them. This is a universal artifact of the conquest and replacement of european peoples by the westward expansion of the indo-europeans (Yaman, Corded ware et al) and their Militaristic, Expansionist, Sky Worshipping, Metalsmithing, business of profiting from the domestication of animal man, with horse, bronze, wheel and their very visible power over nature. It is a religion of agency not submission. Demand for a “religion of empires” increases with the distribution of peoples under rule, and the group strategies of those people under rule, and the compatibilities of those group’s strategies under such a universal rule. The semitic methodology of INVERTING the aristocratic (western) ethos by converting the bible of greco roman civilization (iliad of homer) which occupied the vast majority of writings in the greco roman period, with a ‘hero’ of ‘submission and resistance’ was an interesting strategy by which the vast underclasses of the old european (byzantine), and greco-anatolian, syrian levantine world could create a resistance movement by the cultural destruction of their superiors, Just as the Marxists (Marx, Boas, Freud, Cantor, Mises, Adorno et al, Rothbard, and the neocons) repeated 1700 years later (monopoly marxism of private property, monopoly marxism of common property, monopoly marxism of identity-property (culture)). The Semitic method of undermining was as successful in the Modern world (undermining colonialism) as it was in the ancient world (undermining colonialism). False promise of salvation after death. False promise of economic salvation. False promise of cultural (identity) salvation. The method of using sophism (false promise + sophism (Pilpul) + Straw Manning (Critique) is in fact a successful method of undermining a civilization that is overwhelmed by overextension, and profiting from overextension through commerce, and the dependence of commerce at international scales on trust. Christianity succeeded because trade collapsed in europe after (a) undermining by jewish-christian vanguard, (b) enforcement by byzantine (old world, greek) defeat of rome, and (c) collapse of world trade under arab-muslim expansion, (d) and the eventual consumption of all capital of the great civilizations of the ancient world, and the destruction of all those civilizations as a consequence. So, as trade and knowledge increased, europeans gradually (expectedly) extracted themselves from Semitic superstition, the church’s’ monopoly on information and literacy, the 50% of dead capital in europe under the church. and the corruption of the church as a monopoly federal government selling false receipts of salvation the way the current academy sells false diplomas. Given that the remains of Christianity are what leave us vulnerable to Semiticism (abrahamic monotheism, marxism-socialism-postmodernism-feminism, and the use of false promise, sophism, straw-manning, and the discount on disapproval, shaming, ridicule, moralizing, rallying as a substitute for truthful (scientific, rational) argument. It is only logical that the aristocratic right in Europe (using literary philosophy, moralism, and history) and aristocratic right in the States (using law and, economics, and science) should produce arguments to restore our native religion of the hearth to one that is heroic and expansionary rather than submissive and assisting in our surrender. Nothing in human behavior or history is difficult. It’s all simple. Once you understand that nearly all use of language is simply means of lying in order to obtain discounts on the acquisition of the power to alter the probability of outcomes in one’s favor. And all we do is search for narratives to echo (script). Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Calculating the Value

    Apr 3, 2020, 9:25 AM

    There is a value in ancient things – that is why they persisted. The question is understanding the value that exists rather than the value claimed exists, and a full accounting of externalities good and bad.

    re: magic, occult, religion, myths.

  • Calculating the Value

    Apr 3, 2020, 9:25 AM

    There is a value in ancient things – that is why they persisted. The question is understanding the value that exists rather than the value claimed exists, and a full accounting of externalities good and bad.

    re: magic, occult, religion, myths.

  • THERE IS ONLY ONE CHRISTIAN:

    Apr 10, 2020, 9:18 AM THERE IS ONLY ONE CHRISTIAN: JESUS. AND THE CHURCH WAS AN INVASION AND CONQUEST OF OUR PEOPLE TO TURN WARRIORS INTO SLAVES.

    —“If all the religions were so similar and provided the same product they would have produced similar results. “—

    The point is that group strategy, military, and law influence adults, who are capable of and exercise agency (action) – and religion influences women and children, the weak and the poor who lack agency. Religion provides mindfulness as the first group drags the second group through time. Religions don’t lead – they create mindfulness that prevents defection so that the people may be led, despite the insecurity alienation and anonymity that arises as families, clans, and tribes scale and consolidate into polities.

    —“the faith was built on the natural laws (Gods Laws)”—

    We have discovered THREE sets of god’s laws:

    1. The physical laws of nature (action)
      … 2. The logical laws of consistency (thought)
      … … 3. The grammatical laws of paradigms (speech)

    2. The natural law of reciprocity (cooperation)
      … 5. The christian law of love (seduction into cooperation)
      … … 6. The political law of homogeneity (incentive to insure)

    3. The evolutionary law of transcendence (defeat the red queen).
      … … 8. The … law of self domestication
      … … … 9. The …. law of competition..

    Of this set of God’s laws, what does Christianity DENY? 1. physical laws of nature. 6. the political law of homogeneity 7. the evolutionary law of transcendence 8. the … law of self domestication 9. the … law of competition. What does this mean? Christianity is a feminine religion, because it uses the counter-evolutionary strategy of females. And all female societies die without host males. Just as christians only survive with host Aryans, jews can only survive with host male populations, and Muslims hyper-violate these laws by consuming and destroying those host populations.

    —” looking at historical performance “—

    A monopoly takes credit for the good that would occur in any civilization but not credit for the bad – in economics we learn that we must judge by full accounting, not cherry picking, and account for the seen and unseen, and measure by opportunity cost – the difference between possible choices. Looking at historical performance of the church and christian rome vs aristocracy and literate rome, we have to ask, why did the church choose subjugation supernaturalism, and spreading ignorance rather than militarization, engineering, and spreading literacy as did the roman aristocracy? THe dark ages exist just as much because of the church and religion as it did because of the migration period invasions,made possible by the roman holocaust against the celts. While european aristocracy, military, law, and mythology survived, It took the restoration of (a) viking military, (b) aristotelian reason, (c) north sea trade by first vikings then the hansa (c) literacy (d) then the In the difference between possible choices, there was obvious and necessary utility of an heroic underclass religion to integrate the middle eastern peasantry (tribes, slaves, women) into the pagan pantheon and therefore raise their status to equality in contribution to civilization, and therefore worthy of respect non-existent in the pagan hierarchy that treated them as undomesticated animals, and therefore would no longer be treated as barbarians. The use of this religion as an institution of warfare with which to keep the peasantry ignorant and subservient on one h and, but to undermine the aristocracy through social construction, resistance, and usurpation of power by numbers, just as the marxists-neo-marxists-postmodernists-feminists (jews in this age as in the last) have used immigration, and undermining the aristocratic civilization of the west for the SECOND TIME. So no I don’t give the church credit for the scraps of good that would take place even under the most horridly backward, ignorance producing, and parasitic means of government over the people, trying to reduce them to middle eastern barbarism as a good. Instead i compare what could have been without the church and that means the industrial revolution and a thousand years of ignorance poverty starvation disease and suffering would have been avoided if not for the ignorance-production of the semitic church, and instead, the continuation of the stoic and epicurean and philosophical, and mathematical, and legal, and commercial institutions of the europeans. Myth, Ritual, Oath, Feast, Celebration by Festival, Sport, Theater, Story) (the animal celebration of the rewards of the hunt around the fire) organized into Religion, and some kind of The church destroyed jesus’ message of love and the opportunity of the ancient world to create harmony by the jewish conversion of it into a political weapon of despotic rule, not harmonious like the egyptians, or justificationary like the babylonians, but despotic and hostile and undermining like the jews and arabs. So no. Jesus was the feminine alternative to Achilles – a hero of the poor. And Paul and the rest of the jews turned it into a religion of rebellion and destruction against rome, just as the muslims exacerbated the problem by converting it to a religion of conquest, destruction, and devolution into feminine barbarism – reversing gods law of transcendence of man.

  • THERE IS ONLY ONE CHRISTIAN:

    Apr 10, 2020, 9:18 AM THERE IS ONLY ONE CHRISTIAN: JESUS. AND THE CHURCH WAS AN INVASION AND CONQUEST OF OUR PEOPLE TO TURN WARRIORS INTO SLAVES.

    —“If all the religions were so similar and provided the same product they would have produced similar results. “—

    The point is that group strategy, military, and law influence adults, who are capable of and exercise agency (action) – and religion influences women and children, the weak and the poor who lack agency. Religion provides mindfulness as the first group drags the second group through time. Religions don’t lead – they create mindfulness that prevents defection so that the people may be led, despite the insecurity alienation and anonymity that arises as families, clans, and tribes scale and consolidate into polities.

    —“the faith was built on the natural laws (Gods Laws)”—

    We have discovered THREE sets of god’s laws:

    1. The physical laws of nature (action)
      … 2. The logical laws of consistency (thought)
      … … 3. The grammatical laws of paradigms (speech)

    2. The natural law of reciprocity (cooperation)
      … 5. The christian law of love (seduction into cooperation)
      … … 6. The political law of homogeneity (incentive to insure)

    3. The evolutionary law of transcendence (defeat the red queen).
      … … 8. The … law of self domestication
      … … … 9. The …. law of competition..

    Of this set of God’s laws, what does Christianity DENY? 1. physical laws of nature. 6. the political law of homogeneity 7. the evolutionary law of transcendence 8. the … law of self domestication 9. the … law of competition. What does this mean? Christianity is a feminine religion, because it uses the counter-evolutionary strategy of females. And all female societies die without host males. Just as christians only survive with host Aryans, jews can only survive with host male populations, and Muslims hyper-violate these laws by consuming and destroying those host populations.

    —” looking at historical performance “—

    A monopoly takes credit for the good that would occur in any civilization but not credit for the bad – in economics we learn that we must judge by full accounting, not cherry picking, and account for the seen and unseen, and measure by opportunity cost – the difference between possible choices. Looking at historical performance of the church and christian rome vs aristocracy and literate rome, we have to ask, why did the church choose subjugation supernaturalism, and spreading ignorance rather than militarization, engineering, and spreading literacy as did the roman aristocracy? THe dark ages exist just as much because of the church and religion as it did because of the migration period invasions,made possible by the roman holocaust against the celts. While european aristocracy, military, law, and mythology survived, It took the restoration of (a) viking military, (b) aristotelian reason, (c) north sea trade by first vikings then the hansa (c) literacy (d) then the In the difference between possible choices, there was obvious and necessary utility of an heroic underclass religion to integrate the middle eastern peasantry (tribes, slaves, women) into the pagan pantheon and therefore raise their status to equality in contribution to civilization, and therefore worthy of respect non-existent in the pagan hierarchy that treated them as undomesticated animals, and therefore would no longer be treated as barbarians. The use of this religion as an institution of warfare with which to keep the peasantry ignorant and subservient on one h and, but to undermine the aristocracy through social construction, resistance, and usurpation of power by numbers, just as the marxists-neo-marxists-postmodernists-feminists (jews in this age as in the last) have used immigration, and undermining the aristocratic civilization of the west for the SECOND TIME. So no I don’t give the church credit for the scraps of good that would take place even under the most horridly backward, ignorance producing, and parasitic means of government over the people, trying to reduce them to middle eastern barbarism as a good. Instead i compare what could have been without the church and that means the industrial revolution and a thousand years of ignorance poverty starvation disease and suffering would have been avoided if not for the ignorance-production of the semitic church, and instead, the continuation of the stoic and epicurean and philosophical, and mathematical, and legal, and commercial institutions of the europeans. Myth, Ritual, Oath, Feast, Celebration by Festival, Sport, Theater, Story) (the animal celebration of the rewards of the hunt around the fire) organized into Religion, and some kind of The church destroyed jesus’ message of love and the opportunity of the ancient world to create harmony by the jewish conversion of it into a political weapon of despotic rule, not harmonious like the egyptians, or justificationary like the babylonians, but despotic and hostile and undermining like the jews and arabs. So no. Jesus was the feminine alternative to Achilles – a hero of the poor. And Paul and the rest of the jews turned it into a religion of rebellion and destruction against rome, just as the muslims exacerbated the problem by converting it to a religion of conquest, destruction, and devolution into feminine barbarism – reversing gods law of transcendence of man.

  • American Sub-Regions Are A Torn Country

    Apr 10, 2020, 9:40 AM China isn’t a country it’s a civilization. India isnt’ a country, it’s a civilization. Europe isn’t a country it’s a civilization. America isn’t a country, or civilization it’s an empire. South america is a civilization without a core state. Islamia isn’t a country or empire, but a civilization. Africa isn’t a country it’s a continent Turkey and islam are torn. Russia and europe are torn American sub-regions are torn. Africa is torn in many ways.

  • American Sub-Regions Are A Torn Country

    Apr 10, 2020, 9:40 AM China isn’t a country it’s a civilization. India isnt’ a country, it’s a civilization. Europe isn’t a country it’s a civilization. America isn’t a country, or civilization it’s an empire. South america is a civilization without a core state. Islamia isn’t a country or empire, but a civilization. Africa isn’t a country it’s a continent Turkey and islam are torn. Russia and europe are torn American sub-regions are torn. Africa is torn in many ways.

  • World Religions and Their Consequences

    Apr 10, 2020, 12:09 PM

    —“Curt Doolittle: in comparison between Orthodoxy and evangelical Christianity in making states more or less better or first world or third world?”—Ibrahim Abd El Shihead

    Narrow Point: The fact that the orthodox church didn’t or couldn’t compete with the state on one hand, and didn’t try, as catholicism, to compete with science, reason, commerce, and law, (competition) and remained a specialist in family affairs (unity, community, love) is why it is still regarded as sacred to the people. This is why I don’t ever seem to have a problem with the orthodox community “church is for church, law is for disputes to be avoided at all costs, state is for state to protect us, and we all get along fine if we do our f-king jobs”. The problem i have with xianity is that western christians haven’t given up on fantasy of monopoly – theocratic rule, and can’t seem (like russians and traditional americans) to practice the natural trichotomy of state, law, and faith., Under the rather (insane) presumption that the church, having failed so drastically wouldn’t do so again. So to in this sense while evangelical christianity is closest to jesus’ teaching, the orthodox church is closest to the institutional church we need, and the catholic church and the protestant churches to that sought to limit the parasitism of the church, were failures. In other words, orthodoxy seems to have avoided both the catholic attempt to rule, the protestant attempt to undermine the church’s corruption, the necessity of catholic and protestant churches to attract members of the aristocracy as local administrators, and best preserved the role of the church in society. Another example of the value of intolerant monarchies. Broader Point: Aristotelianism seems to produce scientific and technical potential. Christianity seems to produce political and commercial potential but it wasn’t enough in russia probably because they missed the renaissance, reformation, and enlightenment. Islam seems to resist political, commercial and scientific potential, but produces underclass harmony. Judaism produces organized crime families that prey on the commons, which is extremely profitable for them at the cost of the host people. Judaism hasn’t been nearly as destructive as islam – but it’s certainly been bad for germany, russia, america, and now all of western europe. Hinduism is some kind of absolutely beautiful madness that I still struggle to get my arms around, but their problem seems to be demographic and without division into sub-states politically impossible to overcome. buddhism produces an equally kind harmony at the cost of stagnation. china is trivially easy to understand because they escaped religion. japan and korea easiest to understand. Without christianity (enforced) scandinavia, and without buddhism (enforced) japan/korea, would have come provided a pattern we needed. the optimum ‘religion’ was rule of law, militia, monarchy (imperialism), paganism (aristocracy), stoicism(middle) epicureanism (lower middle) heathenism (family), and a priesthood of any kind to take responsibility for the peasantry. This competition serves better than monopoly but it needs strong rule of law to prevent any usurping the rest. The problem is, markets are susceptible to intolerant monopolies and monotheism is intolerant and intolerance wins, so the only ‘total intolerance’ we need is defense of those markets.

  • World Religions and Their Consequences

    Apr 10, 2020, 12:09 PM

    —“Curt Doolittle: in comparison between Orthodoxy and evangelical Christianity in making states more or less better or first world or third world?”—Ibrahim Abd El Shihead

    Narrow Point: The fact that the orthodox church didn’t or couldn’t compete with the state on one hand, and didn’t try, as catholicism, to compete with science, reason, commerce, and law, (competition) and remained a specialist in family affairs (unity, community, love) is why it is still regarded as sacred to the people. This is why I don’t ever seem to have a problem with the orthodox community “church is for church, law is for disputes to be avoided at all costs, state is for state to protect us, and we all get along fine if we do our f-king jobs”. The problem i have with xianity is that western christians haven’t given up on fantasy of monopoly – theocratic rule, and can’t seem (like russians and traditional americans) to practice the natural trichotomy of state, law, and faith., Under the rather (insane) presumption that the church, having failed so drastically wouldn’t do so again. So to in this sense while evangelical christianity is closest to jesus’ teaching, the orthodox church is closest to the institutional church we need, and the catholic church and the protestant churches to that sought to limit the parasitism of the church, were failures. In other words, orthodoxy seems to have avoided both the catholic attempt to rule, the protestant attempt to undermine the church’s corruption, the necessity of catholic and protestant churches to attract members of the aristocracy as local administrators, and best preserved the role of the church in society. Another example of the value of intolerant monarchies. Broader Point: Aristotelianism seems to produce scientific and technical potential. Christianity seems to produce political and commercial potential but it wasn’t enough in russia probably because they missed the renaissance, reformation, and enlightenment. Islam seems to resist political, commercial and scientific potential, but produces underclass harmony. Judaism produces organized crime families that prey on the commons, which is extremely profitable for them at the cost of the host people. Judaism hasn’t been nearly as destructive as islam – but it’s certainly been bad for germany, russia, america, and now all of western europe. Hinduism is some kind of absolutely beautiful madness that I still struggle to get my arms around, but their problem seems to be demographic and without division into sub-states politically impossible to overcome. buddhism produces an equally kind harmony at the cost of stagnation. china is trivially easy to understand because they escaped religion. japan and korea easiest to understand. Without christianity (enforced) scandinavia, and without buddhism (enforced) japan/korea, would have come provided a pattern we needed. the optimum ‘religion’ was rule of law, militia, monarchy (imperialism), paganism (aristocracy), stoicism(middle) epicureanism (lower middle) heathenism (family), and a priesthood of any kind to take responsibility for the peasantry. This competition serves better than monopoly but it needs strong rule of law to prevent any usurping the rest. The problem is, markets are susceptible to intolerant monopolies and monotheism is intolerant and intolerance wins, so the only ‘total intolerance’ we need is defense of those markets.

  • Graham Hancock

    Apr 10, 2020, 3:23 PM

    —“Curt, What do you think of Graham Hancock?”—

    If I’m sympathetic: I think he is honest about what he does. He makes up, or promotes, myths to inspire and entertain people – to restore wonder to their lives. yes some of what he harps about has a grain of truth in it. I’m charitable because it’s good for us to look back into the past with wonder, the same way we teach children fairy tales so that they will eventually mature into reading history. If I’m charitable, the world needs a few of these people so that we make sure wacky stuff doesn’t get overlooked, and the wrong story entrenched (geology in the past and mathematical physics in the present are the best examples). If I’m doing my job: he’s using pseudoarchaeology (pseudoscience) to get attention, and it’s been a profitable career for him. and given that his stuff is pretty hard to believe I suspect he’s helping us find suckers, catch them, and reeducate them before they do something harmful to themselves or others. Of all the kind of sucker-magnets in the world he’s the least harmful. If I want to correct him, and the audience, it is all but certain that Doggerland, isn’t alone, and the black sea the persian gulf, the red sea, the mediterranean, and the lost lakes and marshes of the south of africa, and various other coastal areas, now obscure much of our long, early, glacial and pre-glacial development with flooding. We may be living in a period of extraordinary technology, but the first five thousand years of chasing the glaciers back north, in doggerland, on the shorts of the black sea has to be about as close to paradise as hunter-gatherers can discover. That said, there is no evidence whatsoever of anything pre-glacial but animals, and nothing obscured by post glacial flooding that gave hints to what is necessary for the evolution of man: fire, metal, and pottery. Yes, people do lose technology (austronesians). Yes people do mature into depth rather than neoteny (equatorial africans). But in general, the long graudal line of history up until the 80-40k, and 40k-10k, and 10k incremental explosions, and the past 400 years of european explosion of knowledge, is so regular in retrospect it looks ordinary.