The idea that primitives were ‘human’ is a postwar invention that accompanied the suppression of research on eugenics. Over the past decade the science has restored the uncomfortable truth: inequality, and wars result from the differences between races, subraces and tribes.
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-25 17:32:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264972645432471554
Reply addressees: @Asweetpoison1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264957684857671680
If our ancestors didn’t have capital punishment for other than cowardice in battle and adultery, how did they get rid of malcontents? Sacrifice. See. Then it was for the gods. No one was responsible. I like that method.
—“Can’t kick off Saturnalia without sacrificing a criminal”–Skarnette Morax
😉
If our ancestors didn’t have capital punishment for other than cowardice in battle and adultery, how did they get rid of malcontents? Sacrifice. See. Then it was for the gods. No one was responsible. I like that method.
—“Can’t kick off Saturnalia without sacrificing a criminal”–Skarnette Morax
😉
Jan 29, 2020, 10:47 AM Definitions: CONQUEROR > SETTLER > IMMIGRANT > REFUGEE > INVADER by Thomas Beesley CONQUEROR: Somebody who risks life and limb to domesticate a primitive territory and people by creating a market order, by the organized application of violence. SETTLER: somebody who comes when there is nothing, and builds a civilization from it. A pioneer, an adventurer, a conqueror. Productivity, masculinity, ingenuity, fierce independence. Patrician founders, their heirs the rightful inheritors of the nation and a portion of all of the fruits of it’s production by right of establishment. IMMIGRANT: somebody who comes over long after the work of establishing and building of the civilization has ended and merely reaps the rewards of those who came before. A plebian underclass by nature, at best a person simply looking for opportunity, at worst a parasite looking for a host. Interlopers, opportunists, traveling merchants, unwelcome guests who readily make themselves at home. My ancestors were not immigrants. They were conquerors and settlers. And they left me and mine our inheritance.And I am willing to fight to defend that inheritance.
Jan 29, 2020, 10:47 AM Definitions: CONQUEROR > SETTLER > IMMIGRANT > REFUGEE > INVADER by Thomas Beesley CONQUEROR: Somebody who risks life and limb to domesticate a primitive territory and people by creating a market order, by the organized application of violence. SETTLER: somebody who comes when there is nothing, and builds a civilization from it. A pioneer, an adventurer, a conqueror. Productivity, masculinity, ingenuity, fierce independence. Patrician founders, their heirs the rightful inheritors of the nation and a portion of all of the fruits of it’s production by right of establishment. IMMIGRANT: somebody who comes over long after the work of establishing and building of the civilization has ended and merely reaps the rewards of those who came before. A plebian underclass by nature, at best a person simply looking for opportunity, at worst a parasite looking for a host. Interlopers, opportunists, traveling merchants, unwelcome guests who readily make themselves at home. My ancestors were not immigrants. They were conquerors and settlers. And they left me and mine our inheritance.And I am willing to fight to defend that inheritance.
Jan 29, 2020, 10:58 AM
—“Hard to say the Islam isn’t successful. It’s been around a long time and is constantly expanding. Do I want their version of success? No but I can’t deny their system works.”— Greg Hamilton
By that measure cancer is successful. Same thing. Islam and cancer. Capital creation or destruction? Islam is the single greatest destroyer of genetic, human, civilizational, cultural, informational, intellectual, scientific, technological, artistic capital in human history. And is second only to the great plague in producing dead. Judaism > Christianity > Islam: if there is a devil, the abrahamic religion and the abrahamic method of false promise baiting into hazard is certainly his creed. Abrahamic Judaism in jewish, christian, islamic, or marxist, postmodernist, feminist, denialist form is the greatest calamity in human history. It’s thousands of times worse than the British Opium trade, or the jewish selling of alcohol and prostitution on credit to eastern europeans, or the jewish usury of 300% on agrarian credit. Or the spread of Syphilis from the new world to the old, or the spread of disease from the old world to the new. Or the spread of black plague from Asia to Europe. There is no comparison to the cancer of judaism, christianity, and islam – even if christianity was miraculously domesticated by the europeans into compatibility with our traditional natural law. Judaism to undermine, Christianity to pacify, and islam to conquer.
Jan 29, 2020, 10:58 AM
—“Hard to say the Islam isn’t successful. It’s been around a long time and is constantly expanding. Do I want their version of success? No but I can’t deny their system works.”— Greg Hamilton
By that measure cancer is successful. Same thing. Islam and cancer. Capital creation or destruction? Islam is the single greatest destroyer of genetic, human, civilizational, cultural, informational, intellectual, scientific, technological, artistic capital in human history. And is second only to the great plague in producing dead. Judaism > Christianity > Islam: if there is a devil, the abrahamic religion and the abrahamic method of false promise baiting into hazard is certainly his creed. Abrahamic Judaism in jewish, christian, islamic, or marxist, postmodernist, feminist, denialist form is the greatest calamity in human history. It’s thousands of times worse than the British Opium trade, or the jewish selling of alcohol and prostitution on credit to eastern europeans, or the jewish usury of 300% on agrarian credit. Or the spread of Syphilis from the new world to the old, or the spread of disease from the old world to the new. Or the spread of black plague from Asia to Europe. There is no comparison to the cancer of judaism, christianity, and islam – even if christianity was miraculously domesticated by the europeans into compatibility with our traditional natural law. Judaism to undermine, Christianity to pacify, and islam to conquer.
Jan 29, 2020, 12:35 PM SURT (giant) (note how semitic gods are from stars, but european gods are from sky and earth. Why? Astrology vs Metallurgy.) Surt (Old Norse Surtr, “Black,” presumably a reference to his charred appearance) is a fire giant who leads his kin into battle against the Aesir and Vanir gods during Ragnarok, the destruction of the cosmos. His particular fate is to kill the god Freyr and to be slain by him in turn. He arrives from Muspelheim, the extreme southern region of heat and fire, bearing his weapon of choice of a burning sword, with which the world is razed before it sinks into the sea. Historian Rudolf Simek has proposed that Surt is the supernatural force who corresponds to “the (volcanic) fire of the Underworld,”[5] a personage who would surely have had a profound emotional resonance for any early Icelander, given the sheer amount of volcanic activity that characterizes that island.
Jan 29, 2020, 12:35 PM SURT (giant) (note how semitic gods are from stars, but european gods are from sky and earth. Why? Astrology vs Metallurgy.) Surt (Old Norse Surtr, “Black,” presumably a reference to his charred appearance) is a fire giant who leads his kin into battle against the Aesir and Vanir gods during Ragnarok, the destruction of the cosmos. His particular fate is to kill the god Freyr and to be slain by him in turn. He arrives from Muspelheim, the extreme southern region of heat and fire, bearing his weapon of choice of a burning sword, with which the world is razed before it sinks into the sea. Historian Rudolf Simek has proposed that Surt is the supernatural force who corresponds to “the (volcanic) fire of the Underworld,”[5] a personage who would surely have had a profound emotional resonance for any early Icelander, given the sheer amount of volcanic activity that characterizes that island.
Civilizational Differences in Strategy and Conflict https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/25/civilizational-differences-in-strategy-and-conflict-2/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-25 16:41:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264959732651044864