Theme: Civilization

  • LEARN INTELLECTUAL HONESTY, HUMILITY, HISTORY, AND REFORM. –“I’m a member of a

    LEARN INTELLECTUAL HONESTY, HUMILITY, HISTORY, AND REFORM.
    –“I’m a member of a 0.2% minority that has produced over 22% of Nobel prizes, and major contributions in virtually every valuable field. Yet it is the most hated group, most violently attacked. It is in group bias, &… https://t.co/YFDxfuDIne


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 00:01:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790170511223189979

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790148936298311775

  • “in your view, why do you think that French culture is cognitively feminine?”–

    –“in your view, why do you think that French culture is cognitively feminine?”–
    Short answer: French for politics and the play, English for science and law, German for military and engineering, Italian for Romance and Art.
    Original regional religion of the french region was a virgin cult – evidenced by the language. Too much latin effeminate signaling. Agrarian wealth and too much status signaling. Too much influence of the catholic church. Failure to produce a middle class capable of constraining the nobility and aristocracy, the most backward government in Europe. Political and social feminine displays of irresponsibility and hyperconsumption as virtue signals. The odd and contrived ‘effeminiate’ twist of the french language to the ‘lispy’ posturing effeminacy in the court. The court as a vehicle for feminine gossip, undermining, sedition, and treason. Effectively they generated an environment where they favored female virtue signaling and means of warfare between elites that was then copied by those ascendent into a norm.

    Reply addressees: @Josh_Ebner @auny_marie @AndreAn97444856 @MinClaydough


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-13 21:26:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790131485439094784

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790128230172639272

  • “The founding fathers, as protestants, amplifying the protestant error, and comp

    —“The founding fathers, as protestants, amplifying the protestant error, and compounding the release of the iews by Napoleon, underestimated the danger of the semitic peoples and their cults, and given the protestant reformation failed to recognize and credit the catholic…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-13 20:31:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790117673717678188

  • THE THEORY OF WESTERN DEMISE IS OVERSTATED: US GEOSTRATEGY IS OBVIOUS: WITHDRAW

    THE THEORY OF WESTERN DEMISE IS OVERSTATED: US GEOSTRATEGY IS OBVIOUS: WITHDRAW WITHOUT CREATING AND OPPORTUNITY FOR EVIL.

    1) Prior to the world wars, the USA considered Europeans in particular, but empires in general to be a threat to world peace and prosperity. This is why the USA was both isolationist and concerned about capturing the continent – and keeping the European empires out of the continent.

    2) Empires are a product of agrarianism, where the only means of increasing state revenue is to increase the quantity and quality of agrarian territory that could be taxed to support elites, the military, a bureaucracy, and the institutions necessary for administration of production, transport and trade.

    3) When empires expanded, particularly during the age of sail, they sought to lay claim to territories for resources that could be brought home and used in production, then sold out to the less urbanized or developed regions or countries.

    4) This means empires try to evade market forces at the expense of their people in order to achieve something between independence (autarky) and power for defense and additional conquest.

    5) A such empires, their territories, claimed territories, and colonies functioned as competitively in the early age of the agrarian, commercial, financial, and proto-industrial production, by demand for conquest as they had under agrarianism – just on a larger scale with greater complexity and a larger number of competitors.

    6) The US, having created a federation, loosely imitating the Holy Roman Empire of the German Peoples, but with Anglo Common Law and Institutions updated to formally written American Natural Law, treated the post world war period as the end of empires, the emergence of nation states, the reciprocal guarantee of independence of those nation states, and a free (as much as possible) market between those states.

    7) The idea that trade creates peace and interdependency and raises people out of poverty is at least as old as Adam Smith in the post-medieval body of thought, but the general understanding is ancient.

    8) In other words, the USA sought to end the age of empires, bring about the age of nation states, and establish incentives that would drag mankind out of poverty – and largely it worked.

    9) However, the USA, itself a product of english, germanic, continental, and the ‘western way of war’ failed to achieve victory on the enemy’s terms – and chose the American terms, meaning, the European tradition under which one monarchy would seek reach settlement somewhat as do industrialists today – and move on.

    10) So the USA failed to complete the destruction of empires by constraining MacArthur in China and Patton in Russia. Without China and Russia the world would have been spared it’s experiments with communism. And without Russia the Iranians would not have had the need for the Shah to resist communism, nor the consequential islamist revolution, and Iran’s attempted restoration of a caliphate (empire).

    11) So, while the USA have managed to create a world of largely free trade, vast institutional networks that assist countries to develop, and medicine and technology that have made it possible, by not ending the empires we have brought about their restoration – perhaps a dying gasp, perhaps a trend – and the USA and the west in general no longer had population, demographic composition, cultural homogeneity and cohesion, so that other than our legal system which defends voluntary cooperation investment, production, and trade, we can no longer police the world against the rise of empires.

    12) Americans had faith in the progress of mankind until the episodes in the middle east convinced them that europeans and perhaps east asians are only capable of peerage, and that our hopes for them and for mankind were mere christian optimism. So Americans are ‘going home’. The difference is that they are trying to ‘go home’ without leaving such a strategic vacuum that the opportunity for restoration of empires and conquests and evasions of the market leads to escalating conflicts resulting in yet another world war that might resolve the question of empires vs sovereign states for the next millennium.

    13) Americans are not terribly concerned with the end of free trade in the world. America is energy and resource autarkic, only needs Canada for resources and Mexico for labor, and it’s legal, finance, and treasury system almost guarantees capital flight to the USA the more uncertain, fragmented, poorer, the world becomes. Or stated differently, while it may affect the bloated financial sector prices that are the product of a boomer generation capital peak combined with the government’s inflationary policies, and while it may cause some rather stressful employment restructuring, the net result is that the USA *Benefits* from chaos in the world. In fact the only real risk to the USA is the immigration program and the success of the radical left in America, have brought the country to the point of civil war – which those of us who study such things expect to escalate rapidly sometime during the next five and at most ten years. The world can fall apart, and the worst that happens to the USA is ‘going home’ and writing down a lot of foreign investment.

    14) It certainly appears that at least the Anglosphere, or what remains of the British Empire, are reforming from a shared language and institutions, to shared intelligence (Five Eyes), to shared geostrategic and military alliances – the only question is whether we add our dear friends the Japanese and south Koreans into this otherwise english speaking network.

    15) As for Europe, while France remains dedicated to the extradition of the USA from European affairs, it is not for the continent’s interest – which would be better served by Germania and Poland, but France’s long standing attempt to dominate Europe despite that no one other than France desires such a thing. meanwhile we wait for Germany to retake her historical position as the core of Europe despite french unearned and undo egoism. However, Germany, Italy, and Russia are in demographic collapse that is unrecoverable – just in time to determine if the AI revolution has ended the need for the rapid expansion of white collar labor since the beginning of computer automation.

    16) India is going her own way – at least until she must face off with China and Pakistan over territory, resources, and water.

    17) The middle east will need another century but the internet has done more for the region than any other intentional policy in our history.

    18) Africa, aside from the population problem – a problem that will become ever more of europe’s problem, and the muslim expansion problem in the north – a cancer everywhere in the world – the rest of Africa is a bright spot if for no other reason than they lack the bad institutions and bad religions and bad traditions that impede the continued evolution of better ones.

    19) While china is in a demographic collapse that is irreversible, it will take longer to play out than germany, italy, and russia. And with such a large population, with that IQ distribution (the smart fraction of the population is larger than europeans) it’s quite literally impossible to compete with them. Additionally authoritarian governments can act far more like venture capitalists (which is what the western government models need to adopt) rather than leaving the economy entirely to the private sector as we do in the states, or the opposite, having the state run industries which turn into low returns on capital, corruption, and low innovation.

    20) So the idea that we can maintain the status quo, is a rather nonsense obsession of the finance and commercial sectors. It’s rather obvious to the geostrategic sectors that the outcome of demographic and development shifts will produce deterministic outcomes, meaning another conflict between authoritarian and free peoples, and between empires and federations of nation states, will return, and with it the poverty that is normal throughout our history, as the wealthy get a bit poorer and the not wealthy much much much more so.

    Apologies for a text wall.
    Hope someone found value in it.
    Affections
    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-13 04:09:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1789870582575570944

  • WHY DID RELIGIONS EVOLVE? Religions arose for a good reason in the age of transf

    WHY DID RELIGIONS EVOLVE?
    Religions arose for a good reason in the age of transformation – whenever population density reaches a point where importance to others, clan differences and class differences emerge and alienatino results we require religion. Where originally religion evolved out of the intersection of burial and feast, and formal religion evolved out of the generalization to all of the initiatic brotherhood of warriors. All of these: burial, feast, male adulthood, and the initiatic brotherhood of warriors are bondings that reduce the alienation that occurs with maturity and need for self responsibility.

    Reply addressees: @Xene1042 @whatifalthist


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-12 18:22:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1789722764418433024

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1789721839041671613

  • RT @jonatanpallesen: The most important thing to understand about history, is th

    RT @jonatanpallesen: The most important thing to understand about history, is that the industrial revolution is the main thing that mattere…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-12 03:56:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1789504805943091483

  • Judaism (slave revolt against greek and roman rule), christianity (slave revolt

    Judaism (slave revolt against greek and roman rule), christianity (slave revolt against roman rule) islam (slave revolt against tribal leaders) are all just underclass revolts, not the product of elites. Instead, elites captured these movements and adapted to use them,


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-11 22:03:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1789416057838415948

    Reply addressees: @YuruInuyama

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1789411644868595782

  • “Q: CURT: What is a non-false religion”– First, what does a religion consist of

    –“Q: CURT: What is a non-false religion”–
    First, what does a religion consist of? A religion suppresses neuroticism and conflict among social animals by conveying a group evolutionary strategy as a standard of weights and measures in and across generations, using the simplest form of memory retention, and most general system of measurement: storytelling using archetypes.
    So religions consist of a group evolutionary strategy, a set of metaphysical presumptions about man, nature, and the relations between, a mythos to communicated it, a system of argument to persist and defend it, and a network of rituals both for the individual, the family, and the polity, by way of the sacred (debt, thanks, and respect), the feast, and the festival, each of which reduces one another to a temporary equality, providing what we call ‘the spiritual’ which is the surrender the self to the pack biological response.
    Most religions in the past have produced these necessities by lying. This is no longer advantageous because it is decreasingly possible. Only a minority of the population is possessed of personality traits open to submission, and worse, nder mass education these superstitions and occultisms, sophistries and pseudosciences are increasingly difficult – and at present only persist due to possibility of family and social indoctrination.
    So effectively the world is searching for a non-false religion. And teh only non-false religion is stoicism (which is just behavioral modification). But it is too psychologically costly for all but the middle to upper classes, and is extremely difficult for women in particular.
    That does not mean we cannot produce some intersection of stoicism and the four agreements for the individual, secular humanism as a philosophy, and nature, ethnicity, polity, ancestor, and hero worship which are the only true debts we have to respect, pay off, and transfer to the following generations.

    Cheers
    CD

    Reply addressees: @HakeemDemi


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-10 17:56:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1788991505387995136

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1788985008931184730

  • Previous generations ‘master slave’ were correct as was ‘aristocracy and middle

    Previous generations ‘master slave’ were correct as was ‘aristocracy and middle classes vs priesthood and bottom classes’.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-10 16:03:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1788963195962446137

    Reply addressees: @Obediencio1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1788961865147539707

  • Of course. I’ve worked on all existing civilizations. The only difficult one is

    Of course. I’ve worked on all existing civilizations. The only difficult one is the Indian (hindustani) because it’s comparatively quite complicated in content even if it’s rather simple, as are all such strategies, in structure. To some degree despite being all but unintelligible, it’s fascinating. Europe(the greek way(stoicism)) and China(Confucianism+Daoism+Buddhism) are all that matter because they’re both quite good. And the only reason we pay any attention to Judaism, Christianity, and Islam is because they’re such horrible religions hostile to the development of a strong and stable state, they generate conflict, mandate superstition, and ignorance, and they produce a race to the bottom.

    Reply addressees: @HakeemDemi


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-10 16:02:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1788962895033679872

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1788953385300849010