Curt Doolittle

Theme: Civilization

  • CORRECT ANSWER 1) Rigidity of all roles is an innovation necessary under the sca

    CORRECT ANSWER
    1) Rigidity of all roles is an innovation necessary under the scale produced by agrarianism. Property, Sex Roles, Marriage, Monogamy, Classes, Specialists, all were caused by the conversation of man under agrarianism from a parasite on the ecologies into a producer of economies. In the case of sex roles, given the utility of intergenerational labor to the family, the general disgust at sexual deviancy increased for practical reasons: dead weight first, and second, preying on children, and third, baiting into hazard. Today we are seeing the reemergence of baiting into hazard (“Grooming”), because of the end of intergenerational economic dependence within families, and an organized effort of dysfunctional to increase legitimacy by increasing their numbers. In other words, the present restoration of self-satisfaction over ‘duty to family clan and commons’ is a deterministic ‘problem’, and how we solve it over time relatively obvious: it’ll eventually be suppressed again.

    Reply addressees: @whatifalthist

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-20 12:37:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637795504045080576

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637696710632939520

  • I think you missed my point. But that’s ok. 😉 The consequences of termination o

    I think you missed my point. But that’s ok. 😉
    The consequences of termination of reproduction and total economic and political collapse are playing out in every single industrialized country that brought women into the workforce AND where they resulted in male replacement in the workforce, and lowering male participation in the workforce. So the ‘trade’ is lost reproduction that prevents the continuation of the redistributive social order we’ve created.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-17 00:47:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636529677547327489

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636504106193018880

  • I think you missed my point. But that’s ok. 😉 The consequences of termination o

    I think you missed my point. But that’s ok. 😉
    The consequences of termination of reproduction and total economic and political collapse are playing out in every single industrialized country that brought women into the workforce AND where they resulted in male replacement in the workforce, and lowering male participation in the workforce. So the ‘trade’ is lost reproduction that prevents the continuation of the redistributive social order we’ve created.

    Reply addressees: @Death2Misogyny @FrailSkeleton

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-17 00:47:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636529677450747909

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636504106193018880

  • IS THE AUDIENCE ANTI-SEMITIC, OR ANTI-ANTI-WESTERN? My audience is intelligent,

    IS THE AUDIENCE ANTI-SEMITIC, OR ANTI-ANTI-WESTERN?
    My audience is intelligent, hyperinformed, especially in history, and biased to systematizing, meaning biased to truth(reals) over face(emotion).

    This set of biases will result in bias against both the non-systematizing (left, women) and the authors of non-systematizing pseudoscience sophistry idealism and utopianism that’s counter to human behavior. And those authors and advocates are almost, but not entirely, jewish authoritarians.

    The same bias is against Russian, Chinese, and Muslim authoritarians. What’s the difference? Jewish presence in the west and relatively limited influence of russian, Chinese, Islamic, (and now hindu fundamentalist) groups in the wast.

    If you didn’t realize what that means it means you’re kind of clueless – because the left has succeeded in social construction of the false narrative and the false promise of ‘salvation’ after ‘whiteness’, where ‘whiteness’ is reducible to nothing more than ‘science’. Not only in nature, but in human behavior.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-16 14:03:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636367665479442432

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636363964799143936

  • IS THE AUDIENCE ANTI-SEMITIC, OR ANTI-ANTI-WESTERN? My audience is intelligent,

    IS THE AUDIENCE ANTI-SEMITIC, OR ANTI-ANTI-WESTERN?
    My audience is intelligent, hyperinformed, especially in history, and biased to systematizing, meaning biased to truth(reals) over face(emotion).

    This set of biases will result in bias against both the non-systematizing (left, women) and the authors of non-systematizing pseudoscience sophistry idealism and utopianism that’s counter to human behavior. And those authors and advocates are almost, but not entirely, jewish authoritarians.

    The same bias is against Russian, Chinese, and Muslim authoritarians. What’s the difference? Jewish presence in the west and relatively limited influence of russian, Chinese, Islamic, (and now hindu fundamentalist) groups in the wast.

    If you didn’t realize what that means it means you’re kind of clueless – because the left has succeeded in social construction of the false narrative and the false promise of ‘salvation’ after ‘whiteness’, where ‘whiteness’ is reducible to nothing more than ‘science’. Not only in nature, but in human behavior.

    Reply addressees: @thenewMJG

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-16 14:03:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636367665307459584

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636363964799143936

  • There are only two groups that produce systemic thought leadership in the world,

    There are only two groups that produce systemic thought leadership in the world, and it.s easy to argue that it’s only European and european jews. The entire marxist corpus comes from jewish authors except for I think two, one Brazilian catholic and one Italan catholic hunchback.… https://t.co/mbT6QVtCgq

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 22:53:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635776208683008001

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635719064193490944

  • WHY ASHKENAZI CULTURE AND BIAS? Jewish culture originated early and we’re not ex

    WHY ASHKENAZI CULTURE AND BIAS?
    Jewish culture originated early and we’re not exactly sure why but they were outcasts from the better coastal land. The egyptians do what all empires do and select a group of outcasts who have no loyalties to the locals, to administer them, and so taught the jews literacy, etc. The rewards were instant and profound. Instead of a pirestly cast that was entirely dependent on taxations, the jwes formed a clerical class that was dependen on TRANSACTIONS. The nepotistic value of this process was so profound that it was continually reinforced by every possible condition. Over time this combination caused heavy selection pressure for cognitively female behavior (empathizing (predicting minds), words, seduction (baiting into hazard), special pleading and pretense of innocence, that has only become self reinforcing over time, especially by redistribution of reproduction to rabbis. Given that Ashkenazim are an admixture of jewish males and european (largely italian) females, and that european IQ is a lot higher than MENA, it would be logical that it would only amplify the reproductive strategy. We are within perhaps 20 years or less of fully explaining it genetically. But in the aggregate of behavior even in outbread ashkenazim it’s universal. Just as the ‘autistic’ tendence of male europeans for the opposite reason: upward redistribution to the middle and upper classes under aristocracy and later manorialism. personaly I find this whole subject fascinating. But at least it’s fixable with minor tweaks to our law to prohibit the spectrum of irresponsibiilty, rent seeking, and baiting into hazard.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 18:04:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635703438729261057

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635700120720232448

  • WHY ASHKENAZI CULTURE AND BIAS? Jewish culture originated early and we’re not ex

    WHY ASHKENAZI CULTURE AND BIAS?
    Jewish culture originated early and we’re not exactly sure why but they were outcasts from the better coastal land. The egyptians do what all empires do and select a group of outcasts who have no loyalties to the locals, to administer them, and so taught the jews literacy, etc. The rewards were instant and profound. Instead of a pirestly cast that was entirely dependent on taxations, the jwes formed a clerical class that was dependen on TRANSACTIONS. The nepotistic value of this process was so profound that it was continually reinforced by every possible condition. Over time this combination caused heavy selection pressure for cognitively female behavior (empathizing (predicting minds), words, seduction (baiting into hazard), special pleading and pretense of innocence, that has only become self reinforcing over time, especially by redistribution of reproduction to rabbis. Given that Ashkenazim are an admixture of jewish males and european (largely italian) females, and that european IQ is a lot higher than MENA, it would be logical that it would only amplify the reproductive strategy. We are within perhaps 20 years or less of fully explaining it genetically. But in the aggregate of behavior even in outbread ashkenazim it’s universal. Just as the ‘autistic’ tendence of male europeans for the opposite reason: upward redistribution to the middle and upper classes under aristocracy and later manorialism. personaly I find this whole subject fascinating. But at least it’s fixable with minor tweaks to our law to prohibit the spectrum of irresponsibiilty, rent seeking, and baiting into hazard.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle

    Reply addressees: @superkanga @KiwiBreeder

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 18:04:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635703438385266722

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635700120720232448

  • I’m not quite sure why we should object to the return to the conflict of civiliz

    I’m not quite sure why we should object to the return to the conflict of civilizations. Our attempts at universalism by universalizing a single class modely of cooperation whether authoritarian socialism(upper), liberalism(upper middle), communism(working) or islamismI(underclass) are all failures. We can spread technology of production but not of governance.

    And if the west should learn one thing it’s that western civ’s group strategy is the most emotionally, psychologically, and intellectually burdensome, and that the rest of the world is unfit for it. And that the only reason we fail, is Aryanism even when cloaked with Christianity, or liberalism, drives us to overextension. We can replace other peoples (europe, americas) but we cannot domesticate, administer, govern, or rule people unfit for our civilizational model that requries maximization of individual rsponsibility for the commons and maximization of truth before face in the commons, and maximization of trust necessary under both. People need temperament and iQ for it, and only eruopeans, the japanese, and koreans are demonstrably fit for it.

    As for Ukraine, Russia. As a ‘resident’ ukrainians are Ruthenians (closer to Poles) not Russians. The russians are closer to muslims and asians in their scope of responsiiblity (family and fence-line), and they are a low trust people who fail the lie-responsibility test.

    America isn’t a civilization. It’s the other side of the river from european civilzation. And neither of us survive without the other over the long term.

    IMO the right favors russia only because they hate their own and are two cowardly and timid to solve the problem of the left at home. While russians are right on culture, they are wrong on politics and economics. And they are so becuase they are a low trust people, who have never built a majority middle class, and have been free of serfdom only for a short window in the late 1800s prior the the bolsheviks, and a short window between 1990 and 2010.

    The family is the priority, not the individual.
    That’s an easy codification to put in place.
    If y’all aren’t too cowardly to show up in numbers and force it.

    Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 16:05:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635673496557584388

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635649197230927872

  • I’m not quite sure why we should object to the return to the conflict of civiliz

    I’m not quite sure why we should object to the return to the conflict of civilizations. Our attempts at universalism by universalizing a single class modely of cooperation whether authoritarian socialism(upper), liberalism(upper middle), communism(working) or islamismI(underclass) are all failures. We can spread technology of production but not of governance.

    And if the west should learn one thing it’s that western civ’s group strategy is the most emotionally, psychologically, and intellectually burdensome, and that the rest of the world is unfit for it. And that the only reason we fail, is Aryanism even when cloaked with Christianity, or liberalism, drives us to overextension. We can replace other peoples (europe, americas) but we cannot domesticate, administer, govern, or rule people unfit for our civilizational model that requries maximization of individual rsponsibility for the commons and maximization of truth before face in the commons, and maximization of trust necessary under both. People need temperament and iQ for it, and only eruopeans, the japanese, and koreans are demonstrably fit for it.

    As for Ukraine, Russia. As a ‘resident’ ukrainians are Ruthenians (closer to Poles) not Russians. The russians are closer to muslims and asians in their scope of responsiiblity (family and fence-line), and they are a low trust people who fail the lie-responsibility test.

    America isn’t a civilization. It’s the other side of the river from european civilzation. And neither of us survive without the other over the long term.

    IMO the right favors russia only because they hate their own and are two cowardly and timid to solve the problem of the left at home. While russians are right on culture, they are wrong on politics and economics. And they are so becuase they are a low trust people, who have never built a majority middle class, and have been free of serfdom only for a short window in the late 1800s prior the the bolsheviks, and a short window between 1990 and 2010.

    The family is the priority, not the individual.
    That’s an easy codification to put in place.
    If y’all aren’t too cowardly to show up in numbers and force it.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @TOOEdit

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 16:05:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635673496058580997

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635649197230927872