Theme: Civilization

  • RT @dr_duchesne: Only Whites care for the wellbeing of all races and non-Christi

    RT @dr_duchesne: Only Whites care for the wellbeing of all races and non-Christians.

    This is the root of White dispossession.

    Hindus do…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-12 06:07:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867088962646577577

  • Well, that might be reasonable or unreasonable depending upon what it means in p

    Well, that might be reasonable or unreasonable depending upon what it means in practice.
    If it means the christian spectrum from stoicism to christianity to secular humanism as the national religious foundation and all others are tolerated only such that they don’t conflict that’s probably a good thing at present.
    I understand the appeal and argument for white nationalism but I feel we must leave that choice to the regions and let the evidence play out.
    If white nationalism means western civilization’s culture then I think that’s not hard to dispute it’s just something that requires careful legislation.

    Reply addressees: @patriciamdavis @ConceptualJames


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-12 01:24:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867017761819594753

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867014021125378224

  • THE FORGOTTEN HOLOCAUSTS BY MUSLIMS “Slavery, Terrorism and Islam documents hund

    THE FORGOTTEN HOLOCAUSTS BY MUSLIMS
    “Slavery, Terrorism and Islam documents hundreds of massacres of Christian populations by Muslim rulers. For example: In 1860 over 12,000 Christians were slaughtered in Lebanon. In 1876 14,700 Bulgarians were murdered by the Turks. 200,000 Armenian Christians were slaughtered by the Turks in Bayazid in 1877. And in 1915 the Turks massacred over 1.5 million Armenian Christians. As recently as September 1922 the Turkish army destroyed the ancient city of Smyrna with its 300,000 Christian population. ”


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-11 17:31:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866898669716525056

  • THE PROCESS OF MUSLIM DESTRUCTION OF CIVILIZATION THROUGH IMMIGRATION AND REPROD

    THE PROCESS OF MUSLIM DESTRUCTION OF CIVILIZATION THROUGH IMMIGRATION AND REPRODUCTION
    (“The process of destroying Lebanon, a formerly prosperous and 65% christian country, was achieved in only forty to fifty years.”)

    In “Slavery, Terrorism & Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat,” Dr. Peter Hammond examines the influence of growing Muslim populations on societal structures. He proposes a correlation between the percentage of Muslims in a population and corresponding societal changes:

    Under 2%: Muslims are perceived as a peace-loving minority and not a threat to other citizens.

    2% to 5%: Proselytization efforts increase, targeting other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, with significant recruitment from prisons and street gangs.

    Above 5%: There is a push for the introduction of halal food standards, influencing major food chains and supermarkets.

    Reaching 10%: Increased lawlessness and unrest occur, often as a form of protest against perceived societal issues.

    At 20%: Expectation of hair-trigger rioting, formation of jihad militias, sporadic killings, and the burning of religious buildings.

    Around 40%: Nations may experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare.

    From 60%: Unfettered persecution of non-believers, sporadic ethnic cleansing, implementation of Sharia law as a weapon, and imposition of jizya (tax on infidels).

    Above 80%: Daily intimidation, violent jihad, state-run ethnic cleansing, and efforts to drive out infidels, moving toward a 100% Muslim society.

    At 100%: Theoretically ushers in ‘Dar-es-Salaam’—the Islamic House of Peace—where the society is entirely Muslim, and Sharia law prevails.

    Dr. Hammond’s analysis suggests that as the Muslim population increases, there is a corresponding rise in demands for Islamic practices and laws, which can lead to societal tensions and conflicts. He emphasizes that these patterns are observable in various countries with significant Muslim populations.

    For a comprehensive understanding, refer to Dr. Hammond’s book, which includes detailed chapters and appendices on the spread of Islam, a glossary of Islamic terms, and guidelines for Muslim evangelism.

    https://t.co/mTNAFuWvYH?


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-11 17:12:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866893882073681923

  • THE DARK AGES WERE VERY DARK “From 536, the coldest year, and through 850 the co

    THE DARK AGES WERE VERY DARK
    “From 536, the coldest year, and through 850 the coldest weather of the past 2000 years. … and then in the 900s the planet warmed up, led to the scandinavian expansion then the germanic expansion (Hansa). Then in the 1330s came a series of very bad years of famine, malnourishment, and immuno vulnerability … and then in the 1340s came the plague – and that was the end of the cathedral building era.”


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-09 19:46:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866207712885059584

  • THE DARK AGES WERE VERY DARK “From 536, the coldest year, and through 850 the co

    THE DARK AGES WERE VERY DARK
    “From 536, the coldest year, and through 850 the coldest weather of the past 2000 years. … and then in the 900s the planet warmed up, led to the scandinavian expansion then the germanic expansion (Hansa). Then in the 1330s came a series of very bad years of famine, malnourishment, and immuno vulnerability … and then in the 1340s that was the end of the cathedral building era.”


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-09 19:46:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866204464279101440

  • RT @IterIntellectus: a plea to america: save europe before it’s too late to my a

    RT @IterIntellectus: a plea to america: save europe before it’s too late

    to my american friends,

    europe is collapsing.
    this is not hyper…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-09 13:03:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866106355574354381

  • Why did the Pacific Northwest, in particular, fall so hard for Radical Leftism?

    Why did the Pacific Northwest, in particular, fall so hard for Radical Leftism?
    1 – Settled by Scandinavians – see wisconsin.
    2 – Avoided black migration. The whitest and least black part of America – no perceived threat and easy virtue signaling.
    3 – Seattle & Portland, like California, attracted transients like loggers, miners, and sailors while farmers etc, settled outside future Urban areas – producing union activism.
    4 – 60s post college migration – Hippies to portland, Yuppies to Seattle.
    6 – Flooding by Californians starting in the 1980s.
    7 – Massive non white immigration of tech families by chain migration post 1990.
    8 – White flight of conservatives.
    9 – Seattle politicals looks to imitating san francisco.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-07 21:42:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1865512260644597760

  • Why did the Pacific Northwest, in particular, fall so hard for Radical Leftism?

    Why did the Pacific Northwest, in particular, fall so hard for Radical Leftism?
    1 – Settled by Scandinavians – see wisconsin.
    2 – Avoided black migration. The whitest and least black part of America – no perceived threat and easy virtue signaling.
    3 – Seattle & Portland, like California, attracted transients like loggers, miners, and sailors while farmers etc, settled outside future Urban areas.
    4 – 60s post college migration – Hippies to portland, Yuppies to Seattle.
    6 – Flooding by Californians starting in the 1980s.
    7 – Massive non white immigration of tech families by chain migration post 1990.
    8 – White flight of conservatives.
    9 – Seattle politicals looks to imitating san francisco.

    Reply addressees: @RetroCoast


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-07 21:18:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1865506125388652544

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1865363618889429072

  • Why did the Pacific Northwest, in particular, fall so hard for Radical Leftism?

    Why did the Pacific Northwest, in particular, fall so hard for Radical Leftism?
    1 – Settled by Scandinavians – see wisconsin.
    2 – Avoided black migration. The whitest and least black part of America – no perceived threat and easy virtue signaling.
    3 – Seattle & Portland, like California, attracted transients like loggers, miners, and sailors while farmers etc, settled outside future Urban areas.
    4 – 60s post college migration – Hippies to portland, Yuppies to Seattle.
    6 – Flooding by Californians starting in the 1980s.
    7 – Massive non white immigration of tech families by chain migration post 1990.
    8 – White flight of conservatives.
    9 – Seattle politicals looks to imitating san francisco.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-07 21:42:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1865506050595819520